ライフサイエンスコーパス: interaural time difference

1 a shift in the tuning of tectal neurons for interaural time difference.

2 ons depended on the neurons' selectivity for interaural time difference.

3 as coincidence detectors for measurement of interaural time difference.

4 ns in the nucleus laminaris (NL) that detect interaural time differences.

5 t contributes to sound localization based on interaural timing differences.

6 SCs, thus refining coincidence detection and interaural timing differences.

7 ptive fields (RFs) because of sensitivity to interaural time difference and frequency-specific intera

8 cts in direction (and its underlying cues of interaural time differences and interaural level differe

9 Responses to interaural time differences and spectral cues were relat

10 on of a sound's direction by detecting small interaural time differences and visual processing, which

11 l sources relative to large mammals, because interaural time differences are much smaller.

12 This suggests that appropriate interaural time differences are necessary for restoring

13 of the brain can acquire alternative maps of interaural time difference as a result of abnormal exper

14 Both species determine the interaural time difference by finding the delay necessar

15 ing versus location during the processing of interaural time difference cues in vivoSIGNIFICANCE STAT

16 ever, the first-order central neurons of the interaural time difference detection circuit encode info

17 of the chicken nucleus laminaris, the first interaural time difference encoder that computes informa

18 nucleus laminaris (NL), the first encoder of interaural time difference for sound localization in bir

19 ween binaural and monaural responses nor the interaural time difference for which nucleus laminaris n

20 ergic inhibition can influence the coding of interaural time differences for sound localization in th

21 ons to the most potent localization cue, the interaural time difference in low-frequency signals (< a

22 mmalian brainstem circuit for computation of interaural time differences is composed of monaural cell

23 h is equivalent to a specific combination of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level di

24 NL neurons may exert a dynamic modulation of interaural time difference (ITD) coding in a CF-dependen

25 The barn owl (Tyto alba) uses interaural time difference (ITD) cues to localize sounds

26 Both mammals and birds use the interaural time difference (ITD) for localization of sou

27 Neural tuning for interaural time difference (ITD) in the optic tectum of

28 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a critical cue to so

29 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a cue to the locatio

30 When an interaural time difference (ITD) is conveyed by a narrow

31 The interaural time difference (ITD) is the primary cue to l

32 Sensitivity to changes in the interaural time difference (ITD) of 50 msec tones was me

33 rgic inhibition can shift the tuning for the interaural time difference (ITD) of the cell.

34 Monaural neurons early in the interaural time difference (ITD) pathway encode the phas

35 Interaural time difference (ITD) plays a central role in

36 Through study of interaural time difference (ITD) processing, the functio

37 tems localize sound sources by computing the interaural time difference (ITD) with submillisecond acc

38 associations between auditory cues, such as interaural time difference (ITD), and locations in visua

39 l neuron in the MSO is tuned to its own best interaural time difference (ITD), indicating the presenc

40 mary cue for localization along the azimuth, interaural time difference (ITD), is based on a cross-co

41 signal-to-noise ratio in the encoding of the interaural time difference (ITD), one of two primary bin

42 ICX neurons are tuned for interaural time difference (ITD), the owl's primary cue

43 olive, and these sites were correlated with interaural time difference (ITD)-sensitive responses to

44 e timing information from each ear to detect interaural time difference (ITD).

45 nes and coincidence detection to measure the interaural time difference (ITD).

46 ry space that is based, in part, on a map of interaural time difference (ITD).

47 erences in the sounds reaching the two ears [interaural time difference (ITD)] to identify where the

48 r implant users do poorly on tasks involving interaural time differences (ITD), a cue that provides i

49 anatomical substrate for the computation of interaural time differences (ITD).

50 t process different sound localization cues, interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

51 of changes in tuning for frequency-specific interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

52 ations in the match between their tuning for interaural time differences (ITDs) and the locations of

53 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

54 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

55 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are an important cue

56 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cue

57 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cues

58 When interaural time differences (ITDs) are the only availabl

59 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the primary cue f

60 Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the tempo

61 Birds and mammals exploit interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

62 The detection of interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

63 Accurate use of interaural time differences (ITDs) for spatial hearing m

64 location in the horizontal plane, extracting interaural time differences (ITDs) from the stimulus fin

65 eral CIs, bilateral CI users' sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) is still poorer than

66 laminaris (NL) is involved in computation of interaural time differences (ITDs) that encode the azimu

67 e capable of great accuracy in detecting the interaural time differences (ITDs) that underlie azimuth

68 Many animals use the interaural time differences (ITDs) to locate the source

69 ns in the medial superior olive (MSO) encode interaural time differences (ITDs) with sustained firing

70 erally implanted human subjects discriminate interaural time differences (ITDs), a major cue for soun

71 a major category of sound localization cue, interaural time differences (ITDs), in juvenile barn owl

72 nteraural intensity or level differences and interaural time differences (ITDs), interact perceptuall

73 em uses three cues to decode sound location: interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

74 athway where cues used to locate sounds, ie, interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

75 anipulation altered the relationship between interaural time differences (ITDs), the principal cue us

76 studied example is the computational map of interaural time differences (ITDs), which is essential t

77 circuitry responsible for the computation of interaural time differences (ITDs).

78 detector neurons that are tuned to different interaural time differences (ITDs).

79 are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs).

80 binaural sound localization cues, including interaural timing differences (ITDs) and interaural leve

81 Interaural timing differences (ITDs) are computed using

82 such as interaural level differences (ILDs), interaural timing differences (ITDs), and spectral cues.

83 lternative, direct measure of sensitivity to interaural time differences, namely, a following respons

84 many mammals to locate a sound source is the interaural time difference, or ITD.

85 o offset interaural intensity differences in interaural time difference processing.

86 auditory brainstem of mammals and birds use interaural time differences to localize sounds.

87 e detectors necessary for the computation of interaural time differences used in sound localization.

88 citatory input to lose their selectivity for interaural time difference when coincidence of impulses

89 had poor cortical sensitivity to changes in interaural time differences, which are critical for loca

90 ris neurons from losing their sensitivity to interaural time difference with intense sounds.

91 al level differences but presented scrambled interaural time differences with vocoded speech.