ライフサイエンスコーパス: judgment

1 he victim's situation especially in judicial judgment).

2 nfluence of surface texture on tactile speed judgment.

3 h motor preparation preceding the perceptual judgment.

4 erious alternative based on collective human judgment.

5 to be consequential is a matter for clinical judgment.

6 t of non-social properties-namely, olfactory judgment.

7 rather than inherent features of human moral judgment.

8 e extant literature as well as good clinical judgment.

9 mmend PMRT requires a great deal of clinical judgment.

10 ical experience is a key process in clinical judgment.

11 Its diagnosis relies on clinical judgment.

12 tle asks how even unintended harms influence judgment.

13 their management is often left to clinician judgment.

14 cial identity dynamically influences sensory judgment.

15 ely simultaneity judgment and temporal order judgment.

16 enabling group discussion before rendering a judgment.

17 trieval decisions together with a confidence judgment.

18 y are integrated into an overall moral value judgment.

19 tion on saccade and on the two modalities of judgment.

20 was titrated as necessary based on clinical judgment.

21 ception task after observing a predecessor's judgment.

22 ly and preserve the independence of personal judgment.

23 ity between simulated moral action and moral judgment.

24 egative bacteremia is determined by clinical judgment.

25 ypes and grading criteria prone to arbitrary judgment.

26 cism remains about the rationality of social judgments.

27 the information that supports metacognitive judgments.

28 rors (biases) in their auditory localisation judgments.

29 ce supports B&P's claims about acceptability judgments.

30 ame stimulus can elicit different perceptual judgments.

31 individuals can form intelligent collective judgments.

32 oanatomy can also explain variation in moral judgments.

33 e activity of sensory neurons and perceptual judgments.

34 aditional questionnaire assessments of moral judgments.

35 behavior, facilitating subsequent perceptual judgments.

36 are far more erratic and unstable than human judgments.

37 efore explain individual differences in size judgments.

38 antly increases the frequency of utilitarian judgments.

39 and mitigating circumstances influence moral judgments.

40 cal basis of individual differences in moral judgments.

41 means of both error detection and confidence judgments.

42 how that computer models can also make valid judgments.

43 ue underlying our ability to make fine depth judgments.

44 nfidence judgments and subjective 'remember' judgments.

45 ess information determined severity of moral judgments.

46 o account for higher-level, relative/ordinal judgments.

47 ld end the current reliance on acceptability judgments.

48 eral purported deficiencies of acceptability judgments.

49 se neurons are causally linked to perceptual judgments.

50 ion is used for metacognitive (second-order) judgments.

51 Do free will beliefs influence moral judgments?

52 titudes and behavior, but what about sensory judgments?

53 did not affect significantly overall sensory judgment (74 vs. 79 for BO and control, respectively).

54 tion typically focus on improving individual judgment, a costly and generally ineffective endeavor.

55 Practice sharpens our perceptual judgments, a process known as perceptual learning.

56 independent and accurate recognition memory judgments about both an item's recency and its frequency

57 Participants provided value judgments about consumer goods in the presence of online

58 rgely by building theories based on explicit judgments about patterns of acceptability - whereas it i

59 Physician judgments about quality of life are highly correlated wi

60 sidered when making recommendations based on judgments about the balance of benefits and harms of bre

61 Thus, the rmCD is involved in making normal judgments about the value of reward.

62 , it can be difficult for scientists to make judgments about the work of others through careful analy

63 iment, groups whose members could make moral judgments achieved greater cooperation than groups with

64 ablished that clinicians cannot use clinical judgment alone to determine whether an individual patien

65 , scholars in the interdisciplinary field of Judgment and Decision Making have amassed a trove of fin

66 g a reward-processing task, and tested their judgment and decision making.

67 nal disgust and disgust sensitivity in moral judgment and decision-making has been debated intensivel

68 n about how risk calculators inform clinical judgment and decision-making.

