ライフサイエンスコーパス: injury severity score

1 gender, ethnicity, lactate measurements, and injury severity score).

2 d impact of associated injuries (measured by injury severity score).

3 er magnitude of injury as reflected in their Injury Severity Score.

4 , and severity of injury by trauma score and injury severity score.

5 vival is independent of maternal distress or Injury Severity Score.

6 independent of maternal distress or maternal Injury Severity Score.

7 34) greater for every 3-unit increase in the Injury Severity Score.

8 , immediate surgery, severe head injury, and injury severity score.

9 The patients enrolled had similar Injury Severity Scores.

10 F-1 concentrations decreased with increasing Injury Severity Scores.

11 vel I and level II trauma centers had higher Injury Severity Scores.

12 Coma Scales score, -0.73 (p < .001); overall Injury Severity Score, 0.37 (p < .001); Injury Severity

13 re) + .09(age2); y = 454 - 10.87(age) - 2.57(Injury Severity Score) + .09(age2); (R2 = .35, p < .0001

14 n, respectively: y = 414 - 10.87(age) + 1.19(Injury Severity Score) + .09(age2); y = 454 - 10.87(age)

15 Moderate (Injury Severity Score 15-29) and severe injury (Injury S

16 Among 4542 casualties (mean injury severity score, 17.3; mortality, 10.1% [457 of 45

17 tients had greater anatomical injury (median Injury Severity Score, 18 vs 25; P = .02) and more physi

18 e studied: mean age, 37.7 +/- 17 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 19 +/- 11; 75% of male.

19 ma (15 males and 7 females; age, 45 +/- 3.8; Injury Severity Score, 20.7 +/- 1.8) were matched with 2

20 (20 males and 8 females; age, 46.1 +/- 2.5; Injury Severity Score, 20.8 +/- 1.3).

21 dian (interquartile ranges) age 8 (4-12) and Injury Severity Score 22 (13-34), 73.5% blunt mechanism,

22 0% surface area burns and 8 trauma patients (injury Severity Score, 25-57).

23 However, severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score, 25-75) who arrive in severe shock

24 le patients were enrolled in the study: mean injury severity score, 26; mean age, 35 yrs; mean Glasgo

25 comial pneumonia were more severely injured (Injury Severity Score 27 vs. 17, p < .001) and had a lon

26 the head, right chest, and bilateral femurs (Injury Severity Score = 27-41) with captive bolt guns wa

27 PAC were older (45.8+/-21.3 yrs), had higher Injury Severity Score (28.4+/-13.5), worse base deficit

28 patient age was 50.1+/-18.7 yrs with a mean Injury Severity Score 30.7+/-11.3).

29 28] mm Hg; Glasgow Coma Scale score, 14 [2]; Injury Severity Score, 6.8 [6.5]).

30 Injury severity score (9 +/- 10 vs. 11 +/- 10, P < 0.000

31 After moderate injuries (Injury Severity Score, 9-16), the deficiency was not ass

32 of hemoperitoneum, active extravasation, and injury severity score (a clinical measure of multiorgan

33 raphic data, vital signs, laboratory values, injury severity score, abbreviated injury severity, fina

34 ALI and ARDS, adjusting for trauma severity (Injury Severity Score), Acute Physiology Score, and age.

35 acute lung injury to be independent of age, injury severity score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Heal

36 asgow Coma Scale score, pupillary responses, Injury Severity Score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Heal

37 val were year of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, age, and pupil reactivity.

38 Scale, presence of hypotension on admission, Injury Severity Score, AIS for all body regions, and pre

39 uated increase in adrenaline with increasing Injury Severity Score and lower platelets and leukocytes

40 When adjusted for injury severity score and time period, the percentage ki

41 Despite greater Injury Severity Scores and packed red blood cell require

42 erity of trauma (eg, mechanism of injury and Injury Severity Score), and TBI-specific variables (eg,

43 talloid/12 hrs, presence of any head injury, injury severity score, and 12 hrs base deficit > 8 mEq/L

44 Data on demography, biochemistry, Injury Severity Score, and 30-day mortality were recorde

45 terval, 0.63-2.43) after adjustment for age, Injury Severity Score, and Acute Physiology Score.

46 disease, injury type, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and admission vital signs.

47 sis, groups were stratified by base deficit, Injury Severity Score, and age to further explore the in

48 ypotension, Glasgow Coma Scale on admission, Injury Severity Score, and AIS for all body regions.

