戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s accessed using microneedles in a minimally invasive procedure.
2 ver, obtaining such tissue often requires an invasive procedure.
3 liver disease who are undergoing an elective invasive procedure.
4 is a deep tissue biopsy culture, which is an invasive procedure.
5 e presence of a stenosis, but it requires an invasive procedure.
6 e-positive chest radiography had a resulting invasive procedure.
7 ute coronary syndromes who are undergoing an invasive procedure.
8 d harm due to adverse events related to this invasive procedure.
9 or embolization was proceeded as a minimally invasive procedure.
10 men within 2 years, with 14.1% undergoing an invasive procedure.
11 nts who receive AC and undergo surgery or an invasive procedure.
12 an 4 (Prg4) mutant TMJ discs without further invasive procedure.
13 nt <50 x 10(9) /L) who will be undergoing an invasive procedure.
14 id VKA reversal before an urgent surgical or invasive procedure.
15  for an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure.
16 , AMR diagnosis relies on biopsy which is an invasive procedure.
17 nical utility, mainly because it requires an invasive procedure.
18 fetal infection while decreasing unnecessary invasive procedures.
19 31 patients were included; 247 underwent 700 invasive procedures.
20  evolving, with recent advances in minimally invasive procedures.
21  and management, noninvasive procedures, and invasive procedures.
22  and delay or even prevent the need for more invasive procedures.
23 ncer within at-risk groups without resort to invasive procedures.
24 al processes and enable improved planning of invasive procedures.
25 at-risk patients undergoing dental and other invasive procedures.
26 nfants admitted to hospital undergo repeated invasive procedures.
27 d trials that examined statin therapy before invasive procedures.
28 t improve clinical outcomes when used before invasive procedures.
29 outcomes are equally applicable to minimally invasive procedures.
30 they require antibiotic prophylaxis prior to invasive procedures.
31 e patients is challenging and often requires invasive procedures.
32 raining physicians for a number of minimally invasive procedures.
33 ls at any developmental stage with minimally invasive procedures.
34  in bleeding patients or in those undergoing invasive procedures.
35 cies or solid tumors or in those who undergo invasive procedures.
36 nce of active bleeding or before surgical or invasive procedures.
37 blood flow in a manner directly analogous to invasive procedures.
38 ently as adjuncts to endoscopic or minimally invasive procedures.
39 ciated with a greater risk of requiring more invasive procedures.
40 or noninvasive testing and subsequent use of invasive procedures.
41 her with nonsurgical techniques or minimally invasive procedures.
42  by nurses and doctors; and task shifting to invasive procedures.
43 atide but were predominantly associated with invasive procedures.
44 s in early caries cannot be measured without invasive procedures.
45 idity and may fare poorly compared with less-invasive procedures.
46  to be associated with the subsequent use of invasive procedures.
47 ally mild, but definitive diagnosis requires invasive procedures.
48 as performed on patients who did not undergo invasive procedures.
49 male sex, African ancestry, and experiencing invasive procedures.
50 onspecific and definitive diagnosis requires invasive procedures.
51 disease and may prevent the need for further invasive procedures.
52 void and reduce the complications during the invasive procedures.
53 -treated patients needing urgent surgical or invasive procedures.
54  needing VKA reversal for urgent surgical or invasive procedures.
55 sary for patients needing urgent surgical or invasive procedures.
56 urgical safety for currently used, minimally invasive procedures.
57 health-care costs by eliminating unnecessary invasive procedures.
58 e choice reported increases in rates of less invasive procedures.
59  trabeculectomy success rates with minimally invasive procedures.
60                 Indeterminate scans led to 6 invasive procedures, 1 patient died of complications of
61 s of endocarditis are not attributable to an invasive procedure; (2) cardiac conditions are stratifie
62  total of 4591 patients underwent at least 1 invasive procedure: 24.7% of patients received dabigatra
63 s, 379 patients (2%) underwent 472 minimally invasive procedures (272 BDTs, 129 PEGs, 71 IVC filters)
64 5%]; risk ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 2.3-2.5]), and invasive procedures (51% [95% CI, 50%-52%], vs hospice w
65                                              Invasive procedures (68.2% vs. 40.8%, p = .004) and hist
66 when examining the utilization of subsequent invasive procedures according to gender.
67 nesis such as these have generally relied on invasive procedures, adequate tissue sampling and meticu
68                                   The use of invasive procedures affects the cost of cardiovascular c
69  patients as well as their downstream use of invasive procedures after noninvasive testing in communi
70 ing from a very low frequency of testing and invasive procedures among a predominantly large percenta
71 total of 23,541 cancer patients underwent an invasive procedure and 474 (2%) had a postoperative VTE.
