ライフサイエンスコーパス: item

1 t into objects (the real-world equivalent of items).

2 from the presentation of the final sentence item.

3 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) item.

4 scale, one or two other features of the cued item.

5 to evaluate the response to a possible hoax item.

6 ladaptation in digestion of alternative prey items.

7 tics were generated to compare questionnaire items.

8 on/perpetration) and validated questionnaire items.

9 ers' understanding and the addition of 3 new items.

10 s with storage duration and number of stored items.

11 nsus was achieved on 18 of the 40 diagnostic items.

12 n metacognitive information seeking for food items.

13 PFC activity predicted performance for these items.

14 es for the task items and similar additional items.

15 ightened by the presence of these diagnostic items.

16 d test version incorporating additional easy items.

17 t neutron count rates were attributed to the items.

18 ease beyond that of individual questionnaire items.

19 with the average value of recently observed items.

20 ds) reached consensus on 42% (n = 46) of 110 items.

21 urements of the radar cross section of large items.

22 ejecting theories based on discrete stimulus items.

23 ution for the lack of a solid definition of "item."

24 tary Movement Scale (AIMS) dyskinesia score (items 1-7), as assessed by blinded central AIMS video ra

25 Maximal performance was achieved with a 4-item, 4-point, Little Schmidy index (LS4) using a cut-of

26 Nurses used the 5-item, 7-point Little Schmidy to assess fall risk each da

27 sed using a 23-item questionnaire comprising items about knowledge of DSM, access to care, and confid

28 ed a postal questionnaire asking for control items according to EPOS control criteria, visual analogu

29 atients had comparable scores on other PANSS items, ACE-III, and GAF at baseline, with no difference

30 These items address whether and how adherence of participants

31 test item was changed compared to the memory item after a retention interval.

32 nitive decline (greater impairment on the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subs

33 ic IOI, and 11 of 14 clinical and radiologic items and 1 of 5 pathologic items for myositic IOI.

34 achieved on 7 of 14 clinical and radiologic items and 5 of 7 pathologic items related to diagnosis o

35 iated by four very different domains of cost items and by three potential stakeholders who bear the c

36 inally, we had people read real science news items and found that the research was judged to be of hi

37 . right-hemisphere) is used to inspect novel items and initiate rapid behavioral-responses.

38 cipants without explicit recognition of cued items and remained reliable when only considering associ

39 structured questionnaire consisting of nine items and scoring from 0 to 6 consecutive scales.

40 lso rated their own preferences for the task items and similar additional items.

41 ic branching model that randomly categorizes items and takes as input only the total number of items

42 and takes as input only the total number of items and the total number of categories is quite succes

43 c (3 items), health status and lifestyle (38 items), and work-related (43 items) variables.

44 d activation factor scores, the CGI severity item, and the Brief Negative Symptom Scale.

45 M precision was significantly lower for Near items, and participants reported the colour of the wrong

46 a set of pseudo-randomly positioned colored items, and the task was to judge whether the test item w

47 nally, novel pathogens, microbes and dietary items are encountered in the saltwater environment, whic

48 We will review evidence that items are essential in visual search, and argue that com

49 Even estimates of 5-20 items are increasingly susceptible to effects of visual

50 at happens when such previously mispredicted items are later reencountered.

51 strate that expectations about when mnemonic items are most relevant can dynamically and reversibly p

52 Within fixations, items are processed in parallel, and the functional fiel

53 statistical distribution describing how many items are typically found in each category in large taxo

54 strates that very short strings of, i.e., 10 items, are sufficient to have their complexity reliably

55 We proposed to abandon the item as conceptual unit in visual search and adopt a fix

56 s was >/= 75% of experts rating a diagnostic item as very important or important.

57 pproach that takes fixations, not individual items, as its central unit.

58 Predictive ability of questionnaire items assessed in the BWHS was similar to that in other

59 reported varied degrees of concern regarding items associated with quality of life.

60 ncelling the beneficial effect of presenting items at a closer depth plane.

61 nd reversibly prioritize individual mnemonic items at specific times at which they are deemed most re

62 aking involves an assessment of the value of items available and the actions required to obtain them.