49 Groups were comparable for age, gender, injury severity score, and APACHE II score.

50 The mean age, Injury Severity Score, and APACHE score were 44 +/- 20 y

51 gic and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, Injury Severity Score, and blunt mechanism of injury (od

52 ups, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, Injury Severity Score, and brain injury severity using t

53 r relative to age, admission blood pressure, injury severity score, and chest abbreviated injury scal

54 sification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-based injury severity score, and ICU admission MELD score.

55 a Registry provided demographic information, injury severity score, and International Classification

56 obtained for each case controlling for age, Injury Severity Score, and mechanism of injury.

57 logy and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score, injury severity score, and the presence of blunt traumat

58 ender, shock (systolic blood pressure < 90), Injury Severity Score, APACHE II, lactate levels, base d

59 re above 8 (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39) or Injury Severity Score below 16 (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-

60 of anatomical injury defined as minor by an injury severity score between 2 and 8 and normal physiol

61 Injury Severity Score, cardiac history, and intubation o

62 Age, gender, number of rib fractures, Injury Severity Score, comorbidities, pneumonia, and mor

63 lar injury, increased wound size, and higher injury severity score correlated with wound dehiscence.

64 Non-survivor Injury Severity Score exceeded that of survivors (27.5 +

65 Median New Injury Severity Score for DCL patients was 29 (interquar

66 Mean injury severity score for the group was 34, with an aver

67 By Cox analyses adjusted for age, sex, injury severity score, Glascow Coma Scale, base excess,

68 multiple linear regression adjusted for age, injury severity score, Glascow Coma Scale, systolic bloo

69 However, age more than 75 years, injury severity score greater than 33, Glasgow Coma Scal

70 Patients older than 13 years with an Injury Severity Score greater than or equal to 16 admitt

71 PATIENTS OR Trauma patients with injury severity scores greater than 20 (n = 10) at days

72 rt study of severely injured adult patients (Injury severity score > 15) admitted to a civilian traum

73 cohorts of 167 and 244 severely traumatized (Injury Severity Score > 15) adult (> 18 yr) patients.

74 cytometry in 17 consecutive trauma patients (injury severity score > 20) within 24 hours of injury an

75 nts without isolated head injury and with an Injury Severity Score > or = 16 were evaluated for devel

76 ort study of 273 subjects with major trauma (injury severity score > or = 16).

77 ith an Abdominal Trauma Index > or = 25 or a Injury Severity Score > or = 21 who had early enteral ac

78 enrolled if they met the following criteria: Injury Severity Score > or = 9, intensive care unit (ICU

79 in survival was confined to patients with an injury severity score > or =16.

80 50.1-950.3, 995.55, maximum head abbreviated Injury Severity Score >/= 3) who received tracheal intub

81 ukocytes from patients with multiple injury (injury severity score >/=17 points; n = 81) were analyze

82 es limited to patients with severe injuries (Injury Severity Score >/=25).

83 ury Severity Score 15-29) and severe injury (Injury Severity Score >/=30) had a six-fold and 16-fold,

84 d transport-related deaths and major trauma (injury severity score >12) cases were extracted from pop

85 Extended) outcomes after blunt major trauma (Injury Severity Score >15) in an organized trauma system

86 rospective cohort study of severely injured (injury severity score >15) patients from the National Tr

87 Inclusion: New Injury Severity Score >16 points, or 3 fractures and Abb

88 ge (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.20-1.34), and higher Injury Severity Score (>/=9 vs <9: OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.3

89 etrating wounds, physiologic compromise, and Injury Severity Scores>or=34 were associated with fewer

90 After severe injury (Injury Severity Score, > or =16), 50% of the deficient a

91 We identified severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score, > or =9) at centers that contribu

92 included all ED encounters for major trauma (Injury Severity Score, >15) seen at non-trauma centers i

93 Of the clinical criteria, injury severity score had the best correlation with outc

94 olved in motor vehicle accidents, had higher Injury Severity Scores, had fever at admission, and had

95 lved in a motor vehicle accident, had higher Injury Severity Scores, had fever at admission, and had

96 rall Injury Severity Score, 0.37 (p < .001); Injury Severity Score (head component only), 0.53 (p < .

97 e helmets, and had lower Glasgow coma scale, injury severity score, head abbreviated injury scale, re

98 ,475 patients older than 15 years, having an injury severity score higher than 15, and sustaining blu

99 P = 0.02) after adjustment for age, gender, injury severity score, highest lactate level, mechanism

100 y Score scale (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13-1.26), Injury Severity Score (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98), Fun

101 nal Classification of diseases ninth Edition Injury Severity Score (ICISS) is the best-known risk-adj

102 ut attenuated adrenaline release with higher Injury Severity Score, impaired platelet and leukocyte m

103 e significant interaction between gender and Injury Severity Score in predicting transthyretin concen

104 The mean injury severity score increased from 10.1 +/- 9.1 (stand

105 lasma nitrite and nitrate concentrations and injury Severity Score independently predicted cerebrospi

106 Data included age, Injury Severity Score, injury mechanism, survival, labor

107 s were stratified based on survival outcome, Injury Severity Score, insurance status, and length of s

108 As the Injury Severity Score is not accurately known at the tim

109 y of cardiac disease, especially when a high Injury Severity Score is present.

