戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 stry suffer from a high degree of inter- and intraobserver variability.
2 omly selected patients was used to determine intraobserver variability.
3  months after the first session to determine intraobserver variability.
4  analysis of cellular morphology with inter-/intraobserver variability.
5 maging reproducibility and interobserver and intraobserver variability.
6 t set conditions to establish a baseline for intraobserver variability.
7 he interobserver variability (37% to 7%) and intraobserver variability (19% to 8%).
8 tablish interobserver variability, to assess intraobserver variability, and to evaluate means of impr
9 ion methods were tested in 100 patients, and intraobserver variabilities as well as comparison with c
10  assessment, the 6-SD threshold yielded less intraobserver variability (difference, 0.6 g +/- 8, kapp
11                       Substantial inter- and intraobserver variability exists in the cytopathologic a
12 al of this study was to determine inter- and intraobserver variability in measurement of pulmonary ar
13              To assess the interobserver and intraobserver variability in the clinical evaluation of
14               Outcome variables consisted of intraobserver variability (in a subsample of 40 cases) a
15 ver variability of -0.1 g +/- 2.3 and a mean intraobserver variability of 0.2 g +/- 1.6 at every-sect
16 Altman analysis was performed for inter- and intraobserver variability of cannulation time.
17          We determined the interobserver and intraobserver variability of HRCT findings and correlate
18                               The inter- and intraobserver variability of MBF quantitation with dynam
19                                   Inter- and intraobserver variability of radiologists' interpretatio
20                                          The intraobserver variability of sonographic measurements wa
21 h recent carotid events, assessed inter- and intraobserver variability of such measurements, and expl
22   For the determination of HF-US volume, the intraobserver variability was 9.7% +/- 5.1% (n = 8), and
23                                              Intraobserver variability was higher for visual EF than
24                            Interobserver and intraobserver variability was smallest for linear polyp
25                                   Inter- and intraobserver variabilities were assessed by using weigh
26                                   Inter- and intraobserver variabilities were determined by means of
27 o PET quantification methods with inter- and intraobserver variability were assessed.
28                       Substantial inter- and intraobserver variability were observed for all tonomete

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。