ライフサイエンスコーパス: invasive species

1 found to be important to the success of some invasive species.

2 nd behavior, S. invicta is a more successful invasive species.

3 there are very few process-based models for invasive species.

4 tween TEs, life history and adaptation in an invasive species.

5 periodicity of spread of this potential new invasive species.

6 id in assessing and mitigating the impact of invasive species.

7 several trait differences between native and invasive species.

8 are to be made to halt this potential marine invasive species.

9 lowstone cutthroat trout (YCT) and competing invasive species.

10 at symbionts may help to trace the source of invasive species.

11 try has not been examined in more than a few invasive species.

12 n important step in the evolution of asexual invasive species.

13 cognized as one of the world's most damaging invasive species.

14 eing important ornamental but also weedy and invasive species.

15 al reproduction is a trait commonly found in invasive species.

16 ens, representing assembly in the context of invasive species.

17 food webs containing a mixture of native and invasive species.

18 e shifts can shed light on the management of invasive species.

19 that may aid the success of this widespread invasive species.

20 structive as a predator and successful as an invasive species.

21 ncrease due to climate-induced expansions of invasive species.

22 of global change: the rapid establishment of invasive species.

23 because of the dominance and persistence of invasive species.

24 , the Japanese beetle remains a threat as an invasive species.

25 educed the advantages of the larger, faster, invasive species.

26 utility for the monitoring of this important invasive species.

27 on, direct exploitation, climate change, and invasive species.

28 opulation management for both threatened and invasive species.

29 sure by quagga mussels, a widespread aquatic invasive species.

30 onary processes that modulate the effects of invasive species.

31 competitors on the dietary niche breadths of invasive species.

32 effects on B. tectorum and other nitrophilic invasive species.

33 their trading partners and incumbent pool of invasive species.

34 at influence the establishment and spread of invasive species.

35 f less-competitive species and the spread of invasive species.

36 ctive asynchrony or the population growth of invasive species.

37 g and prediction of the predatory impacts of invasive species.

38 e in insects and weeds, and control damaging invasive species.

39 , SGARs remain a mainstay for eradication of invasive species.

40 A large majority of studies on invasive species address timescales of less than one yea

41 er se is not a pathway by which forest woody invasive species affect North American temperate forest

42 toring, including early detection of aquatic invasive species (AIS).

43 e better predictors than the trait values of invasive species alone.

44 There are examples of invasive species altering the evolutionary pathway of na

45 tries vary in terms of potential threat from invasive species and also their role as potential source

46 o forecast the progress and impacts of alien invasive species and assess potential range-shifting dri

47 roduction, revealing a close linkage between invasive species and carbon dynamics.

48 nteractions for future biological control of invasive species and conservation of native species.

49 vasion success is in high fecundity for both invasive species and demographic compensation for Apetio

50 ns) are bred with characteristics typical of invasive species and environmental weeds.

51 mming from climate change, overexploitation, invasive species and habitat degradation often cause an

52 estimates of the financial damage caused by invasive species and high estimates of the value of spec

53 standing of intraspecific differentiation in invasive species and its interaction with climate change

54 dioxide enrichment, nitrogen eutrophication, invasive species and land-use changes.

55 ses of humans and managed species, policy on invasive species and parasites of wildlife is fragmented

56 uld be critical for predicting the spread of invasive species and population responses to climate cha

57 bacteria are engineered to communicate with invasive species and potentially prevent human disease.

58 ds are easily adapted for a variety of other invasive species and that such risk maps could be used b

59 In addition, hotspots of invasive species and the most susceptible native species

60 e subsequent establishment of extrabasinal (=invasive) species and may have led to a suppression of s

61 of disease, wildfire, carbon sequestration, invasive species, and biogeochemical cycles.

62 rgoing range expansion, including pathogens, invasive species, and humans.

