戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 inal epithelium, and are therefore the small intestinal stem cell.
2 hieved by Pol III inhibition specifically in intestinal stem cells.
3 n enteroblasts to control niche signaling to intestinal stem cells.
4 roy is produced specifically by fast-cycling intestinal stem cells.
5 monstrated that Hopx is a specific marker of intestinal stem cells.
6 ay reduces the proliferative capacity of the intestinal stem cells.
7 reported that Bmi1 is a potential marker for intestinal stem cells.
8  that TLR4 is expressed on the Lgr5-positive intestinal stem cells.
9 turnover based on the asymmetric division of intestinal stem cells.
10 diate, and cell-autonomous target of Sox2 in intestinal stem cells.
11 f APC in governing the homeostasis of normal intestinal stem cells.
12 in starvation) and assayed both germline and intestinal stem cells.
13 fically, labels "classical" undifferentiated intestinal stem cells.
14 ssion of PUMA and p53 in the crypt cells and intestinal stem cells.
15 ich is required in germline, epithelial, and intestinal stem cells.
16 te from a rare population of putative CD133+ intestinal stem cells.
17 and has been implicated in the regulation of intestinal stem cells.
18 ne stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, and intestinal stem cells.
19 se Akt and colocalizes with activated Akt in intestinal stem cells.
20 , but little is known about its functions in intestinal stem cells.
21 olic and proliferative signals in Drosophila intestinal stem cells.
22 ed changes in 5-mC during differentiation of intestinal stem cells.
23 regulator of postnatal epigenetic changes in intestinal stem cells.
24                      How the niche regulates intestinal stem cell activity in both mammals and flies
25 5 reporter mice, we show that maintenance of intestinal stem cells after damage is severely impaired
26 uiescence, proliferation and regeneration of intestinal stem cells after injury.
27 s issue, O'Brien et al. demonstrate that fly intestinal stem cells alter their division patterns in r
28 g to groups of immune response, ion channel, intestinal stem cell and other growth signaling regulato
29 f TNF signaling in Wnt/beta-catenin-mediated intestinal stem cell and progenitor cell expansion in CD
30                              In CD patients, intestinal stem cell and progenitor cell Wnt/beta-cateni
31  formation caused by loss of Apc and control intestinal stem cell and secretory cell homeostasis by d
32        Clevers and his associates identified intestinal stem cells and established conditions to grow
33 ally overexpressed in colon cancer cells and intestinal stem cells and is required for colon cancer c
34 ioning of the H3K79me2 mark in Lgr5(+) mouse intestinal stem cells and mature intestinal villus epith
35  small intestinal crypts, which contain both intestinal stem cells and mature villus cells.
36 e the impact of conditional Hey2 deletion on intestinal stem cells and microvascular compartment radi
37 ration, leading to hyperplasia, expansion of intestinal stem cells and niche cells, and formation of
38 ellular matrix to support in vitro growth of intestinal stem cells and organoids.
39 ted receptor delta (PPAR-delta) signature in intestinal stem cells and progenitor cells (non-intestin
40 plitude oscillations of circadian rhythms in intestinal stem cells and progenitor cells, indicating a
41      Transcript profiles in isolated LGR5(+) intestinal stem cells and secretory and absorptive proge
42 signaling is required for the maintenance of intestinal stem cells and self-renewal of the intestinal
43 tionship between proliferative and quiescent intestinal stem cells and support a model in which intes
44 ates the DNA damage response and survival of intestinal stem cells and support the concept that pharm
45 tion of the base-resolution DNA methylome in intestinal stem cells and their differentiated descendan
46 tect extensive dynamic epigenetic changes in intestinal stem cells and their progeny during the suckl
47  study the effect of TGF-beta on the Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells and their progeny in intestinal ad
48 rogenitor cell populations to maintain adult intestinal stem cells and to regulate cell fate choice t
49 ates an isoform-specific function of CD44 in intestinal stem cells and tumorigenesis.
