ライフサイエンスコーパス: intromission

1 set of these transients immediately preceded intromission.

2 of birds have retained a phallus capable of intromission.

3 increase withdrawal from the male following intromissions.

4 cervical stimulation (VCS) to the female via intromissions.

5 the female left the male's chamber following intromissions.

6 contacts with males until receiving 5 or 15 intromissions.

7 cifically among paced females receiving five intromissions.

8 t the number rather than the timing of prior intromissions affected subsequent behavior.

9 e levels were seen in paced females given 15 intromissions, all nonpaced females, and mounts only ani

10 se-dependent linear trends for reductions in intromission and ejaculation behavior.

11 xcitability of cholinergic circuits used for intromission and ejaculation.

12 d latency to ejaculation and postejaculatory intromission and longer interintromission intervals.

13 had shorter latencies and intervals between intromissions and ejaculation, higher lordosis quotients

14 lengthen contact-return latencies following intromissions and ejaculations and increase withdrawal f

15 anscription factor, showed reduced levels of intromissions and no ejaculations whereas simple mountin

16 tion to mount females but they achieved less intromissions and virtually no ejaculations.

17 association with the initial (first mount or intromission) and final (ejaculation) events of each cop

18 n of MDMA did not produce a change in mount, intromission, and ejaculation latency or in mount and in

19 ed by three indices: frequency and length of intromission, and latency of ejaculation.

20 onger to exit the male compartment following intromissions, and returned to the male more quickly fol

21 The bHR males required more intromissions at a faster pace per ejaculation than did

22 emporally and spatially restricts repetitive intromission attempts to vulva cues was unclear.

23 on of UNC-7 ensures attenuation of recursive intromission attempts when the male disengages or is dis

24 socket neuronal support cells function with intromission circuit components, including the cholinerg

25 returned to the male more quickly following intromissions compared to rats with an intact pelvic ner

26 missions or ejaculation preceded by only 0-1 intromission did not affect Fos-IR.

27 ctivated after mating while mounting-without-intromission did not affect the percentage of colabeled

28 sociated with ejaculation, because mounts or intromissions did not trigger expression.

29 rietalis), the loss of receptivity following intromission during mating can be prevented by injection

30 onpaced, or 15 nonpaced followed by 15 paced intromissions during mating tests.

31 tal investigation) and consummatory (mounts, intromissions, ejaculations) components of male sexual b

32 receipt of sexual stimulation (e.g., mounts, intromissions, ejaculations).

33 ion, and ejaculation latency or in mount and intromission frequency compared with such latency and fr

34 owed more incomplete mounts before the first intromission (IN), but having achieved that IN, they exh

35 males, only ejaculation preceded by multiple intromissions induced a significant increase in Fos-IR;

36 The results showed that mating-with-intromissions induced a significant increase in the perc

37 fusion combined with subthreshold numbers of intromissions induced P/PSP.

38 ng; pacing was associated with greater inter-intromission intervals, decreased proceptivity, and incr

39 treated, androgenized females showed reduced intromission-like behavior and lordosis quotients compar

40 ore PGE(2) did not exhibit as many mounts or intromission-like behaviors or initiate these behaviors

41 Proestrous rats receiving intromissions (mated group) from males or mounts-without

42 s (mated group) from males or mounts-without-intromission (mounted group) were sacrificed along with

43 Such findings suggest that single intromissions normally release individually subthreshold

44 Control groups received mounts-without-intromission only from males or remained in their homeca

45 ale's latency to return to the male after an intromission or an ejaculation, thereby decreasing the p

46 A1 and A2 cells compared to mounting-without-intromission or control.

47 d a significant increase in Fos-IR; multiple intromissions or ejaculation preceded by only 0-1 introm

48 In experiment II, females that received five intromissions (paced or nonpaced) showed significant inc

49 as the male repeatedly mounted and achieved intromissions, peaked 2-3 min after male's ejaculation (

50 copulated to ejaculation, but they had lower intromission ratios and longer ejaculatory latencies.

51 0) after mating, while females receiving 15 intromissions showed hyperalgesia (15 nonpaced) or no ch

52 modulate the number and interval between the intromissions the female receives during mating.

53 behavior, contact-return latencies following intromissions were significantly shorter in rats with pe