63 rs such as global emissions, climate change, invasive species, and local geochemistry are likely affe

64 al systems, including issues like fisheries, invasive species, and restoration, as well as others, of

65 , eradication of disease vectors, control of invasive species, and the safe study of emerging biotech

66 Invasive species are a key driver of global environmenta

67 Invasive species are a significant threat to global biod

68 Many invasive species are able to escape from coevolved enemi

69 atives more likely to be invasive, but these invasive species are also evolutionarily closer to nativ

70 Aggressive invasive species are associated with all three groups.

71 Invasive species are believed to spread through a proces

72 Invasive species are expected to cluster on the "high-re

73 Efforts to limit the impact of invasive species are frustrated by the cryptogenic statu

74 While invasive species are most often studied in the context o

75 Invasive species are of great interest to evolutionary b

76 an three-quarters of taxa listed globally as invasive species are plants.

77 Invasive species are rare in long-established national p

78 Because invasive species are rarely eradicated, and their damage

79 and use and climate, nitrogen deposition and invasive species are the most important threats to globa

80 rchical model that differentiated native and invasive species as a function of summer growth rate and

81 two host populations though evidence for the invasive species as the source of the outbreak was equiv

82 ntine ant (Linepithema humile), a widespread invasive species, at three spatial scales.

83 r the effective management of threatened and invasive species because false detections directly affec

84 ng 70% of all termite species) have only two invasive species, because relatively few species have th

85 effective management strategies not only for invasive species but also for assisted colonization unde

86 es in wildlands to greater use of exotic and invasive species by cougars in contemporary urban interf

87 The impacts of invasive species can be more pervasive than simple reduc

88 Invasive species can cause severe damage in their introd

89 New England salt marshes and assertions that invasive species can play positive roles outside of thei

90 Eradication of an invasive species can provide significant environmental,

91 Invasive species can quickly transform biological commun

92 lophora glabripennis, a globally significant invasive species capable of inflicting severe feeding da

93 In the worst cases, impacts from invasive species cascade through a community and destabi

94 The expansion of invasive species challenges our understanding of the pro

95 how the trophic position of this widespread invasive species changes over time as native ant species

96 l environmental changes (e.g., habitat loss, invasive species, climate change) are often overlooked,

97 act values are due mainly to the presence of invasive species, climate change, cropland and pasture a

98 ion interact across a variety of ecosystem - invasive species combinations.

99 ethod for estimating the range of a globally invasive species, common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifoli

100 vels is not always an effective strategy for invasive species control.

101 ch provide a net economic benefit) for every invasive species correctly identified.

102 Invasive species cost the global economy billions of dol

103 characterising the genetic structure of the invasive species D. suzukii in Italy.

104 stimates of invasion success from the Global Invasive Species Database as well as the primary literat

105 ion for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Global Invasive Species Database, which are presented here for

106 eriments containing a population gradient of invasive species densities.

107 future climates; study the distributions of invasive species; discover new species; and simulate inc

108 ish (Gambusia affinis), one of the 100 worst invasive species, disperse further, suggesting a sociabi

109 Global change is likely to affect invasive species distribution, especially at range margi

110 dbacks structure plant communities, underlie invasive species dynamics, or reduce agricultural produc

111 Invasive species, expanding human technologies, and glob

112 Invasive species' facilitation, or benefiting, of native

113 represent the greatest potential sources of invasive species for the rest of the world.

114 seven leaf N pools for five native and five invasive species from Hawaii under low irradiance to mim

115 Preemptive measures to prevent potential invasive species from reaching new habitats are the most

116 stressors, such as atmospheric pollution and invasive species, further weaken trees in some regions.

117 tivity, disturbance) and anthropogenic (e.g. invasive species, habitat destruction) ecological driver

118 tion of biogeochemical cycles, introduced or invasive species, habitat loss and fragmentation through

119 The successful establishment of invasive species has been shown to depend on aspects of

120 Recent discussion on invasive species has invigorated the debate on strategie

121 Studies focusing on invasive species have been based on plants or animals wh

122 Although mean rates of spread for invasive species have been intensively studied, variance

123 Invasive species have great ecological and economic impa

124 y spatio-temporal metadata enable rapid, non-invasive species identification.

