ライフサイエンスコーパス: intraocular lens

1 to be pseudophakic with a posterior chamber intraocular lens.

2 d by phacoemulsification and insertion of an intraocular lens.

3 d by phacoemulsification and insertion of an intraocular lens.

4 ular hole, vitreous opacities, or dislocated intraocular lens.

5 ially in eyes with an angle-supported phakic intraocular lens.

6 pattern, thus allowing for a 'custom-fitted' intraocular lens.

7 e cataractous lens and implant an artificial intraocular lens.

8 ird (n = 64; 38%) of original approvals were intraocular lenses.

9 ed keratometer for surgery planning of toric intraocular lenses.

10 ving these options for presbyopic-correcting intraocular lenses.

11 vailable or pending release on accommodative intraocular lenses.

12 ated the early safety and efficacy of phakic intraocular lenses.

13 coaxial phacoemulsification and established intraocular lenses.

14 ntrol patients received a standard monofocal intraocular lenses.

15 stration (FDA) approval of the Acrysof Toric intraocular lenses.

16 To provide an update on the status of toric intraocular lenses.

17 nufacturers in designing suitable contact or intraocular lenses.

18 contrast sensitivity when compared to all 3 intraocular lenses.

19 vs. phakic eyes: 1.15 for posterior chamber intraocular lens, 1.43 for anterior chamber intraocular

20 Five eyes had sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses, 1 eye had a sulcus intraocular lens,

21 aphakic, 4 patients with an anterior chamber intraocular lens, 2 patients with a scleral-fixated post

22 short-term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens (AcrySof PanOptix).

23 Attempts to correct presbyopia with intraocular lenses add complexity to the pathway with th

24 A three-piece intraocular lens allows for full 360 degree capsular ben

25 ome, aniridia, aphakia, and anterior chamber intraocular lenses, among others.

26 tivity for the clinician regarding cataract, intraocular lenses and refractive surgery that goes beyo

27 lts proved that contamination of hydrophilic intraocular lenses and the preservative solution was the

28 imens cultured, only the hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses and their solution grew P. aeruginosa

29 amber intraocular lenses, 1 eye had a sulcus intraocular lens, and 2 eyes were aphakic.

30 aphakic eyes and eyes with anterior chamber intraocular lens, and eyes with PK (compared with eyes w

31 ion by air, solutions, surgical instruments, intraocular lens, and wound leakage have been identified

32 stable vision attributable to the subluxated intraocular lenses, and 40.3% of them required aphakic c

33 Phakic and pseudophakic piggyback intraocular lenses are also being used to treat high deg

34 Toric intraocular lenses are also safe and effective for treat

35 In recent years new models of intraocular lenses are appearing on the market to reduce

36 th continued research and experience, phakic intraocular lenses are becoming an invaluable addition t

37 Intraocular lenses are being progressively implanted in

38 inical details and analysis of the explanted intraocular lenses are provided with environmental scann

39 arginal outcomes, improved designs of phakic intraocular lenses are providing increasing safety and e

40 Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses are widely available.

41 ailable materials used in the manufacture of intraocular lenses, as well as new materials under devel

42 patient had bilateral dislocated in-the-bag intraocular lenses at 5.5 years and 6 years after surger

43 However, presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses, at least at their current stage of d

44 spherical results were achieved by selecting intraocular lenses based on a hyperopic shift of -0.75 D

45 will continue as newer presbyopic correcting intraocular lenses become available.

46 d the continued improvements in biometry and intraocular lens calculations.

47 Photic phenomena associated with intraocular lenses can degrade visual performance follow

48 Intraocular lenses can introduce stray light artifacts i

49 Dislocation of the intraocular lenses can occur frequently, however.

50 ed, allowing improved capsular stability and intraocular lens centration by scleral-suture fixation.

51 rincipally been applied to the assessment of intraocular lens centration, tilt, position relative to

52 The wide array of intraocular lens choices has broadened the scope of refr

53 s may be lower in patients receiving acrylic intraocular lenses compared with other materials.

54 Accommodative intraocular lens design and development are at a feveris

55 fractive lens exchange and new accommodating intraocular lens designs become more popular, the proble

56 New intraocular-lens designs and surgical maneuvers permit i

57 ics of 8 patients presenting with in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation after repair of retinal det

58 In-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation is an uncommon but serious

59 ght in the newly developing light-adjustable intraocular lenses does not increase ECL.