72                   Skin biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure and has been used in the evaluation o
73  For both sexes, these approaches involve an invasive procedure and have an uncertain risk of tissue
74                                The effect of invasive procedures and analgesic-sedative exposure on h
75 n be introduced into the body with minimally invasive procedures and are often applied in tissue engi
76 y, family members were excluded from viewing invasive procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in
77 rents' overwhelming desire to be present for invasive procedures and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
78 thod has the potential to reduce unnecessary invasive procedures and emotional distress for breast ca
79 restoration of visual function avoiding more invasive procedures and enabling early assessment of the
80 t and quantify CTCs and ctDNA could minimize invasive procedures and improve prediction of clinical o
81 ting that the use of these biomarkers avoids invasive procedures and improves patient or transplant o
82               Both approaches involve highly invasive procedures and neither allows examination of in
83 ancer (NMIBC) are committed to a lifetime of invasive procedures and potential hospitalizations that
84 ported that parents were present during more invasive procedures and reported higher levels of comfor
85 heparin (LMWH), with brief interruptions for invasive procedures and surgery.
86                       Parent presence during invasive procedures and/or resuscitation is a relatively
87  options and support during their children's invasive procedures and/or resuscitation.
88  validated (13 with urgent surgical or other invasive procedures) and 14 were discoverable (54%; 95%
89 rrhythmic therapy that includes medications, invasive procedures, and a combination of both in approp
90 n were measured and subsequent transfusions, invasive procedures, and bleed volume recorded.
91 ymptoms, with subsequent use of medications, invasive procedures, and clinical outcomes.
92  proxy for access and willingness to undergo invasive procedures, and examined treatments and outcome
93 have revolutionized medicine by facilitating invasive procedures, and have thus become essential drug
94 ed with greater use of statins, aspirin, and invasive procedures, and higher costs than functional te
95 novative behavior-based treatment, minimally invasive procedures, and medications currently under dev
96        The mean costs of subsequent testing, invasive procedures, and medications were higher after c
97 s monitoring, frequent physical evaluations, invasive procedures, and other demands of bedside care a
98 cant risk for bleeding, plans for surgery or invasive procedures, and platelet count </=5,000/mm.
99 nds is mediated in part by the lower rate of invasive procedures, and we speculate that better access
100 ases in which the wrong patient undergoes an invasive procedure are sufficiently distressing to warra
101 s-especially von Willebrand's disease-before invasive procedures are done.
102 World Health Organization grade 2 or planned invasive procedures are established indications for plat
103                                              Invasive procedures are frequent in the ICU and consent
104                               However, these invasive procedures are not without risk for the fetus.
105                                              Invasive procedures are often performed emergently in th
106  monitor single-unit activity in humans when invasive procedures are required due to particular patho
107 ency have been key advantages, laborious and invasive procedures are required for electrophysiologica
108 t it might increase bleeding when surgery or invasive procedures are required.
109  for each patient and in determining whether invasive procedures are warranted.
110  the newer applications of PVF in monitoring invasive procedures, are mentioned.
111                                  The role of invasive procedures as a risk factor is deemphasized, si
112 eterm human neonates are exposed to numerous invasive procedures as part of life-saving care.
113 lve, and include its latest use in minimally invasive procedures as well as in the operating room.
114       Policies to concentrate or regionalize invasive procedures at high-volume medical centers are u
115 lization, intensive care unit admission, and invasive procedures at the end of life, along with signi
116 ic lung volume reduction (BLVR), a minimally invasive procedure based on tissue engineering principle
117 c liver disease who were undergoing elective invasive procedures, but it was associated with an incre
118 nd is well suited for guiding many minimally invasive procedures, but its use is often precluded by t
119             A placebo-controlled trial of an invasive procedure can be ethically justified if: 1) the
120 ents with ACS who are scheduled for an early invasive procedure can prevent CI-AKI and improve short-
121                              The efficacy of invasive procedures can be assessed with a placebo contr
122                                              Invasive procedures can result in adverse cardiovascular
123 t confounders (underlying illness, severity, invasive procedures, Candida colonization), and using a
124  to determine whether the FNAB or additional invasive procedures caused the subsequent extraocular di
125 nutrition (TPN), blood product transfusions, invasive procedures, central venous catheters, hemodialy
126 n account the consequent diagnostic testing, invasive procedures, clinical outcomes, radiation exposu
127                            Acupuncture is an invasive procedure commonly used to relieve pain.
128 uated from 7 days before until 30 days after invasive procedures, considering only the first procedur
129  viral gene delivery systems, this minimally invasive procedure, consisting of a series of percutaneo
130       Evaluation and management services and invasive procedures contributed relatively little to thi
131 osis in 30 of 64 (46.8%) eyes; thus, further invasive procedures could be avoided.
