ライフサイエンスコーパス: international classification

1 eriphery using the categories defined by the International Classification confirmed the presence of w

2 age-related maculopathy grading system, the international classification for age-related macular deg

3 spital Reading Centre primarily based on the International Classification for AMD.

4 terminologies; 9.6% on Omaha System; 7.1% on International Classification for Nursing Practice; 1.6%

5 SE +/- 21.2); it was 74.3% (SE >/= 18.8) for International Classification group C to E eyes.

6 l fundus photography graded according to the International Classification of Age-related Maculopathy

7 eye respectively and DR was graded using the International classification of Diabetic Retinopathy sev

8 ave been hindered by the lack of a validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding alg

9 Two authors selected studies using International Classification of Disease or Diagnostic an

10 International Classification of Disease version 9 (ICD9)

11 ed patients with primary aldosteronism using International Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th Re

12 We used a validated approach involving International Classification of Disease, 9th edition, Cl

13 Validated International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition, Cl

14 ith a primary diagnosis of sarcoidosis using International Classification of Disease, ninth edition,

15 Using inpatient/emergency department (ED) International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision

16 ascular morbidity score were calculated from International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision

17 as searched for cases of NTS, defined by the International Classification of Disease, Ninth revision,

18 e cataract surgery were identified using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision,

19 International Classification of Disease-Ninth Revision (

20 cases were identified by hospital discharge International Classification of Disease-revision 9-Clini

21 Register using validated algorithms based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 8-10.

22 he epidemiology of poisoning deaths, but the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes use

23 We compared admission rates between the two International Classification of Diseases (ICD) periods,

24 The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) standardi

25 databases worldwide increasingly use the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system to

26 least in part, to difficult coding under the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10.

27 hypersensitivity conditions according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 revisi

28 persensitivity conditions in the forthcoming International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 versio

29 development of the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), WHO a

30 tegories of health conditions defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision c

31 ococcal pneumonia, and empyema (all coded by International Classification of Diseases 9) for 2005-12.

32 mortality was determined on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Rev

33 d as having a new endophthalmitis diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision 36

34 ify renal condition diagnoses categorized by International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision co

35 ugh December 31, 2010 were ascertained using International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision co

36 All 12- to 36-month survivors of CRC (International Classification of Diseases [10th revision]

37 ic codes for charcoal-burning suicide in the International Classification of Diseases and variations

38 ems such as the El Escorial criteria and the International Classification of Diseases are systematic

39 arital status, sex, educational level, site, International Classification of Diseases code, Current P

40 based on MESA-ascertained hospital-discharge International Classification of Diseases codes and Cente

41 entified from the first among the following: International Classification of Diseases codes for AF on

42 ient and outpatient visits and defined using International Classification of Diseases codes for bipol

43 disease deaths were defined according to the International Classification of Diseases codes for disea

44 Cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes for inter

45 International Classification of Diseases codes identifie

46 gurgitation on color Doppler in FHS and from International Classification of Diseases codes in Sweden

47 for neuropathy defined according to relevant International Classification of Diseases codes in the Sw

48 TAA and AD mortality (1994-2010) using International Classification of Diseases codes was extra

49 AAA mortality (1994-2010) using International Classification of Diseases codes were extr

50 International Classification of Diseases codes were used

51 ection, cancer, other, or not reported using International Classification of Diseases codes.

52 and nosocomial bacterial meningitis based on International Classification of Diseases coding across a

53 Causes of death were determined using International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code

54 Summary SMR estimates for the International Classification of Diseases disease categor

55 haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues and the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (t

56 e files for HCC, which was identified by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, t

57 cohort study of patients with invasive PADC (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, T

58 cies were defined by morphology codes in the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, t

59 We used International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision

60 UD was defined by discharge diagnoses of the International Classification of Diseases or a purchase o

61 using the 10th clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases system diagnost

62 riants of the ninth or tenth versions of the International Classification of Diseases) to estimate 30

63 ord search, browsing of an arborized list of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

64 -malignant blood disorder-related costs (WHO International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

65 ported having a symptom burden resembling an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision

66 een 1993 and 1999 who later received ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision)

67 he relative hazards of cardiovascular death (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision,

68 e primary diagnosis of allergic reaction per International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

69 th an infection, classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Version.