60 Intraocular lens exchange was performed in 40% of patien

61 As multifocal intraocular lenses, femtosecond laser technology, and ot

62 Colored spectacle or intraocular lens filters reduce both proportionately, so

63 ons to choose the most optically appropriate intraocular lens for a patient's individualized wavefron

64 0 year old male patient implanted with toric intraocular lens for the treatment of post PKP astigmati

65 Advances in the design of intraocular lenses give options to patients for some ret

66 requently required removal of ocular device (intraocular lens, glaucoma implant, or scleral buckle).

67 Intraocular lens haptic misplacement was confirmed by ul

68 rm the clinical suspicion of misplacement of intraocular lens haptics were reviewed.

69 ent, long-term studies of a hyperopic phakic intraocular lens have shown excellent visual outcomes an

70 New trifocal intraocular lenses have been developed to try and fullfi

71 Iris-sutured intraocular lenses have been used as an alternative to t

72 dvances in the design and material of phakic intraocular lenses have made them very predictable, safe

73 incisions and cataract extraction with toric intraocular lenses have proven to be effective.

74 of aspheric, presbyopic correcting and toric intraocular lenses have shifted the emphasis of cataract

75 opia in pseudophakic patients with monofocal intraocular lenses; however, there is scant published li

76 ction than patients with a posterior chamber intraocular lens (HR, 3.23; P<0.0266), but not more like

77 exis (C), 3) phacoemulsification (P), and 4) intraocular lens implantation (IOL).

78 0.25+/-0.41 logMAR at the final visit after intraocular lens implantation (p=0.000).

79 ed with most intraocular surgeries including intraocular lens implantation after cataract removal, it

80 Implementing safety protocols for intraocular lens implantation and asking for legal advic

81 abeculectomy and/or cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation and uncontrolled glaucoma

82 g stress induced on corneal incisions during intraocular lens implantation by 7 injectors revealed di

83 phacoemulsification cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation by a single surgeon betwee

84 ulsification of uncomplicated cataracts with intraocular lens implantation can be performed safely in

85 g phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation for age-related cataract.

86 sification, and the most recent advancement, intraocular lens implantation for dogs, cats, and horses

87 ng phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in patients with primary o

88 Cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation in the setting of meticulo

89 neventful phacoemulsification and in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation on intraocular pressure co

90 tive range for surface ablation--need phakic intraocular lens implantation or clear lens extraction,

91 arly results demonstrate that monocular IC-8 intraocular lens implantation provides a continuous, bro

92 ho had undergone cataract extraction without intraocular lens implantation reported generally lower s

93 rized as having had phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation vs no cataract surgery at

94 Intraocular lens implantation was completed in 56 eyes;

95 Phacoaspiration and intraocular lens implantation was done in children with

96 Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation was performed and recorded

97 Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation was performed by 3 surgeon

98 nd anterior vitrectomy combined with primary intraocular lens implantation were included.

99 eons can refine the refractive outcome after intraocular lens implantation with the excimer laser to

100 cting refractive surprises include piggyback intraocular lens implantation, corneal incisional surger

101 Twenty simulation scenarios, including wrong intraocular lens implantation, wrong eye operation, wron

102 apsular cataract extraction and "in the bag" intraocular lens implantation.

103 iatric eyes undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation.

104 patients underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

105 follow-up underwent cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation.

106 pheral corneal relaxing incisions, and toric intraocular lens implantation.

107 ses can degrade visual performance following intraocular lens implantation.

108 th phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

109 d phacoemulsification, PPV, ILM peeling, and intraocular lens implantation; 20 preoperative pseudopha

110 eported efficacy and complications of phakic intraocular lens implantations in children for correctio

111 were either left aphakic (n = 53) or had an intraocular lens implanted (n = 55).

112 implant technology, particularly presbyopic intraocular lens implants, patients and physicians have

113 ery with bilateral implantation of the study intraocular lens in a private practice clinic were consi

114 The ideal intraocular lens in cases of aphakia without capsular su

115 ccessful implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens in the capsular bag.

116 of small-aperture corneal inlay or specific intraocular lens in the correction of presbyopia.

117 dy, and it led to long-term stability of the intraocular lenses in 93.55% of cases.

118 may be necessary when implanting multifocal intraocular lenses in eyes with more than 1 diopter of a

119 al benefits and pitfalls of using multifocal intraocular lenses in glaucomatous eyes.