132 upplement, and may even replace, some of the invasive procedures currently applied routinely to the e
133 creased MD (beta = 0.002, p = 0.02), whereas invasive procedures did not (beta = 0, p > 0.5 each).
134 , possibly due to growing evidence that this invasive procedure does not reduce mortality.
135 ble agents to include patients desiring less invasive procedures due to personal preference or as a r
136 ditional methods of fetal evaluation require invasive procedures (e.g. amniocentesis) with an inheren
137  of surgical procedures; number of minimally invasive procedures (eg, operative laparoscopy or ultras
138 ntial diagnosis of new lesions arising after invasive procedures, even in immunocompetent patients in
139  reperfusion strategies and greater usage of invasive procedures, factors that may possibly reduce sh
140 econdary outcomes included nodule detection, invasive procedures, follow-up tests, and smoking cessat
141 ment of hemophilia would require a minimally invasive procedure for gene delivery, have minimal assoc
142      Recent studies reported a new minimally invasive procedure for inguinal lymphadenectomy in patie
143            Sentinel-node biopsy, a minimally invasive procedure for regional melanoma staging, was ev
144 iewed all patients who underwent a minimally invasive procedure for the management of hepatic tumors
145           Balloon kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of painful vertebra
146 utaneous lumbar decompression is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of symptomatic lumb
147 d is simple and entails a significantly less invasive procedure for tissue sampling.
148     Percutaneous cryoablation is a minimally invasive procedure for tumor destruction, which can pote
149 eons, and fuels the study of alternate, less invasive procedures for Behcet patients.
150                                              Invasive procedures for complications declined during th
151 hrinking lung, and might obviate unnecessary invasive procedures for MPM.
152 em cell seeding on a scaffold and relatively invasive procedures for stem cell harvesting.
153  repair and recent developments in minimally invasive procedures for the repair of ureteropelvic junc
154               The authors went on to perform invasive procedures for the treatment of CCSVI with ques
155  the recent introduction of novel, minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of prostate cancer
156       With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of ureteropelvic j
157 ea and accessibility, which allows minimally invasive procedures for transplantation, graft monitorin
158 stic lesion and supports the necessity of an invasive procedure, for example, biopsy or surgical rese
159  for an elective operation or other elective invasive procedure, forgoing bridging anticoagulation wa
160 ated indications cardiologists who performed invasive procedures gave higher appropriateness ratings
161                                The minimally invasive procedure has been successfully performed in 25
162  of fibroid treatment, and various minimally invasive procedures have been developed in addition to h
163 r, although gender differences in the use of invasive procedures have been reported, the use of nonin
164                            Various minimally invasive procedures have emerged recently for the treatm
165                        Advances in minimally invasive procedures have resulted in an increased demand
166 ften associated with health-care contact and invasive procedures, have overtaken streptococci as the
167 er 1990 and December 1993; none had previous invasive procedures, heart failure or valve disease.
168              The number of diagnostic tests, invasive procedures, hospitalizations, and medications d
169 dings fewer women than men were referred for invasive procedures, however, newer studies suggest an a
170 ominent role of acute coronary syndromes and invasive procedures in cardiology, we practically consid
171       Venepuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in healthcare.
172         Bleeding is a feared complication of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and signi
173 al benefits, as do potential noninvasive and invasive procedures in recalcitrant cases.
174                        There were also fewer invasive procedures in specialized surveillance compared
175 owever, craniotomy was superior to minimally invasive procedures in the management of recurrences (RR
176 edictive value of recall examinations and of invasive procedures, in addition to rates of screening-d
177 and had been subjected to multiple and often invasive procedures including arthroscopy/synovial biops
178 the risk of acute adverse outcomes following invasive procedures, including postoperative atrial fibr
179 ; intraoperative graft assessment; minimally invasive procedures, including robotic-assisted surgery;
180 edictive value of recall examinations and of invasive procedures increased from 19.3% (4559 of 23 598
181           As tissue-based approaches require invasive procedures, information was mainly gleaned from
182       HWs protected themselves better during invasive procedures (injections, venipuncture, and surge
183 bnormal coagulation test results prior to an invasive procedure is a common clinical practice; howeve
184  oral anticoagulation (AC) for surgery or an invasive procedure is a complicated process.