125 l biodiversity, but our understanding of how invasive species impact native communities across space

126 al responses as a tool to predict and assess invasive species impacts incorporating multiple context

127 rate ecosystem services into our analysis of invasive species impacts, management, and public policy.

128 nitrogen (C : N) ratio, explain variation in invasive species' impacts on soil N cycling.

129 e more prevalent in NIS and therefore favour invasive species in aquatic habitats.

130 tially address questions about the impact of invasive species in ecological systems and new competito

131 minance trade-off is thought to be broken by invasive species in enemy-free space or territorial spec

132 ical questions, including methods to control invasive species in light-limited restored ecosystems.

133 Like invasive species in nature, cancer cells at the leading

134 the distributions of species, especially of invasive species in non-native ranges, involves multiple

135 rope and Asia that has emerged as an aquatic invasive species in North America.

136 To date, the most successful marine invasive species in the Atlantic is the lionfish (Pteroi

137 ecause of its population history as an alien invasive species in the UK.

138 at Centaurea maculosa (spotted knapweed), an invasive species in the western United States, displaces

139 tial picture of the spread and management of invasive species, in the absence of any other long-term

140 stablished quickly among noncoevolved (e.g., invasive) species, indicating its easy assembly is due t

141 Invasive species introduced via the ballast water of com

142 The growing problem of invasive species introductions brings considerable econo

143 in developing gene drive systems to control invasive species is growing, with New Zealand reportedly

144 y across all environments, so the success of invasive species is habitat-dependent.

145 In contrast, the richness of invasive species is high in the more recently designated

146 y tissue traits, in addition to those of the invasive species, is critical to understanding the impac

147 t resistance to pesticides, rapid changes in invasive species, life-history change in commercial fish

148 d the economic and ecological harm caused by invasive species, linkages between invasions, changes in

149 ncreasing biological and economic impacts of invasive species, little is known about the evolutionary

150 These results could help guide invasive species management in many waterways globally.

151 As this suggests that invasive species management in the UK is vulnerable to a

152 important implications for conservation and invasive species management.

153 Such invasive species may be able to evolve in response to ch

154 This hypothesis predicts that high-resource invasive species may be particularly susceptible to biol

155 The dynamics of invasive species may depend on their abilities to compet

156 mates of the economic effects of Great Lakes invasive species may increase considerably if cases of s

157 Invasive species may not exhibit different population dy

158 Invasive species may precipitate evolutionary change in

159 Invasive species may succeed by employing a wide range o

160 s adapted to resource-poor environments, and invasive species may succeed in low-resource environment

161 udies addressing the trophic interactions of invasive species most often focus on their direct effect

162 Halyomorpha halys is a global invasive species, native to Southeast Asia, that is thre

163 Our results show that invasive species not only reduce biodiversity but rapidl

164 e efficiencies in 14 native and 18 nonnative invasive species of common genera found in Eastern North

165 trol of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), an invasive species of the Laurentian Great Lakes.

166 both direct and indirect losses, with alien invasive species often having the most severe ecological

167 While invasive species often threaten biodiversity and human w

168 ings demonstrate the potential impacts of an invasive species on a diverse faunal assemblage across b

169 orldwide, yet knowledge about the impacts of invasive species on bacterial communities remains sparse

170 n order to predict and manage the impacts of invasive species on ecosystems.

171 ate the strength of ecological effects of an invasive species on invaded communities.

