コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 is HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board.
2 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board.
3 ctive case-control study was approved by the institutional review board.
4 s This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board.
5 ere compliant with HIPAA and approved by the institutional review board.
6 nd HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board.
7 tudy was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board.
8 study and meta-analysis was approved by the institutional review board.
9 iant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board.
10 This study was approved by the institutional review board.
11 ls and Methods The study was approved by the institutional review board.
12 comparative study was approved by the local institutional review board.
13 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board.
14 the protocol was approved by the university institutional review board.
15 was compliant with HIPAA and approved by the institutional review board.
16 a over a 12-month period and approved by the institutional review board.
17 is HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board.
18 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board.
19 tional animal care and use committee and the institutional review board.
20 s and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board.
21 ed by the local animal studies committee and institutional review board.
22 ve HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board.
23 r, HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board.
24 aining written consent under approval of the institutional review board.
25 nter retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board.
27 s and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board and all participants gave inf
29 s and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA and
30 ter, retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.
31 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.
32 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.
35 s and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.
36 s All experiments were approved by the local institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.
37 is cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA.
39 esign and implementation were overseen by an institutional review board and conformed to HIPAA guidel
41 Walter Reed National Military Medical Center institutional review board and is compliant with HIPAA g
42 Walter Reed National Military Medical Center institutional review board and is compliant with HIPAA g
44 ls and Methods The study was approved by the institutional review board and local ethics committee.
45 s The study was compliant with HIPAA and the institutional review board and required written consent
46 rk with human stem cells was approved by the institutional review board and the stem cell research ov
47 ngle-center cohort study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA.
48 is was a retrospective study approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant with
49 ls and Methods The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent
50 s This prospective study was approved by the institutional review boards and compliant with HIPAA.
51 a sharing, establishing common protocols for institutional review boards and data sharing, creating p
52 thods The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards and was HIPAA compliant.
54 s and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants gave wr
55 s and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board, and all subjects gave signed
56 prospective study was approved by the local institutional review board, and informed consent was obt
57 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was wai
58 nter retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for info
59 iant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for info
60 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtai
61 iant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtai
62 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent
63 s and Methods This study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent
64 ve cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional review boards, and all participants gave i
65 pliant prospective study was approved by the institutional review boards, and written informed consen
67 Materials and Methods The study received institutional review board approval and all patients gav
68 and Methods This prospective study received institutional review board approval and fully complied w
82 prospective study was HIPAA compliant, with institutional review board approval and written informed
83 ion for colorectal liver metastases, whereas institutional review board approval is required before g
84 Materials and Methods In accordance with the institutional review board approval obtained at the two
112 sement program in U.S. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was waived, as the s
115 Materials and Methods This study received institutional review board approval with waiver of conse
116 ective multicenter HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and all participant
119 Materials and Methods This study received institutional review board approval, and patients gave i
120 Materials and Methods The study received institutional review board approval, and patients in the
121 s and Methods This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and the need for in
122 als and Methods This retrospective study had institutional review board approval, and the need to obt
123 thods After obtaining antemortem consent and institutional review board approval, the authors compare
126 nd Methods This retrospective study received institutional review board approval, with a waiver of th
134 als and Methods This retrospective study had institutional review board approval; written informed co
170 rials and Methods This prospective study was institutional review board- approved and HIPAA compliant
174 th 67 CLMs were enrolled in this prospective institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant
177 a prospective, multicenter, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved clinical trial was p
178 astinal lymph node resection (MLNR) under an Institutional Review Board-approved common protocol from
179 Methods From July 2012 to October 2013, this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant pros
188 terials and Methods This was a retrospective institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant stud
189 agnosed HL (n = 19) and NHL (n = 2) onto the Institutional Review Board-approved investigation of (11
190 agnosed HL (n = 19) and NHL (n = 2) onto the Institutional Review Board-approved investigation of (11
191 erials and Methods For this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective blinded
192 ce of distant metastases were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical
193 ce of distant metastases were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved prospective clinical
195 aterials and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved prospective study in
199 rials and Methods By using a HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved protocol where infor
201 terials and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort
202 als and Methods Analysis was conducted on an institutional review board-approved retrospective data s
204 This study consisted of a HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved retrospective review
207 ortability and Accountability Act-compliant, Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study
208 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study
209 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective study
210 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved retrospective study
214 l, clinical, and genetic findings as part of institutional review board-approved studies at Children'
215 from November 2010 to October 2012 for this institutional review board-approved study after they pro
216 icipate in this prospective HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study between April
219 Materials and Methods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included 24 pa
220 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study measured the p
221 Materials and Methods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study received a wai
222 d Methods This retrospective HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study was exempt fro
223 and Methods Written informed consent in this institutional review board-approved study was obtained f
225 Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed
226 Materials and Methods In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 120 patients
227 hods In this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 136 consecuti
228 ongitudinal, single-center, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 157 patients
230 Materials and Methods In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 33 patients w
231 Materials and Methods In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, 41 pediatric
233 terials and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, all patients
235 rials and Methods This was a HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved study, with informed
247 ing from October 2011 to September 2012 with institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant pro
248 Materials and Methods In this binational, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant pro
251 tudy was a multireader, multi-institutional, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant ret
252 Materials and Methods This retrospective institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant rev
253 erials and Methods This was a retrospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant stu
270 s approval was obtained from the centralized institutional review board for this prospective single-a
271 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtaine
272 ve cross-sectional study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtaine
273 nd Methods This research was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) and was HIPAA compliant
274 ses/practices, protocol design, choice of an institutional review board (IRB), and trial outcomes.
275 essive disorder (TRD) who participated in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved randomised dou
276 andards in the ethical review of research by institutional review boards (IRBs) due to the rush to en
278 tronic health records review approved by the institutional review board of the University Health Netw
279 ls and Methods The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Medical Cen
280 iant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Wisconsi
285 HIPAA-compliant protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating centers
287 aphy (CT) colonography Materials and Methods Institutional review board permission was obtained to us
288 ns from OLT patients were collected under an institutional review board protocol 2 hours after portal
292 priate ICU-based research, investigators and Institutional Review Boards should consider a deferred c
293 iant retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; the requirement to obtain in
296 study that were exempted from review by the institutional review board, which consisted of 1007 post
297 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, which waived the requirement
298 lity Act-compliant study was approved by our institutional review board with a waiver of informed con
299 This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with patient informed consent
300 rospective multicenter study was approved by institutional review boards with written informed consen
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。