戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 oorly matched resources, and the strength of interspecific competition.
2 rentiation and divergence, in order to avoid interspecific competition.
3 damentally alter the dynamics and outcome of interspecific competition.
4 vergent selection acting on traits mediating interspecific competition.
5 t alter plant performance and the outcome of interspecific competition.
6 ' performance in monoculture and outcomes of interspecific competition.
7 more generalized when they are released from interspecific competition.
8 artition soil P, but this does not eliminate interspecific competition.
9 uences the fitness of a host in a setting of interspecific competition.
10 e displacement is the most severe outcome of interspecific competition.
11 tween sympatric species are enhanced through interspecific competition.
12 loridanum alters caste ratios in response to interspecific competition.
13 microhabitat topography dramatically reduced interspecific competition.
14 corals, as well as coral polyp behaviour and interspecific competition.
15 aphic patterns in the intensity of intra- or interspecific competition [4].
16 fe histories lead to variation in intra- and interspecific competition across the annual cycle.
17 es, such as carrion, are a source of intense interspecific competition among animal scavengers and mi
18                Fossil evidence suggests that interspecific competition among carnivores was relativel
19 host, and that energy is limited, intra- and interspecific competition among castrators is generally
20 munities is understudied relative to that of interspecific competition among prey.
21                        Its structure reduces interspecific competition and allows ample but modular c
22  the importance of understanding the role of interspecific competition and disturbance when studying
23  plant performance, changed the intensity of interspecific competition and even reversed whether plan
24 nferior competitors that mitigate effects of interspecific competition and facilitate long-term persi
25 nary time that omits explicit mechanisms for interspecific competition and other microevolutionary pr
26  host-microbe interactions, thereby reducing interspecific competition and promoting the coexistence
27 ith a version of the Lotka-Volterra model of interspecific competition and show that habitat destruct
28  in understanding territoriality, intra- and interspecific competition, and contact rates that influe
29 O(2) is affected significantly by intra- and interspecific competition, and that the elevated CO(2) r
30 rmined chiefly by the autecology of species, interspecific competition, and the diversity of resource
31 he trade-off between foraging efficiency and interspecific competition, and underline niche partition
32  from top-down control, leading to increased interspecific competition at the herbivore trophic level
33 erbivore species such that the potential for interspecific competition at this level was high.
34  argued about the commonness and strength of interspecific competition between insect herbivores, but
35 havioural interactions are key components of interspecific competition between predators, yet these a
36 -mediated and above-ground intraspecific and interspecific competition between two species of Limnant
37         Thus coexistence is promoted by weak interspecific competition but there is a tension between
38 ngth of additive and non-additive intra- and interspecific competition by manipulating densities of a
39 ta from a wide range of ecosystems show that interspecific competition can drive variation in ecologi
40                      Yet, whether intra- and interspecific competition can have non-additive effects
41 actions between species-shared infection and interspecific competition-combine to determine community
42 y shows how ecology can confound taxonomy if interspecific competition constrains size diversificatio
43  particular host behaviours, cross-immunity, interspecific competition) could be affected by traits t
44                      We conclude that either interspecific competition does not affect the sexual siz
45 pts to adjust this paradigm, suggesting that interspecific competition for food is probably less impo
46 70s and early 1980s led to the paradigm that interspecific competition for limited seed resources is
47                                              Interspecific competition for resources does occur, but
48 istently influenced dynamics in systems with interspecific competition for the entire duration of the
49 ment of the relative strengths of intra- and interspecific competition has increased in recent years
50                             The intensity of interspecific competition, hindering enhanced dimorphism
51                                              Interspecific competition, however, is thought to limit
52 re precise form, the higher the intensity of interspecific competition in an assemblage of species, t
53 r guild is a poor proxy for the intensity of interspecific competition in insular assemblages.
54                                      Intense interspecific competition in its native Argentina constr
55 nomists and likely reflects uniquely intense interspecific competition in the East African carnivore
56     Aedes aegypti was negatively affected by interspecific competition in the wet season.
57 ds and assessed the evidence for the role of interspecific competition in these displacements.
58                                We found that interspecific competition increased selection on growth
59           Non-additive effects of intra- and interspecific competition influenced some response varia
60 size suggests that character displacement or interspecific competition is not responsible for these p
61           Ecologists have proposed that when interspecific competition is reduced, competition within
62  support the pathogen, support it jointly if interspecific competition is relatively weak, interspeci
63  is linked to the species-level pattern that interspecific competition led to most frequent extinctio
64 ulse of populations that are challenged with interspecific competition may result in a multigeneratio
65 udy of plant-insect interactions, dispersal, interspecific competition, predator-prey interactions, a
66  the extent to which this plasticity affects interspecific competition remains unclear.
67                                              Interspecific competition significantly increased rates
68  declines in food availability and increased interspecific competition to facilitate first access to
69 cies, and few observed comparisons indicated interspecific competition was an important factor in pre
70 loying some well-known general properties of interspecific competition, we elaborate a theoretical fr
71 s: whether invasion will result in increased interspecific competition, which would result in negativ
72  guarding the burial site due to the risk of interspecific competition; while dead conspecifics, rega
73 edundant species, suggesting that increasing interspecific competition with decreasing productivity r
74 ll groups along the gradient and manipulated interspecific competition with flies by heating carcasse
75    Moreover, shrub facilitation mediates the interspecific competition within the associated annual c

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。