50 estinal stem cells and progenitor cells (non-intestinal stem cells), and pharmacological activation o
51                DVL signals in the nucleus of intestinal stem cells, and its forced expression leads t
52      The differences between fetal and adult intestinal stem cells are unclear, and understanding thi
53 PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/p53 axis in the intestinal stem cells as a novel molecular mechanism of
54 etion of miR-34a/b/c increased the number of intestinal stem cells as well as Paneth and Goblet cells
55 trands, and this appears to be a property of intestinal stem cells because they are extremely sensiti
56 c stem cell activity, the sex differences in intestinal stem cell behaviour arise from intrinsic mech
57 summarize our current understanding of small intestinal stem cell biology and the current tools avail
58  identified both proliferative and quiescent intestinal stem cells, but the molecular circuitry contr
59 stinal tissues of mice, PRC2 maintains small intestinal stem cells by promoting proliferation and pre
60         Notch signaling controls the fate of intestinal stem cells by regulating the expression of He
61 dy was to explore the hypothesis that viable intestinal stem cells can be isolated as a side populati
62 d it in CaCo-2 cells, a human cell line with intestinal stem cell characteristics.
63 nthase 2 (Ptgs2) is repositioned next to the intestinal stem cell compartment where local production
64 we demonstrate that MSI2 is expressed in the intestinal stem cell compartment, that its expression is
65 g a potential role of Cftr in regulating the intestinal stem cell compartment.
66 ration and preventing differentiation in the intestinal stem cell compartment.
67  mice displayed complete loss of Lgr5+/Olfm4+intestinal stem cells, compromised Wnt signaling and imp
68 form mature human intestinal epithelium with intestinal stem cells contributing to the crypt-villus a
69 diation tissue damage, recent studies showed intestinal stem cell damage is conditionally linked to c
70     After gamma-irradiation, the survival of intestinal stem cells decreased significantly in APOBEC-
71                                        Human intestinal stem cell-derived enteroid monolayers co-cult
72 ors associated with the endocrine lineage of intestinal stem cell development.
73 mportant gene regulation cascade controlling intestinal stem cell development.
74                     Thus, apparently similar intestinal stem cells differ regionally in cell producti
75 o not decrease as descendants of multipotent intestinal stem cells differentiate.
76 ion and lineage-generating capacity of small intestinal stem cells, disrupting the supply of differen
77 ever, the molecular mechanisms that regulate intestinal stem cell division and epithelial homeostasis
78 al center protein kinase Misshapen restricts intestinal stem cell division by repressing the expressi
79  growth factors necessary to replicate adult intestinal stem cell division has led to the establishme
80 n stem cell progeny (ECs and EBs) stimulates intestinal stem cell division through modulation of JAK/
81  (neuroblast) and adult (female germline and intestinal stem cell) Drosophila melanogaster asymmetric
82 lly occurring mutations in Drosophila midgut intestinal stem cells during aging and find high-frequen
83 1) is up-regulated in and required for adult intestinal stem cells during metamorphosis.
84 nvolved in the T3-induced formation of adult intestinal stem cells during metamorphosis.
85 e developed a technique to follow changes in intestinal stem cell dynamics in human epithelial tissue
86       Clonal descendants of Cdx2(null) small intestinal stem cells enter the gastric differentiation
87 blet and Paneth cell function, ion channels, intestinal stem cells, epidermal growth factor receptor
88              The cells expressed markers for intestinal stem cells, epithelial cells, and mature ente
89 reports that genetic removal of YAP enhances intestinal stem cell expansion and regeneration.
90  Zeilstra et al. report studies showing that intestinal stem cells express a specific CD44 variant th
91  has suboptimal Wnt pathway activity causing intestinal stem cell failure and that enhanced expressio
92                This result demonstrates that intestinal stem cells form an equipotent population in w
93                 Our data indicate that human intestinal stem cells form de novo during development.
94       EVI and MDS/EVI are required for adult intestinal stem cell formation during postembryonic vert
95 clooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 protect the intestinal stem cells from IR.
96                                          The intestinal stem cell fuels the highest rate of tissue tu
97  Moreover, these mice show signs of impaired intestinal stem cell function.
98 ch pathway as a key regulator of gastric and intestinal stem cell function.
99 stablish that the loss of DNA methylation at intestinal stem cell gene enhancers causes inappropriate
100 anscription factor that controls the Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cell gene expression program.
101              In addition to the Lgr5 marker, intestinal stem cells have been associated with other ma
102 d interaction of proliferating and quiescent intestinal stem cells have been debated since their disc
103 s to model signals definitively that control intestinal stem cells have been difficult because of a l
104                             Although Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells have been expanded in vitro as org
105 mpact on understanding the regulation of the intestinal stem cell hierarchy during homeostasis and in
106 our understanding of metabolic regulation in intestinal stem cell homeostasis.