63 fic lights, in everyday life, we must select items based on color.

64 When studying visual search, item-based approaches using synthetic targets and distra

65 rge in parallel but in a spatially selective item-based fashion.

66 n tasks, whereas the unit may mandatorily be item-based in compound tasks.

67 We show that our item-based model, competitive guided search, accounts fo

68 that Hulleman & Olivers (H&O) invoke against item-based models, and we highlight recently reported di

69 ased model is shown to be superior to extant item-based models.

70 We use item-based theories to propose an account that does not

71 We argue that mechanistic premises of "item-based" theories are not invalidated by the fixation

72 efficacy end points included additional VAS items (burning/stinging, itching, foreign body sensation

73 items was observed than that of the farther items, but the capacity for the two-depth-planes conditi

74 tions (matched periods during recall when no items came to mind).

75 The item can only be dispensed within artificial tasks that,

76 f newly developed questionnaire or interview items capture the history of FA.

77 mber of hazards (mean = 7.9; 54.2% of graded items classified as hazardous), and the most common haza

78 aging and to explore the potential of the 26-item claustrophobia questionnaire (CLQ) (range, 0-4) as

79 y and cognitive decline, we found that intra-item configural processing, regardless of an object's no

80 The item content of hearing loss assessment tools should see

81 e), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (36 items covering 8 dimensions of health status as well as

82 City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (23 items covering physical function, social function, sympt

83 g similar ideas, alongside the importance of items, covert attention, and top-down/contextual influen

84 h Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9), patient-reported satisfac

85 The item difficulties (between .25 and .73) and the item-tot

86 Primary outcomes included item difficulty (how easy or difficult the question was)

87 en Mini-Mental State Examination orientation items, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Category Nami

88 ty (how easy or difficult the question was), item discrimination (how well the question differentiate

89 ty and differentiate between old and altered items during periods of threat.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT An

90 ter LPI using a questionnaire based on the 7-item dysphotopsia symptoms described by Spaeth et al.

91 erties that individuate conceptually related items (e.g. robins, in particular, have red breasts).

92 Here Item et al. show that Fas, a member of the TNF receptor

93 Patient-reported function on the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) 36

94 tics as they appear to be remnants of larger items; fibres being the principal form of microplastic p

95 accessible working memory is limited to four items for most people.

96 l and radiologic items and 1 of 5 pathologic items for myositic IOI.

97 (RCTs) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

98 We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)

99 meta-analysis adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)

100 el in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)

101 REVIEW The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist

102 chrane Collaboration and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline

103 es included according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline

104 d in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement

105 ing to guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement

106 eported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement

107 with guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

108 consider ranges of possible values for cost items for which data are not yet available.

109 By selection of 1 item from each domain, the 10-point SaFETy (Serious figh

110 Asked to freely recall items from a predefined set (e.g., animals), we rarely r

111 he primary outcome measures were the suicide items from clinician-administered (the Montgomery-Asberg

112 alls, intrusions (incorrect recall of either items from prior lists or items not previously studied),

113 essive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) scale and 14 items from the clinician-rated Hamilton Depression (HAM-

114 tient-centered care were assessed using four items from the Generic Short Patient Experiences Questio

115 Items from the National Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive E

116 Twelve items from the self-reported Quick Inventory of Depressi

117 Differential item functioning analysis addressed whether 22q11DS diff

118 the left dorsolateral superior frontal gyri (item-gamma) on permutation test, where the coupling was

119 ess as measured by the total score on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) assessed at 3

120 ple, psychological distress was assessed (12-item General Health Questionnaire).

121 sion scale) and anxiety (measured by the two-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder [GAD]-2 anxiety scale)

122 Health Questionnaire-2 for depression, a two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 questionnaire for an

123 Random Item Generation tasks (RIG) are commonly used to assess

124 computerised adaptive testing, and automatic item generation.

125 The mean number of items graded per home was 85.2 (SD = 13.2), and an avera

126 point was the change from baseline in the 17-item HAM-D total score at 60 h, assessed in all randomis

127 The primary outcome was change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), administe

128 ary outcome measure was the change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score (r

129 nded observer ratings) as assessed by the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24).

