ライフサイエンスコーパス: journal

1 arly since it was originally rejected by the Journal!

2 y Beaven et al. in this issue of Biophysical Journal.

3 ehavior within the historical context of the Journal.

4 y studies and invite their submission to the journal.

5 ng numbers of outstanding submissions to the Journal.

6 me, geographical location, subspecialty, and journal.

7 of reviewed FS can be cited in peer-reviewed journals.

8 ences or articles published in technological journals.

9 ere limited to publications in peer-reviewed journals.

10 k records of authors but also of editors and journals.

11 ophthalmology journals than for subspecialty journals.

12 there was more variability among comparison journals.

13 almost all publication types, languages, and journals.

14 e low rates of data sharing among comparison journals.

15 h from across the world and in peer-reviewed journals.

16 tion of general medical and general surgical journals.

17 ss, and are consistent across publishers and journals.

18 lines were mentioned by >10% of the included journals.

19 011, through December 31, 2012, in 5 surgery journals.

20 king studies in science end up in lower-tier journals.

21 ently they are not widely endorsed by dental journals.

22 ant rise for last authorship in subspecialty journals.

23 ct-factor general medicine and ophthalmology journals.

24 esidency programs) outcomes in peer-reviewed journals.

25 editorial boards of 24 environmental biology journals.

26 ant results for primary outcomes in surgical journals.

27 shed articles (69%) appearing in 6 of the 26 journals (25%).

28 Most were reported in nursing journals (63.4%).

29 reviewers" were available online for only 9 journals (8.3%), 3 of which mentioned RGs.

30 five main stakeholders-funders, regulators, journals, academic institutions, and researchers.

31 ster et al. in this issue of the Biophysical Journal, advance our understanding of the signaling mech

32 In this issue of the Journal, Amirian et al. present a report from the Geneti

33 e aim of providing some insight into how the Journal and the Society have contributed to the evolutio

34 of implementation science through scientific journals and conferences, and teaching the next generati

35 for all RCTs published in top ophthalmology journals and ophthalmology-related RCTs published in hig

36 Journals and other scientific organizations produce a di

37 values in 151 English-language core clinical journals and specific article types as classified by Pub

38 cles published in subspecialty ophthalmology journals and the proportion of women listed as last auth

39 ng unconscious bias is a major challenge for journals and the rest of the scientific community.

40 estrictions and searched manually in regular journals and unpublished studies.

41 reviews (a practice already embraced by some journals) and monitoring not only the track records of a

42 briefly the intersection of the School, the Journal, and the Society throughout their histories, wit

43 All biomedical engineering journals, and the 5 basic science journals with the high

44 Conclusion Journal- and study-level variables considered important

45 > 0.05) form 10 high-impact factor surgical journals (Annals of Surgery, Journal of Neurology, Neuro

46 Journals are an integral part of the foundation of scien

47 nd how authors and peer reviewers for dental journals are encouraged to use reporting guidelines (RGs

48 Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in

49 overall articles published in ophthalmology journals are still low.

50 a-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in imaging journals are used in a minority of reviews; this has not

51 icators in a random sample of 441 biomedical journal articles published in 2000-2014.

52 Journal articles seldom report on publication agreements

53 Most information comes from journal articles, but we now also index kinase cross-scr

54 controls" to identify relevant peer-reviewed journal articles.

55 (documented in a 1980 article in Biophysical Journal, as well as in two more comprehensive 1982 artic

56 Journal-based science communication is not accessible or

57 In their article in the present issue of the Journal, Basu et al. used difference-in-difference-in-di

58 ' use of CPGs and published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and August 2015 were inclu

59 on of all authors in 6 leading ophthalmology journals between January 2002 and December 2014.

60 d (10459730) participants included among the journals, between US domestic and international studies,

61 articles to be published in select journals 'journal bias' and discuss the implication of this form o

62 alysis plan and article in this issue of the Journal by Evenson et al. is well-conceived, thoughtfull

63 cized a previous study published in the same journal by Gomes et al. in 2016, and an alternative inte

64 hat interpretation of RCT results in medical journals can be distorted by authors of published report

65 In this issue of the Journal, Chen et al. (Am J Epidemiol.

66 subspecialty (chi(2) = 46.7, P < .001), and journal (chi(2) = 27.6, P < .001) heterogeneity.