70 Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision

71 Chronic disease outcomes were assessed by International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition co

72 history of antihyperglycemic medications or International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition di

73 We used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

74 We also used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

75 piratory failure were those with a principal International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

76 We also compared modeled outcomes to International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

77 2,612 critical illness hospitalizations with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

78 The primary outcome was sepsis as defined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

79 y is a significant predictor for the risk of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

80 Furthermore, in cohort patients with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

81 identified pneumonia hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition-Co

82 International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (

83 ses of syphilitic uveitis was defined by (1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (

84 , and comorbidities were identified by using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision a

85 Ocular diagnoses were determined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision c

86 ecords of patients with a diagnosis of PPCM (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision c

87 osis and decompensation were determined from International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision c

88 Progressive HM was defined as HM with the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

89 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

90 2007-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

91 weeks) and ELBW (<1000 g) infants with PDA (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

92 o identify those newly diagnosed with NAION (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

93 ears of age with 2 or more NIIPPU diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

94 el was developed and internally validated in International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

95 c causes were identified using predetermined International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

96 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

97 = 217 061) were searched electronically for International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

98 Subjects were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

99 and timing of central venous catheter using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

100 ng clinical trial data that does not rely on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

101 identified AF-related hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

102 dministrative data may be biased by changing International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

103 rom statins to ezetimibe monotherapy, having International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

104 Cirrhosis was documented, based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

105 patients with severe sepsis were created: 1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

106 We aggregated primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

107 ng an ED for ocular conditions identified by International Classification of Diseases, billing codes.

108 hrenia according to the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic Cri

109 Parental depression diagnoses (based on the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

110 sified using the codes E950 to E959 from the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

111 ldren were followed up for diagnoses of ASD (International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

112 ped to popular hierarchical ontologies (e.g. International Classification of Diseases, Human Phenotyp

113 disease age-standardized death rates (as per International Classification of Diseases, ninth and tent

114 for rate of keratoplasty performed for FECD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

115 r instance, the positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

116 We used laboratory results, International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition

117 tic cardiovascular disease (self-reported or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

118 e CHS adjudicated event (CHS[adj]), selected International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

119 rhythmias, or heart failure), ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

120 who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

121 We used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

122 sified as having severe mental illness if an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

123 cation of Diseases, Eighth Revision [ICD-8], International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

124 between 2000 and 2013 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

125 Truven Health MarketScan Database and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

126 CLD who underwent an EGS procedure based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

127 on opioids were identified by codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

128 dex, sepsis, number of acute organ failures, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

129 in Boston, Massachusetts, was searched using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

130 ds for research, it is important to validate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

131 onfatal opioid overdose was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

132 ned from the final hospital discharge codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

133 Retinal artery occlusion was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

134 t children with stroke were identified by an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

135 , and inpatient costs calculated per 3-digit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

136 Hospitalized HF, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

137 Design, Setting, and Participants: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

138 t of 2995 persons diagnosed with giardiasis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

139 s (19%) with major depressive disorder (MDD; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

140 cated another diagnosis were available for 4 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

141 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

142 Incident AF was ascertained by use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

143 uding Asperger syndrome, or unspecified PDD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

144 of interest was hospital admission for ICH (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

145 ationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2009) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

146 Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes F20 to F29 and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

147 We identified CHB patients by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

148 We identified International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

149 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

150 uated in the emergency department who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

151 ns in terms of bipartite graphs and provides International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

152 ional Trauma Data Bank were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

153 ected using the codes for anaphylaxis in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

154 ith severe sepsis, as defined by concomitant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

155 talizations were identified by the principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

156 ary 1, 2004, through December 31, 2009, with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

157 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

158 ified by >/= 1 inpatient or >/= 2 outpatient International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

159 diagnostic codes E950 through E958 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

160 ed risk factors were identified by secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

161 disease (ALD), and other liver disease using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

162 f delivery were identified by using selected International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

163 ecord review included 40011 patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

164 ung transplant recipients using 2004 to 2010 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

165 natal factors and ASD diagnoses based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

166 mber 30, 2006, we identified 156 743 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

167 bed with TLR, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

168 iscal years 2005 and 2010 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

169 Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

170 rgery hospitalizations were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

171 Incident HZ cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

172 Complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

173 classified with codes E950 to E959 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

174 Using ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

175 comorbid conditions based on codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

176 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

177 Electronic medical record review for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

178 th type 2 diabetes and STDR identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

179 ter donor hepatectomy were categorized using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

180 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

181 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

182 d compared with claims-based estimates using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

183 RRD was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

184 ined by diagnostic codes 850 to 854 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

185 ry 1, 2003, through December 30, 2010) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

186 was hospital-acquired pneumonia, defined via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

187 s were linked to ischemic stroke discharges (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

188 topic disease status was determined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

189 r more outpatient type 1 diabetes diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

190 em, we compared clinical complications using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

191 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

192 dy, we used a validated case-capture method (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

193 y 15, 2013 to May 14, 2015) with a principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision

194 isease Control and Prevention criteria using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

195 Incident HF was identified through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

196 ketScan Research Databases using an expanded International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

197 We identified patients with International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision

198 es for acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

199 he patients who had 2 or more claims for HS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

200 Thyroid disease was determined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

201 mary diagnosis of C difficile colitis on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

202 nt or cataract surgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

203 Diagnoses from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

204 Although changes in International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

205 choroidal neovascularization as indicated by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