120 ions cannot be made on the use of multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with glaucoma as large st

121 y, the decision of whether to use multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with glaucoma has to be m

122 pecifically evaluating the use of multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with glaucoma.

123 ommendations regarding the use of multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with glaucoma.

124 New applications of phakic intraocular lenses in presbyopia and in other conditions

125 Placement of intraocular lenses in the setting of certain forms of uv

126 n few recent reports on the use of 'premium' intraocular lenses in the setting of endothelial keratop

127 ethacrylate (PMMA; n=18), and acrylic (n=18) intraocular lenses in vitro.

128 lial cell attachment to the various types of intraocular lenses in vitro.

129 r-lens designs and surgical maneuvers permit intraocular-lens insertion through corneal incisions mea

130 With the introduction of several new intraocular lenses into the US ophthalmology market over

131 Initial undercorrection of intraocular lens (IOL power) is a common practice in chi

132 To describe management of a case of intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular bag (CB) dislocation

133 The 9 patients (56%) who had intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular bag removals had bet

134 ce of PCO types and the distance between the intraocular lens (IOL) and the posterior capsule (PC), i

135 To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas (Barrett Uni

136 nt contributions addressing the challenge of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in patients undergoin

137 excised membranes were gently moved in a 2.2 intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge and pulled further in t

138 e implantation of a new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) combined with Enhanced depth of f

139 equirements in patients with late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation operated with 2 diffe

140 y of 2 operation methods for late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation.

141 rature addressing the surgical approaches to intraocular lens (IOL) fixation in the setting of inadeq

142 Scleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation is an accepted treatment

143 a or luxated or subluxated posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) following complicated cataract su

144 niques for fixation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) have been developed.

145 its underwent standard cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implant and postoperative topical

146 gone cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and 7 patients had e

147 nts underwent phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and Group 2 patients

148 Toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation can be an effective

149 Evaluate the usefulness of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation during cataract surg

150 The efficacy and safety of primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation during early infancy

151 t 5 years of age after cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for infants enrolled

152 Pediatric primary posterior intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in children older th

153 nisometropia at age 5 years after unilateral intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in infants.

154 Cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is a well tolerated

155 yet their relationship to aphakia vs primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation remains unsettled.

156 More eyes undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation than eyes left aphak

157 during the surgery in terms of capsulotomy, intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and anterior vitrec

158 uality of visual after cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

159 ied CTR, and in-the-bag single-piece AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

160 urface-based method, in candidates for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

161 on was combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

162 abbit eyes, leading to successful in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

163 rowing number of patients undergoing premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantations, patient expectatio

164 nation with monofocal, multifocal, and toric intraocular lens (IOL) implants.

165 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To implant an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) in a child, we must measure the e

166 Calculating the most accurate power of the intraocular lens (IOL) is a critical factor in optimizin

167 An intraocular lens (IOL) is implanted into residual lens t

168 uare-edge (SE) polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) modification in comparison with a

169 epithelial cells (LEC) were cultured with an intraocular lens (IOL) on a surface of type IV collagen

170 Three cases of hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) opacification confined to the pup

171 ataracts at age 1-7 months to either primary intraocular lens (IOL) or contact lens correction.

172 the accuracy and reproducibility of the VRF intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula with we

173 sented here aims to optimize the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in patients af

174 s approaches have been developed to estimate intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes postrefractive surg

175 meters respond to cycloplegia, and therefore intraocular lens (IOL) power measurements calculated by

176 nd ocular surface conditions, calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power, delineation of anterior ch

177 dary objective is the stable placement of an intraocular lens (IOL) selected for best refractive outc

178 treous humors), the capsular tissue, and the intraocular lens (IOL) surfaces of normal eyes after lon

179 from younger age, follow-up time and type of intraocular lens (IOL) were associated with risk of PCO,

180 aft endothelial failure implanted with toric intraocular lens (IOL) who was treated with Descemet str

181 optic position of glued transscleral fixated intraocular lens (IOL) with optical coherence tomography

182 ication and the contemporary implantation of intraocular lens (IOL) within the capsular bag represent

183 ion cataract extraction plus insertion of an intraocular lens (IOL).

184 in the posterior chamber and in front of the intraocular lens (IOL).

185 formance after implantation of a quadrifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

186 and the implant of a FineVision(R) trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

187 tients implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

188 associated with the implantation of foldable intraocular lenses (IOL) in the ciliary sulcus.