185                               This minimally invasive procedure is an option for patients with centra
186 gulopathy when there is overt bleeding or an invasive procedure is planned.
187  from healthier patients undergoing the less invasive procedure is unclear.
188 ment but the technology to perform minimally invasive procedures is not currently available.
189 ve to be used as tissue sealant in minimally invasive procedures is reported.
190 loped to improve the rational use of cardiac invasive procedures, it is unknown whether greater adher
191                       Unlike other minimally invasive procedures, laparoscopic appendectomy did not o
192 em via an intravenous route, avoiding a more invasive procedure later in life.
193 oming years will be to find a way to obviate invasive procedures like posterior capsulotomy and vitre
194 ilation patients required significantly more invasive procedures, longer hospital stays, and longer t
195          Further use of noninvasive testing, invasive procedures, medications, and medical costs with
196  and Complex randomised controlled Trials In Invasive procedures, MR/K025643/1).
197 agnostic imaging tests (n = 19), nonsurgical invasive procedures (n = 19), and surgical procedures (n
198             In patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures (n = 5177; 17 studies), 13 frailty i
199 ble analysis, combined urinary diagnoses and invasive procedures (obstruction, incontinence, bleeding
200                  A complication diagnosis or invasive procedure occurred in 54.5% of men within 2 yea
201           Its diagnosis is contingent on the invasive procedure of allograft biopsy.
202 tion, and its diagnosis is contingent on the invasive procedure of allograft biopsy.
203 s and human outcomes and the need to perform invasive procedures on animals; hence requiring new pred
204  initiation of treatment, before surgical or invasive procedures, on the occasion of hemorrhagic or t
205 ture and, after mechanical denudation during invasive procedures or cellular loss from natural causes
206  appropriate selection of elderly people for invasive procedures or drug treatments and would be the
207 ed coronary atherosclerosis as the basis for invasive procedures or for lifelong intense risk factor
208 ethods of stimulating brain activity require invasive procedures or have other limitations.
209 ate patients' comfort and their tolerance of invasive procedures or other interventions within the IC
210 alization, physician fees, laboratory tests, invasive procedures, outpatient encounters, and readmiss
211 ten for a noninvasive or, when indicated, an invasive procedure (P < .05).
212 ferences in the use of acute medications and invasive procedures partially attenuated this mortality
213   Because APA diagnosis requires a difficult invasive procedure, patients often remain undiagnosed an
214 mortality reduction) and 1186 false-positive invasive procedures per 100 000 persons.
215 bcutaneous (SC) site may require a minimally invasive procedure performed under local anesthesia, but
216                                              Invasive procedures performed by residents were recorded
217                                    Number of invasive procedures performed, failure and complication
218                    SLN biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure, performed on an outpatient basis at
219 ose prolonged stays in hospital and need for invasive procedures place them at increased risk for hos
220                                        These invasive procedures pose a small but not negligible risk
221 opic procedures and may facilitate minimally invasive procedures previously felt unfeasible with stan
222                                              Invasive procedure rates declined with later year of bra
223 e 33.8%, 21.0%, and 16.7%, respectively, and invasive procedure rates were 10.3%, 0.8%, and 4.0%, res
224         The use of antithrombotic agents and invasive procedures reduces ischemic complications but i
225  intensive care, mechanical ventilation, and invasive procedure remained unchanged after the introduc
226 loping advanced surgical tools for minimally invasive procedures represents an activity of central im
227 thods for staging exist; mediastinoscopy, an invasive procedure requiring general anesthesia, is curr
228 g anginal episode and less likely to undergo invasive procedures (risk ratio [RR], 0.65%; 95% confide
229            The routine use of statins before invasive procedures should be considered.
230                  Statins administered before invasive procedures significantly reduce the hazard of p
231 nd difficult, and it is hard to justify more invasive procedures such as a bronchoscopy in young chil
232  cycle phase without fatal and/or perturbing invasive procedures such as cell staining, fixing, and/o
233                               Prior to FAST, invasive procedures such as diagnostic peritoneal lavage
234 etermine if individual patients require more invasive procedures such as endomyocardial biopsy and ma
235                                         More invasive procedures such as hemispherectomy and multiple
236 ome more adept at such procedures, maximally invasive procedures such as intestinal neovagina may be
237 atients, thereby sparing these patients more invasive procedures such as mediastinoscopy.
238  Generally, agreement was excellent for more invasive procedures such as prostatectomy or radiation (
239 vironments such as the oral cavity or during invasive procedures such as surgery.
