ライフサイエンスコーパス: interaural

1 The most ventral aspect of the HDB (interaural +0.9-1.3 mm) had proportionally fewer tempera

2 eurons (65% vs. 88%) than areas more dorsal (interaural +1.3-1.7 mm), and only one of seven ventral H

3 idally varying linear acceleration along the interaural and naso-occipital head axis.

4 h elements presented dichotically at varying interaural asynchronies, were used to parametrically mod

5 muth lines instead converged in front of the interaural axis for all listeners, often at a point betw

6 ear acceleration of the whole body along the interaural axis, we examined the LVOR in six patients wi

7 th lines retreated toward or even behind the interaural axis.

8 ce should intersect near the midpoint of the interaural axis.

9 eration (0.24 g) of the whole body along the interaural axis.

10 g distances (15-100 cm) along the right-side interaural axis.

11 This interaural (between the ears) time difference (ITD) prov

12 A large interaural CF map misalignment of DeltaCF approximately

13 ion was analyzed in terms of ITDs, ILDs, and interaural coherence, both for whole stimuli and in a ti

14 ency envelope ITDs and significantly reduced interaural coherence.

15 Decreasing interaural correlation also causes the response of the o

16 imuli, possibly the periodic fluctuations in interaural correlation at the modulation frequency.

17 In each case, sensitivity increases with interaural correlation difference.

18 livocochlear efferents, disrupted the normal interaural correlation in response amplitudes to sounds

19 orally, listeners' sensitivity to changes in interaural correlation is asymmetrical.

20 for the variance of behavioral responses as interaural correlation is decreased.

21 rity between the left and right ear signals (interaural correlation).

22 ynamics of cortical processing of changes in interaural correlation, a measure of interaural similari

23 the same noise with intermediate degrees of interaural correlation.

24 cross-correlation analysis suggests that low interaural correlations cause misalignment of cross-corr

25 tory-nerve model was used to verify that the interaural correlations in TFS differed across condition

26 Misalignment of interaural cortical response maps in asymmetric hearing

27 Interaural cortical threshold map misalignment faithfull

28 ust to temporal stimulus degradations (e.g., interaural decorrelation due to reverberation), or, in h

29 in front is due to neural sensitivity to the interaural decorrelation of sound, at both low and high

30 is not caused by envelope distortion, static interaural decorrelation, or spectral coloration.

31 tivation that depends on the availability of interaural delay cues.

32 In acoustical recordings, we found that interaural delay varies with frequency at a fine scale.

33 recordings of midbrain neurons sensitive to interaural delay, we found that preferred delay also var

34 ear differs between the ears and creates an interaural delay.

35 y dependence of acoustical and physiological interaural delays are matched in key respects.

36 cological environments, rather than to fixed interaural delays.

37 uclei relies on the detection of microsecond interaural differences in action potentials that encode

38 sources in azimuth depends on sensitivity to interaural differences in sound timing (ITD) and level (

39 Interaural differences in stimulus intensity and timing

40 In mammalian hearing, interaural differences in the timing (ITD) and level (IL

41 e that is based on the tuning of neurons for interaural differences in the timing of sound.

42 ction to a sound source can be determined by interaural differences, and the mechanisms of direction

43 es of nucleus laminaris neurons showed small interaural differences.

44 arn owl's head grows after hatching, causing interaural distances to more than double in the first 3

45 account for progressive realignment of both interaural frequency and threshold maps.

46 olution of left primary auditory cortex (AI) interaural frequency map changes is chronicled in squirr

47 preferred ITDs were not correlated with the interaural frequency mismatches.

48 re P16 disrupts the normal coregistration of interaural frequency tuning, whereas CHL on P16, but not

49 bat while presenting stimuli that varied in interaural intensity and in interaural time of arrival.

