ライフサイエンスコーパス: internist

1 tified internal medicine physicians (general internists).

2 endous importance for both pediatricians and internists.

3 cs that should be achieved by board-eligible internists.

4 develop geriatrics-oriented academic general internists.

5 these initiatives and their implications for internists.

6 nder the care of nephrologists compared with internists.

7 red by nephrologists and services covered by internists.

8 e to improve the practice of medicine by all internists.

9 that includes both family practitioners and internists.

10 339 urologists, rheumatologists, and general internists.

11 ited States, nonobese patients and visits to internists.

12 y different challenges for pediatricians and internists.

13 fit than either family physicians or general internists.

14 ld be managed in its early stages by general internists.

15 ed the number and type of procedures done by internists.

16 western world and is frequently diagnosed by internists.

17 nymous survey was conducted of 217 attending internists, 132 medical house officers, and 219 staff nu

18 more likely to report aspirin use than were internists (20%), family physicians (18%), or general pr

19 18873 Medicare admissions treated by general internists, 38475 (2.1%) received care from a locum tene

20 More than half the internists (51.1%) reported caring for at least 1 CCS; 7

21 icipants and the correct cause was 56.9% for internists, 56.0% for residents, and 55.7% for medical s

22 Internists (6%) and physicians practicing in health main

23 is percentage is notably lower among general internists (79%).

24 ician volume and mortality was strongest for internists (9.2% versus 10.6%; P<0.001) and weakest for

25 Selection was by consensus of a general internist, a lipid clinic director, and a researcher in

26 eam that consisted of a primary care general internist, a pharmacist, and a nurse or other certified

27 taff, ancillary services, and nursing staff, internists aboard the COMFORT were integral to supportin

28 s a discussion between a cardiologist and an internist about how each clinician would balance these f

29 The number and variety of procedures done by internists also increased with greater time spent in tot

30 oldemar Mobitz, an early 20th century German internist, analyzed arrhythmias by graphing the relation

31 Each was staffed by an attending internist and 3 house officers.

32 his paper summarizes a discussion between an internist and a gynecologist on how they would balance t

33 aper summarizes a conference during which an internist and a radiologist discuss the application of t

34 Only one internist and five residents had received formal trainin

35 , but all represent syndromes with which the internist and general cardiologist should be familiar.

36 nal Medicine (ABIM) show that 23% of general internists and 14% of subspecialists choose not to renew

37 es were 72% in both specialties (301 general internists and 297 family medicine physicians).

38 Twenty-nine percent of general internists and 32% of family physicians reported assessi

39 Of the respondents, 48% were internists and 52% were family practitioners.

40 onse rates were 79% (352 of 443) for general internists and 62% (255 of 409) for family physicians.

41 ce coverage for the vaccine (55% for general internists and 62% for family physicians) or inadequate

42 by 87% of cardiologists, but by only 77% of internists and 63% of FP/GPs (p < 0.001 between groups).

43 Furthermore, although 84% of internists and 72% of surgeons believe that physicians s

44 Ninety-four percent of internists and 87% of surgeons believe firearm violence

45 survey mailed to all Board-certified female internists and a matched group of male internists who ha

46 Internists and cardiologists are often asked to estimate

47 0 family and general practitioners (FP/GPs), internists and cardiologists.

48 lure will continue to be provided by general internists and cardiologists.

49 is, therefore, of concern to obstetricians, internists and endocrine specialists.

50 (49.8%) of all ambulatory visits to general internists and family physicians are made by patients fo

51 The target physician audience is internists and family physicians dedicated to primary ca

52 The practices of general internists and family physicians differ systematically f

53 Among general internists and family physicians who completed residency

54 es of adult primary care physicians (general internists and family physicians) across Primary Care Se

55 Internists and family practitioners were given the choic

56 rs among 59 primary care physicians (general internists and family practitioners) and 65 general and

57 nzyme inhibitors were used by cardiologists, internists and FP/GPs in 80%, 71% and 60% of patients wi

58 ty with published guidelines for CHF than do internists and FP/GPs.

59 ironment of health care delivery for general internists and internist-subspecialists.

60 ly review available guidelines to help guide internists and other clinicians in making decisions abou

61 with heroin dependence frequently present to internists and other physicians for heroin-related medic

62 o non-American College of Physicians' member internists and other physicians is unknown.

63 In an effort to provide internists and other primary care physicians with effect

64 The target audience for this guideline is internists and other primary care physicians.

65 Among generalists, demand for internists and pediatricians is rising.

66 ed for the treatment of ARTIs, especially by internists and physicians in the Northeast and South.

67 ely to produce sufficient numbers of general internists and primary care physicians.

68 mation is particularly important for general internists and specialists.

69 on to encourage research training of general internists and subspecialists.

70 A majority of internists and surgeons also support community efforts t

71 Many internists and surgeons think that firearm injuries are

72 cts on many of the ethical tensions faced by internists and their patients and attempts to shed light

73 icians, including 149 family physicians, 115 internists, and 136 obstetrician/gynecologists.

74 1 family physicians, 77 (40%) of 194 general internists, and 66 (34%) of 194 cardiologists responded.