240                     The results of minimally invasive procedures such as urethral dilation and transu
241 ently, family member presence during routine invasive procedures such as venipuncture, intravenous ca
242  morbidity and mortality incidence, requires invasive procedures such as, debridement with primary cl
243 he most sensitive diagnosis of PDAC requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopic ultrasonography,
244 irrhosis and significant coagulopathy before invasive procedures, TEG-guided transfusion strategy lea
245 acoronary stents in most patients, is a less invasive procedure than coronary artery bypass graft (CA
246 omy without axillary surgery, it is an extra invasive procedure that does not facilitate obtaining ne
247             Radioembolization is a minimally invasive procedure that involves implantation of radioac
248                           PTK is a minimally invasive procedure that is often successful in delaying
249 lagen crosslinking (CXL) is a relatively non-invasive procedure that leads to an increase in corneal
250                                   This is an invasive procedure that may interfere with the microtubu
251 n in patients with HOCM is a safe, minimally invasive procedure that provides symptomatic relief with
252 lacebo for 14 days before a planned elective invasive procedure that was performed within 5 days afte
253 eal-time x-ray fused with MRI (XFM) to guide invasive procedures that combines the best features of b
254 lizations in hospitals capable of performing invasive procedures that had at least 25 HF hospitalizat
255 ctice of neurosurgery has moved towards less invasive procedures the need for prolonged, deep general
256 cytopenia) or that were addressed partially (invasive procedures), the ASCO search extended back to J
257            Among patients who do not receive invasive procedures, the cost of HF hospitalization is h
258 ted variables, including the availability of invasive procedures, the specialty of the attending phys
259             Along with a trend for minimally invasive procedures, these forces have challenged the ea
260            Transfusion of plasma prior to an invasive procedure to correct mild to moderate abnormal
261 er to determine whether we are offering this invasive procedure to the patients who are most at risk
262               Too few patients had minimally invasive procedures to comment on their effect on sexual
263  is readily available, patients must undergo invasive procedures to differentiate heartworm from othe
264 mising alternatives to hBMSCs, which require invasive procedures to harvest with limited cell quantit
265 will allow for more judicious application of invasive procedures to pregnancies at significant risk f
266 utilized glabrous skin biopsies, a minimally invasive procedure, to evaluate these issues systematica
267          Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive procedure used during coronary angiography to d
268 ent System (Pulmonx Inc., Redwood, CA) is an invasive procedure used to assess collateral ventilation
269 ammation undergoing topical therapy alone vs invasive procedures (vitreous biopsy and/or intravitreal
270                              A slightly more invasive procedure was performed later in the study: the
271                   Of 103 patients in whom an invasive procedure was planned after the stress data, th
272 or kidneys procured by open versus minimally invasive procedures was compared (procedures compared we
273         Only 1 study investigating minimally invasive procedures was identified.
274 s treated with dabigatran and planned for an invasive procedure were eligible for inclusion.
275 r 3 of 6 types of surgery studied, minimally invasive procedures were associated with significantly l
276            For 4 types of surgery, minimally invasive procedures were consistently associated with si
277                                              Invasive procedures were defined as percutaneous coronar
278              Tests performed in follow-up to invasive procedures were excluded (eg, stress test follo
279                           Complications from invasive procedures were low in both groups (9.8% in the
280 ions were nondiagnostic for lung cancer, and invasive procedures were performed after bronchoscopy in
281 eyond initial examinations was frequent, and invasive procedures were performed for 27% of patients.
282 nd the initial visit in 66% of patients, and invasive procedures were performed in 27% of patients.
283 er prostate brachytherapy was common, though invasive procedures were required infrequently.
284                              Medications and invasive procedures were used to a similar extent in pat
285 w in addition to structural OCT data without invasive procedures will help to further elucidate both
286    Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive procedure with increasing promise in treatment
287 utinely performed to screen for TxCAD, is an invasive procedure with limited sensitivity.
288   Today open radical prostatectomy is a less-invasive procedure with low morbidity providing excellen
289                      However, this is a semi-invasive procedure with rare but potential life-threaten
290 ey health after kidney transplantation is an invasive procedure with some risk to the patient.
291 of the most commonly practiced and minimally invasive procedures with a recognized morbidity relating
292            Models testing the association of invasive procedures with hippocampal volumes and DTI mea
293                                    Minimally invasive procedures with little-to-no recovery time are
294  needed to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive procedures with those of open procedures.
295 ocietal shifts have focused patients on less invasive procedures, with less downtime and more rapid r
296                 We found that both minimally invasive procedures yielded kidney allografts with excel

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top