50 In this paper, we propose that the Interaural Intensity Difference (IID) and travel time of

51 binaurally inhibited, and an orderly map of interaural intensity difference (IID) sensitivity is pre

52 Modelling of interaural intensity difference suggests that the increa

53 Interaural intensity differences (IIDs) are important cu

54 superior olive (LSO) respond selectively to interaural intensity differences (IIDs), one of the chie

55 ing in mammals and is thought to make use of interaural intensity differences for localizing high-fre

56 SON circuitry, in part, functions to offset interaural intensity differences in interaural time diff

57 Sensitivity to interaural intensity differences predicts azimuth tuning

58 s pathway is part of a circuit that computes interaural intensity differences used in sound localizat

59 s pathway is critical for the computation of interaural intensity differences, which are used in soun

60 excitatory-inhibitory (EI) neurons] can code interaural intensity disparities (IIDs), the cues animal

61 siveness of IC cells to dynamic signals with interaural intensity disparities that change over time,

62 ry/inhibitory (EI) neurons, are sensitive to interaural intensity disparities, the cues animals use t

63 e two cues for azimuthal sound localization, interaural intensity or level differences and interaural

64 mpute sound location based on differences in interaural intensity, coded in ascending signals from th

65 cy tones, indicating that they could use the interaural intensity-difference cue.

66 We found impaired interaural interaction that depended on the ROBO1 in a d

67 variety of auditory spatial cues, including interaural level and time differences, as well as change

68 ignificantly enhances discrimination of both interaural level and time differences, whereas directing

69 e auditory brainstem to small differences in interaural level and timing occurring within a submillis

70 Spike rate sensitivities to binaural interaural level difference (ILD) and average binaural l

71 Conversely, when both ITD and interaural level difference (ILD) cues are available, di

72 The gain value is modulated by interaural level difference (ILD) primarily through scal

73 l motion stimulus produced by modulating the interaural level difference (ILD), a major cue for sound

74 aural time difference and frequency-specific interaural level difference (ILD).

75 tion of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD).

76 ratio (D/R) is more reliable and robust than interaural level difference (ILD).

77 frequency response area, and a shift in the interaural level difference function of LSO neurons.

78 PSC kinetics are required to generate mature interaural level difference functions, and that longer-l

79 HL on P16, but not before or after, disrupts interaural level difference sensitivity contained in lon

80 the increased EPSC duration after AT shifts interaural level difference to the right and compensates

81 he results suggest that linear processing of interaural level difference underlies spatial tuning in

82 etized ferrets with noise sequences in which interaural level differences (ILD) rapidly fluctuated ac

83 ation, and disrupted binaural integration of interaural level differences (ILD).

84 s used to localize the sources of sounds are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time

85 (ITDs) from the stimulus fine structure and interaural level differences (ILDs) from the stimulus en

86 that LSO neurons can signal small changes in interaural level differences (ILDs), a cue to horizontal

87 he auditory system of guinea pigs to compare interaural level differences (ILDs), a key localization

88 nds, ie, interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and pinna spectral

89 ocation: interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and spectral notche

90 uding sound localization information such as interaural level differences (ILDs), interaural timing d

91 both ears, and LSO neurons are sensitive to interaural level differences (ILDs), one of the primary

92 ing interaural timing differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs).

93 ment 3 maintained faithful long-term average interaural level differences but presented scrambled int

94 Faithful long-term average interaural level differences were insufficient for produ

95 ying cues of interaural time differences and interaural level differences) and distance for normal-he

96 cortical neurons and in their sensitivity to interaural level differences, the principal localization

97 d vary their output spike rates according to interaural level differences.

98 tion and contralateral inhibition to compute interaural level differences.

99 om both ears, and its cells are sensitive to interaural level disparities (ILDs) when stimulated by s

100 uency sounds in the horizontal plane uses an interaural-level difference (ILD) cue, yet little is kno

101 Here, we investigated how interaural-level differences are combined across frequen

102 therefore investigated the relation between interaural mismatches in frequency tuning and ITD tuning

103 000 Hz and by two measures of sensitivity to interaural phase at low frequencies.

104 mates the highest frequency at which a fixed interaural phase difference (IPD) of varphi (varied here

105 ortex showed robust and consistent tuning to interaural phase difference (IPD).

106 ed in the firing rate of neurons that detect interaural phase difference (IPD).

107 mely, a following response to modulations in interaural phase difference (the interaural phase modula

108 Such periodic modulations to interaural phase difference can evoke a steady state fol

109 As the IPM-FR magnitude varied with interaural phase difference modulation depth, it could p

110 itude-modulated signal is presented, and the interaural phase difference of the carrier is switched p

111 Frequencies with interaural phase differences that are shared by both sou

112 pendent: spike rates elicited by a 0 degrees interaural phase disparity (IPD) were very different whe

113 r vertebrates makes an ongoing comparison of interaural phase for the localization of sound in the az

114 and the acoustic change complex evoked by an interaural phase inversion; (b) psychoacoustic tests inc

115 of anesthetized guinea pigs were recorded to interaural phase modulation (IPM) before, during, and af

116 ulations in interaural phase difference (the interaural phase modulation following response; IPM-FR).