189 tachment, corneal decompensation, dislocated intraocular lens [IOL]).

190 nd treatment modality (contact lens [CL] vs. intraocular lens [IOL]).

191 intraocular lens, 1.43 for anterior chamber intraocular lens [IOL], 2.83 for aphakic eyes; P < 0.001

192 ce of and risk factors for calcifications of intraocular lenses (IOLs) after Descemet membrane endoth

193 One-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) are not indicated for sulcus f

194 Ultraviolet-blocking intraocular lenses (IOLs) are used routinely in cataract

195 harms associated with implantation of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) during cataract surgery.

196 months of 2 diffractive (non-toric) trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a large series of patients.

197 evidence of the use of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients who have previousl

198 The technological advancement of intraocular lenses (IOLs) in recent years has increased

199 geon groups and different types of implanted intraocular lenses (IOLs) were assessed, adjusting for a

200 Multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs) were introduced 2 decades ago

201 Capsular bags with intraocular lenses (IOLs) were prepared from human donor

202 Four brands of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) were reported in these studies

203 antages of blue light (400-480 nm) filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) when compared with the ultravi

204 troduction of phacoemulsification and use of intraocular lenses (IOLs), both very controversial when

205 Recent literature suggests that modern intraocular lenses (IOLs), particularly hydrophilic or h

206 esia, capsular management, type and power of intraocular lenses (IOLs), sutured IOLs, and risk of sub

207 ing the patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

208 patients receiving newer advanced technology intraocular lenses (IOLs).

209 g ametropia after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

210 yes of 91 patients with monofocal, non-toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).

211 difference between blue-blocking and neutral intraocular lenses (IOLs).

212 the use of high refractive index square-edge intraocular lenses (IOLs).

213 Imaging of the crystalline lens and intraocular lens is becoming increasingly more important

214 r unilateral cataract and that implanting an intraocular lens is not associated with adherence.

215 sidual ametropia after presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses is a safe adjunct treatment to increa

216 predictability and visual quality of phakic intraocular lenses make them invaluable for the correcti

217 Materials used in intraocular lens manufacture should, therefore, insure l

218 The biocompatibility of intraocular lens materials should be assessed in terms o

219 ecific anterior chamber pathology, wavefront intraocular lenses may not be appropriate.

220 A multifocal intraocular lens (MFIOL) allows for spectacle independen

221 ), silicone oil removal (n = 16), dislocated intraocular lens (n = 10), submacular hemorrhage (n = 7)

222 tion and implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (n = 33) using prestripped donor tissue

223 The intraocular lenses of the same make were discontinued at

224 Reports on intraocular lens opacification suggest that the potentia

225 The new intraocular lens options for correcting both near and di

226 e likely than those with an anterior chamber intraocular lens or who were aphakic.

227 trate the superior visual outcomes of phakic intraocular lenses over laser in-situ keratomileusis in

228 trate the superior visual outcomes of phakic intraocular lenses over other refractive surgeries in pa

229 rventions related to the phacoemulsification/intraocular lens pathway occurred in the 2-year study pe

230 ard the refractive mindset of the presbyopic intraocular lens patient must be understood and mastered

231 er clarity on billing Medicare for a premium intraocular lens patient's return to the operating room

232 acement of an iris-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) before pars plana vitrectomy an

233 nts with a scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL), 2 patients with a PCIOL, and 1

234 nage complications and to ascertain advanced intraocular lens performance.

235 the incidence and pathophysiology of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) associated cataracts, surgical i

236 Phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation has been used to co

237 he accumulating peer-reviewed data of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation in the pediatric po

238 ed the long-term outcomes of the ZB5M phakic intraocular lens (PIOL).

239 in refractive lens exchange (RLE) vs. phakic intraocular lens (pIOL).

240 tion of 2 types of rigid iris-fixated phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) for the treatment of myopia a

241 my (odds ratio [OR] 1.8, P = .03) and sulcus intraocular lens placement (OR 1.65, P = .03) during cat

242 Intraocular lens placement does not prevent the early de

243 reflect the increased tolerance for primary intraocular lens placement in the pediatric cohort.

244 ndergone previous vitrectomy and complicated intraocular lens placement or were aphakic.

245 photorefractive keratectomy, and refractive intraocular lens placement.

246 plant and underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens placement.

