ライフサイエンスコーパス: international classification of disease

1 ophthalmoscopy and defined based on the WHO International Classification of Diseases.

2 uicide defined by discharge diagnoses of the International Classification of Diseases.

3 orthcoming revisions to both the DSM and the International Classification of Diseases.

4 he eighth, ninth, and tenth revisions of the International Classification of Diseases.

5 We compiled Australian Modification-International Classification of Diseases-10 codes from t

6 National Health Service in England with the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes in Hos

7 tegories of health conditions defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision c

8 All 12- to 36-month survivors of CRC (International Classification of Diseases [10th revision]

9 ord search, browsing of an arborized list of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

10 -malignant blood disorder-related costs (WHO International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

11 ported having a symptom burden resembling an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision

12 een 1993 and 1999 who later received ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision)

13 he relative hazards of cardiovascular death (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision,

14 e primary diagnosis of allergic reaction per International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

15 ged 18 years with major depression using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

16 th an infection, classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Version.

17 m of China, which has coded deaths using the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (

18 "legal intervention" in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (

19 dentify race/ethnicity and cause of death by International Classification of Diseases-10th revision c

20 ococcal pneumonia, and empyema (all coded by International Classification of Diseases 9) for 2005-12.

21 Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision

22 y for Healthcare and Research Quality (AHRQ) International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) code-

23 spitalizations with primary diagnosis of VT (International Classification of Diseases-9 Clinical Modi

24 ification code: 427.1) and cardiac ablation (International Classification of Diseases-9 Clinical Modi

25 e for patients with a admission diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases-9 code 584.xx (

26 MI (Medicaid, Medicare, and Veterans Affairs International Classification of Diseases-9 codes) and de

27 mic stroke and major bleeding, defined using International Classification of Diseases-9 codes.

28 mortality was determined on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Rev

29 d as having a new endophthalmitis diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision 36

30 ify renal condition diagnoses categorized by International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision co

31 ugh December 31, 2010 were ascertained using International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision co

32 ed patients with primary aldosteronism using International Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th Re

33 We used a validated approach involving International Classification of Disease, 9th edition, Cl

34 Validated International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition, Cl

35 of Kaiser Permanente Hawaii were queried for International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition (I

36 Chronic disease outcomes were assessed by International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition co

37 history of antihyperglycemic medications or International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition di

38 We used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

39 We also used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

40 piratory failure were those with a principal International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

41 We also compared modeled outcomes to International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

42 2,612 critical illness hospitalizations with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

43 The primary outcome was sepsis as defined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

44 y is a significant predictor for the risk of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

45 Furthermore, in cohort patients with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

46 t of cohort patients enriched for those with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

47 y (admission Glasgow Coma Scale score </= 8, International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, d

48 identified pneumonia hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition-Co

49 International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (

50 ses of syphilitic uveitis was defined by (1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (

51 , and comorbidities were identified by using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision a

52 Ocular diagnoses were determined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision c

53 ecords of patients with a diagnosis of PPCM (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision c

54 osis and decompensation were determined from International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision c

55 Progressive HM was defined as HM with the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

56 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

57 2007-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

58 weeks) and ELBW (<1000 g) infants with PDA (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

59 o identify those newly diagnosed with NAION (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

60 ears of age with 2 or more NIIPPU diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

61 el was developed and internally validated in International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

62 c causes were identified using predetermined International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

63 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

64 = 217 061) were searched electronically for International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

65 Subjects were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

66 and timing of central venous catheter using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

67 ng clinical trial data that does not rely on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

68 identified AF-related hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

69 dministrative data may be biased by changing International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

70 children discharged in 2010 with at least 1 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

71 , or postpartum conditions using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

72 d from administrative databases that rely on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

73 rom statins to ezetimibe monotherapy, having International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

74 Cirrhosis was documented, based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

75 patients with severe sepsis were created: 1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

76 We aggregated primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

77 ted between 2009 and 2014 were identified by International Classification of Diseases,9th Revision, C

78 Specifically, we extracted International Classification of Diseases-9th revision di

79 We used International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision, C

80 Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual II, International Classification of Diseases and Related Hea

81 ic codes for charcoal-burning suicide in the International Classification of Diseases and variations

82 ems such as the El Escorial criteria and the International Classification of Diseases are systematic

83 Sweden who received inpatient and outpatient International Classification of Diseases-based diagnoses

84 ng an ED for ocular conditions identified by International Classification of Diseases, billing codes.