172 root traits that differed between native and invasive species, only leaf nitrogen was significantly a

173 Specially, establishing whether invasive species operate within the constraint of conser

174 enturies and ask: Can we fight the spread of invasive species or do we need to develop strategies for

175 Homogenization can be also driven by invasive species or effects of soil eutrophication propa

176 Most invasive species originate from Southeast Asia.

177 ecies in the United States, yet as with many invasive species, our ability to predict, control or und

178 ailable resources on attempting to eradicate invasive species, our findings suggest that in the futur

179 However, the invasive species P. macrodactylus represents an exceptio

180 Invasive species pose serious threats to community struc

181 Despite knowledge on invasive species' predatory effects, we know little of t

182 Invasive species present significant threats to global a

183 Plants are commonly listed as invasive species, presuming that they cause harm at both

184 Recently, authors have theorized that invasive species prevention is more cost-effective than

185 (LTS) assay, we test for the presence of two invasive species: quagga (Dreissena bugensis) and zebra

186 lepidopterans to determine the importance of invasive species relative to 15 other recognized endange

187 cognized, the response of carbon dynamics to invasive species remains largely unknown.

188 Invasive species represent a significant threat to globa

189 Invasive species represent promising models to study spe

190 Adding two invasive species, Ruminococcus gnavus and Clostridium sy

191 To address the global problems caused by invasive species, several studies investigated steps ii

192 All invasive species share three characteristics that togeth

193 In particular, invasive species showed preferential N allocation to met

194 torical CO2 increase in the atmosphere, with invasive species showing the largest increase.

195 sessing the risks of aquaculture activities, invasive species spread, and movements of ballast water

196 t contemporary evolution may facilitate this invasive species' spread in this desert ecosystem.

197 ent years, either by natural factors such as invasive species, storms and global change or by direct

198 just trade flow, as has been interpreted in invasive species studies.

199 ted CO2 and warming would strongly influence invasive species success in a semi-arid grassland, as a

200 al controls are inadequate, and the range of invasive species such as Aedes albopictus (Asian Tiger M

201 seems to play a major role in the success of invasive species such as the viburnum leaf beetle.

202 re invaded to a greater extent by non-native invasive species than ectomycorrhizal (ECM) dominant for

203 s and highlight the additional risk posed by invasive species that are highly abundant and can act as

204 ald ash borer (EAB, Agrilus planipennis), an invasive species that causes widespread mortality of ash

205 Islands have double the number of invasive species that continents do, with islands in the

206 However, the limited number of invasive species that have been included in decompositio

207 Many invasive species that have been spread through the globa

208 hat fire ants may be representative of other invasive species that would be better described as distu

209 To determine the probable origin of this invasive species, the genetic structure of the populatio

210 spread of organisms governs the dynamics of invasive species, the spread of pathogens, and the shift

211 sed niche shifts in one of the world's worst invasive species: the wild boar Sus scrofa.

212 Invasive species threaten biodiversity globally, and inv

213 investment in the prevention and control of invasive species to better maximize the economic benefit

214 er diversity may also improve the ability of invasive species to establish and subsequently spread in

215 The introduction of invasive species to new locations (that is, biological i

216 th and less conservative water use may allow invasive species to take advantage of both carbon fertil

217 the mainland has led to the arrival of many invasive species to the Galapagos Islands, including nov

218 d (Scardinius erythrophthalmus), which is an invasive species to the Great Lakes.

219 wgrass (C3 ) led to the establishment of the invasive species torpedograss (C4 ) when water was resup

220 tic potential of the orthologs from the less invasive species Treponema denticola and Treponema phage

221 dea that native species generally outperform invasive species under conditions of low resource availa

222 Native to Asia, this invasive species was first discovered in North America i

223 de and the direct and indirect effects of an invasive species, we examined the impacts of Norway rats

224 e growth forms and broad taxonomic diversity invasive species were generally more efficient than nati

225 the maternal fitness of a self-incompatible invasive species, wild radish (Raphanus sativus).

226 er mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Skuse), is an invasive species with substantial biting activity, high

227 scales and to determine the trophic roles of invasive species within native ecosystems.

228 commerce has resulted in the spread of urban invasive species worldwide such that various species are