ライフサイエンスコーパス: jitter

1 the standard deviation of synaptic latency (jitter).

2 small motion parallax cues provided by head jitter.

3 h-frequency temporal information with little jitter.

4 tion algoritm, and is insensitive to spatial jitter.

5 into forms are quite robust to topographical jitter.

6 tween photon detection efficiency and timing jitter.

7 wire detectors which also feature low timing jitter.

8 lted in less-potent reduction of latency and jitter.

9 AN stimulation, and reduced the latency and jitter.

10 sion, AP duration, firing rates and temporal jitter.

11 rst inter-spike interval and increased spike jitter.

12 , although there was an increase in temporal jitter.

13 amp technique), or introducing a small input jitter.

14 spectively; p = 0.011), but they had similar jitter.

15 he room was stable without drift and minimal jittering.

16 ted by a fixed (400 ms regular condition) or jittered (200/300/400/500/600 ms irregular condition) in

17 field size turns out to be a consequence of jitter across trials.

18 Additionally, jittering analysis revealed that the correlations betwee

19 epetitive stimulation at 3 Hz, and increased jitter and blocking was detected by SFEMG, confirming th

20 synaptic AP firing that minimizes both spike jitter and failures, two characteristics critically impo

21 transmission at high rates with low temporal jitter and has adapted specialized synaptic mechanisms t

22 ause of high detection efficiency, sub-50-ps jitter and nanosecond-scale reset time.

23 ion of the fundamental frequency (F0SD), and jitter and shimmer as measured by relative average pertu

24 turbations of phonation, including increased jitter and shimmer, are associated with desiccated ambie

25 n (5-HT) through the analysis of the latency jitter and the quantal parameters: n and p in the opener

26 aboons' responses to displays that contained jittered and blurred icons suggested that their same-dif

27 In two control experiments using spatially jittered and phase-randomized stimuli, we demonstrated t

28 , which include bump latency (mean delay and jitter) and shape (amplitude and width) variance, it is

29 ts in a loss of temporal fidelity (increased jitter) and the failure to follow high-frequency amplitu

30 JARs occurred even when a large artificial jitter ( approximately 60 micro;sec) was introduced to a

31 that synaptic randomness, dynamic range, and jitter are causally related.

32 ough sparse, phase-lock to a stimulus with a jitter as low as 2-3 ms.

33 ty, crowding, undersampling or topographical jitter), as they also underestimated the number of featu

34 erage responses was due to different latency jitters, as confirmed with latency-corrected averages.

35 es indicated that increasing the latency and jitter at a subset of synapses reduced the number of act

36 The trial-to-trial response jitter averaged 12 ms, a precision comparable to other s

37 Using a novel, jitter-based measure of synchrony, we found that synchro

38 poral resolution, with negligible pump-probe jitter being possible with future laser-wakefield-accele

39 ingle-trial analysis revealed a considerable jitter between activation peaks in visual and auditory c

40 ample, the uncertainty--the so-called timing jitter--between the arrival of an optical trigger ('pump

41 while thin-junction devices have good timing jitter but poor efficiency.

42 erved during line-scan imaging was found to 'jitter' by +/- 0.41 microm.

43 aximum phonational frequency range and vocal jitter changes from baseline were significantly associat

44 e in the unadapted regions then appeared to 'jitter' coherently in random directions.

45 in volunteers with AMD under stationary and jittering conditions.

46 Transmission jitter, delay, or failures, which would corrupt the proc

47 Ten low-jitter detectors are integrated on one circuit with 100%

48 t first spike latencies and their precision (jitter) determine the onset time and precision of SLCs.

49 veral observations indicate that this visual jitter directly reflects fixational eye movements.

50 y the compensation stage, producing illusory jitter due to the undercompensation of retinal slip.

51 Most minimal focal shocks activated low jitter EPSCs from single axons with characteristics rese

52 althy comparison subjects performed a rapid, jittered event-related go/no-go task.

53 scending pathway suggests that the increased jitter found in -/- MNTB responses arises mostly in the

54 sponses following a single excitation pulse, jitter-free, with fs timing precision.

55 A prototype of optoelectronic jitter goggles produced similar improvement in facial em

56 ients to discriminate the facial emotions of jittering images improved by a factor of 2.

57 ll converge to a small value dictated by the jitter in axonal propagation times.

58 study the relationship between the temporal jitter in excitatory and inhibitory synaptic input and t

59 ynaptic inputs to a neuron and the resultant jitter in its output spike?

60 nse peaks, suggesting a decrease in temporal jitter in response to a speech signal.

61 onduction studies were normal, but increased jitter in single-fibre EMG studies indicated unstable ne

62 y account for the spike variation, while the jitter in spike timing can be primarily attributed to th

63 Given the intrinsic jitter in spike triggering, evoked synaptic potentials a

64 Thus, the timing jitter in successive layers of such neurons will converg

65 hat is the relationship between the temporal jitter in the arrival times of individual synaptic input

66 was employed to compensate for mass spectral jittering in MALDI data collection (e.g., peak shifts al

67 of spike occurrence, ignoring the intrinsic "jitter" in the stimulus-to-spike latency.

68 ed by calculating the standard deviation or "jitter" in the times of individual identified spikes eli

69 first-spike latency and first-spike latency jitter increased, while spontaneous and evoked firing ra

70 , inhibitory synaptic conductance, and input jitter influenced the firing rate representation of inpu

71 We present an algorithm that takes this jitter into account.

72 tively oppose circadian synchrony and inject jitter into daily rhythms.