117 ere we show that detection of changes in the interaural phase or amplitude difference occurs through

118 ency, but not the measures of sensitivity to interaural phase, supported the suggestion that preferen

119 ral modulation detection, and sensitivity to interaural phase; and (c) speech tests including filtere

120 ted from FRAs, and they are used to quantify interaural response map differences.

121 nges in interaural correlation, a measure of interaural similarity, and compare them with behavior.

122 ment allow ICC neurons to dynamically encode interaural sound localization cues while maintaining an

123 eurons to tens of microsecond differences in interaural temporal delay (ITD) derives in part from the

124 Neurons in the medial superior olive encode interaural temporal disparity, and their receptive field

125 The owl's auditory system computes interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences to cre

126 processing pathways specialized in encoding interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences, respe

127 agation, which is defined by combinations of interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences.

128 spatial receptive fields (RFs) computed from interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences.

129 Interaural time and intensity differences (ITD and IID)

130 sensitivity to acoustical cues-particularly interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILD)-that

131 binaural sound localization are comprised of interaural time and level differences (ITD/ILD), which a

132 sers' access to binaural information, namely interaural time and level differences (ITDs and ILDs), c

133 Computational models of sensitivity to interaural time and level differences suggest that upreg

134 ch subject's ear canals, which preserved the interaural time and level differences that are critical

135 the bird to a constantly increasing range of interaural time cues.

136 n of the function relating discharge rate to interaural time delay (ITD) fell close to midline for al

137 nd localization in humans depends largely on interaural time delay (ITD).

138 en sound-frequency tuning and sensitivity to interaural time delays for neurons in the midbrain nucle

139 ral stimulus; most neurons were sensitive to interaural time delays in pure tone and noise stimuli su

140 h is equivalent to a specific combination of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level di

141 NL neurons may exert a dynamic modulation of interaural time difference (ITD) coding in a CF-dependen

142 The barn owl (Tyto alba) uses interaural time difference (ITD) cues to localize sounds

143 Both mammals and birds use the interaural time difference (ITD) for localization of sou

144 Neural tuning for interaural time difference (ITD) in the optic tectum of

145 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a critical cue to so

146 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a cue to the locatio

147 When an interaural time difference (ITD) is conveyed by a narrow

148 The interaural time difference (ITD) is the primary cue to l

149 Sensitivity to changes in the interaural time difference (ITD) of 50 msec tones was me

150 rgic inhibition can shift the tuning for the interaural time difference (ITD) of the cell.

151 Monaural neurons early in the interaural time difference (ITD) pathway encode the phas

152 Interaural time difference (ITD) plays a central role in

153 Through study of interaural time difference (ITD) processing, the functio

154 tems localize sound sources by computing the interaural time difference (ITD) with submillisecond acc

155 associations between auditory cues, such as interaural time difference (ITD), and locations in visua

156 l neuron in the MSO is tuned to its own best interaural time difference (ITD), indicating the presenc

157 mary cue for localization along the azimuth, interaural time difference (ITD), is based on a cross-co

158 signal-to-noise ratio in the encoding of the interaural time difference (ITD), one of two primary bin

159 ICX neurons are tuned for interaural time difference (ITD), the owl's primary cue

160 olive, and these sites were correlated with interaural time difference (ITD)-sensitive responses to

161 e timing information from each ear to detect interaural time difference (ITD).

162 nes and coincidence detection to measure the interaural time difference (ITD).

163 ry space that is based, in part, on a map of interaural time difference (ITD).

164 erences in the sounds reaching the two ears [interaural time difference (ITD)] to identify where the

165 ptive fields (RFs) because of sensitivity to interaural time difference and frequency-specific intera

166 of the brain can acquire alternative maps of interaural time difference as a result of abnormal exper

167 Both species determine the interaural time difference by finding the delay necessar

168 ing versus location during the processing of interaural time difference cues in vivoSIGNIFICANCE STAT

169 ever, the first-order central neurons of the interaural time difference detection circuit encode info

170 of the chicken nucleus laminaris, the first interaural time difference encoder that computes informa

171 nucleus laminaris (NL), the first encoder of interaural time difference for sound localization in bir

172 ween binaural and monaural responses nor the interaural time difference for which nucleus laminaris n

173 ons to the most potent localization cue, the interaural time difference in low-frequency signals (< a

174 o offset interaural intensity differences in interaural time difference processing.

