ライフサイエンスコーパス: interviewer

1 after treatment started (assessed by blinded interviewers).

2 further probing did differ significantly by interviewer.

3 ctions and observing their behavior with the interviewer.

4 similar to how they interacted with a human interviewer.

5 out in participants' own homes by a trained interviewer.

6 w designed to be administered by trained lay interviewers.

7 rates from community samples assessed by lay interviewers.

8 d at baseline and follow-up by trained field interviewers.

9 t interviewers, and the response time of the interviewers.

10 were randomly selected and then assigned to interviewers.

11 f techniques available to forensic and other interviewers.

12 or at least 2 weeks as diagnosed by clinical interviewers.

13 wered questionnaires administered by trained interviewers.

14 tency amongst doctors and other nonclinician interviewers.

15 d with a structured questionnaire by trained interviewers about their experiences after the departure

16 Interviewer administered pretested structured questionna

17 Trained lay interviewers administered a modified version of the OCD

18 Trained interviewers administered a questionnaire obtaining info

19 Masked interviewers administered questionnaires by telephone be

20 Interviewers administered questionnaires containing ques

21 Nurse interviewers administered standard questionnaires to pat

22 Master's level clinical research interviewers administered the Diagnostic Interview Sched

23 Independent master's-level clinical research interviewers administered the National Crime Victimizati

24 Independent clinical research interviewers administered the National Institute of Ment

25 Master's level clinical research interviewers administered the PTSD module of the Diagnos

26 Trained interviewers administered two questionnaires to older ad

27 tary protein intake was assessed by using an interviewer-administered 108-item food-frequency questio

28 They also completed seven interviewer-administered 24-hour physical activity recal

29 Although the interviewer-administered AMPM performed somewhat better

30 )) were randomly assigned to either ACASI or interviewer-administered assessment at their second foll

31 randomly assigned to complete an ASA24 or an interviewer-administered Automated Multiple-Pass Method

32 An interviewer-administered bilingual questionnaire collect

33 a were collected in 1995 during two separate interviewer-administered computer-assisted interviews co

34 and vegetable consumption was assessed by an interviewer-administered diet history method.

35 questionnaires, were compared with a longer, interviewer-administered diet history.

36 the following: energy intake with the use of interviewer-administered dietary recalls and calculated

37 ake, the authors assessed the validity of an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire (F

38 tary habits were assessed with an in-person, interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire de

39 tment for these differences, patients in the interviewer-administered group had higher scores on scal

40 The interviewer-administered group was older, was more likel

41 ifferences between the self-administered and interviewer-administered groups were obtained from multi

42 t covariates was obtained through structured interviewer-administered in-person questionnaires, and u

43 Diet was assessed by an interviewer-administered quantitative food frequency que

44 Diet was assessed by a validated interviewer-administered quantitative food-frequency que

45 self-identified adult Latinos, underwent an interviewer-administered questionnaire and a complete oc

46 An interviewer-administered questionnaire assessed sociodem

47 t women with unknown HIV status completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire assessing their p

48 iratory conditions were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire from 1,226 women.

49 Pregnant women completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire on the usual diet

50 n New York county hospitals and completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire regarding lifesty

51 zed clinical examination and responded to an interviewer-administered questionnaire that collected cl

52 The pregnant women completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire that was validate

53 An interviewer-administered questionnaire was conducted to

54 An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to colle

55 From parentally reported history of wheeze (interviewer-administered questionnaire, age 3 and 5 year

56 sure information was derived from a detailed interviewer-administered questionnaire, and XRCC1 genoty

57 Subjects were invited to complete an interviewer-administered questionnaire, skin prick testi

58 phic and health data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

59 factors were assessed by using an in-person, interviewer-administered questionnaire.

60 ial risk factors was obtained by means of an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

61 ants from supplements were estimated with an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

62 Data were collected by using an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

63 ticipants provided responses to a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire.

64 Functional activities were assessed using an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

65 and physical activity were obtained from an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

66 feeding practices, were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire.

67 on on a range of activities was collected by interviewer-administered questionnaire.

68 ardized systemic and ocular examinations and interviewer-administered questionnaires for risk factor

69 ardized systemic and ocular examinations and interviewer-administered questionnaires for risk factor

70 andardized systemic and ocular examinations, interviewer-administered questionnaires, and blood inves

71 Diabetes history was assessed through interviewer-administered questionnaires.

72 CASI elicited more honest responses than did interviewer-administered questionnaires.

73 was conducted in 1996-1997 in two stages: an interviewer-administered survey followed by a clinical e

74 Interviewer-administered surveys collected information o

75 o self-administered surveys to assess HRQOL, interviewer-administered surveys were made available to

76 veys generally produce higher estimates than interviewer-administered surveys.

77 4) performs similarly enough to the standard interviewer-administered, Automated Multiple-Pass Method

78 ces using HRQOL as an outcome should include interviewer administration or risk a selection bias agai

79 With interviewer administration, this FFQ seems to be a valid

80 collection method, although yields varied by interviewer among self-collected samples (p = 0.02).