75 mes of care by 284 hospitalists, 993 general internists, and 971 family physicians.

76 entified ambulatory visits to cardiologists, internists, and family practitioners.

77 pitalists has implications for patients, for internists, and for the specialty of internal medicine.

78 rointestinal bleeding varies among surgeons, internists, and gastroenterologists.

79 rs (intensivists, emergency care physicians, internists, and medical students).

80 be familiar to generalists, haematologists, internists, and paediatricians alike.

81 linical problem to practicing cardiologists, internists, and pediatricians.

82 consultant, the family physician and general internist are becoming peers, and they increasingly have

83 ons and the general public must be shown why internists are better able than family physicians to mee

84 General internists are ideally suited to the integrated care of

85 General internists are often responsible for teaching medical st

86 t also threatens the traditional role of the internist as the caregiver for adults in health and dise

87 ort treated by the MOC-grandfathered general internists as the control.

88 tients with diabetes mellitus treated by 301 internists at primary care practices affiliated with 2 l

89 y cohort treated by the MOC-required general internists before (1999-2000) and after (2002-2005) they

90 edicare patients who were treated by general internists (both hospitalists and traditional, non-hospi

91 clinical need and expands opportunities for internists, but it is important that it not overreach, f

92 less expensive than that provided by general internists, but it offers no significant savings as comp

93 Ways in which internists can aid patients with alcohol problems by scr

94 Internists care for many women who have had abortions an

95 ectronic health record in our independent, 4-internist, community-based practice of general internal

96 These academic general internists could play a pivotal role in providing geriat

97 of screening compared to those cared for by internists, despite equal or higher levels of awareness;

98 Here, an oncologist and an internist discuss how they would balance these recommend

99 anagement, a bariatric surgeon and a general internist, discuss the role of weight loss surgery versu

100 Internists--"doctors for adults"--provide most of the me

101 On average, the percentage of general internists doing each procedure now is less than half of

102 All family physicians work closely with internists during residency, but many general internists

103 the dining room table." The case of Dr B, an internist dying of myelofibrosis and congestive heart fa

104 Ironically, as general internists face the challenge of integrating advances of

105 Finally, pediatricians, internists, family physicians, and emergency department

106 We asked 1058 internists, family practitioners, and cardiologists in C

107 General internists find themselves at the crossroads of prosperi

108 232 male and 213 female internists for whom data were complete.

109 Compared to internists, FPs' patients were more likely to have heard

110 patients and health plans to distinguish the internist from family physicians and nurse practitioners

111 ospitalist could become the means to exclude internists from hospital care and deprive them of an imp

112 s to services covered by nephrologists or by internists from July 1995 to March 1996.

113 and traditional, non-hospital-based general internists), from 46.4% in 1995 to 61.0% in 2006.

114 how general and subspecialty cardiologists, internists, gastroenterologists, and orthopedic surgeons

115 tings with a broad representation of general internists, geriatricians, funding agencies, and policym

116 Compared with cardiologists, internists had similar rates (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-1.0

117 her income beneficiaries receiving care from internists had the highest screening rate (68%), while d

118 ubspecialist is superior to that given by an internist has become more prominent.

119 er and variety of procedures done by general internists has decreased dramatically.

120 er and variety of procedures done by general internists have decreased considerably since 1986.

121 nternists during residency, but many general internists have had little or no experience working with

122 To general internists, his name is linked to Kussmaul's sign and Ku

123 care provided by family practitioners (FPs), internists (IMs), and gastroenterologists (GIs) for acut

124 ered by the physiatrist, rheumatologist, and internist in clinical practice, including osteoarthritis

125 ces that drive managed care make the role of internist in the care of adults even more central.

126 iaries who received medical care from FPs or internists in 2006 (using Medicare Current Beneficiary S

127 and the rapidly changing responsibilities of internists in inpatient and outpatient settings.

128 pioid dependence and will expand the role of internists in the care of these patients.

129 However, the leadership role of internists in the medical care of adults is now being th

130 s sent to all surgeons, gastroenterologists, internists, intensivists, and radiologists who are curre

131 2.62), or reported a favorable impression of internists' lifestyle (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.39-2.87).

132 internists, the IM practice environment, and internists' lifestyle were more likely to pursue a caree

133 Prompt diagnosis and management, aided by an internist, may lead to resolution of the infection witho

134 A survey of general internist members of the American College of Physicians

135 ested: a pilot project of volunteer salaried internists (more trusted, less audited) commissioned to

136 Today's internists must have the necessary knowledge, skills, an

137 ed caring for at least 1 CCS; 72.0% of these internists never received a treatment summary.

138 ists and pediatricians, adult cardiologists, internists, obstetricians, nurses, and thoracic surgeons

139 Eighty-nine percent of respondents were internists; of these, 51% were generalists and 38% were

140 688 patients visiting their internists' offices were surveyed (response rate, 86%);

141 General internists often care for patients with advanced cancer.

142 providers in the practice, and, for general internists only, having more patients with Medicare Part

143 y rate than matched patients who saw only an internist or a family practitioner (14.6 percent vs. 18.