67 Multivariate analysis accounting for journal clustering effects revealed that, when impact fa

68 In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Correia-Melo et al (2016) combine targeted depl

69 A recent commentary to Biophysical Journal criticized a previous study published in the sam

70 In this issue of the Journal, Downing et al. add to what is known about forec

71 In this issue of the Journal, Dr. Infante suggested that meta-analyses of stu

72 ndomized controlled trials from five leading journals during the last 6 months of 2014.

73 discusses the relevance of patient care to a journal editor's work.

74 The scholars comprising journal editorial boards play a critical role in definin

75 armaceutical industry statisticians (n = 3), journal editors (n = 9), and regulators (n = 2) (3 parti

76 aspects of virology and to assist and annoy journal editors and others in regard to viral taxonomy.

77 The pilot engaged over 25 biomedical journal editors from most major publishers, as well as s

78 wledge, opinions, and future plans of dental journal editors in chief (EICs) on RGs.

79 e and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors released guidance on sharing clinical tr

80 experienced COS developers, methodologists, journal editors, potential users of COS (clinical triali

81 experienced COS developers, methodologists, journal editors, potential users of COS (clinical triali

82 m statisticians, previous guideline authors, journal editors, regulators, and funders.

83 rrying out meta-analyses and for readers and journal editors, who must interpret the findings and gau

84 of all articles in 4 ophthalmology clinical journals fail to provide a Snellen equivalent when visua

85 arched in top general medicine and specialty journals for articles referring to glycemic control appe

86 1, 2016, and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were performed.

87 t of 100 studies published in top psychology journals found that only 39% could be unambiguously repr

88 ticles published in 4 ophthalmology clinical journals from November 2015 through October 2016, includ

89 We encourage journals, funding bodies, and scientists to unite in pro

90 In this issue of the Journal, Ghiasvand et al. present results from a longitu

91 In the current issue of the Journal, Giorgis-Allemand et al. take the field a step f

92 top-cited articles that have appeared in the journal has also been included.

93 ed regarding these concerns, but to date the journal has received no response.

94 In reaction, guidelines for journals have been promulgated and grant applicants have

95 To address this problem, many journals have implemented new policies that require auth

96 9.4%), with those published in higher-impact journals having greater quality scores.

97 In their theoretical analysis in the Journal, Hutcheon et al. critiqued the existing evidence

98 In particular, it adamantly declared that Journal Impact Factor (JIF) should never be used as a su

99 ge citations per year over their lifespan or journal impact factor (JIF).

100 1), larger number of events (P = 0.011), and journal impact factor (P = 0.029).

101 Analysis of journal impact factor showed no significant difference b

102 tep in solving this problem is replacing the Journal Impact Factor with an article-level alternative.

103 The date of publication, journal impact factor, and citation rate (citations per

104 s true across authorship position, year, and journal impact factor.

105 Journal impact factors negatively correlated with power.

106 quality assessment of the articles using the journals' impact factor, journal quartile, and the numbe

107 less than 3% of the papers submitted to the Journal in 2015.

108 s in food allergy that were published in the Journal in 2015.

109 iginal research published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language.

110 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, the leading journal in the field of medicinal chemistry, to provide

111 mantle of the leading translational science journal in the world and the flagship of the American So

112 lity and impact per publication value of the journal in which the article had been published was also

113 nth highest impact factors for ophthalmology journals in 2015.

114 re published in leading medical and surgical journals in 2015.

115 lished in three high-impact nursing research journals in 2016 was undertaken.

116 Articles published in journals in the clinical medicine category versus other

117 the MEDLINE database and the most respected journals in the field.

118 mology-related RCTs published in high-impact journals in the past 10 years.

119 junction with peer review and publication in journals in the physical sciences for almost 25 years.

