ライフサイエンスコーパス: isolator

1 ttle of BacT/Alert or the aerobic culture of Isolator.

2 on has been achieved without any intracavity isolator.

3 lectrically controlled subwavelength optical isolator.

4 down the functionalities of these nonlinear isolators.

5 medium and 41 of 42 (98%) which grew only in Isolators.

6 The Isolator 1.5 microbial system (ISO 1.5) (Wampole Laborat

7 The use of the Wampole Isolator 1.5-ml pediatric blood culture tube for the det

8 lawi by using the BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC (MFL), ISOLATOR 10 (Isolator), Septi-Chek AFB (SC-AFB), and Sep

9 mia than were the heretofore standard manual ISOLATOR 10 and radiometric BACTEC 13A systems.

10 for BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC versus 20.4 days for ISOLATOR 10 for 24 of 230 pairs, and 9.9 days for BacT/A

11 days for BacT/ALERT MB versus 19.0 days for ISOLATOR 10 for 24 of 257 pairs.

12 2.6 days for BACTEC 13A versus 20.0 days for ISOLATOR 10 for 26 of 261 pairs, 12.8 days for BACTEC MY

13 acT/ALERT MB (bioMerieux, Durham, N.C.), and ISOLATOR 10 lysis-centrifugation (Wampole Laboratories,

14 ctec Myco/F Lytic procedure, and that of the Isolator 10 lysis-centrifugation system in the detection

15 BacT/ALERT MB was positive for 22 (85%), and ISOLATOR 10 was positive for 21 (81%).

16 days for BacT/Alert MB versus 23.8 days for Isolator 10, and 21.1 days for Bactec Myco/F Lytic versu

17 for Bactec Myco/F Lytic versus 22.7 days for Isolator 10.

18 BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC and BACTEC 13A and then ISOLATOR 10.

19 Laboratories; 1.5 ml of blood) or a standard Isolator (10 ml of blood) and a bottle of ESP anaerobic

20 ogens in the blood could be determined using Isolators, 73 (60.3%) represented low-level bacteremia (

21 uding optically controllable circulators and isolators, all-optical switching, nonlinear-enhanced rot

22 The use of a second Isolator and additional aerobic and anaerobic bottles an

23 However, a similar comparison showed the Isolator and the ESP 80A systems to have statistically s

24 Low-loss optical isolators and circulators are critical nonreciprocal com

25 alization of non-reciprocal devices, such as isolators and circulators, of fundamental importance in

26 Nonreciprocal components, such as isolators and circulators, provide highly desirable func

27 b repertoire when animals were maintained in isolators and colonized with a defined gut flora.

28 sodes for which two or more culture devices (Isolators and/or bottles) were inoculated, 85 (59%) were

29 tle of BacT/Alert and the aerobic culture of Isolator, and both of these combinations identified at l

30 gle mode lasers, coherent perfect absorbers, isolators, and diodes.

31 other experimentally demonstrated terahertz isolators, and indeed, even rivals that of commercially

32 ived as GF by embryo transfer, maintained in isolators, and sacrificed at 60 days in parallel with ag

33 nanoribbons and realization of a NEMS signal isolator are also discussed.

34 The presented FR isolators are made via lithography and sputter depositio

35 The isolators are simple 1D 2-element waveguides, where garn

36 10 germfree mice were maintained in separate isolators as controls.

37 ample of blood, cultures for fungi using the Isolator blood culture system (Wampole Laboratories, Cra

38 covery of 1,270 fungal isolates from 176,144 Isolator blood cultures (0.72% positive) on bacterial an

39 ed CD4 lymphocyte counts, immunophenotyping, isolator blood cultures, and radiological scans.

40 nfected cats were collected in both EDTA and Isolator blood-lysis tubes and were subsequently plated

41 Moreover, one cannot construct an optical isolator by incorporating this structure into any system

42 a lead-lined compounding aseptic containment isolator (CACI) was installed.

43 re separated from their neuron targets by an isolator chamber ring.

44 capitulate these findings in vitro using the isolator chamber system developed in our lab for analysi

45 However, non-reciprocal components such as isolators, circulators and gyrators enable new applicati

46 interference by background contamination, an isolator column (PFC kit) was installed in between eluen

47 bacteremia, the sensitivities of the MFL and Isolator concentrate in the SC-AFB bottle were similar (

48 For bacteremia, the MFL was similar to the Isolator concentrate on chocolate agar (34 of 44 versus

49 ottle was as sensitive as the SC-B bottle or Isolator concentrate on chocolate agar or IMA slants.