144 Patients who saw both a cardiologist and an internist or a family practitioner had a lower mortality

145 As compared with patients who saw only an internist or a family practitioner in the three months a

146 Concurrent care by an internist or a family practitioner was associated with a

147 arget audience for this guideline is general internists or other clinicians involved in perioperative

148 stly than patients under the primary care of internists or surgeons.

149 are physician (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 3.17-3.41), internist (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.69-2.90), pediatrician (O

150 5% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.1-5.7) and internists (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.6) were significantly m

151 differentials exist between male and female internists overall and in various medical practice setti

152 was $7,925 versus $10,773 under the care of internists (P = 0.101).

153 ission was 24% for nephrologists and 30% for internists (P = 0.328).

154 compared with patients cared for by general internists, patients cared for by hospitalists had a mod

155 lergists, gastroenterologists, pathologists, internists, pediatricians, and otolaryngologists must no

156 Of a random sample of Massachusetts general internists, pediatricians, cardiologists, orthopedic sur

157 family medicine (FPs) vs. internal medicine (internists) physicians.

158 ore aggressive oral steroid regimens used by internists preclude strict comparisons between pediatric

159 Among internists providing primary care at 4 VA medical center

160 Although most general internists report involvement in the care of CCSs, many

161 Internists reported being "somewhat unfamiliar" with ava

162 50 miles of a pediatric rheumatologist or an internist rheumatologist who treats children.

163 ogy rotations and are more likely to rely on internist rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists to addr

164 Our analysis suggests that internist rheumatologists are more geographically diffus

165 Research is needed to understand the role of internist rheumatologists in caring for children with rh

166 Internist rheumatologists in private practice were 3 tim

167 Likewise, internist rheumatologists who live 200 or more miles fro

168 ty characteristics that were associated with internist rheumatologists' willingness to treat children

169 ut on-site pediatric rheumatologists rely on internist rheumatologists, general pediatricians, or oth

170 mortality than patients cared for by either internists (risk ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.1

171 mandatory hand-off because it threatens the internist's identity as the physician who can care for t

172 renal cell carcinoma (RCC)] is known as "the internist's tumor" because it has protean systemic manif

173 Therefore, RCC is labeled the internist's tumor.

174 The internist's unique training and clinical approach should

175 s why rates of MOC participation for general internists seem lower than those for subspecialists (77%

176 Internists selected a median of 10 terms, while others s

177 Wherever they practice, general internists should be able to lead teams and be responsib

178 lth care delivery for general internists and internist-subspecialists.

179 Although most internists supported a physician's right to counsel pati

180 mpared among patients primarily cared for by internists, surgeons, and gastroenterologists.

181 Clinicians including internists, surgeons, pulmonologists, and other speciali

182 valuation-and-management services by general internists that were attributed to hospitalists increase

183 For many internists, the hospitalist model is attractive, but the

184 ble impressions of the patients cared for by internists, the IM practice environment, and internists'

185 isit characteristics and compared to general internists, the likelihood of providing services was hig

186 Compared with patients of internists, the odds of bone mass measurement were lowes

187 Medicare beneficiaries treated by a general internist, there were no significant differences in over

188 actitioners (i.e., pediatricians and general internists), those who were in one- or two-physician pra

189 portant for both the ophthalmologist and the internist to recognize because they may precede the diag

190 r 10 years, ranging from $16 725 for general internists to $40 495 for hematologists-oncologists.

191 lear whether residency programs are training internists to provide effective care for patients who re

192 On average, internists were "somewhat uncomfortable" caring for surv

193 es of conditions seen in practice by general internists were estimated from the primary diagnosis for

194 nens physician; 9.3% (4123/44520) of general internists were temporarily covered by a locum tenens ph

195 Patients of FPs, compared to those of internists, were less likely to have received an FOBT ki

196 By training, most hospitalists are internists who are well prepared to care for inpatients.

197 We defined hospitalists as general internists who derived 90% or more of their Medicare cla

198 es that were returned, 990 were from general internists who had completed the survey.

199 emale internists and a matched group of male internists who had graduated from medical school 10 to 3

200 The relatively large percentage of general internists who left internal medicine mostly to work in

201 le provides the perspective of the U.S. Navy internists who participated in the initial response to t

202 As in the 1986 survey, general internists who practice in smaller cities and smaller ho

203 Internists who practice in smaller towns and smaller hos

204 cially for smaller practices and for general internists who see more patients with Medicare Part D.

205 The internist will be called on to assess the risk that infe

206 hysicians, subspecialists, and hospitalists, internists will continue to play a central role in provi

207 Internists will incur an average of $23 607 (95% CI, $53

208 We presented 503 board-certified internists with abstracts that we designed describing cl

209 based (sub)specialists or paediatricians and internists with an expertise in allergology may deliver

210 Participants were internists with time-limited (n = 71) or time-unlimited

211 valuating differences in performance between internists with time-limited or time-unlimited board cer

212 rences in outcomes for patients cared for by internists with time-limited or time-unlimited certifica

213 ternal Medicine (ABIM) initiatives encourage internists with time-unlimited certificates to recertify

214 Organizations that represent general internists would do well to join forces with many other