110 /- 5 days vs. 6 +/- 5, P < 0.0001), a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS 5 +/- 8 vs. 9 +/- 11, P < 0.0

111 Moderate to severely injured [injury severity score (ISS) > 8] adult patients (age >/=

112 h included patients >14 years of age and had injury severity score (ISS) >15, were alive on admission

113 The TRAN group had a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (17.5 versus 11.0, P < 0.05)

114 4% vs. 73% male), age (44 vs. 43 years), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) (26 vs. 25).

115 ic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score or injury severity score (ISS) and previous antibiotic use.

116 y prediction in trauma is assessed using the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Revised Trauma Score usi

117 Outcomes were compared per incremental Injury Severity Score (ISS) bins.

118 nit with blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI), Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, and Glasgow

119 rs, range 18-90 years, 75 males) with a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 24 (range 9-66), from who

120 ance was observed for the negative impact of injury severity score (ISS) on mortality (P = 0.071).

121 They used the Injury Severity Score (ISS) to classify 84 severely inju

122 The median injury severity score (ISS) was 13 (interquartile range

123 Higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) was associated with abnormal

124 Mean age, injury severity score (ISS), and APACHE score were 43 +/

125 Injury severity score (ISS), associated injury, and pati

126 , loss of limb, abdominal trauma, and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS).

127 imilar in age (31 +/- 8 vs. 30 +/- 8 years), Injury Severity Score (ISS; 12 +/- 11 vs. 12 +/- 11), sy

128 t patients (35.1 +/- 16.3 years of age) with Injury Severity Scores (ISS) 36.6 +/- 13.9 on days 1 and

129 n a total of 70 critically injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] >/= 25) at The Royal London

130 uman blunt trauma patients (n = 472, average injury severity score [ISS] = 20.2) exhibited elevations

131 Injury types and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs), timing and location of de

132 nations with positive BAPT-related findings, injury severity score, length of hospital stay, and numb

133 risk range after exclusion of patients with Injury Severity Score less than 16.

134 ter who did not require an operation, had an Injury Severity Score lower than 15, and were discharged

135 e in mothers with mild to moderate injuries (Injury Severity Score < 16).

136 atients were excluded with no signs of life, Injury Severity Score <9, hospitalization <3 days, or wh

137 survivors and decedents with respect to the Injury Severity Score (mean [SD], 23.4 [12.4] vs 37.7 [1

138 yrs with complete data on base deficit, and Injury Severity Score (n=53,312).

139 predictors of in-hospital mortality were the Injury Severity Score (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.

140 ients after severe injuries as defined by an Injury Severity Score of > or =16.

141 an (SD) age of 49 (20) years and a mean (SD) Injury Severity Score of 10 (9).

142 a mean (SD) age of 77.9 (8.1) years, median Injury Severity Score of 15 (range, 9-18), median Glasgo

143 tality risk in adult trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score of 16 or higher.

144 and penetrating trauma victims with a median injury severity score of 17.5 (interquartile range, 9.25

145 <17 years and 3 were aged >60 years]; median injury severity score of 19 admitted patients, 9 [range,

146 ere evaluated, including 16 trauma patients (injury Severity Score of 20 +/- 8) and 11 general surgic

147 The patient cohort demonstrated a mean Injury Severity Score of 23.7 and an overall 30-day mort

148 the following severe injury characteristics: Injury Severity Score of 25-75, base deficit of less tha

149 with arrival base deficit worse than -11 and Injury Severity Score of 25-75, had a decrease in the ri

150 Patients with a head Injury Severity Score of 3 or greater, an out-of-state a

151 ts had a median age of 45 years and a median injury severity score of 43 (interquartile range, 34-50)

152 included primary trauma room admissions with Injury Severity Score of 9 or more into the analysis.

153 ustaining blunt/penetrating injuries with an Injury Severity Score of 9 or more were included.

154 ), transferred patients had a similar median Injury Severity Score of 9, but 24% of transferred adult

155 same age groups (P < 0.001), even though the Injury Severity Score of the women was significantly hig

156 ers aged >/= 15 years with serious injuries (injury severity scores of >/= 9).