69 s used in steps of GRADE that required panel judgment and for those based purely on expert consensus.

70 s that can behaviorally dissociate affective judgment and motivation.

71 choll (F&S) consider the distinction between judgment and perception to be clear and intuitive.

72 iovisual temporal tasks, namely simultaneity judgment and temporal order judgment.

73 This holds true for both the simultaneity judgment and the temporal order judgment tasks.

74 representational spaces based on behavioral judgments and a computational model of early vision and

75 large body of research has demonstrated that judgments and behaviors can propagate from person to per

76 mechanisms through which emotions influence judgments and choices.

77 ate analogous to a wavelike pattern and that judgments and decisions are constructed by a measurement

78 We compared surgeons' judgments and decisions between the groups.

79 exploring the distinction between perceptual judgments and interpretive judgments; second, by conside

80 ich prior experience affects both perceptual judgments and neural responses in the human visual syste

81 cepted that religion contours people's moral judgments and prosocial behavior, the relation between r

82 rain's frontostriatal reward system in moral judgments and prosocial behaviors.

83 cess signal detection analysis of confidence judgments and subjective 'remember' judgments.

84 rative utilitarian appraisals influence such judgments and that these appraisals often conflict.

85 could help staff move away from rigid binary judgments and train them to adopt formal carer roles tha

86 we ask two questions: how accurate is human judgment, and how do these forecasts compare to their mo

87 igated are not sufficient to come to a final judgment, and no maintenance studies are available to en

88 tion to escalation and the need for clinical judgment, and the intermittent nature of recording.

89 ino acid content served as the index for the judgment, and the results were validated by capillary el

90 aluable predictive power in collective human judgment, and we discuss the benefits and drawbacks of t

91 ess information for different types of moral judgments, and individual differences in the extent to w

92 D themselves, but also from the perceptions, judgments, and social decisions made by those around the

93 amics of striatal neurons predicted duration judgments, and that simultaneously recorded ensembles co

94 oited contextual salience cues in their gaze judgments, and that the average strength of this context

95 arity (ensemble) rather than a single ligand judgment; and (3) integrating the standardized ensemble

96 Instead, we assume that numerosity judgments are accomplished by weighing the different con

97 mains an open question whether metacognitive judgments are based on the same information as first-ord

98 t for the hypothesis that retrospective time judgments are driven by 'drift' in contextual representa

99 a new light on the old questions of how such judgments are formed.

100 Acceptability judgments are no longer acceptable as the holy grail for

101 ation process, indicating that metacognitive judgments are not solely based on the accumulation of fe

102 Human confidence judgments are thought to originate from metacognitive pr

103 ements were useful in supplementing clinical judgment as to disease course.

104 striatal neurons were necessary for duration judgments, as muscimol infusions produced a specific imp

105 ippocampal cortex is driven predominantly by judgments associated with pictorial scene analysis, wher

106 med based on the usual practice and clinical judgment at the site.

107 ertainty: there is a place for well-informed judgments, based on understanding of underlying processe

108 ortion of the observed changes could, in our judgment, be attributed to changes in weather patterns a

109 of single orientations and relative/ordinal judgments between two sequentially presented orientation

110 , in broiler chickens produced a pessimistic judgment bias.

111 Pessimistic judgment biases, whereby humans or non-human animals int

112 ndings suggest that motivation and affective judgment both recruit dlPFC and ACC neurons but with dif

113 udied only by linguists using grammaticality judgments, Branigan & Pickering (B&P) present structural

114 no superiority of low frequencies in timing judgments but reveal a robust asymmetry in the perceptio

115 nformation is neurally represented for moral judgments, but few studies have investigated whether ind

116 ability to make competence or attractiveness judgments, but patients with damage to the lateral OFC d

117 endently; overall strength of evidence (SOE) judgment by group.

