コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 inal epithelium, and are therefore the small intestinal stem cell.
2 hieved by Pol III inhibition specifically in intestinal stem cells.
3 n enteroblasts to control niche signaling to intestinal stem cells.
4 roy is produced specifically by fast-cycling intestinal stem cells.
5 monstrated that Hopx is a specific marker of intestinal stem cells.
6 ay reduces the proliferative capacity of the intestinal stem cells.
7 reported that Bmi1 is a potential marker for intestinal stem cells.
8 that TLR4 is expressed on the Lgr5-positive intestinal stem cells.
9 turnover based on the asymmetric division of intestinal stem cells.
10 diate, and cell-autonomous target of Sox2 in intestinal stem cells.
11 f APC in governing the homeostasis of normal intestinal stem cells.
12 in starvation) and assayed both germline and intestinal stem cells.
13 fically, labels "classical" undifferentiated intestinal stem cells.
14 ssion of PUMA and p53 in the crypt cells and intestinal stem cells.
15 ich is required in germline, epithelial, and intestinal stem cells.
16 te from a rare population of putative CD133+ intestinal stem cells.
17 and has been implicated in the regulation of intestinal stem cells.
18 ne stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, and intestinal stem cells.
19 se Akt and colocalizes with activated Akt in intestinal stem cells.
20 , but little is known about its functions in intestinal stem cells.
21 olic and proliferative signals in Drosophila intestinal stem cells.
22 ed changes in 5-mC during differentiation of intestinal stem cells.
23 regulator of postnatal epigenetic changes in intestinal stem cells.
25 5 reporter mice, we show that maintenance of intestinal stem cells after damage is severely impaired
27 s issue, O'Brien et al. demonstrate that fly intestinal stem cells alter their division patterns in r
28 g to groups of immune response, ion channel, intestinal stem cell and other growth signaling regulato
29 f TNF signaling in Wnt/beta-catenin-mediated intestinal stem cell and progenitor cell expansion in CD
31 formation caused by loss of Apc and control intestinal stem cell and secretory cell homeostasis by d
33 ally overexpressed in colon cancer cells and intestinal stem cells and is required for colon cancer c
34 ioning of the H3K79me2 mark in Lgr5(+) mouse intestinal stem cells and mature intestinal villus epith
36 e the impact of conditional Hey2 deletion on intestinal stem cells and microvascular compartment radi
37 ration, leading to hyperplasia, expansion of intestinal stem cells and niche cells, and formation of
39 ted receptor delta (PPAR-delta) signature in intestinal stem cells and progenitor cells (non-intestin
40 plitude oscillations of circadian rhythms in intestinal stem cells and progenitor cells, indicating a
42 signaling is required for the maintenance of intestinal stem cells and self-renewal of the intestinal
43 tionship between proliferative and quiescent intestinal stem cells and support a model in which intes
44 ates the DNA damage response and survival of intestinal stem cells and support the concept that pharm
45 tion of the base-resolution DNA methylome in intestinal stem cells and their differentiated descendan
46 tect extensive dynamic epigenetic changes in intestinal stem cells and their progeny during the suckl
47 study the effect of TGF-beta on the Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells and their progeny in intestinal ad
48 rogenitor cell populations to maintain adult intestinal stem cells and to regulate cell fate choice t
50 estinal stem cells and progenitor cells (non-intestinal stem cells), and pharmacological activation o
53 PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/p53 axis in the intestinal stem cells as a novel molecular mechanism of
54 etion of miR-34a/b/c increased the number of intestinal stem cells as well as Paneth and Goblet cells
55 trands, and this appears to be a property of intestinal stem cells because they are extremely sensiti
56 c stem cell activity, the sex differences in intestinal stem cell behaviour arise from intrinsic mech
57 summarize our current understanding of small intestinal stem cell biology and the current tools avail
58 identified both proliferative and quiescent intestinal stem cells, but the molecular circuitry contr
59 stinal tissues of mice, PRC2 maintains small intestinal stem cells by promoting proliferation and pre
61 dy was to explore the hypothesis that viable intestinal stem cells can be isolated as a side populati
63 nthase 2 (Ptgs2) is repositioned next to the intestinal stem cell compartment where local production
64 we demonstrate that MSI2 is expressed in the intestinal stem cell compartment, that its expression is
67 mice displayed complete loss of Lgr5+/Olfm4+intestinal stem cells, compromised Wnt signaling and imp
68 form mature human intestinal epithelium with intestinal stem cells contributing to the crypt-villus a
69 diation tissue damage, recent studies showed intestinal stem cell damage is conditionally linked to c
70 After gamma-irradiation, the survival of intestinal stem cells decreased significantly in APOBEC-
76 ion and lineage-generating capacity of small intestinal stem cells, disrupting the supply of differen
77 ever, the molecular mechanisms that regulate intestinal stem cell division and epithelial homeostasis
