戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 psy/normal histology and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
2 sted case-control study of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
3 ed in both low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
4 raepithelial lesions, or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
5 d risk of progression to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
6 40 participants (6%) had high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
7 .61-1.20) for those with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
8  in a high proportion of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
9 women before and after treatment of cervical intraepithelial lesions.
10 ngly associated with detection of a squamous intraepithelial lesions 4-8 months earlier (odds ratio,
11 5 percent of all smears); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 44 (0.5 percent); high-grade squ
12 esion, 44 (0.5 percent); high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 6 (0.1 percent); and squamous-ce
13             Eleven of 33 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 1 of 12 low-grade squamous i
14 sible the simultaneous screening of cervical intraepithelial lesions and detection of C. trachomatis
15  selectively in the epithelium of high-grade intraepithelial lesions and in frank cancer.
16 lain the increased risk of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer in
17  with the development of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer.
18 nificance (ASC-US) and patients negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancy (NILM) (P </= 0.0
19 ad a higher frequency of advanced pancreatic intraepithelial lesions and more foci of invasive cancer
20 ed in SCCs compared with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and normal squamous epithelia.
21 termined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) and CIN1+ was also significant.
22 e, and 17.0% had high- or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) and were significantly associat
23 49 participants (24%) had low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 40 participants (6%) had hi
24 nfection (HPV), low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cervical cancer stages I-IV
25 intraepithelial lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and SCC specimens.
26           Genital HPV infection and squamous intraepithelial lesions are common among women who are s
27                                              Intraepithelial lesions are common early events among wo
28 KPC) mice at 4 weeks of age (when pancreatic intraepithelial lesions are histologically evident).
29 val = 2.4-13.4) more likely to have squamous intraepithelial lesions associated with the detection of
30 d significance [ASCUS] or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) because of an ASCUS Papanicolao
31 women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN).
32  increased through ASCUS, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, CIN1, and CIN2 (18%-25%), up to
33          Among women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology, HC2 was more likely to
34 ermined significance and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology.
35 ions with either CIN2 or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology; cluster 3 included olde
36 nknown protective factors that operate after intraepithelial lesions develop.
37 rmal cervical tissues and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from cervical cancers and most o
38 elial lesions and 1 of 12 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions had abnormal Fhit expression.
39 of primary normal cervix, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, high-grade squamous intraepithe
40 US) or as cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (ASC-H).
41 PV)-associated precancer high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in human immunodeficiency
42 e anal cancer precursor, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), frequently regresses spon
43  a higher burden of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and anal cancer (AC) comp
44 ions (LSIL, n = 14), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) grade 2 (CIN2, n = 8), an
45 t untreated, a subset of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of the cervix will progre
46  lesions (LSIL), 21 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and 28 with invasive cer
47 lial neoplasia (CIN2-3), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and invasive cervical ca
48 tances, women with ASC-H, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, HSIL, and atypical glandular cel
49  low-grade and 1282 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) diagnosed cytologically;
50 re than one third of the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) in screening populations
51  associated with risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).
52  focal intra-anal tissue high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).
53  cancers and most of the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs).
54 nvasive cervical cancer, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs; n=166), or low-grade squ
55 vical cancer precursors (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSILs]).
56 rs and/or progression to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (ie, cervical intraepithelial ne
57 en, HPV DNA was detected in 19% and squamous intraepithelial lesions in 14%.
58  explain the increased incidence of squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-seropositive women.
59 AS mutations, and reliably detect pancreatic intraepithelial lesions in mice despite negative signals
60  cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, low-grade squamous intraepitheli
61  significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) triage study (ALTS), who w
62  HPV test, and persistent low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) were significantly associa
63 HIV-infected women with a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL; benchmark indication for c
64 -16) can lead to low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL or HSIL).
65  significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) who were triaged with tes
66  significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) who were triaged with tes
67 d 66 women diagnosed with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 21 with high-grade squam
68  including normal cervix, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), high-grade SILs (HSIL),
69 amous cells (ASC, n = 5), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL, n = 14), and high-grade s
70                           Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) have been described as a
71 ned significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HS
72 esions (HSILs; n=166), or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs); were positive for human
73 ble analysis, a history of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (odds ratio [OR], 4.2; 95% confid
74  HPV16, HPV18, or both or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse cytology had better sens
75 HPV16, HPV18, or both or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse cytology had higher sens
76 iopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions or invasive cancer.
77 s intraepithelial lesion, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, or high-grade squamous intraepi
78 maging (BLI), we discovered that microscopic intraepithelial lesions precede the onset of peripheral
79 sponses have a protective effect in squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) development.
80 outcomes: high-risk HPV prevalence; squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) or cervical intraepithelial
81  cytologic evidence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) were referred for colposcop
82 h MY09/MY11/HMB01 HPV primers), and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) (by cytological examinatio
83 ions, abnormal cervical smears, and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) among women with systemic
84 orted to be 1.2-83.3% for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and to be 13.3-83.3% for h
85 en human papillomavirus (HPV), anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL), and human immunodeficienc
86 A (retinol) deficiency and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) in human immunodeficiency
87  commonly associated with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) were 56 and 53.
88 ults, defined as at least low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), in 774 human immunodefic
89  are at increased risk for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), the precursors to invasi
90 al and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).
91 RT) on HPV persistence and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).
92  (by polymerase chain reaction) and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs).
93 ion have a higher risk for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions than do women without HIV infect
94 e lesions progressed from low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to HSILs and finally to cancer.
95  of human papillomavirus-associated squamous intraepithelial lesions to invasive cervical cancer is p
96  preventing the progression of preneoplastic intraepithelial lesions to invasive pancreatic ductal ad
97 ancies in TRAMP mice progress from precursor intraepithelial lesions, to invasive carcinoma that meta
98 undetermined significance-low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS).
99 Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS, 1997-2001), t
100 Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study provided blood sampl
101 termined Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study who were treated for
102 undetermined significance-low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study with the use of unsu
103 termined Significance and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study, in which women were
104  Significance (ASCUS) and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study.
105 Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Triage Study (ALTS), we determin
106 Undetermined Significance-Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion) Triage Study and who returned 1
107 n elevated risk for high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions was associated with infection by
108        The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions was strongly related to oncogeni
109 ease (ie, CIN 2 or 3, or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) was 6.09 (3.87-9.60) compared wi
110 seases, compared with the risk of developing intraepithelial lesions, was not related to any of a lar
111  use by their partners, no cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions were detected in 32 patient-year
112                          High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were identified in 47 (3.4%) of
113                                     Squamous intraepithelial lesions were present in 15% (17/16) of H
114 V-infected men with high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions were significantly more likely t
115 on and progression rates of HPV and squamous intraepithelial lesions, were obtained from the literatu
116 in HPV-positive cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions when compared with normal cervic
117 termined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions who are at higher and lower risk
118 untreated, some cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions will progress to invasive squamo
119 ng the pathological features of higher-grade intraepithelial lesions, yet did not exhibit chromosomal

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top