85 arital status, sex, educational level, site, International Classification of Diseases code, Current P

86 based on MESA-ascertained hospital-discharge International Classification of Diseases codes and Cente

87 entified from the first among the following: International Classification of Diseases codes for AF on

88 ient and outpatient visits and defined using International Classification of Diseases codes for bipol

89 disease deaths were defined according to the International Classification of Diseases codes for disea

90 Cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes for inter

91 International Classification of Diseases codes identifie

92 gurgitation on color Doppler in FHS and from International Classification of Diseases codes in Sweden

93 for neuropathy defined according to relevant International Classification of Diseases codes in the Sw

94 TAA and AD mortality (1994-2010) using International Classification of Diseases codes was extra

95 AAA mortality (1994-2010) using International Classification of Diseases codes were extr

96 International Classification of Diseases codes were used

97 ection, cancer, other, or not reported using International Classification of Diseases codes.

98 and nosocomial bacterial meningitis based on International Classification of Diseases coding across a

99 We examined a broad range of International Classification of Diseases-defined mental

100 International Classification of Diseases diagnosis of ch

101 Causes of death were determined using International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code

102 hrenia according to the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic Cri

103 otential HF hospitalizations were sampled by International Classification of Diseases discharge codes

104 Summary SMR estimates for the International Classification of Diseases disease categor

105 sified using the codes E950 to E959 from the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

106 ldren were followed up for diagnoses of ASD (International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

107 Parental depression diagnoses (based on the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

108 haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues and the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (t

109 e files for HCC, which was identified by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, t

110 cohort study of patients with invasive PADC (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, T

111 cies were defined by morphology codes in the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, t

112 ped to popular hierarchical ontologies (e.g. International Classification of Diseases, Human Phenotyp

113 ave been hindered by the lack of a validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding alg

114 Register using validated algorithms based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 8-10.

115 he epidemiology of poisoning deaths, but the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes use

116 We compared admission rates between the two International Classification of Diseases (ICD) periods,

117 The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) standardi

118 databases worldwide increasingly use the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system to

119 least in part, to difficult coding under the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10.

120 hypersensitivity conditions according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 revisi

121 persensitivity conditions in the forthcoming International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 versio

122 development of the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), WHO a

123 We used International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision

124 gnosis of acute myocardial infarction (using International Classification of Diseases ninth Revision

125 ith a primary diagnosis of sarcoidosis using International Classification of Disease, ninth edition,

126 Using inpatient/emergency department (ED) International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision

127 ascular morbidity score were calculated from International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision

128 as searched for cases of NTS, defined by the International Classification of Disease, Ninth revision,

129 e cataract surgery were identified using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision,

130 abase was queried for all discharges with an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision,

131 disease age-standardized death rates (as per International Classification of Diseases, ninth and tent

132 for rate of keratoplasty performed for FECD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

133 r instance, the positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

134 We used laboratory results, International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition

135 tic cardiovascular disease (self-reported or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

136 e CHS adjudicated event (CHS[adj]), selected International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

137 who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

138 We used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

139 sified as having severe mental illness if an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

140 rhythmias, or heart failure), ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

141 on opioids were identified by codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

142 dex, sepsis, number of acute organ failures, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

143 in Boston, Massachusetts, was searched using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

144 ds for research, it is important to validate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

145 onfatal opioid overdose was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

146 Retinal artery occlusion was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

147 ned from the final hospital discharge codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

148 t children with stroke were identified by an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

149 , and inpatient costs calculated per 3-digit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

150 Hospitalized HF, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

151 Design, Setting, and Participants: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

152 t of 2995 persons diagnosed with giardiasis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

153 s (19%) with major depressive disorder (MDD; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

154 cated another diagnosis were available for 4 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

155 Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes F20 to F29 and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

156 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

157 Incident AF was ascertained by use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

158 uding Asperger syndrome, or unspecified PDD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

159 of interest was hospital admission for ICH (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

160 ationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2009) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

161 We identified CHB patients by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

162 We identified International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

163 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

164 uated in the emergency department who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

165 talizations were identified by the principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

166 ns in terms of bipartite graphs and provides International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

167 ional Trauma Data Bank were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

168 ected using the codes for anaphylaxis in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

169 ed risk factors were identified by secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

170 ith severe sepsis, as defined by concomitant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

171 ecord review included 40011 patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

172 ary 1, 2004, through December 31, 2009, with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

173 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

174 ified by >/= 1 inpatient or >/= 2 outpatient International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

175 diagnostic codes E950 through E958 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

176 mber 30, 2006, we identified 156 743 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

177 disease (ALD), and other liver disease using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

178 f delivery were identified by using selected International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

179 ung transplant recipients using 2004 to 2010 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

180 natal factors and ASD diagnoses based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

181 bed with TLR, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

182 iscal years 2005 and 2010 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

183 Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

184 rgery hospitalizations were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

185 Incident HZ cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

186 Complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

187 classified with codes E950 to E959 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