81 ted), except that DNA yields did not vary by interviewer and a larger fraction (10.2%) of samples con

82 ed for all generations by clinically trained interviewers and best-estimate diagnosis made blind to d

83 Convergent and discriminant validity between interviewers and clinicians was also strong.

84 In a second, independent sample, research interviewers and patients' treating clinicians were able

85 ion, from other teens in the study, from the interviewer, and from prior reports in the literature.

86 the eye gaze directed towards the different interviewers, and the response time of the interviewers.

87 Measurements: Interviewer- and self-administered versions of the TAPS

88 Results: Interviewer- and self-administered versions of the TAPS

89 y be associated with factors relating to the interviewer as well as the consulted family member.

90 A team of three interviewers asked 27 individuals (13 investigators and

91 Interview Schedule for Children version 2.3, interviewers assessed a randomly selected, stratified sa

92 e Diagnostic Interview Schedule, independent interviewers assessed a randomly selected, stratified sa

93 Trained interviewers assessed and recorded participant-reported

94 Trained interviewers assessed cognitive function by using the Sh

95 Trained interviewers assessed self-reported usual weekly caffein

96 nt (defined as a 10- to 12-point decrease in interviewer-assessed or self-reported symptoms).

97 intained through the 12-month follow-up: for interviewer-assessed PTSD (difference, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.6-

98 Main exposures were interviewer-assessed screen time (<2 h/day; 2 to <4 h/da

99 Interviewers assessing outcomes were blinded to treatmen

100 disease were evaluated by use of a standard interviewer-assisted questionnaire.

101 ed from computer-assisted questionnaires and interviewer-assisted questionnaires among participants o

102 naires were more likely than those receiving interviewer-assisted questionnaires to report smoking ma

103 first 190 participants underwent traditional interviewer-assisted questionnaires, whereas the remaini

104 rack house relative to respondents receiving interviewer-assisted questionnaires.

105 d a seven station four-minute model with one interviewer at each station and in Stream B a six statio

106 were administered by clinically experienced interviewers at 5 assessment points during a 15-year per

107 n in-person interview conducted by 2 trained interviewers at 9 sites in 7 counties in North Carolina.

108 racteristics were similar for the four study interviewers at the first follow-up.

109 complete assessments, administered by blind interviewers, at baseline, at the end of the interventio

110 d at five distinct 2-year follow-up waves by interviewers blind to all previously collected informati

111 ects were reassessed at 2, 4, and 6 years by interviewers blind to previously collected information.

112 Family psychiatric history was determined by interviewers blind to probands' diagnosis, with mothers

113 Randomized, interviewer-blind, clinical trial in an integrated healt

114 Outcomes were assessed by interviewers blinded to participant allocation using loc

115 Interviewers, blinded to the treatment given, collected

116 Blinded interviewers called caregivers within 2 weeks to inquire

117 Clinicians and independent interviewers can reliably assess complex personality tra

118 Interviewers classified the mode of acquisition of the f

119 patient characteristics were described, the interviewers collected clinical history independently, a

120 Interviewers collected information by using a standardiz

121 From October 1996 to May 2001, interviewers collected information through a standardize

122 technique not only allowed us to bridge teen-interviewer communication barriers and develop shared te

123 identify the effect of specifically tailored interviewer communications training among other factors

124 provided identification codes for telephone interviewers completing BRFSS interviews in its public-u

125 Interviewers conducted personal interviews and took anth

126 Trained interviewers conducted structured in-person interviews.

127 Trained female interviewers conducted the interviews.

128 Prototype diagnoses from independent interviewers correlated on average r = .50 and showed su

129 the location of their knee pain, and trained interviewers could reliably record those locations.

130 n center, intervention group, age, race, and interviewer; covariates included study entry diastolic b

131 ialing confirms prior observations, although interviewer differences or changes in respondents or hou

132 physical activity was collected by bilingual interviewers during pregnancy.

133 ere a robot may have advantages over a human interviewer, e.g. in police, social services, or healthc

134 in a subset of the population that minimized interviewer effect.

135 here there are no sampling clusters in which interviewer effects could be captured.

136 estimation, and find evidence of substantial interviewer effects for 5 key estimates across states.

137 Adjustment for interviewer effects had no impact on the conclusions obt

138 and model-based approaches to incorporating interviewer effects in variance estimation, and find evi

139 iven these findings, examination of data for interviewer effects is advisable despite incorporation o

140 RFSS analysts should consider accounting for interviewer effects, and we provide example code enablin

141 Although interviewer error is widely recognized as an important s

142 vide another route for teachers, clinicians, interviewers, etc., to better understand their communica

143 th outcomes were assessed by self-report and interviewer evaluation.

144 The inventory was administered by an interviewer for children aged 5 through 7 years.

145 it dialing numbers were assigned to a second interviewer for recontacting within 4 months.