107 vious Wnt pathway activity, that perpetuates intestinal stem cell identity in response to Wnt/R-spond
108 (a Wnt target gene) is a master regulator of intestinal stem cell identity.
109  of PARP-1 in the in vivo damage response of intestinal stem cells in crypts of PARP-1-/- and control
110               For the first time mouse small intestinal stem cells in intact live crypts are identifi
111 dly, Wnt3 was dispensable for maintenance of intestinal stem cells in mice, indicating a redundancy o
112 port that Lin-28 is highly enriched in adult intestinal stem cells in the Drosophila intestine.
113 sh that PARP-1 acts as a survival factor for intestinal stem cells in vivo and suggest a functional l
114              In the adult Drosophila midgut, intestinal stem cells interpret a nutrient cue to "break
115 ll populations have been reported to possess intestinal stem cell (ISC) activity during homeostasis a
116  Ca(2+) signalling as a central regulator of intestinal stem cell (ISC) activity in Drosophila.
117  of WNT ligands but their origin and role in intestinal stem cell (ISC) and epithelial repair remains
118                                              Intestinal stem cell (ISC) are believed to contribute to
119 ale undergoes major deterioration, driven by intestinal stem cell (ISC) division, while lower ISC act
120                     This is characterized by intestinal stem cell (ISC) expansion as shown by an inos
121 nits of the Osa-containing complex result in intestinal stem cell (ISC) expansion as well as enteroen
122 e to tissue damage is crucial in maintaining intestinal stem cell (ISC) homeostasis.
123 quired for the initiation and maintenance of intestinal stem cell (ISC) hyperproliferation following
124 JAK/STAT signaling pathway in the Drosophila intestinal stem cell (ISC) lineage.
125 ne silencing and activation are critical for intestinal stem cell (ISC) maintenance and differentiati
126                       Both are necessary for intestinal stem cell (ISC) maintenance, and R-spondins a
127             We apply this model to the adult intestinal stem cell (ISC) of Drosophila, the fate of wh
128                           Although quiescent intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations have been describ
129 apid advance in identifying the once elusive intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations that fuel the con
130 ve (Bmi1(+)) lineages, representing putative intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations, were present in
131 or stress and it is exclusively required for intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation during tissue r
132 hat Src is necessary and sufficient to drive intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation during tissue s
133 ) signaling in enteroblasts (EBs) to promote intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation in Drosophila m
134 naling is also involved in the modulation of intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation in response to
135 ndocrine cells acting as local regulators of intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation through modulat
136          Wnt/beta-catenin signaling controls intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation, and is aberran
137 ease rates of Drosophila melanogaster midgut intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation, it is largely
138  be both necessary and sufficient to trigger intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation.
139 oupled receptor 5 (Lgr5)(+) cells within the intestinal stem cell (ISC) region.
140 ium-derived BMP serves as a niche signal for intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal in Drosophila ad
141 t RAC1 is required for expansion of the LGR5 intestinal stem cell (ISC) signature, progenitor hyperpr
142 roendocrine (EE) cells are generated from an intestinal stem cell (ISC).
143 th cells, a key constituent of the mammalian intestinal stem-cell (ISC) niche, augment stem-cell func
144 ized that genes shared between NF-kappaB and intestinal stem cell (ISCs) signatures might identify co
145 ells: slow cycling, injury-resistant reserve intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and actively proliferative
146 pent enterocytes (ECs) relies on division of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and differentiation of thei
147     Little is known about the maintenance of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and progenitors during immu
148 idgut, the Snail homolog Esg is expressed in intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and their transient undiffe
149                               In Drosophila, intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are essential for homeostat
150                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are maintained by a niche m
151                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are regulated by the mesenc
152                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are the only cells in the a
153 testinal epithelium, but specific effects on intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are undefined.