175 citatory input to lose their selectivity for interaural time difference when coincidence of impulses

176 ris neurons from losing their sensitivity to interaural time difference with intense sounds.

177 many mammals to locate a sound source is the interaural time difference, or ITD.

178 a shift in the tuning of tectal neurons for interaural time difference.

179 as coincidence detectors for measurement of interaural time difference.

180 ons depended on the neurons' selectivity for interaural time difference.

181 r implant users do poorly on tasks involving interaural time differences (ITD), a cue that provides i

182 anatomical substrate for the computation of interaural time differences (ITD).

183 of changes in tuning for frequency-specific interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

184 t process different sound localization cues, interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

185 ations in the match between their tuning for interaural time differences (ITDs) and the locations of

186 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

187 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

188 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are an important cue

189 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cue

190 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cues

191 When interaural time differences (ITDs) are the only availabl

192 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the primary cue f

193 Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the tempo

194 The detection of interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

195 Birds and mammals exploit interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

196 Accurate use of interaural time differences (ITDs) for spatial hearing m

197 location in the horizontal plane, extracting interaural time differences (ITDs) from the stimulus fin

198 eral CIs, bilateral CI users' sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) is still poorer than

199 laminaris (NL) is involved in computation of interaural time differences (ITDs) that encode the azimu

200 e capable of great accuracy in detecting the interaural time differences (ITDs) that underlie azimuth

201 Many animals use the interaural time differences (ITDs) to locate the source

202 ns in the medial superior olive (MSO) encode interaural time differences (ITDs) with sustained firing

203 erally implanted human subjects discriminate interaural time differences (ITDs), a major cue for soun

204 a major category of sound localization cue, interaural time differences (ITDs), in juvenile barn owl

205 nteraural intensity or level differences and interaural time differences (ITDs), interact perceptuall

206 em uses three cues to decode sound location: interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

207 athway where cues used to locate sounds, ie, interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

208 anipulation altered the relationship between interaural time differences (ITDs), the principal cue us

209 studied example is the computational map of interaural time differences (ITDs), which is essential t

210 detector neurons that are tuned to different interaural time differences (ITDs).

211 are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs).

212 circuitry responsible for the computation of interaural time differences (ITDs).

213 cts in direction (and its underlying cues of interaural time differences and interaural level differe

214 Responses to interaural time differences and spectral cues were relat

215 on of a sound's direction by detecting small interaural time differences and visual processing, which

216 l sources relative to large mammals, because interaural time differences are much smaller.

217 This suggests that appropriate interaural time differences are necessary for restoring

218 ergic inhibition can influence the coding of interaural time differences for sound localization in th

219 mmalian brainstem circuit for computation of interaural time differences is composed of monaural cell

220 auditory brainstem of mammals and birds use interaural time differences to localize sounds.

221 e detectors necessary for the computation of interaural time differences used in sound localization.

222 al level differences but presented scrambled interaural time differences with vocoded speech.

223 lternative, direct measure of sensitivity to interaural time differences, namely, a following respons

224 had poor cortical sensitivity to changes in interaural time differences, which are critical for loca

225 ns in the nucleus laminaris (NL) that detect interaural time differences.

226 Interaural time disparities (ITDs) are the primary cues

227 aural inputs and is implicated in processing interaural time disparities used for sound localization.

228 i that varied in interaural intensity and in interaural time of arrival.

229 rovides an adaptive mechanism for preserving interaural time-delay information (a proxy for the locat

230 binaural sound localization cues, including interaural timing differences (ITDs) and interaural leve

231 Interaural timing differences (ITDs) are computed using

232 such as interaural level differences (ILDs), interaural timing differences (ITDs), and spectral cues.

233 t contributes to sound localization based on interaural timing differences.

234 SCs, thus refining coincidence detection and interaural timing differences.

235 rior-inferior translation ("z-translation"), interaural translation ("y-translation"), and roll tilt