120 report by Catov et al. in this issue of the Journal, in which they showed downward trends in birth w

121 This issue of Cell Stem Cell and affiliated journals include several manuscripts describing the resu

122 y literature published during 1974-2015 from journals indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded

123 ject, presented in Cell and other Cell Press journals, integrate environmental and genetic factors wi

124 d to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context.

125 d to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context.

126 types of articles to be published in select journals 'journal bias' and discuss the implication of t

127 ased nearly 2.4 fold (416 to 1001) and three journals (Journal of Controlled Release, Advanced Drug D

128 nge influenced by lack of access to academic journals, lack of time to read long complex research pap

129 Data on journal-level and primary-study variables were extracted

130 For journal-level factors, the greatest difference found (1.

131 Purpose To evaluate whether journal-level variables (impact factor, cited half-life,

132 In this issue of the Journal, Lindam et al. present results from a sibling ca

133 ein sequences and structures, and biomedical journal literature in PubMed.

134 genomes, protein structures, and biomedical journal literature in PubMed.

135 also significantly involved in peer-reviewed journal literature, serving as editors (20%), associate

136 cked and hand-searching was undertaken for 2 journals ('Midwifery' and 'Social Science and Medicine')

137 In this issue of the Journal, Mooney et al. compare in-person and virtual aud

138 In the current issue of the Journal, Murray et al. compare the performance of the g-

139 The NIH, investigators, and journals must collaborate to ensure that quality science

140 ordance with the PRISMA statement in 6 major journals (NEJM, Lancet, BMJ, JAMA, Medical Care, Annals

141 General descriptors such as type of journal, nursing speciality, type of educational issue a

142 Vazquez-Benitez et al. in this issue of the Journal, observational studies in which the causal effec

143 arch of articles published since 2015 in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and other hig

144 ches recently published in Allergy (European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology).

145 the results of a study in this issue of the Journal of Animal Ecology that investigates the impact o

146 In this issue of Journal of Animal Ecology, Shao et al. () explored how N

147 In this issue of Journal of Animal Ecology, Wagner et al. (2017) demonstr

148 ides information on the contributions to the journal of authors from each country and highlights the

149 This series of five minireviews from the Journal of Biological Chemistry provides a broad overvie

150 Transplantation, British Journal of Surgery, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Journal of the Americ

151 Two recent papers published in The Journal of Cell Biology and Science have begun to shed l

152 helm of the Duke-UNC Editorial Board of the Journal of Clinical Investigation and have had the privi

153 This edition of the Journal of Clinical Investigation marks the transition t

154 An article in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology demonstrates the use of

155 An article in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology describes an innovative

156 An article in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology describes the use of ma

157 uent taxonomic changes being compiled by the Journal of Clinical Microbiology on a biannual basis, th

158 esistant clone reported in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology underscore the limitati

159 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Bautista-Lopez et al.

160 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Fitzgerald and colleag

161 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Karlowsky et al. repor

162 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Leber et al. report re

163 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, M. L. Faron et al. rep

164 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Truong et al. report s

165 y in Enterobacteriaceae In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, V.

166 In this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Y.

167 nly much later as the editor of The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition did I appreciate the polic

168 It was applied recently in an article in Journal of Clinical Oncology to measure the impact of us

169 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

170 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

171 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

172 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

173 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

174 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

175 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

176 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

177 of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their

179 y 2.4 fold (416 to 1001) and three journals (Journal of Controlled Release, Advanced Drug Delivery Re

180 e American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics between 2011 and 2014.

181 In previous articles in the American Journal of Epidemiology and American Journal of Public H

182 on the ties between the School, the American Journal of Epidemiology, and the Society for Epidemiolog

183 In a 1987 paper in the American Journal of Epidemiology, Richard Kaslow et al. described

184 l of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, American Jour

185 preceding articles in this supplement to The Journal of Infectious Diseases There was a consensus amo

186 We devote a special issue of the Journal of Infectious Diseases to review the recent adva

187 included in this supplemental edition of the Journal of Infectious Diseases.