50 Next, 0.5-ml aliquots of Isolator concentrate were inoculated into an SC-AFB bott

51 The performance of our isolator far exceeds that of other experimentally demons

52 t-effective for those laboratories using the Isolator for routine blood cultures and furthermore may

53 f designing chip-based magnetic-free optical isolators for information processing and laser protectio

54 ssing, providing a way to chip-scale optical isolators for optical communications and computing.

55 , even rivals that of commercially available isolators for optical wavelengths.

56 ted broth systems that are comparable to the Isolator in recovery of fungi.

57 well as all of the bottles containing actual Isolator LAR failed to reach the maximum within 42 days.

58 to identify the specific component(s) of the Isolator lysis-anticoagulant reagent (LAR) responsible f

59 samples also were negative for fungi by the Isolator method.

60 reciprocity, we here demonstrate an optical isolator on a silicon chip enforced by phase-matched par

61 to immunologic injury and suggests that the isolator piglet model could serve as a useful model to d

62 This can best be tested in the isolator piglet model in which maternal and other extrin

63 Isolator piglets infected with porcine reproductive and

64 ectratypic analysis of B cells from neonatal isolator piglets show a non-Gaussian pattern with prefer

65 ate that PRRSV induces B cell hyperplasia in isolator piglets that leads to immunologic injury and su

66 However, only in PRRSV-infected isolator piglets was nearly the identical spectratype ob

67 Therefore, neonatal isolator piglets were colonized with a benign Escherichi

68 e-matched, virus-infected fetuses, colonized isolator piglets, and conventional adults.

69 anaerobic bottle and the aerobic culture of Isolator recovered as may isolates (374 versus 377) and

70 ly when combined with the aerobic culture of Isolator, resulted from not only enhanced recovery of ob

71 Isolator sediment was divided among eight agar media, in

72 the BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC (MFL), ISOLATOR 10 (Isolator), Septi-Chek AFB (SC-AFB), and Septi-Chek bacte

73 Over this period, a total of 9,442 pediatric Isolator specimens were processed, with yeast or yeast-l

74 40 blood culture system, was compared to the Isolator system (IS) for the recovery of fungi and to th

75 , 6 to 18 days) for those recovered with the Isolator system (P < 0.05).

76 dium and 7 days (range, 5 to 7 days) for the Isolator system (P < 0.05); the mean times to identifica

77 EC Plus Aerobic/F bottle than for either the Isolator system (P = 0.0003) or the MYCO/F Lytic bottle

78 ess for the MYCO/F Lytic bottle than for the Isolator system (P = 0.0004).

79 ignificantly more pathogens overall than the Isolator system (P = 0.0006).

80 significantly more pathogens than either the Isolator system (P = 0.0084) or the standard method (P =

81 d.) was compared with aerobic culture of the Isolator system (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) f

82 ected H. capsulatum in seven samples but the Isolator system alone detected H. capsulatum in seven sa

83 vered, 6 from broth medium alone, 4 from the Isolator system alone, and 10 from both systems.

84 ystem required less processing time than the Isolator system and eliminates the hands-on time for det

85 ystem required less processing time than the Isolator system and eliminates the hands-on time for the

86 The combination of the Isolator system and MYCO/F Lytic bottle may be useful as

87 Both the Isolator system and the standard plate method recovered

88 The Isolator system detected statistically significantly mor

89 Similarly, the Isolator system detected statistically significantly mor

90 assessing individual probable pathogens, the Isolator system detected statistically significantly mor

91 bottle with two other BACTEC bottles and the Isolator system for the recovery of bacteria as well as

92 by comparing its performance to that of the Isolator system for the recovery of fungi and to that of

93 y of fungal isolates from blood by using the Isolator system has been reported previously.

