ライフサイエンスコーパス: interpretive

1 s and zone diameters (r = 0.94) and superior interpretive accuracy with the susceptible criteria at >

2 length, schedule, or examination volume and interpretive accuracy.

3 scertain how published studies were used and interpretive analysis with a constructivist grounded the

4 This recommendation, as well as the interpretive and quality control criteria that are descr

5 We developed technical, bioinformatic, interpretive, and validation pipelines for whole-exome s

6 ging techniques, operational considerations, interpretive approaches, and interventional procedures.

7 iron(III) paramagnetism, and a quantitative interpretive basis of the hyperfine shifts is establishe

8 hanges coincided with revised telavancin MIC interpretive break point criteria for susceptibility app

9 ed a reduced fluconazole MIC that crossed an interpretive breakpoint (e.g., resistant [MIC, >or=64 mi

10 These findings suggest that an interpretive breakpoint of 0.5 microg/ml may be useful i

11 Developing interpretive breakpoints for any given organism-drug com

12 s performed to derive susceptibility testing interpretive breakpoints for doxycycline with Streptococ

13 Current work is focusing on defining interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida spe

14 he proposed introduction of species-specific interpretive breakpoints for MICs obtained in yeast anti

15 ntifungal susceptibility testing products or interpretive breakpoints for susceptibility testing of t

16 oratory Standards Institute has now proposed interpretive breakpoints for voriconazole and Candida sp

17 azole than to fluconazole, assuming proposed interpretive breakpoints of > or =17 mm (susceptible) an

18 ilution at either pH, with NCCLS-recommended interpretive breakpoints.

19 Voriconazole MICs and interpretive categories (susceptible, < or =1 microg/ml;

20 Ravuconazole MICs and tentative interpretive categories (susceptible, </=1 microg/ml; re

21 Interlaboratory agreement based on interpretive category also varied and overall was best f

22 re 1.3% very major, 6.6% minor, and no major interpretive category errors encountered with the clinic

23 Minor interpretive category errors ranged from 12.2% with cefo

24 There were no very major or major interpretive category errors resulting from the MICroSTR

25 ution and Mueller-Hinton broth, agreement by interpretive category was 100% for eight isolates and >9

26 most variable for imipenem, and agreement by interpretive category was lowest for imipenem and amikac

27 Reproducibility among MICs and agreement by interpretive category was most variable for imipenem.

28 ates tested had results within the sensitive interpretive category, and 90% of the results compared w

29 Agreement based on the interpretive category, using currently suggested breakpo

30 Agreement based on interpretive category, with NCCLS-recommended breakpoint

31 in hemochromatosis, and the histopathologic interpretive challenge of centrilobular lesions in postt

32 Errors were categorized as perceptional, interpretive, communication related, or procedural.

33 ise the evidence and to subsequently present interpretive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of

34 hout involving principal cell loss and other interpretive confounds inherent in the use of global neu

35 ibodies and their specificities, a number of interpretive considerations must be appreciated to under

36 esearch, including conceptual, analytic, and interpretive considerations.

37 espectively, according to the manufacturer's interpretive criteria (> or =30,000 RLU is positive).

38 s Institute (CLSI) revised the ciprofloxacin interpretive criteria (breakpoints) for disk diffusion a

39 py) by using the most prominent standardized interpretive criteria (including International Harmoniza

40 The interpretive criteria advocated for the MICs of clarithr

41 These preliminary interpretive criteria and QC limits (accepted by the Nat

42 Thus, revision of the traditional lung scan interpretive criteria based upon pleural effusion size i

43 sequently neither quality control limits nor interpretive criteria could be established.

44 Laboratory Standards Institute published MIC interpretive criteria for 13 antimicrobial agents used f

45 and zone diameter quality control limits and interpretive criteria for antimicrobial susceptibility t

46 titute (CLSI) established "susceptible-only" interpretive criteria for broth microdilution (BMD) and

47 The revised interpretive criteria for Streptococcus pneumoniae recen

48 Interpretive criteria for susceptibility were proposed f

49 The proposed interpretive criteria for testing CoNS have been adopted

50 njugants) were studied to define "sensitive" interpretive criteria for the Etest ESBL screen.