154    However, the population of putative small intestinal stem cells (ISCs) at position +4 from the cry
155      We address the mechanism by which adult intestinal stem cells (ISCs) become localized to the bas
156 ds, Dpp and Gbb, which drive an expansion of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) by promoting their symmetri
157 t, the surrounding visceral muscle maintains intestinal stem cells (ISCs) by stimulating Wingless (Wg
158                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) drive small intestinal epit
159                                We found that intestinal stem cells (ISCs) expressed Slit2 and its sin
160                                   Drosophila intestinal stem cells (ISCs) generate enterocytes (ECs)
161                            Identification of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) has relied heavily on the u
162                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in the adult Drosophila mel
163                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in the adult Drosophila mid
164                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in the adult Drosophila mid
165                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in the Drosophila adult mid
166   Here, we show that after severe depletion, intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in the Drosophila midgut ar
167                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in the Drosophila posterior
168  cells and quiescent Bmi1(+) cells behave as intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in vivo.
169       Here, we show that mTORC1 signaling in intestinal stem cells (ISCs) is instead upregulated duri
170                        Rapidly cycling LGR5+ intestinal stem cells (ISCs) located at the base of cryp
171                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) maintain the midgut epithel
172                      Drosophila adult midgut intestinal stem cells (ISCs) maintain tissue homeostasis
173 cellular cues that regulate the apoptosis of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) remain incompletely underst
174 egulating the proliferation and apoptosis of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) remain incompletely underst
175 adult Drosophila midgut contains multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs) scattered along its basemen
176             Gut homeostasis is maintained by intestinal stem cells (ISCs) that divide to replenish th
177 is maintained by a population of multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs) that resides in epithelial
178                                              Intestinal stem cells (ISCs) undergo symmetric division
179 romatin remodelling proteins are enriched in intestinal stem cells (ISCs), although their function in
180 here, the adult Drosophila midgut, including intestinal stem cells (ISCs), develops from adult midgut
181 ich is fueled by proliferative crypt Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
182 issues in Drosophila melanogaster, including intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
183 and the current tools available for studying intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
184 gut is constantly replenished by multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
185 d continuous regeneration supported by crypt intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
186 by a population of rapidly cycling (Lgr5(+)) intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
187 hat arise from a population of self-renewing intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
188 rease in the number of crypts, which contain intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
189 y replenished by a distinctive population of intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
190 istance in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
191                Lgr5 marks mitotically active intestinal stem cells (ISCs).
192 rrent concept is that there are two pools of intestinal stem cells (ISCs): an actively cycling pool t
193 The adult Drosophila midgut is maintained by intestinal stem cells (ISCs); however, how they are esta
194 ted by Wnt signaling and highly expressed by intestinal stem cells [ISCs] and adenomas) affects intes
195 on of Yorkie, the Yap1 oncogene ortholog, in intestinal stem cells leads to wasting of the ovary, fat
196         These cells derive from the columnar intestinal stem cell located at position 0 and the trans
197                                              Intestinal stem cells, located at the base of the intest
198 se that both these cell types represent true intestinal stem cells maintained in different states (qu
199 nt self renewal and differentiation of adult intestinal stem cells maintains a functional intestinal
200 AM10 deletion on cell fate specification and intestinal stem cell maintenance.
201                       Although essential for intestinal stem-cell maintenance and adenoma formation,
202                Identification of Lgr5 as the intestinal stem cell marker as well as the growth factor
203 (LRIG1) is a pan-ErbB negative regulator and intestinal stem cell marker down-regulated in many malig
204        These experiments identify Bmi1 as an intestinal stem cell marker in vivo.
205                                          The intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5 is identified as a cand
206                                          The intestinal stem cell marker lgr5 was identified as a nov
207 nd fluorescent in situ hybridization for the intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5, we demonstrate that TL
208 ule-associated kinase DCAMKL-1 is a putative intestinal stem cell marker that is expressed in Apc(Min
209 ning G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), an intestinal stem cell marker, is known to exhibit tumor s
210     Olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4) has emerged as an intestinal stem-cell marker, but its biological function
211 e expression of cell lineage markers and the intestinal stem-cell marker, Musashi-1.
212 n nuclear localization, and induction of the intestinal stem cell markers Lgr5 and Musashi-1 and the
213 ve LIN28B expression increases expression of intestinal stem cell markers LGR5 and PROM1 in the prese
214 rypt-like proliferative zones that expressed intestinal stem cell markers.
215 re, we examined the effect of disrupting the intestinal stem cell niche by inducible deletion of the
216                                          The intestinal stem cell niche provides cues that actively m
217 pmental signaling pathways suggests that the intestinal stem cell niche regulates the activity of the
218 al function, PCs serve as a component of the intestinal stem cell niche.
219 66 is highly expressed within the endogenous intestinal stem cell niche.