130 ontrols (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-24 item [HDRS-24] = 1.7) and 26 medication-free patients wi

131 Participants were surveyed using the 31-item Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Sur

132 es of 17, 16, and 0.3; scores on the RAND 36-Item Health Survey ranged from 0 to 100, with higher sco

133 ponent Summary (MCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-i

134 work disability included sociodemographic (3 items), health status and lifestyle (38 items), and work

135 hat received "yes" of both evaluators to the item: "I would recommend this GL for use." The domains o

136 luded in the guidance, with an additional 17 items identified as important but may be referenced else

137 The type of patient care items implicated as a fomite causing healthcare-associat

138 Combinations of questionnaire items improved the predictive ability with respect to se

139 and deficits were limited to a single NIHSS item in 62 episodes (38%).

140 nit of selection may be larger than a single item in standard detection tasks, whereas the unit may m

141 Each item in the LLQ is designated to 1 of 6 subscales descri

142 ival in the emergency department and had all items in a 3-hour bundle of care for patients with sepsi

143 es in mean RT as a function of the number of items in a display.

144 emporal lobe while subjects held up to three items in memory.

145 We found that presenting the items in stereoscopic depth alone hardly affected VWM pe

146 This tool has 11 items in the following domains: randomization, concealme

147 dynamically and reversibly prioritize these items in time.

148 The number of items in working memory can be regulated by external exc

149 alysis of 65 written responses to open-ended items included concerns about the roles of physicians an

150 validate the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), a 14-item instrument used to measure surgical frailty.

151 hs prior to the stroke using scores of the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function-5 question

152 ndardized framework to classify and organize items into categories.

153 at required them to decide whether to encode items into working memory.

154 When an item is predicted in a particular context but the predic

155 uction cue that directs people to forget one item is sufficient to wipe the corresponding trace from

156 There, the attended item is the goal of search.

157 the prediction is violated, memory for that item is weakened.

158 The "item" is a flexible unit that represents not only an ind

159 Uncovering how the "item" is represented based on prior knowledge is essenti

160 ulleman & Olivers (H&O) by arguing that the "item" is still useful for understanding visual search an

161 Even though we lack a precise definition of "item," it is clear that people do parse their visual env

162 esired food item or a property of a non-food item (length of a tool).

163 gy was constructed using a bifactor model of item-level data from a psychiatric screening interview,

164 The revised 4-item Little Schmidy, the LS4, predicts pediatric falls w

165 Factor analyses indicated that the 31 items loaded well (loading values 0.48-0.90), supporting

166 us, habituation designs that include various items may be as effective for studying early memory as r

167 Certain items may be more concerning than others.

168 We developed a 16-item model.

169 articipants reported the colour of the wrong item more often.

170 ty of life (36-Item Short Form Survey and 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), bladder and se

171 s, and quality of life (QOL; based on the 54-item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale score).

172 The 25-item National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnair

173 he SHPC-18 with visual field severity and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnair

174 scans, and all participants completed the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnair

175 Data from the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionn

176 methods for understanding such typical user-item networks are mainly projecting them to unipartite o

177 t recall of either items from prior lists or items not previously studied), and deliberations (matche

178 Whether searching for your car, a particular item of clothing, or just obeying traffic lights, in eve

179 Triploid fish has become an important item of commercial aquaculture, but data on its fatty ac

180 matical features actually change faster than items of basic vocabulary.

181 We extracted data, in duplicate, related to items of selection bias (sequence generation, allocation

182 gnificant benefits on the individual suicide items of the MADRS, the HAM-D, and the QIDS-SR but not t

183 For GBS, we included 36 items, of which more than half the relevant studies supp

184 =3013 nurses) was measured by a validated 20-item online test, quality of care related to ECG monitor

185 eman & Olivers' (H&O's) model can ignore the item only by reducing search to the question of whether

186 to determine the location of a desired food item or a property of a non-food item (length of a tool)

187 th swap errors, in which observers report an item other than the one indicated by the cue.