78 al center protein kinase Misshapen restricts intestinal stem cell division by repressing the expressi
79 growth factors necessary to replicate adult intestinal stem cell division has led to the establishme
80 n stem cell progeny (ECs and EBs) stimulates intestinal stem cell division through modulation of JAK/
81 (neuroblast) and adult (female germline and intestinal stem cell) Drosophila melanogaster asymmetric
82 lly occurring mutations in Drosophila midgut intestinal stem cells during aging and find high-frequen
85 e developed a technique to follow changes in intestinal stem cell dynamics in human epithelial tissue
87 blet and Paneth cell function, ion channels, intestinal stem cells, epidermal growth factor receptor
90 Zeilstra et al. report studies showing that intestinal stem cells express a specific CD44 variant th
91 has suboptimal Wnt pathway activity causing intestinal stem cell failure and that enhanced expressio
99 stablish that the loss of DNA methylation at intestinal stem cell gene enhancers causes inappropriate
102 d interaction of proliferating and quiescent intestinal stem cells have been debated since their disc
103 s to model signals definitively that control intestinal stem cells have been difficult because of a l
105 mpact on understanding the regulation of the intestinal stem cell hierarchy during homeostasis and in
107 vious Wnt pathway activity, that perpetuates intestinal stem cell identity in response to Wnt/R-spond
109 of PARP-1 in the in vivo damage response of intestinal stem cells in crypts of PARP-1-/- and control
111 dly, Wnt3 was dispensable for maintenance of intestinal stem cells in mice, indicating a redundancy o
113 sh that PARP-1 acts as a survival factor for intestinal stem cells in vivo and suggest a functional l
115 ll populations have been reported to possess intestinal stem cell (ISC) activity during homeostasis a
117 of WNT ligands but their origin and role in intestinal stem cell (ISC) and epithelial repair remains
119 ale undergoes major deterioration, driven by intestinal stem cell (ISC) division, while lower ISC act
121 nits of the Osa-containing complex result in intestinal stem cell (ISC) expansion as well as enteroen
123 quired for the initiation and maintenance of intestinal stem cell (ISC) hyperproliferation following
125 ne silencing and activation are critical for intestinal stem cell (ISC) maintenance and differentiati
129 apid advance in identifying the once elusive intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations that fuel the con
130 ve (Bmi1(+)) lineages, representing putative intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations, were present in
131 or stress and it is exclusively required for intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation during tissue r
132 hat Src is necessary and sufficient to drive intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation during tissue s
133 ) signaling in enteroblasts (EBs) to promote intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation in Drosophila m
134 naling is also involved in the modulation of intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation in response to
135 ndocrine cells acting as local regulators of intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation through modulat
137 ease rates of Drosophila melanogaster midgut intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation, it is largely
140 ium-derived BMP serves as a niche signal for intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal in Drosophila ad
141 t RAC1 is required for expansion of the LGR5 intestinal stem cell (ISC) signature, progenitor hyperpr
143 th cells, a key constituent of the mammalian intestinal stem-cell (ISC) niche, augment stem-cell func
144 ized that genes shared between NF-kappaB and intestinal stem cell (ISCs) signatures might identify co
145 ells: slow cycling, injury-resistant reserve intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and actively proliferative
146 pent enterocytes (ECs) relies on division of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and differentiation of thei
147 Little is known about the maintenance of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and progenitors during immu
148 idgut, the Snail homolog Esg is expressed in intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and their transient undiffe
154 However, the population of putative small intestinal stem cells (ISCs) at position +4 from the cry
155 We address the mechanism by which adult intestinal stem cells (ISCs) become localized to the bas
156 ds, Dpp and Gbb, which drive an expansion of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) by promoting their symmetri
157 t, the surrounding visceral muscle maintains intestinal stem cells (ISCs) by stimulating Wingless (Wg
166 Here, we show that after severe depletion, intestinal stem cells (ISCs) in the Drosophila midgut ar
173 cellular cues that regulate the apoptosis of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) remain incompletely underst
174 egulating the proliferation and apoptosis of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) remain incompletely underst
175 adult Drosophila midgut contains multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs) scattered along its basemen
177 is maintained by a population of multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs) that resides in epithelial
