ライフサイエンスコーパス: interventional radiology

1 beta blocker therapy, injection therapy, and interventional radiology.

2 nd shows potential for real-time tracking in interventional radiology.

3 re possibilities of image-guided surgery and interventional radiology.

4 efit from training in nonvascular aspects of interventional radiology.

5 rformed an identical year-long fellowship in interventional radiology.

6 nt advances in digital, cross-sectional, and interventional radiology.

7 resonance imaging, computed tomography, and interventional radiology.

8 members of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.

9 heir male peers but were underrepresented in interventional radiology (2% vs 13%, P < .001) and neuro

10 %, P < 0.05) followed by endoscopy (76%) and interventional radiology (50%) and improved over time (7

11 ting two rapidly advancing scientific fields-interventional radiology and nanotechnology.

12 ntegrated fellowship in vascular surgery and interventional radiology and now report their interim re

13 s analyzed records of cases performed by all interventional radiology and vascular surgery fellows fr

14 adiology, neurosurgery,neurology, peripheral interventional radiology, and cardiology) lay claim to t

15 r MR imaging and 7%-15% per year for CT, US, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine, while th

16 uted tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, interventional radiology, and nuclear medicine; and (c)

17 The capabilities of interventional radiology are developing faster than perh

18 The evolution of modern interventional radiology began over half century ago wit

19 ve been significant advances in the field of interventional radiology both in terms of technology and

20 Interventional radiology can extend the capabilities of

21 es expertise from interventional cardiology, interventional radiology, cardiac surgery, cardiac imagi

22 s were evaluated according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guidelines.

23 al and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology collateral grading system) were

24 ucted of prospectively acquired data from an interventional radiology database and of individual elec

25 to October 1, 2010, were identified from an interventional radiology database.

26 for benign stenosis were identified from an interventional radiology database.

27 Patient was transferred to the interventional radiology department, where the fistula's

28 side nursing-based team with backup from the Interventional Radiology department.

29 prepared for exclusive use by the pediatric interventional radiology department.

30 and 29.9% of patients required percutaneous interventional radiology drainage after initial debridem

31 The attitudes of vascular surgery and interventional radiology faculty and fellows toward the

32 Vascular surgery and interventional radiology faculty members wanted addition

33 xceptional training for vascular surgery and interventional radiology fellows in all catheter-based t

34 Integration of vascular surgery and interventional radiology fellowships is feasible and is

35 The use of interventional radiology for elective caesarean sections

36 A therapy to 18 patients with OO referred to interventional radiology from other clinics primarily fr

37 (n = 478) in grade >/=3 fistula or need for interventional radiology-guided procedures.

38 essential between anesthesiology, obstetric, interventional radiology, gynecologic oncology, blood ba

39 Interventional radiology has been used in the last decad

40 The techniques involved in interventional radiology have found applications through

41 tional radiologist members of the Society of Interventional Radiology, including attending-level phys

42 The complete hospital and interventional radiology (IR) billing records for 49 pat

43 adiation risk in patients undergoing cardiac interventional radiology (IR) procedures.

44 (i.v.) nurses, with failures referred to the interventional radiology (IR) service.

45 The primary goal of radiation management in interventional radiology is to minimize the unnecessary

46 hospitals with interventional cardiology or interventional radiology laboratories took an electronic

47 Interventional radiology may reduce blood loss in these

48 tment modalities involve open procedures and interventional radiology methods (endovascular).

49 aging (n=114), ultrasonography (US) (n=921), interventional radiology (n=215), mammography (n=221), a

50 at the Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology of the Pomeranian Medical Unive

51 ence of and risk factors for needlesticks in interventional radiology physicians, as well as the atti

52 and urgent surgical treatment combined with interventional radiology played a decisive role in the f

53 Complications were recorded per Society of Interventional Radiology practice guidelines.

54 on and to compare demographics and different interventional radiology practices.

55 ients for conservative treatment, surgery or interventional radiology procedure.

56 Similar reoperation (both <1%), interventional radiology procedures (15% vs 19%; P = 0.1

57 analysis of data from the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures (RAD-IR) study was c

58 es to provide useful information for guiding interventional radiology procedures and localized therap

59 ticle also indicates the conditions in which interventional radiology procedures can be applied for t

60 As indications for interventional radiology procedures during pregnancy con

61 nts undergoing cardiac arrhythmia ablations, interventional radiology procedures, and extracorporeal

62 range from surgery to ablation with various interventional radiology procedures, and include both re

63 To evaluate the type and number of interventional radiology procedures, the authors analyze

64 ered when planning anesthetic management for interventional radiology procedures.

65 resonance imaging, computed tomography, and interventional radiology revealed associated adverse res

66 Interventional radiology's major identity problem will r

67 ty-eight of the 76 STFBs were removed in the interventional radiology section.

68 secutive patients who underwent FBD with our interventional radiology service (1999-2011) were review

69 herapeutic Neuroradiology (ASITN)/Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) collateral vessel grading

70 ssay, this technique was extrapolated to the interventional radiology suite and generated near real-t

71 the fetus for pregnant women working in the interventional radiology suite as long as proper monitor

72 t chemoembolization in a combined MR imaging-interventional radiology suite between February 2006 and

73 es to manipulate thymic function based on an interventional radiology technique for intrathymic injec

74 Interventional radiology techniques useful for treatment

75 t of these can be managed nonoperatively via interventional radiology techniques.

76 m the pulmonary artery postoperatively using interventional radiology techniques.

77 ced by a specialized team of PICC nurses and interventional radiology technologists in an angiography

78 In the light of these new developments in interventional radiology there is much research to be do

79 lty, female representation varies from 8.6% (interventional radiology) to 63.1% (breast imaging); car

80 To retrospectively analyze the outcomes of interventional radiology treatment of patients with hepa

81 d and discussed with indications of possible interventional radiology treatment.

82 d separately from the procedure) and that of interventional radiology (typically two-dimensional imag

83 raphy, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $41.92, $50.28, $112.32, $

84 raphy, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $65.06, $28.74, $20.95, $1

85 s, and dependence on innovation characterize interventional radiology, which will continue as the fie

86 Interventional radiology will maintain its role through

87 Damage control surgery and definitive interventional radiology will probably combine with more

88 This concept, by combining interventional radiology with molecular imaging, is aimi

89 motic complication requiring intervention or interventional radiology within 60 days of surgery.