188 the articles mentioned were published in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, but many articles

189 In this issue of the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Meylan et al. pres

190 ave appeared during the past 10 years in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, the leading journal in t

191 papers published recently in the New England Journal of Medicine describe the utility of abiraterone

192 secretly funded a review in the New England Journal of Medicine that discounted evidence linking suc

193 vascular prevention published in New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and the Journal of the

194 versary of John Kendrew's birth in 1917, the Journal of Molecular Biology recognizes his seminal cont

195 the Founder and first Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Molecular Biology, Deputy Chairman of the Lab

196 factor surgical journals (Annals of Surgery, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Journ

197 lished the subject of this commentary in the Journal of Neuroscience: a highly detailed anatomical de

198 In this Journal of Nuclear Medicine Hot Topics discussion, we re

199 iscussed elsewhere in this supplement to The Journal of Nuclear Medicine-the management of prostate c

200 describes new enhanced scope of The American Journal of Pathology and introduces its new editorial te

201 itorial highlights the value of The American Journal of Pathology beyond normal metrics.

202 blished in the current issue of The American Journal of Pathology.

203 blished in the current issue of The American Journal of Pathology.

204 ced Drug Delivery Reviews, and International Journal of Pharmaceutics) published nearly one-fifth of

205 We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Journal of Probiotics and Prebiotics, and The Cochrane L

206 merican Journal of Epidemiology and American Journal of Public Health, Masters et al. reported age-sp

207 h Management Information Consortium, and the Journal of Research Evaluation from inception until May

208 recommendation are presented in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and Ch

209 examines articles published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and ot

210 American Journal of Transplantation, British Journal of Surgery, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, J

211 us/species designations by the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology Know

212 of fervent debate in several articles in the Journal of the American Chemical Society and elsewhere.

213 two more comprehensive 1982 articles in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, provided a sim

214 Surgery, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Endoscopy,

215 and Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and the Journal of the American Medical Association between 1986

216 the American Society of Nephrology/Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, and Nephr

217 resources used by fellows included UpToDate, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology/Clinical J

218 cle "On the Origin of Mitosing Cells" in the Journal of Theoretical Biology by Lynn Margulis (then Ly

219 of Heart and Lung Transplantation, American Journal of Transplantation, British Journal of Surgery,

220 journals were identified and retrieved from journals' official websites.

221 of the information published in peer-review journals on direct N2O emissions from agricultural syste

222 We searched PubMed, African Journals Online, WHO Global Health Library, and Web of S

223 We searched PubMed, African Journals Online, WHO Global Health Library, and Web of S

224 ty criteria: be published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented as a peer-reviewed abstract at a sc

225 (APCI(-)) of 2378-TCDD was described in this journal over 30 years ago.

226 re more frequently mentioned by SCIE-indexed journals (P < 0.001), higher-impact journals (P = 0.002)

227 -indexed journals (P < 0.001), higher-impact journals (P = 0.002), and journals that endorsed the ICM

228 r for general journals than for subspecialty journals (P<0.001).

229 In this issue of the Journal, Pace et al.:1115-1124) clearly documented that

230 In this issue of the Journal, Paige et al. have quantified the value of addin

231 Non-English languages, non-journal papers, and studies that only included a descrip

232 The number of journals participating has expanded from the original 25

233 USA reviewed data published in peer-reviewed journals, presented by regulatory agencies, or presented

234 For a sampling of the journals producing top papers, bioinformatics journals t

235 All 109 journals provided "instructions to authors," among which

236 The primary outcome was time to journal publication (or results reporting in other media

237 and an initial validation are combined in a journal publication.

238 CT protocols and statements in corresponding journal publications.

239 sis of test accuracy data limited to imaging journals published from January 2005 to May 2015.

240 Hence, authors and journals publishing randomized controlled trials should

241 on remain rare, especially those focusing on journals publishing research in the increasingly globali

242 Impact factors for the journals publishing the primary trial results, and the n

243 articles using the journals' impact factor, journal quartile, and the number of citations as suitabl

244 In this issue of the Journal, Raikkonen et al. provide an ingenious test of a

245 In this issue of the Journal, Rasmussen-Torvik et al. have highlighted this p

246 riginal studies published in a peer-reviewed journal; recruited children (aged 0-18 years at diagnosi

247 The 4 journals reviewed had the second, fourth, fifth, and nin

248 g of the sexes among the specialties and the journals reviewed.