179 romatin remodelling proteins are enriched in intestinal stem cells (ISCs), although their function in
180 here, the adult Drosophila midgut, including intestinal stem cells (ISCs), develops from adult midgut
192 rrent concept is that there are two pools of intestinal stem cells (ISCs): an actively cycling pool t
193 The adult Drosophila midgut is maintained by intestinal stem cells (ISCs); however, how they are esta
194 ted by Wnt signaling and highly expressed by intestinal stem cells [ISCs] and adenomas) affects intes
195 on of Yorkie, the Yap1 oncogene ortholog, in intestinal stem cells leads to wasting of the ovary, fat
198 se that both these cell types represent true intestinal stem cells maintained in different states (qu
199 nt self renewal and differentiation of adult intestinal stem cells maintains a functional intestinal
203 (LRIG1) is a pan-ErbB negative regulator and intestinal stem cell marker down-regulated in many malig
207 nd fluorescent in situ hybridization for the intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5, we demonstrate that TL
208 ule-associated kinase DCAMKL-1 is a putative intestinal stem cell marker that is expressed in Apc(Min
209 ning G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), an intestinal stem cell marker, is known to exhibit tumor s
210 Olfactomedin 4 (OLFM4) has emerged as an intestinal stem-cell marker, but its biological function
212 n nuclear localization, and induction of the intestinal stem cell markers Lgr5 and Musashi-1 and the
213 ve LIN28B expression increases expression of intestinal stem cell markers LGR5 and PROM1 in the prese
215 re, we examined the effect of disrupting the intestinal stem cell niche by inducible deletion of the
217 pmental signaling pathways suggests that the intestinal stem cell niche regulates the activity of the
222 ells completely or permanently; defining the intestinal stem-cell niche requires clarity with respect
225 ic population of adult midgut organ-boundary intestinal stem cells (OB-ISCs) is regulated by the neig
227 cription factors that might recruit Mtgr1 in intestinal stem cells or progenitor cells and found that
228 anding the regulatory mechanisms controlling intestinal stem cell physiology is of great importance.
232 cellent template to study how alterations in intestinal stem cells promote trans-differentiation, cry
233 Surprisingly, of the cells analyzed only the intestinal stem cell protects itself by segregating HNE
234 inal stem cells and support a model in which intestinal stem cell quiescence is maintained by calibra
235 that the activation of TLR4 directly on the intestinal stem cells regulates their ability to prolife
236 he EPHB3 gene that integrates input from the intestinal stem-cell regulator achaete-scute family basi
237 nonical WNT signaling pathway is crucial for intestinal stem cell renewal and aberrant WNT signaling
239 e known neutral-drift dynamics that describe intestinal stem cell replacement, we quantify the number
242 cally maintain self-renewal of mouse Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells, resulting in nearly homogeneous c
243 progenitors were well demarcated in LGR5(+) intestinal stem cells, revealing early priming of chroma
244 ng evidence suggests that hyperproliferating intestinal stem cells (SCs) and progenitors drive cancer
245 We investigated the role of PGs in mouse intestinal stem cell survival and proliferation followin
247 length by superficially similar, multipotent intestinal stem cells that generate new enterocytes and
248 that are rapidly and continually renewed by intestinal stem cells that reside near the base of the c
249 any recent advances regarding the biology of intestinal stem cells, the field has been hampered signi
250 Since the discovery of LGR5 as a marker of intestinal stem cells, the field has developed explosive
251 BMP signaling may control the duplication of intestinal stem cells, thereby preventing crypt fission
252 paired Wnt signaling and concomitant loss of intestinal stem cells, this phenotype was not reversed u
253 d find that differentiation of mouse colonic intestinal stem cells to intestinal epithelium is not as
254 e (EGFR/MAPK) signalling triggers Drosophila intestinal stem cells to produce enteroblasts (EBs) and
255 ing agent temozolomide caused MSH2-deficient intestinal stem cells to proliferate more rapidly than w
256 ic reversals of the sexual identity of adult intestinal stem cells uncovers the key role this identit
257 ion and consequent cellular proliferation in intestinal stem cells upon initial ingestion into the mu
258 Here we establish the short-term dynamics of intestinal stem cells using the novel approach of contin
259 Because Wnt signaling plays a key role in intestinal stem cells, we analyzed the effects of Wnt si
260 -regulated during the formation of the adult intestinal stem cells, we cloned the Xenopus PRMT1 promo
262 gely intact in Aim2-deficient mice; however, intestinal stem cells were prone to uncontrolled prolife
263 lipopolysaccharide before gamma-irradiation, intestinal stem cells were protected by marked increases
264 ary sulindac induced apoptosis to remove the intestinal stem cells with nuclear or phosphorylated bet
266 od is critical for epigenetic development of intestinal stem cells, with potential important implicat
267 emonstrate the increased radiosensitivity of intestinal stem cells within the crypts in IL-7R alpha(-
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。