94 sults support previous observations that the Isolator system is more sensitive than tubes containing

95 th systems, 7 samples were positive with the Isolator system only, and 5 samples were positive with M

96 ical difference in recovery that favored the Isolator system over the MYCO/F Lytic bottle (P = 0.0015

97 The Isolator system recovered more pathogens than the standa

98 Septi-Chek system (P = 0.083); however, the Isolator system recovered significantly more microorgani

99 The Isolator system recovered statistically significantly mo

100 The Isolator system required the most processing time compar

101 when blood collected and processed with the Isolator system was placed in BACTEC 12B bottles for rad

102 used and in 6 of 20 (30%) cases in which the Isolator system was used.

103 ely compared three blood culture system, the Isolator system, a lysis-centrifugation system, the Sept

104 -year study period, the use of the pediatric Isolator system, at the discretion of the treating physi

105 Compared with the manual Isolator system, the MYCO/F Lytic system has the advanta

106 ction of positive cultures required with the Isolator system.

107 nt medium for the recovery of fungi from the Isolator system.

108 , 7 to 11 days) for those recovered with the Isolator system.

109 ve Staphylococcus spp. (P = 0.0029) than the Isolator system.

110 ium and 9 days (range, 6 to 18 days) for the Isolator system; the mean times to identification were 2

111 me probable pathogens in the ESP 80A and the Isolator systems, there was no statistically significant

112 ent an active, purely mechanical stress wave isolator that consists of short cylindrical particles ar

113 obic BacT/Alert bottle or aerobic culture of Isolator, the BacT/Alert anaerobic bottle recovered sign

114 t mice were also housed in the same germfree isolator to study transmission patterns, and 10 germfree

115 ngs indicate that spines serve as electrical isolators to prevent input interaction, and thus generat

116 ed favoring the BACTEC resin bottle over the Isolator tube (P < 0.05).

117 each of four blood culture receptacles: the Isolator tube (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) and

118 F Lytic bottle only and one isolate from the Isolator tube (whose sediment was inoculated into the BA

119 e other from the MYCO/F Lytic bottle and the Isolator tube (whose sediment was inoculated into the BA

120 ed at 5 ml into an MFL bottle, 10 ml into an Isolator tube for lysis and centrifugation, and 10 ml in

121 ator tube on SDA, 30 days; and sediment from Isolator tube in a BACTEC 13A bottle, 42 days.

122 m Isolator tube on CA, 3 days; sediment from Isolator tube on BHI, 30 days; sediment from Isolator tu

123 robic Lytic/10 bottle, 5 days; sediment from Isolator tube on CA, 3 days; sediment from Isolator tube

124 d subcultures on chocolate agar and from the Isolator tube on fungal media showed no growth.

125 Isolator tube on BHI, 30 days; sediment from Isolator tube on SDA, 30 days; and sediment from Isolato

126 stoplasma capsulatum were recovered from the Isolator tube only.

127 eria from sediments of blood collected in an Isolator tube was evaluated by comparing its performance

128 The sediment from the Isolator tube was inoculated onto chocolate agar (CA), b

129 ubated for 7 days, and the sediment from the Isolator tube was inoculated onto solid medium and this

130 ubated for 7 days, and the sediment from the Isolator tube was inoculated to sheep blood and chocolat

131 um tube with sodium polyanetholsulfonate, an Isolator tube, and BACTEC aerobic and anaerobic bottles.

132 egative were blood specimens collected in an Isolator tube.

133 d with 25,333 CFU/ml after collection in the Isolator tubes (P < 0.01).

134 We do not advocate the routine use of Isolator tubes in the evaluation of the febrile, neutrop

135 om sediments of blood specimens collected in Isolator tubes, and it provided significantly faster det

136 Current experimental SOI isolators use nonreciprocal phase shift (NRPS) in interf

137 erimental TE-mode silicon-on-insulator (SOI) isolators using Faraday Rotation are here realized to fi

138 ed the utility of a fungal isolation device (Isolator) versus conventional techniques for recovering

139 wo manual aerobic blood culture systems, the Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) and the

140 knika, Durham, N.C.) and aerobic cultures of Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.).

141 al) was inoculated into at least a Pediatric Isolator (Wampole Laboratories; 1.5 ml of blood) or a st

142 e lysis-centrifugation blood culture system (Isolator, Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, NJ) from 1987

143 notobiotic transgenic rats raised in Trexler isolators were selectively colonized with either B. vulg

144 ing on the same idea, we also demonstrate an isolator with non-reciprocal transmission, providing hig