220 tinal mucosal morphogenesis, we consider the intestinal stem cell niche.
221 stinal tumor suppressor by regulation of the intestinal stem cell niche.
222 ells completely or permanently; defining the intestinal stem-cell niche requires clarity with respect
223 pletely rescues lin-28-associated defects in intestinal stem cell number and division pattern.
224 lt in increased crypt cell proliferation and intestinal stem cell number.
225 ic population of adult midgut organ-boundary intestinal stem cells (OB-ISCs) is regulated by the neig
226 augments the numbers and function of Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells of the mammalian intestine.
227 cription factors that might recruit Mtgr1 in intestinal stem cells or progenitor cells and found that
228 anding the regulatory mechanisms controlling intestinal stem cell physiology is of great importance.
229                     In particular, the small intestinal stem cell populations identified as the crypt
230 l fate specification, and the maintenance of intestinal stem cell/progenitor populations.
231 ap polypeptide levels are necessary to drive intestinal stem cell proliferation.
232 cellent template to study how alterations in intestinal stem cells promote trans-differentiation, cry
233 Surprisingly, of the cells analyzed only the intestinal stem cell protects itself by segregating HNE
234 inal stem cells and support a model in which intestinal stem cell quiescence is maintained by calibra
235  that the activation of TLR4 directly on the intestinal stem cells regulates their ability to prolife
236 he EPHB3 gene that integrates input from the intestinal stem-cell regulator achaete-scute family basi
237 nonical WNT signaling pathway is crucial for intestinal stem cell renewal and aberrant WNT signaling
238 he transcription factor YY1 is essential for intestinal stem cell renewal.
239 e known neutral-drift dynamics that describe intestinal stem cell replacement, we quantify the number
240                                              Intestinal stem cells require Wnt signaling, but the und
241                                              Intestinal stem cells reside at the base of the crypt, w
242 cally maintain self-renewal of mouse Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells, resulting in nearly homogeneous c
243  progenitors were well demarcated in LGR5(+) intestinal stem cells, revealing early priming of chroma
244 ng evidence suggests that hyperproliferating intestinal stem cells (SCs) and progenitors drive cancer
245     We investigated the role of PGs in mouse intestinal stem cell survival and proliferation followin
246                 Lipopolysaccharide increases intestinal stem cell survival through apobec-1-mediated
247 length by superficially similar, multipotent intestinal stem cells that generate new enterocytes and
248  that are rapidly and continually renewed by intestinal stem cells that reside near the base of the c
249 any recent advances regarding the biology of intestinal stem cells, the field has been hampered signi
250   Since the discovery of LGR5 as a marker of intestinal stem cells, the field has developed explosive
251 BMP signaling may control the duplication of intestinal stem cells, thereby preventing crypt fission
252 paired Wnt signaling and concomitant loss of intestinal stem cells, this phenotype was not reversed u
253 d find that differentiation of mouse colonic intestinal stem cells to intestinal epithelium is not as
254 e (EGFR/MAPK) signalling triggers Drosophila intestinal stem cells to produce enteroblasts (EBs) and
255 ing agent temozolomide caused MSH2-deficient intestinal stem cells to proliferate more rapidly than w
256 ic reversals of the sexual identity of adult intestinal stem cells uncovers the key role this identit
257 ion and consequent cellular proliferation in intestinal stem cells upon initial ingestion into the mu
258 Here we establish the short-term dynamics of intestinal stem cells using the novel approach of contin
259    Because Wnt signaling plays a key role in intestinal stem cells, we analyzed the effects of Wnt si
260 -regulated during the formation of the adult intestinal stem cells, we cloned the Xenopus PRMT1 promo
261                           The MSH2-deficient intestinal stem cells were able to colonize the intestin
262 gely intact in Aim2-deficient mice; however, intestinal stem cells were prone to uncontrolled prolife
263 lipopolysaccharide before gamma-irradiation, intestinal stem cells were protected by marked increases
264 ary sulindac induced apoptosis to remove the intestinal stem cells with nuclear or phosphorylated bet
265             The identification of Drosophila intestinal stem cells with striking similarities to thei
266 od is critical for epigenetic development of intestinal stem cells, with potential important implicat
267 emonstrate the increased radiosensitivity of intestinal stem cells within the crypts in IL-7R alpha(-
268 ductal epithelia, which are connected to the intestinal stem-cell zone.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top