188 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) items: P1 (delusions), P2 (conceptual disorganisation),

189 ssion severity at 4-month follow-up on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; score range, 0

190 gait impairment, and depressive symptoms (2-item Patient Health Questionnaire).

191 ic template comprising five questions (a two-item Patient Health Questionnaire-2 for depression, a tw

192 inburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire; elevated depression s

193 account that does not advocate strict serial item processing and integrates fixations.

194 ed with the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder 8 items (PTSD-8) and severe mental illness was measured wi

195 EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire

196 Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 items (QLQ-LC13), and the European Quality of Life 5 Dim

197 irmatory factor analysis of the resulting 18-item questionnaire (SHPC-18), the reliability of the SHP

198 ived barriers to DSM was assessed using a 23-item questionnaire comprising items about knowledge of D

199 A 3-item questionnaire was used to examine perceptions of se

200 A five-item questionnaire, CAPTURE (COPD Assessment in Primary

201 mission during the acute treatment phase (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinic

202 REPORTING METHOD: Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trails (SPIRIT

203 orting Trials) and SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidel

204 ral Distress Scale-Revised is composed of 14 items referring to four factors: futile care, poor teamw

205 l and radiologic items and 5 of 7 pathologic items related to diagnosis of nonmyositic IOI, and 11 of

206 In contrast, temporarily unattended items remain robustly coded in the hidden state, decoupl

207 parallel architecture for visual search, the item remains the critical unit of selection.

208 Confirmatory factor analyses, including item response theory calibration, were performed; reliab

209 ny useful tools for ability testing, such as item response theory, computerised adaptive testing, and

210 ION: The PRECISE-DAPT score is a simple five-item risk score, which provides a standardised tool for

211 ubjects received prior information about the item's location or property.

212 udy should have the net effect of moving the item's neural representation away from the neural repres

213 estudy-should lead to differentiation of the item's neural representation from the previous context (

214 The 31-item scale was completed by 147 individuals representing

215 e-Revised, and McGill Quality of Life Single-Item Scale were measured at screening, visit 6, and visi

216 y to assess self-reported isolation (a three-item scale) and loneliness (two questions).

217 Items scored positive in the CFI-S and subtypes identifi

218 yed Recall, Semantic Animal Fluency) and Six-Item Screener (SIS) assessments, administered longitudin

219 delines for Americans and derived from a 137-item self-administered food-frequency questionnaire.

220 g the Inventory of Drinking Situations, a 30-item self-report questionnaire.

221 The authors evaluated the validity of a 152-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ

222 316 of whom (91.0%) completed a baseline 116-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire and w

223 ual diet was evaluated using a validated 165-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire at re

224 was assessed with the use of a validated 192-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire.

225 signs (Eczema Area and Severity Index, Three Item Severity Score, and Six Signs, Six Areas Atopic Der

226 et a priori consensus criteria: EQ-5D and 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (optional) for t

227 ments (Dermatology Life Quality Index and 36-item short form health survey).

228 , functional status, and quality of life (12-Item Short Form Health Survey, ranging from 0 to 100, wi

229 ing the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Rose Dyspnea Scale, t

230 physical and role emotional scales of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

231 eattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

232 Generic health status (12-item Short Form physical and mental scales and fatigue),

233 erest were (1) patient-reported outcomes: 12-item Short Form physical/mental health status, (2) quali

234 RQoL was assessed using the self-reported 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) version 2.

235 ire (IND-VFQ), and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) were obtained at enrollme

236 r pathological outcomes, quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey and 20-item Multidimensional Fati

237 Pain was estimated using the 36-Item Short Form Survey.

238 mmary (PCS) of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): physical function

239 e Physical Component Summary score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.

240 matched French normal values by using the 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) HRQoL questionnaire.

241 Consensus that an item should be included in the set of minimum standards

242 heir proposal that fixations, not individual items should be considered a fundamental unit in visual

243 The expert panel (N = 12) agreed that 63 items should be included in the guidance, with an additi

244 udy evaluated the factor structure of the 43-item SHPC that was obtained from CIGTS participants at b

245 pping two items strongly correlated with the items' similarity in the cue feature dimension, and foun

246 non-numerical quantitative features such as item size, density, and convex hull.