249 The arrival of the Journal's 175th anniversary occurs at a time of recent a

250 In this issue of the Journal, Schmid et al identify Spondin 2 (SPON2) as a pr

251 In this issue of the Journal, Shepherd et al. outline a pragmatic approach fo

252 New findings published in The EMBO Journal show that in Drosophila, the function of both of

253 As a result, some journals, since at least 2013, have instructed authors t

254 pted standard, supported by requirements for journal submissions resulting in public data release bec

255 In this issue of the Journal, Sullivan et al. carefully examine the theoretic

256 During the last 15years, the journals targeted by drug delivery research increased ne

257 ournals producing top papers, bioinformatics journals tended to have higher Gini coefficients, sugges

258 pted and was recommended for use in surgical journals, textbooks, and teaching courses ("assessment"

259 uthors was significantly steeper for general journals than for subspecialty journals (P<0.001).

260 consistently higher in general ophthalmology journals than for subspecialty journals.

261 Yesil et al. report in this issue of the Journal that maternal gestational blood pressure elevati

262 and apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission

263 and apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission

264 01), higher-impact journals (P = 0.002), and journals that endorsed the ICMJE recommendations (P < 0.

265 y and Critical Care Medicine and other major journals that have made significant advances in the fiel

266 2015 through October 2016, including 3 of 4 journals that instructed authors to provide Snellen equi

267 viewed and original research-oriented dental journals that were indexed in the MEDLINE and/or SCIE da

268 e the previous reviews on this topic in this journal, the field has seen significant expansion in the

269 t the creativity of scholarship published in journals, the progress and direction of research, the co

270 icant primary outcomes published in surgical journals, the reporting and interpretation of findings w

271 published in the September 1979 issue of the Journal, then study director William Kannel et al. descr

272 fectively shut down following the refusal of journals to accept articles that had been circulated as

273 tribution of these 108 articles among the 26 journals to be non-random (p<0.01), with 75 of the 108 p

274 han 40, with RRIDs appearing in 62 different journals to date.

275 for science policy and support the need for journals to require authentication testing as a conditio

276 nd of studies not published in peer-reviewed journals to underestimate them.

277 and race groups in studies were compared by journal type, disease type, and funding source.

278 A manual search of four relevant journals updated the search to May 2017.

279 nostic accuracy studies published in imaging journals used recommended methods for meta-analysis, and

280 tudies published in English in peer-reviewed journals using both quantitative and qualitative methods

281 In this issue of the Journal, VanderWeele et al. report that more frequent at

282 ic search of 10 electronic databases and key journals was conducted to identify studies from the ince

283 anonymous survey of the EICs of the included journals was conducted with a validated questionnaire.

284 nd Clinical Immunology and other high-impact journals was performed.

285 ed between 1881 and 2015 from 123 scientific journals, we show that the readability of science is ste

286 43000 reviewers from the Frontiers series of journals, we show that women are underrepresented in the

287 Hand search of reference lists, specialty journals, websites, published conference proceedings, an

288 Three journals were electronically hand-searched.

289 Relevant journals were hand-searched and reference lists from ret

290 rs" and "instructions to reviewers" of these journals were identified and retrieved from journals' of

291 Moreover, certain journals were likely to publish a large number of articl

292 a 10-year period in 5 leading cardiovascular journals were reviewed.

293 Two periodontal journals were searched manually.

294 RGs should be adopted by all refereed dental journals where appropriate.

295 In this issue of the Journal, Wilkinson et al. describe how they applied a la

296 Among the 24 studies published in journals with an impact factor of 10 or greater, 16 (67%

297 tions from positive trials were published in journals with higher mean (SD) 2-year impact factors (28

298 88) was in mean deviation for sensitivity in journals with impact factors above the median compared w

299 ngineering journals, and the 5 basic science journals with the highest impact factor, were searched b

300 s were published between 2007 and 2017 in 12 journals, with the most in Radiology (12 articles).

301 In this issue of the Journal, Wyss et al. describe the association between us