51 Interpretive criteria for the MIC of azithromycin were e

52 ave been revised to provide species-specific interpretive criteria for the six most common species.

53 ion zone diameters led to the development of interpretive criteria for the zone diameters for azithro

54 standardized susceptibility test methods or interpretive criteria have been proposed for this organi

55 uberculin reaction size supports the current interpretive criteria of the Centers for Disease Control

56 uoroquinolone compound with in vitro testing interpretive criteria that will produce accurate results

57 and FDG PET/CT (82%-95%), regardless of the interpretive criteria used.

58 e, intermediate, and resistant zone diameter interpretive criteria using the error rate-bounded metho

59 Caspofungin MIC values and species-specific interpretive criteria were compared with those of micafu

60 Interpretive criteria were developed for 12 antimicrobia

61 ains at the present time, "susceptible only" interpretive criteria were proposed for cefotaxime, ceft

62 h microdilution methods and species-specific interpretive criteria were used to test 4,290 strains of

63 e reliability of Staphylococcus breakpoints (interpretive criteria) for other beta-lactam agents, the

64 standardized susceptibility testing methods, interpretive criteria, and reagent details for use in ve

65 Despite the lack of interpretive criteria, antifungal susceptibility testing

66 According to recommended interpretive criteria, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cipr

67 ical benefit with minimal harm, standardized interpretive criteria, direct biopsy guidance, and accep

68 ibility (%S) observed for all pathogens with interpretive criteria, excluding Enterobacter cloacae (9

69 nalysis of the data with rather conservative interpretive criteria, however, revealed a number of def

70 ciprofloxacin, for which there are no NCCLS interpretive criteria.

71 he development and implementation of generic interpretive criteria.

72 ween CLSI and FDA revisions of antimicrobial interpretive criteria.

73 using reference methods and species-specific interpretive criteria.

74 plates were stratified according to PAP-AUC interpretive criteria: <0.90 (susceptible [S-MRSA]), 0.9

75 zed by three investigators using qualitative interpretive description.

76 omise but face important obstacles including interpretive difficulties inherent in using serum creati

77 d obesity are often plagued by low power and interpretive difficulties.

78 such sophisticated analyses are fraught with interpretive difficulties.

79 and diffusion constants are sought, can face interpretive difficulty.

80 derations illuminate some of the logical and interpretive dilemmas that enter into debates about Freu

81 volumes are associated with increased major interpretive discrepancies.

82 Interpretive disk diffusion breakpoints for caspofungin

83 le the 2-micrograms disk produced only minor interpretive errors (12.5%).

84 These minor interpretive errors also occurred most frequently with E

85 The rates of interpretive errors for 12 commonly used antipseudomonal

86 linical isolates, although >80% of the minor interpretive errors involved only a single log(2) diluti

87 No major interpretive errors occurred with either device.

88 Minor interpretive errors were frequent with all methods.

89 For all test methods, interpretive errors were most frequent when testing ampi

90 No interpretive errors were observed.

91 The numbers of minor interpretive errors with penicillin and ampicillin disk

92 lution compensation may substantially reduce interpretive errors.

93 wing methods produced no very major or major interpretive errors: broth microdilution with BHI media

94 Interpretive essay.

95 inates report on these interactions, but the interpretive framework developed for CO adducts, involvi

96 The current, widely implemented interpretive framework for doing so is the Michaelis-Men

97 The proposed model can advance our interpretive framework for future in vivo FSCV studies e

98 To generate an interpretive framework for future research in microbial

99 The entire interpretive framework for the Naisbett-Jones et al.[1]

100 imes contrasting views and unify them in one interpretive framework.

101 New interpretive guidelines are presented for the testing of

102 ic properties, administration procedures and interpretive guidelines are provided in this protocol.

103 By using the interpretive guidelines of the National Committee for Cl

104 d applied both 2009 and 2010 CLSI carbapenem interpretive guidelines.