73 This immunity of JAR to the EOD jitter is explained by the insensitivity of the differen

74 tances, the standard deviation in the output jitter is linearly related to the standard deviation in

75 itter was 17.4 mus; 29% of neurons had spike jitter < 10 mus.

76 C latency characteristics (directly coupled, jitter < 200 micros).

77 ynaptic EPSCs identified by minimal synaptic jitter (<150 microsec) and divided into two groups: CAP-

78 Text jittering markedly enhanced word recognition speed for p

79 in the absence and presence of a temporally jittering mask.

80 Thus, the jittering motion of granules adjacent to the plasma memb

81 from nanoseconds to microseconds, and other "jittering" motions at timescales ranging from picosecond

82 requency of 10,000s(-1)trap(-1) and a timing jitter of +/-0.5 micros to be created.

83 occurred with a latency of 12.1 +/- 1.1 ms, jitter of 0.8-2 ms and amplitude of 57.8 +/- 7.5 pA.

84 tonic circuits and provide ultrashort timing jitter of 18 ps.

85 l neurones with a latency of 1.8 +/- 0.1 ms, jitter of 625 mus, and peak amplitude of 239 +/- 45 pA.

86 ut curve, and decreased both the latency and jitter of action potential activation.

87 lso show how chloride loading can affect the jitter of action potential timing associated with immine

88 hout constraints set by the speed and timing jitter of electronics, and should find applications rang

89 reproducible from trial to trial: the timing jitter of individual spikes was as low as 1 msec, and th

90 the LGN, identified by short latency and low jitter of LGN-evoked PSPs, showed moderate reductions in

91 ptic onset latency was much smaller than the jitter of spike response.

92 vers instead report a clear illusory spatial jitter of the low-luminance-contrast boundary.

93 In addition, the temporal jitter of the synaptic onset latency was much smaller th

94 roportion (0-20 of 40) and precision (0-4 ms jitter) of synchrony of inhibitory inputs, along with th

95 cterize the effect of pause length and spike jitter on the nuclear neuron firing.

96 We investigated the effect of retinal-image jitter on word recognition speed and facial emotion reco

97 e 10-150 msec range with very small temporal jitter (on the order of 1 msec).

98 n in the presence of thermal noise and clock jitter or clock skew.

99 of remarkably precise activity with very low jitter or spike count variability.

100 vs 3.6 +/- 0.3 msec; p = 0.001) but similar jitter (p = 0.57) compared with CAP-resistant neurons, r

101 What should be substantial, distracting jitter passes completely unseen.

102 temporal precision ( 100 micros arrival time jitter per mm length) and reliability: in more than 8,00

103 When jitter perception occurred, MR signal decreased in lower

104 aximum phonational frequency range and vocal jitter predict late perceived vocal changes.

105 The jitter rate did not vary with the speed of movement.

106 We suggest that this jitter reflects a deficit in the matching of current spa

107 ovement from a single set of features: rate, jitter (regularity of rate), direction, step size, and d

108 n the near infrared regime, while the timing jitter remains 25 ps.

109 Due to a 5-fold reduced temporal jitter resulting in a shorter measurement time, the hori

110 n the second experiment, off-beat times were jittered, resulting in a similar CNV adjustment and also

111 hat presenting time-reversed, randomized, or jittered scallops increased behavioral response threshol

112 Monosynaptic EPSCs had low synaptic jitter (SD of latency to successive shocks) averaging 84

113 scallops from time-reversed, randomized, and jittered sequences.

114 P-sensitive EPSCs (n = 5) with latencies and jitter similar to those of unlabeled monosynaptic neuron

115 in horizontal brainstem slices by their low-jitter, ST-evoked glutamatergic EPSCs.

116 veral response properties of C-LEPs (latency jitter, stimulus-response and perception-response functi

117 A novel illusion (visual jitter) suggests the compensation mechanism is based sol

118 cross-correlation of cell pairs, relative to jittered surrogate spike-trains, allowed us to identify

119 Deeper cells displayed more latency jitter than superficial cells.

120 ted monosynaptic IPSCs at fixed latency (low jitter) that often failed (30%) and had no frequency-dep

121 microsaccades during fixation, which rapidly jitter the "sensor" exactly when it is being voluntarily

122 al fixation, small eye movements continually jitter the location of gaze.

123 By jittering the position of the bar inside the RF across t

124 They then had "jittered" vertical grating patterns presented in their v

125 Median spike jitter was 17.4 mus; 29% of neurons had spike jitter < 1

126 ltage changes only when presynaptic temporal jitter was included.

127 The jitter was not due to small involuntary movements of the

128 The SD of the first-spike latency (jitter) was increased in VCN neurons, calyces, and MNTB

129 se but led to shifts in latency, or 'latency jitter', which decreased with age.

130 decrease in first spike latencies and their jitter, which could account for the intensity-dependent

131 photon detection efficiency but poor timing jitter, while thin-junction devices have good timing jit

132 approaches were used to induce retinal-image jitter with duration of 100 or 166 ms and amplitude with

133 Results suggest that retinal-image jitter with optimal frequency and amplitude is an effect

134 lated to the standard deviation in the input jitter, with a constant of less than one.