ライフサイエンスコーパス: intruder

1 freezing behavior when confronted by a human intruder.

2 by altering brain activity in response to an intruder.

3 viors even when paired with a non-aggressive intruder.

4 and the total time spent attacking the male intruder.

5 er but more defensive aggression to a female intruder.

6 tection against and response to any possible intruder.

7 e anxiety responses of a marmoset to a human intruder.

8 rger than both the assisted neighbor and the intruder.

9 e a tendency to express aggression toward an intruder.

10 rubber snake and in the presence of a human intruder.

11 n responding to a social stimulus, the human intruder.

12 ion than controls in the presence of a human intruder.

13 esidents selectively attacked T-treated male intruders.

14 ds its calling territory against conspecific intruders.

15 ng to fiercely protective aggression against intruders.

16 ostures and attacks on unfamiliar adult male intruders.

17 /sexual activity and involved in response to intruders.

18 aggressive response to both male and female intruders.

19 alert other immune cell types to pathogenic intruders.

20 ulated as defense mechanisms against genomic intruders.

21 mmunity by marking and eliminating microbial intruders.

22 n healthy and altered host cells and foreign intruders.

23 heir territories against conspecific calling intruders.

24 defeat and were paired with a non-aggressive intruder 24 h later as in experiment 1.

25 ritorial aggression when tested with a novel intruder 24 hours after an acute social defeat.

26 e a competitive advantage for residents over intruders across a wide range of relative group sizes, w

27 n inexperienced adult males, male and female intruders activated overlapping neuronal populations.

28 e doubling of maternal attacks toward a male intruder after lesioning was also confirmed and was rela

29 either a sham or real 7-min test with a male intruder, after which their brains were examined for imm

30 prior to being tested with a non-aggressive intruder also displayed significantly less submissive be

31 as induced selectively in response to a male intruder and a similar trend was found in the LS.

32 for 24 h exhibited aggression towards a male intruder and had more Fos-immunoreactive (Fos-ir) cells

33 rtant role for the PMv in detecting the male intruder and how this nucleus modulates the network cont

34 dure as seen by decreased time exploring the intruder and in the three chamber sociability test by de

35 n tested for their aggressive response to an intruder and killed to examine AVT phenotype in the preo

36 mportant for attacking in response to a male intruder and that the Avpr1b, likely through its role in

37 that the PMv signals the presence of a male intruder and transfers this information to the network o

38 4 weeks is associated with aggression toward intruders and a down-regulation of brain allopregnanolon

39 s are crucial in the defense against foreign intruders and cancerous growths.

40 hibited improved defensive reactions against intruders and highly efficient pup retrieval performance

41 pair's own nest (personal information of an intruder) and/or on a neighbouring territory, to which t

42 ior experience with a female and identity of intruders) and the limbic activation in response to an i

43 a neutral arena with a small, nonaggressive intruder, and agonistic behavior was scored for 10 min.

44 d by the perception of sensory cues from the intruder, and here we have identified a site in the hypo

45 the average number of attacks against a male intruder, and the total time spent attacking the male in

46 (CCK4/5 and CCK8) from tissue homogenates in intruder animals 6 h after resident-intruder inter-male

47 Intruder animals that demonstrated submissive behavior (

48 ompared to non-submissive (i.e., "Friendly") intruder animals.

49 media, forces on arbitrarily shaped granular intruders are observed to obey surprisingly simple, yet

50 ocial interaction with a smaller subordinate intruder as reinforcement for the development of conditi

51 Thus, antisense subjects clearly classify intruders as offensive, but fail to attack.

52 s from resident males following the resident-intruder assay.

53 Intruders behave and develop selfishly once they have in

54 ce showed reduced behavioral responses to an intruder behind a wire barrier.