247 esis using human fMRI by tracking changes in item-specific BOLD activity patterns in the hippocampus,

248 bserved that the probability of swapping two items strongly correlated with the items' similarity in

249 een used to produce various gluten free food items such as pasta and bread.

250 veloped to assess spectacle independence via items that assess what patients say and do, and how they

251 develop recommendations for a minimum set of items that should be addressed in SAPs for clinical tria

252 would be more stringent when evaluating food items that specifically target children on their package

253 Participants preferentially sampled items that were less diagnostic of the correct answer ("

254 n for abstracts of NPT trials includes 2 new items that were not specified in the original CONSORT St

255 found that people were more likely to choose items that were paired with "interesting-looking" scient

256 more accurate orientation reproductions for items that were probed at expected times.

257 ry was only present for the usual activities item; the adjusted relative risk (ARR) of reporting prob

258 I detail ways in which item-thought is worse than the authors suggest.

259 " involving the retention of a set number of items throughout a shared delay interval.

260 (Test of Infant Motor Performance Screening Items [TIMPSI], The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

261 arch tasks, a cue instructed observers which item to look for first (current template) and which seco

262 : the grief subscale of the Core Bereavement Items to assess normative grief; and the Intrusive Grief

263 o clear the working memory of currently held items to make room for new ones.

264 ss Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), adding 6 new items to rate their quality.

265 pants to maintain the sequentially presented items together in WM.

266 We used Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation for internal consistency reliabil

267 m difficulties (between .25 and .73) and the item-total correlations (between .48 and .83) were equal

268 We advise against "forsaking the item" unless and until a full fixation-based model is sh

269 cipants assigned importance ratings for each item using a 1-9 scale.

270 over the past month was collected with a 203-item validated food-frequency questionnaire.

271 d lifestyle (38 items), and work-related (43 items) variables.

272 , was assessed in the adult survey via a ten item version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Dep

273 A shorter, 20-item version of the MFM, which was specifically adapted

274 udy quality was assessed using a modified 12-item version of the Physiotherapy Evidence-Based Databas

275 her mental health score on the Short Form 12-Item, version 2, Health Survey (IRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-

276 Moreover, when tracking moving items, VWM failed to detect salient changes in the objec

277 , and the task was to judge whether the test item was changed compared to the memory item after a ret

278 zation effects were stronger when the memory item was currently relevant (i.e., for the first search)

279 After a brief delay, one feature of one item was given as a cue, and the observer had to report,

280 This preference to sample inlying items was linked to decisions, enhancing the tendency to

281 capacity of the perceptually closer-in-depth items was observed than that of the farther items, but t

282 le scar), based on 6 clinician and 2 patient items was used.

283 ing standardized and validated questionnaire items, we identified respondents with chronic rhinosinus

284 ed outbreaks via a contaminated patient-care item were identified, including infections with multidru

285 Draft items were assessed and revised in a series of cognitive

286 The items were clustered around the anatomic subtypes of IOI

287 The final draft items were evaluated in 2 quantitative studies.

288 decrease was progressively enhanced as more items were stored into working memory.

289 which gave confidence that the interrogated items were undergoing induced fission.

290 efs, the mean (standard deviation) number of items where intimate partner violence was endorsed as ac

291 vealed a four-factorial structure of the RDF items, which mainly resembled the structure of the Engli

292 rvey of experts generated an initial list of items, which was refined by a 2-round Delphi survey invo

293 s were rescored in the second round, and all items with consensus (median, >/=4; interquartile range,

294 Items with dissensus were rescored in the second round,

295 ity of individual and combined questionnaire items with respect to clinical periodontal disease sever

296 Performance of individual questionnaire items with respect to predicting periodontitis was bette

297 Characterizing the typical distribution of items within taxonomic categories is an important questi

298 nitive memory effects in the classical multi-item WM task of encoding and immediate free recall of wo

299 The mean (SD) baseline 5-item World Health Organization Well-being Index was 10.0

300 d together could select one of three grocery items worth US$1.50.