247 rlenticular opacification (between piggyback intraocular lenses), posterior capsule opacification and

248 a, iris, and natural lens preoperatively and intraocular lens postoperatively.

249 0.001 diopters [D]; P = .933), or calculated intraocular lens power (0.011 D; P = .609).

250 n obtaining more accurate estimations of the intraocular lens power after corneal refractive surgery,

251 corneal power, and corresponding theoretical intraocular lens power calculated using the Sanders-Retz

252 o understand methods to accurately determine intraocular lens power calculation after keratorefractiv

253 This may generate errors in intraocular lens power calculation when using the Gaussi

254 o earlier than 3 months post SB surgery, and intraocular lens power calculation with a fourth-generat

255 Newer methods to address errors in intraocular lens power calculations after keratorefracti

256 es and advances in the field of biometry and intraocular lens power calculations.

257 is review article, we provide an overview of intraocular lens power determination after corneal refra

258 Anticipating the correct intraocular lens power for a patient undergoing cataract

259 te keratometry and biometry, and appropriate intraocular lens power formula selection with optimized

260 effective lens position and the shape of the intraocular lens power prediction curve more accurately.

261 determine the position and the shape of the intraocular lens power prediction curve.

262 rating this correction preoperatively in the intraocular lens power selection.

263 Intraocular lens power value in diopters and the magnitu

264 rneal power, cylinder, and the corresponding intraocular lens power, which was calculated using the S

265 degrees of refractive error, however, phakic intraocular lenses provide superior quality of vision wi

266 The study found that the Acrysof Toric intraocular lenses provided excellent visual outcomes an

267 al serous chorioretinopathy in 1.4% of eyes; intraocular lens reflections in 0.9% of eyes; blue field

268 without implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (refractive lens exchange).

269 implanted bilaterally with either monofocal intraocular lenses, refractive MIOLs, diffractive MIOLs,

270 Intraocular lens removal was performed for 6 of 7 patien

271 Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses require emmetropia for the best visua

272 illary implantation of the Artisan iris-claw intraocular lens (RPICIOL) in several aphakic conditions

273 These findings may guide intraocular lens selection for individual patients seeki

274 During cataract surgery, intraocular lens selection in these patients is importan

275 outcomes can be achieved with many types of intraocular lenses, several recent studies have suggeste

276 th existing scleral-fixated and iris-fixated intraocular lenses (sf-IOL and if-IOL, respectively).

277 The isolates from the patients and the intraocular lens solution revealed matching patterns sim

278 Implantation of a single-piece-acrylic intraocular lens (SPA-IOL) in the ciliary sulcus during

279 ular opacification, epiretinal membrane, and intraocular lens subluxation.

280 complications of different designs of phakic intraocular lenses, such as endothelial cell loss, catar

281 form the reader of forthcoming accommodative intraocular lens technologies that are being clinically

282 domized chart review of eyes with subluxated intraocular lenses that underwent iris suture fixation a

283 With the Acrysof Toric intraocular lenses, the average lens rotation was less t

284 th the development of advanced technology in intraocular lenses, the combined treatment of cataract a

285 To compare the outcomes after toric intraocular lens (tIOL) or peripheral corneal relaxing i

286 as an alternative to transsclerally sutured intraocular lenses to correct aphakia in pediatric patie

287 be induced in eyes implanted with adjustable intraocular lenses to enhance near vision.

288 the surgery, technique of cataract surgery, intraocular lens type, method of antibiotic prophylaxis,

289 xtraction and randomization to receipt of an intraocular lens vs being left aphakic for the first 5 y

290 he anterior chamber of the posterior chamber intraocular lens was observed (0.18%).

291 In delayed-onset cases, the intraocular lens was removed or exchanged in 19 of 26 ca

292 The intraocular lens was stable and centered at the last fol

293 traoperative complications occurred, and the intraocular lens was successfully placed in the capsular

294 Iris suture fixation of subluxated intraocular lenses was efficacious for the eyes included

295 eceiving bilateral implantation of the study intraocular lens were analysed.

296 Most (93.55%) intraocular lenses were stable and centered at the final

297 The three types of intraocular lenses were then coated with fibronectin: si

298 nd formation will determine how resistant an intraocular lens will be to posterior capsule opacificat

299 ility, determined by the relationship of the intraocular lens with remaining lens epithelial cells wi

300 anatomy and may allow custom-designed phakic intraocular lenses with proper sizing.

301 Blue light-filter intraocular lenses, with their possible advantage of mac