55 xhibited more offensive aggression to a male intruder but more defensive aggression to a female intru

56 ions, neighbors may help residents fight off intruders, but only when the resident does not stand a r

57 ofessional phagocytic cells ingest microbial intruders by engulfing them into phagosomes, which subse

58 and the limbic activation in response to an intruder (by mapping regional staining for c-fos) in mal

59 Some intruders can be dispatched by the humoral immune system

60 s (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus) using the Intruder Challenge Test.

61 heightened aggressors (ANAs) during resident-intruder confrontations after self-administering 1.0 g/k

62 dependence of stresses in granular media on intruder depth, orientation, and movement direction and

63 Exposure to a male or female intruder did not increase Fos-ir staining in the MPO.

64 sions prior to testing with a non-aggressive intruder displayed significantly more aggression than di

65 epolarization and spiking following resident-intruder encounters.

66 e, T-treated male, and estrogen-treated male intruders equally.

67 ntruder home-cage test as shown by increased intruder exploration.

68 In defeated intruders, extracellular dopamine levels in accumbens an

69 ough males often behave aggressively against intruders, female rodents usually express aggression onl

70 d then the females were replaced with a male intruder for 10 min.

71 lactating female mice were exposed to a male intruder for 20 min and those exhibiting maternal aggres

72 dentified by behavioral responses to a human intruder (HI) that are known to be sensitive to anxiolyt

73 ial interaction tests: the resident-juvenile-intruder home-cage test and the three chamber sociabilit

74 social interaction in the resident-juvenile intruder home-cage test as shown by increased intruder e

75 he majority of monkeys (9/15), serving as an intruder in another social group affected cocaine self-a

76 ube (CNT), which also represents a potential intruder in the environment accompanying with the develo

77 a security sensor which can detect and count intruders in a locality with decent precision and switch

78 ression toward both sexual partners and male intruders in a seminatural environment.

79 activity levels following exposure to naive intruders in their home cages.

80 moset displayed in the presence of the human intruder, increasing the likelihood of proactive mobbing

81 nates in intruder animals 6 h after resident-intruder inter-male aggression.

82 Resident-intruder interactions strongly activated granule cells i

83 ced DG granule cell activity during resident-intruder interactions.

84 dler crab can estimate how close a potential intruder is from its burrow entrance, even when the entr

85 e and fail to initiate aggressive attacks on intruder males.

86 on and increased licking and grooming toward intruder males.

87 ess using a modified version of the resident-intruder model for social stress (social defeat).

88 In the resident-intruder model of aggression, resident eNOS(-/-) males s

89 Rats were exposed to the resident-intruder model of social stress for 5 days.

90 marmoset monkeys were exposed to a resident-intruder model of stress.

91 sessions of social stress using the resident-intruder model or control manipulation.

92 ters were paired for 15-min using a resident-intruder model, and individuals were identified as winne

93 to repeated social stress using the resident-intruder model.

94 psychosocial stress was produced using a rat intruder model.

95 liferating cells in the dentate gyrus of the intruder monkeys was compared with that of unstressed co

96 After 1 hr in this condition, the intruder monkeys were injected with BrdU and perfused 2

97 very' period following an encounter with the intruder-more than an order of magnitude greater than th

98 hat is typical of wild-type males towards an intruder mouse.

99 vel of inter-male aggression in the resident-intruder or dangler behavioral tests, NZB/B1NJ mice are

100 he trap-jaw mechanism to capture prey, eject intruders, or jump to safety.

101 develop a conditioned place aversion to the intruder-paired context.

102 lHb neuronal firing and promotes CPP to the intruder-paired context.

103 lHb neuronal firing and abolishes CPP to the intruder-paired context.

104 for offensive aggression using the resident-intruder paradigm, and then examined for changes in GAD6

105 Following the resident-intruder paradigm, Arc-expressing IGCs in acute AOB slic

106 Further, in a resident-intruder paradigm, male Cplx1(-/-) mice failed to show t

107 ested for offensive aggression in a resident/intruder paradigm, resident hamsters treated with fluoxe

108 keys by 50% at 21 mg/kg (po) using the human intruder paradigm.