146 iews, we observed complete agreement between interviewers for diagnosing major depressive, manic, and

147 future work towards developing KASPAR as an 'interviewer' for young children in application areas whe

148 d on recorded interviews with dietitians and interviewers from the National Health and Nutrition Exam

149 The individual interviewer had an impact on the OR of up to 1.255 (95%

150 d pretested in both English and Spanish, and interviewers have been rigorously trained.

151 s to be used in epidemiologic studies by lay interviewers have, since the 1970s, attempted to operati

152 Trained nonmilitary interviewers identified risk factors for HIV-1 infection

153 tained from a patient survey by professional interviewers in addition to a comprehensive review of me

154 The interviewer inquired about demographic and socioeconomic

155 ood Leukemia Study during 2001-2006, trained interviewers inventoried residential pesticide products

156 An interviewer-led questionnaire administered to mothers pr

157 In the second study, independent interviewers made prototype diagnoses following either a

158 An interviewer, masked to dementia diagnosis, administered

159 ing environment through maternal reports and interviewer observations.

160 Although the impact of interviewers on survey measurement has been studied for

161 are responses to questions--asked by survey interviewers or medical personnel--such as, "How happy d

162 rrelated with the clinical experience of the interviewer (OR, 0.884; 95% CI, 0.831-0.938; P < 0.0001)

163 ne (1987-1989) and follow-up (1995-1997), an interviewer-phlebotomist visited each subject in his hom

164 ct personalized, in-depth interviews without interviewers; provide standardized data collection with

165 A third interviewer provided independent ratings of global adapt

166 lues, which were obtained by having a second interviewer rate a recording of the original interview.

167 ior therapy resulted in more rapid relief in interviewer-rated (vs both treatments, P = .03) and self

168 Interviewer-rated and self-report instruments were used

169 Primary outcomes included interviewer-rated anxiety severity (Hamilton Anxiety Rat

170 Secondary outcomes included masked interviewer-rated depression with the Hamilton Depressio

171 Interviewer-rated global disability was associated with

172 re (Brief Disability Questionnaire), and the interviewer-rated Social Disability Schedule.

173 ention reduced reports of thought intrusion, interviewer ratings of anxiety, and emotional distress a

174 , and canonical correlation analysis related interviewer ratings to the latent trait.

175 Trained interviewers recorded use of antihypertensive drugs.

176 Interviewers revisited them in order of decreasing sympt

177 effects of time, the subject's age, and the interviewer's sex were essentially null.

178 nder the direction of a nonmedically trained interviewer ("self-collection"); the other group (94 con

179 Of the 1769 physicians with whom an interviewer spoke, 1236 participated.

180 Telephone-based interviewers, statisticians, and chief investigators wer

181 uestions, 3) choosing a format acceptable to interviewers that maximizes accurate answering and recor

182 Diagnoses were made by two interviewers through use of the Structured Clinical Inte

183 on costs and logistic feasibility, including interviewer time and subject fatigue.

184 ned over two separate occasions by different interviewers to face-to-face and real-time interactive v

185 nomenclature's algorithms, 6) developing an interviewer training program that maximizes reliability,

186 s provided spot urine and blood samples, and interviewers transcribed nutrient information from their

187 hood-onset conduct disorder rated by trained interviewers using a standard diagnostic interview.

188 years old, were interviewed by trained study interviewers using a standardized, structured questionna

189 nd over, at five sites were evaluated by lay interviewers using the DIS (wave 1).

190 ted for current major depressive disorder by interviewers using the nonpatient edition of the Structu

191 works on psychological symptoms, wherein the interviewer variable was strongly related to the outcome

192 ged women (1982-1987), the authors evaluated interviewer variation in responses to different types of

193 redictors of depression, despite significant interviewer variation in the outcome and predictor varia

194 pes of questions, and assessed the impact of interviewer variation on inferences derived from study d

195 information exists documenting the impact of interviewer variation on study findings.

196 No interviewer variation was detected for questions concern

197 Interviewers visited all sampled addresses between Sept

198 Interviewers were blinded to the treatment condition.

199 ot masked to group allocation, but telephone interviewers were blinded.

200 reasons for overdiagnosis of OCD by the lay interviewers were inappropriate labeling of worries or c

201 Research interviewers were masked as to which patients were in th

202 Participants and independent interviewers were masked to group assignment (ie, they w

203 Participants and interviewers were masked to group assignment.

204 Caregivers and interviewers were not masked.

205 The interviewers were unaware of what group the participants

206 Best judgment ratings were generated by an interviewer who administered the rating scales to patien

207 with personality disorders were assessed by interviewers who used a semistructured research intervie

208 s with personality disorders was assessed by interviewers who were blind to clinical diagnosis and wh

209 Interviewers who were blind to diagnosis administered st

210 mpled households were interviewed by trained interviewers with a structured questionnaire that was de

211 nistered telephonically by clinical research interviewers with extensive experience in the diagnosis

212 and data were collected by a team of female interviewers with secondary school education.