105 the NAcc and striatum conveys qualitative or interpretive information about the rewarding value of st

106 distinction between perceptual judgments and interpretive judgments; second, by considering the power

107 However, shoppers who used interpretive labels found them to be significantly more

108 its widespread use, there are technical and interpretive limitations of this technique.

109 foldons and their role supplies an essential interpretive link.

110 This interpretive meta-synthesis of 11 qualitative articles p

111 The reader's preference for interpretive method had no effect on CT colonographic pe

112 e followed the M23-A2 "blueprint" to develop interpretive MIC breakpoints for anidulafungin, caspofun

113 le class as posaconazole, have CLSI-approved interpretive MIC breakpoints, and are available on some

114 Thus, the caudate nucleus provides interpretive monitoring of ongoing behavior, which is ne

115 eating.We aimed to evaluate the effects of 2 interpretive nutrition labels compared with a noninterpr

116 ely low level of use observed in this trial, interpretive nutrition labels had no significant effect

117 riteria for identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance at screening mammography as mea

118 Survey responses were linked to interpretive performance for all screening mammography e

119 riteria for identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance for both workup after abnormal

120 E) on breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging interpretive performance in a large multi-institutional

121 r digital mammography alone) and if reported interpretive performance metrics of improved specificity

122 The interpretive performance of radiologists among their pee

123 ared to previous methods, GIFT showed better interpretive performance, and performance for the recove

124 Using an interpretive phenomenological approach data were collect

125 nterval time courses; limiting the available interpretive power.

126 ive broad descriptions to three questionable interpretive practices described by Duarte et al. and in

127 intervals, readers were asked whether their interpretive preference in clinical practice was to perf

128 10 mm or larger and 6 mm or larger, based on interpretive preference were estimated by using resampli

129 receptor preferences by different STATs and interpretive problems in the use of STAT-deficient cells

130 per, ethical arguments are addressed and the interpretive problems inherent in the use of active-cont

131 s can create both statistical and biological interpretive problems.

132 avigation of image data performed during the interpretive process.

133 Interpretive quantitative models have been developed and

134 developed to support discovery research, the interpretive requirements for recovering clinically usef

135 tituberculous agents demonstrated equivalent interpretive results for 100% of the isolates tested.

136 To provide a concise interpretive review of excellence in intensive care medi

137 , additional optimization of the Invader 1.0 interpretive software (Invader Data Analysis Worksheet)

138 Interpretive software from the assay manufacturer was mo

139 Based on NCCLS interpretive standards for gram-positive and/or aerobic

140 scans for the 1 year straddling the shift in interpretive strategy, with traditional interpretation b

141 network depends heavily on the similarity of interpretive styles between the network trainer and the

142 la concept for treatments that operate on an interpretive-supportive continuum and is frequently used

143 new oxazolidinones were tested to determine interpretive susceptibility testing criteria for MIC and

144 A narrative interpretive synthesis of the views data from studies of

145 ically appraised and analyzed using critical interpretive synthesis.

146 s demonstrated that automated processing and interpretive systems yield results comparable to those o

147 evaluated the performances of two automated interpretive systems, TrinBlot/BLOTrix (Trinity Biotech,

148 rable to that of linezolid and had identical interpretive testing criteria.

149 , which is often delayed, relies on complex, interpretive testing for presence and titer of the inhib

150 There are two main interpretive types of networks, "softwired" and "hardwir

151 I resistance, provides particular additional interpretive value in cases where in vitro IC(50) and cl

152 Interpretive variability is substantial for all types of

153 Interpretive volume and diagnostic performance have comp

154 Our results suggest that diagnostic interpretive volume is a key determinant in the developm

155 Annual interpretive volume measures (total, screening, diagnost

156 Increasing minimum interpretive volume requirements in the United States wh

157 and CDR cancer detection rate at all annual interpretive volumes.

158 A single susceptible interpretive zone diameter of > or = 17 mm (MIC, < = or