188 Using ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

189 comorbid conditions based on codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

190 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

191 Electronic medical record review for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

192 th type 2 diabetes and STDR identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

193 d compared with claims-based estimates using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

194 ter donor hepatectomy were categorized using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

195 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

196 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

197 RRD was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

198 ined by diagnostic codes 850 to 854 from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

199 ry 1, 2003, through December 30, 2010) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

200 y 15, 2013 to May 14, 2015) with a principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision

201 was hospital-acquired pneumonia, defined via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

202 s were linked to ischemic stroke discharges (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

203 topic disease status was determined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

204 r more outpatient type 1 diabetes diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

205 em, we compared clinical complications using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

206 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

207 dy, we used a validated case-capture method (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

208 Thyroid disease was determined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

209 isease Control and Prevention criteria using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

210 Incident HF was identified through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

211 ketScan Research Databases using an expanded International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

212 We identified patients with International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision

213 es for acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

214 he patients who had 2 or more claims for HS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

215 mary diagnosis of C difficile colitis on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

216 nt or cataract surgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

217 Diagnoses from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

218 Although changes in International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

219 Types of FRH evaluated, according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

220 choroidal neovascularization as indicated by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

221 dominal aortic aneurysm were identified with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

222 es of dialysis-requiring AKI using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

223 eligible patients, 872 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

224 ere identified with procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

225 ser Permanente Hawaii for uveitis-associated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

226 fined these complications by using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

227 sion, injury patients were defined as having International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

228 from 2007 to 2008 Medicare claims using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

229 ty, and diabetes mellitus diagnosis by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

230 Participants included patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

231 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

232 diagnosis of Alzheimer disease based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

233 Codes from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

234 Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

235 Clinical diagnoses of ASDs identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

236 Demographic data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

237 le patients with codes for delivery from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

238 s not attending the ARIC-NCS visit, or by an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

239 Primary diagnoses were classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

240 ncidence of PCP defined as patients with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

241 itive impairment, suggested by corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

242 18 years) with meningitis or encephalitis by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

243 Influenza infection was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

244 between 2000 and 2013 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

245 Septic patients as identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

246 Patients who were included had 1 or more International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

247 tional Health Insurance Research Database by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

248 and bleeding events were identified per the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

249 in the study required the patient to have an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

250 Participants were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

251 With the use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

252 mon diagnosis in both settings was diplopia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

253 Cases of HZ were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

254 trocardiographic (ECG) phenotypes defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

255 sion visits in the EHR were defined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

256 prediction models for ADHF separately for 3 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

257 0 to December 2010, sepsis was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

258 Exfoliation syndrome outcome was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

259 injury (Barell Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

260 identified using diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

261 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

262 ural Terminology codes; comorbidities as per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

263 y were identified using both diagnoses (from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

264 betic patients were screened by diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

265 cation of Diseases, Eighth Revision [ICD-8], International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

266 between 2000 and 2013 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

267 Truven Health MarketScan Database and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

268 CLD who underwent an EGS procedure based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

269 s for asthma, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Version

270 on for asthma, bronchitis and bronchiolitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Version

271 Administrative code data (ACD), such as International Classifications of Diseases, Ninth Revisio

272 International Classification of Disease-Ninth Revision (

273 ularization procedures were identified using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition-C

274 Using medical history or International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

275 on control, and major hemorrhagic events, by International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

276 from the Veterans Affairs from 2007 to 2008, International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

277 ational Inpatient Sample 2001 to 2012, using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

278 ents over the age of 18 years with a 3-digit International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

279 lculated using patient safety indicators and International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

280 ocardial infarction/acute coronary syndrome (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

281 evision, 410.0-410.91, 411.1-411.8), stroke (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

282 ision, 430-432.9, 433-434.9), heart failure (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

283 METHODS AND Patients undergoing TAVR (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-

284 diagnosis of inferior vena cava thrombosis (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-

285 Two authors selected studies using International Classification of Disease or Diagnostic an

286 UD was defined by discharge diagnoses of the International Classification of Diseases or a purchase o

287 cases were identified by hospital discharge International Classification of Disease-revision 9-Clini

288 using the 10th clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases system diagnost

289 s on in-hospital complications registered by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

290 documented in the medical records using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

291 on to severe stress or adjustment disorders (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

292 s and adjustment disorders categorized using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

293 Incident cases of PLC (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

294 Failure Registry to national registries with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

295 ly attended infectious diseases according to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

296 sease conditions were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision

297 sexual orientation as a binary outcome, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth, Revisio

298 riants of the ninth or tenth versions of the International Classification of Diseases) to estimate 30

299 International Classification of Disease version 9 (ICD9)

300 comorbidities, and CHF were identified using International Classification of Diseases, version 9, and