109 ibution), population density, group size and intruder pressure (relative resource-holding potential).

110 le prey density, wolf population density and intruder pressure are not associated with territory size

111 behaviors as shown in the resident-juvenile intruder procedure as seen by decreased time exploring t

112 NR1 hypomorphic mice tested in the resident-intruder procedure displayed distinctly different behavi

113 t less, both spontaneously and in a resident/intruder provocation model.

114 rs display heightened aggression toward male intruders, purportedly to protect vulnerable young.

115 d binge-like access in episodically defeated intruder rats but suppressed cocaine intake by continuou

116 les were collected from previously-defeated 'intruder' rats in consecutive phases, while (1) in the h

117 The AMYGme was involved in processing intruder-related cues and/or in the regulation of aggres

118 or sexual experience but did not respond to intruder-related cues as measured by Fos-ir.

119 freezing in response to an unfamiliar human intruder's profile.

120 Dams infused with 1,000 ng OTA attacked intruders significantly more often than buffer-infused d

121 male Long-Evans rats defeated in a resident-intruder social aggression paradigm, as indexed by eleva

122 Rats were exposed to repeated resident-intruder stress and coping strategy determined.

123 However, intruder stress increased p-Smad1 nuclear staining in th

124 en adult and adolescent rats during resident-intruder stress.

125 ndisturbed or exposed to a 2-week regimen of intruder stress.

126 t became elevated in the cytoplasm following intruder stress.

127 dism was achieved by thyroidectomy, and the 'intruder' stress was used as a model of chronic psychoso

128 ly, the varying responses of mockingbirds to intruders suggests behavioral flexibility and a keen awa

129 number of displacements in a 3-min resident-intruder test from 38 in control subjects to 0 in antise

130 stem nuclei, and when tested on the resident-intruder test they exhibited: 1) increased aggressive be

131 d plus maze tests), aggressiveness (resident-intruder test), and locomotor activity (horizontal and v

132 avior using a primate test of anxiety (human intruder test).

133 components of Fos induction by the resident-intruder test, responses were compared for mice assessed

134 for offensive aggression using the resident/intruder test, sacrificed the following day, and, using

135 In the resident-pair intruder test, TP significantly increased aggression whe

136 mpared to wild-type controls in the resident-intruder test.

137 le mice and reduced freezing in the resident-intruder test.

138 nd their wild type controls after a resident-intruder test.

139 Here, we used resident-intruder testing to determine whether endogenous opioids

140 y of this behavior is studied using resident-intruder testing.

141 ce tested in social interaction and resident-intruder tests (n = 8-14).

142 ere more likely to attack younger and weaker intruders than nonsubjugated controls.

143 xidation activity in the presence of O(2)-an intruder that normally incapacitates the sulfur- and ele

144 ression produced by lactating females toward intruders that plays an important role in protection of

145 In their encounters with foreign intruders, the cells of the insect innate immune system,

146 ivated to drive off potentially infanticidal intruders, the participation of others (e.g. juveniles,

147 g rats that is highly responsive to the male intruder--the ventral premammillary nucleus (PMv).

148 hat sophisticated social parasites were nest intruders throughout, and probably before, the ascent of

149 the provocative stimulus or attempts by the intruder to 'cope' with the stimulus.

150 rapidly approach, engage, and challenge the intruder was derived from factor analysis of behavioral

151 The average time spent sniffing the intruder was indistinguishable between the 3-Br-7NI- and

152 trikingly, maternal aggression toward a male intruder was not different between control and preoptic

153 tricle 5 min before a smaller non-aggressive intruder was placed in the home cage of the experimental

154 male rodents are fiercely aggressive against intruders when they are rearing and protecting pups.

155 tating female rodents are aggressive against intruders when they are rearing and protecting pups.