157 OS was observed in patients with PAI and New Injury Severity Scores of 16 or higher (difference in ad

158 The median Injury Severity Score overall was 24 (range, 1-75).

159 Patients with PNM had higher Injury Severity Scores (P < .001) and chest Abbreviated

160 patients (p = .04) and tended to have higher injury Severity Scores (p = .09).

161 risk of mortality III scores (p=0.0003), and injury severity scores (p=0.02) were reliably associated

162 hypotension, Head Abbreviated Injury Score, Injury Severity Score, PO(2), and base deficit.

163 al 1.01-1.07], p = .005) after adjusting for Injury Severity Score, prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale, a

164 +/- 25 vs. 134 +/- 25 mm Hg), TRISS (Trauma Injury Severity Score; probability of survival (94% +/-

165 mponent of the Glasgow Coma Scale score, the Injury Severity Score, pupillary reactivity, and presenc

166 In this diverse group of patients, Injury Severity Score ranged from 1 to 45 (11.5 +/- 10.3

167 In this heterogeneous group of patients, Injury Severity Score ranged from 1 to 45 (11.5 +/- 10.3

168 arable to known risk factors such as age and injury severity score, regarding development of organ dy

169 Logistic regression identified Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, lower admis

170 Both groups had similar Injury Severity Scores, Revised Trauma Scores, baseline

171 logy and Chronic Health Evaluation II or new injury severity score scoring systems.

172 Age, Injury Severity Score, serum osmolality, time since inju

173 The further addition of Injury Severity Score significantly improved the predict

174 nitrate concentrations were associated with injury Severity Score, suggesting that increased nitric

175 Trauma patients having the highest injury severity score tended to have the most severe apo

176 The level of Vo2 was not related to Injury Severity Score, the number or combination of orga

177 Age, injury severity score, thoracic abbreviated injury score

178 Interpretation was expressed in tubular injury severity scores (TISS) that ranged from 1 (a norm

179 (ISS) and Revised Trauma Score using Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology.

180 Mean injury severity score varied by center from 22 to 40; th

181 mean (SD) age was 15.9 (20.6), the mean (SD) Injury Severity Score was 10.9 (9.6), and 8397 (50.7%) w

182 The mean patient age was 93 years, the mean Injury Severity Score was 12, and the mean number of com

183 rs (interquartile range [IQR] 24-50), median injury severity score was 13 (IQR 9-22), median 24-hour

184 Mean Injury Severity Score was 13.1.

185 The median injury severity score was 17 [interquartile range 9-26];

186 5 randomized), 43% had penetrating injuries, injury severity score was 23 +/- 16, 20% had admission s

187 .7% were men, 15.2% were black, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.4 (on a scale from 0 to 75,

188 The median Injury Severity Score was 25 (interquartile range, 17-34

189 jury was 51.1% and increased to 73.2% if the Injury Severity Score was 25 or higher and to 78.7% if m

190 to the head and bilateral chests (estimated injury severity score was 25-32) was followed by hypoven

191 ge of the children was 9.2 yrs, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 27 +/- 9.

192 Mean injury severity score was 28 +/- 1; associated injuries

193 The mean (SD) Injury Severity Score was 28.4 (16.2), the mean (SD) bas

194 Median injury severity score was 30 (interquartile range 22-51)

195 The mean injury severity score was 30.

196 Mean Injury Severity Score was 32 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD).

197 The average injury severity score was 9.3.

198 other factors, each 5-point increment in the injury severity score was associated with a 6%, 13%, 13%

199 Increasing injury severity measured by Injury Severity Score was associated with increased inci

200 Injury Severity Score was similar (33 no bypass, 31 bypa

201 ds from 8.72 to 7.06 days, while the average injury severity score was unchanged.

202 Increasing injury severity, measured by Injury Severity Score, was a significant independent pre

203 adjusting for age, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, weekend admission and month of vi

204 age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Injury Severity Score were 36 years, 13.7, and 13.5, res

205 stic regression models incorporating age and injury severity score were developed on a test set of pa

206 ched controls, age, sex, race/ethnicity, and Injury Severity Score were entered into a multivariable

207 Plasma and platelet to RBC ratios and injury severity score were predictors of death at 6 hour

208 In a multivariate model, age and Injury Severity Score were significantly associated with

209 Demographics and injury severity score were similar.

210 ing for multiple known risk factors, age and Injury Severity Score were the only important predictors

211 Injury severity scores were highest in the cryoprecipita

212 adjusted for age, sex, injury mechanism, and injury severity score] were used to calculate risk ratio

213 outcome and in developing the Relative Head Injury Severity Score, which can assess severity of trau