206 Participants included patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

207 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

208 diagnosis of Alzheimer disease based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

209 ty, and diabetes mellitus diagnosis by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

210 Codes from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

211 Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

212 Demographic data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

213 le patients with codes for delivery from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

214 Clinical diagnoses of ASDs identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

215 s not attending the ARIC-NCS visit, or by an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

216 Primary diagnoses were classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

217 ncidence of PCP defined as patients with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

218 itive impairment, suggested by corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

219 18 years) with meningitis or encephalitis by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

220 Influenza infection was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

221 between 2000 and 2013 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

222 Septic patients as identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

223 Patients who were included had 1 or more International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

224 tional Health Insurance Research Database by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

225 and bleeding events were identified per the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

226 in the study required the patient to have an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

227 Participants were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

228 With the use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

229 mon diagnosis in both settings was diplopia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

230 Cases of HZ were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

231 trocardiographic (ECG) phenotypes defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

232 sion visits in the EHR were defined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

233 prediction models for ADHF separately for 3 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

234 0 to December 2010, sepsis was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

235 Exfoliation syndrome outcome was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

236 identified using diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

237 injury (Barell Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

238 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

239 ural Terminology codes; comorbidities as per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

240 y were identified using both diagnoses (from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

241 betic patients were screened by diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

242 s for asthma, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Version

243 on for asthma, bronchitis and bronchiolitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Version

244 s on in-hospital complications registered by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

245 documented in the medical records using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

246 on to severe stress or adjustment disorders (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

247 s and adjustment disorders categorized using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

248 Incident cases of PLC (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

249 Failure Registry to national registries with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

250 ly attended infectious diseases according to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

251 sease conditions were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision

252 sexual orientation as a binary outcome, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth, Revisio

253 ted between 2009 and 2014 were identified by International Classification of Diseases,9th Revision, C

254 We compiled Australian Modification-International Classification of Diseases-10 codes from t

255 National Health Service in England with the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes in Hos

256 m of China, which has coded deaths using the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (

257 "legal intervention" in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (

258 dentify race/ethnicity and cause of death by International Classification of Diseases-10th revision c

259 y for Healthcare and Research Quality (AHRQ) International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) code-

260 spitalizations with primary diagnosis of VT (International Classification of Diseases-9 Clinical Modi

261 ification code: 427.1) and cardiac ablation (International Classification of Diseases-9 Clinical Modi

262 e for patients with a admission diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases-9 code 584.xx (

263 MI (Medicaid, Medicare, and Veterans Affairs International Classification of Diseases-9 codes) and de

264 mic stroke and major bleeding, defined using International Classification of Diseases-9 codes.

265 Specifically, we extracted International Classification of Diseases-9th revision di

266 We used International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision, C

267 Sweden who received inpatient and outpatient International Classification of Diseases-based diagnoses

268 We examined a broad range of International Classification of Diseases-defined mental

269 ularization procedures were identified using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition-C

270 ents over the age of 18 years with a 3-digit International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

271 Using medical history or International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

272 on control, and major hemorrhagic events, by International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

273 from the Veterans Affairs from 2007 to 2008, International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

274 ational Inpatient Sample 2001 to 2012, using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

275 lculated using patient safety indicators and International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

276 ocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

277 evision, 410.0-410.91, 411.1-411.8), stroke (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

278 ision, 430-432.9, 433-434.9), heart failure (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

279 METHODS AND Patients undergoing TAVR (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-

280 diagnosis of inferior vena cava thrombosis (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-

281 ophthalmoscopy and defined based on the WHO International Classification of Diseases.

282 uicide defined by discharge diagnoses of the International Classification of Diseases.

283 he eighth, ninth, and tenth revisions of the International Classification of Diseases.

284 ts for outcome measurements in hearing loss (International classification of functioning, disability,

285 The International Classification of Functioning, Disability,

286 sified using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability,

287 rs, thus grouped in separate sections of the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3 bet

288 tion of ICD-11 and implementation in the WHO International Classification of Health Interventions (IC

289 On the basis of International Classification of Intraocular Retinoblasto

290 ssified as having Reese-Ellsworth group 5 or International Classification of Retinoblastoma (Children

291 herapy eyes were classified according to the International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) as

292 nged to Reese-Ellsworth group VB, but on the International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB), 2

293 as group D (n = 6) or E (n = 3) according to International Classification of Retinoblastoma categoriz

294 e Reese-Ellsworth group IV to V, and 37 were International Classification of Retinoblastoma group C t

295 The International Classification of Retinoblastoma groups we

296 International Classification of Sleep Disorders, second

297 Administrative code data (ACD), such as International Classifications of Diseases, Ninth Revisio

298 T) and was graded according to the OCT-based International Classification System developed by the Int

299 Images were graded according to the International Classification System for age-related macu

300 Fundus images were graded using the International Classification System for Age-Related Macu