118 nition, supports diverse kinds of high-level judgments: causal reasoning, moral judgment, language co

119 y far less favorable across a range of trait judgments compared to controls, but also are associated

120 ntial actions, and then make difficult moral judgments constructed from combinations of these actions

121 gth of certain recommendations, and clinical judgment continues to be paramount.

122 racted from speech sounds, which vary across judgment dimensions.

123 veal private information, such as subjective judgments (e.g., "Are you satisfied with your life?") or

124 ssociable from other types of attractiveness judgments (e.g., judgments of scenes, objects).

125 These negative judgments emerge when hiding is volitional (experiments

126 In contrast, acceptability judgments enable clearer inferences about structure.

127 al expression of positive and negative moral judgments encourages cooperation in groups and prosocial

128 n's duties to provide care based on clinical judgment, evidence, and ethics.

129 We found that lower-level, absolute judgments failed to account for higher-level, relative/o

130 view largely to studies measuring perceptual judgment, Firestone & Scholl (F&S) overstate their case.

131 brief discussion of the implications of the Judgment for the International Convention on the Regulat

132 -regulated for acceptability, but not blame, judgments for accidental harm condition, suggesting that

133 g experiments should supplant grammaticality judgments for testing linguistic representation.

134 In contrast, TMS to pMTG disrupted thematic judgments for weak but not strong associations (e.g., a

135 ary to Greene's dual-process theory of moral judgment (Greene 2013), this commentary suggests that th

136 In addition, members of moral judgment groups subsequently showed more interpersonal t

137 ote that though the role of disgust in moral judgment has been questioned recently, few studies have

138 role in policy decisions, awareness of those judgments has grown, as have methods for making them.

139 ge agreement; and (iii) computer personality judgments have higher external validity when predicting

140 s self-interest and build cooperation, moral judgments have most often been studied as processes inte

141 screening devices provide positive/negative judgment in a short response time.

142 ains of individuals can revise their initial judgment in a visual perception task after observing a p

143 d highlights the role of individual clinical judgment in situations not covered by evidence-based tre

144 s updated their initial value and confidence judgments in a Bayesian fashion, taking into account bot

145 ical stimulation tended to bias the animals' judgments in a fashion that was coarsely but significant

146 as also modulated by posture, with increased judgments in both orientations when the fingers were spl

147 he relationship between confidence and error judgments in human perceptual decision making.

148 ng the hands has a detrimental effect on TOJ judgments in sighted but not in early blind people.

149 an excellent fit to both position and motion judgments in simple stimuli.

150 optic flow enhances the accuracy of heading judgments in the presence of a moving object.

151 e orientations, striking aspects of absolute judgments, including the correlation and forward/backwar

152 was based on the quality of the evidence and judgment (incorporating values and preferences) about th

153 ns use synovial fluid analysis when clinical judgment indicates that diagnostic testing is necessary

154 nics in acute neurologic conditions, bedside judgment, interpretation of additional laboratory tests,

155 s through collective integration of people's judgments into group decisions, a phenomenon known as th

156 ailing to distinguish between perception and judgment is therefore not a flaw in investigating top-do

157 icle's call to end reliance on acceptability judgments is premature.

158 igh-level judgments: causal reasoning, moral judgment, language comprehension, and more.

159 Even basic judgments, like those of visual object size, vary substa

160 ing the terms of an analysis, and scientific judgments, made when conducting it.

161 subjectivity found in all analyses: ethical judgments, made when setting the terms of an analysis, a

162 capable of ameliorating core impairments in judgment may be beneficial in a range of patient populat

163 Clinical judgment may be used to make this assessment, but relati

164 Its use, together with clinical judgment, may facilitate treatment decisions in patients

165 Perceptual judgments obtained across these various conditions will

166 perceived suffering of a victim colors moral judgment of an accidental harmdoer.

167 bjective perceptions as opposed to clinician judgment of degree.

168 g an expression matching task, requiring the judgment of emotional congruence between sequentially pr

169 s, and it seems critical to the professional judgment of every academic neurologist to assimilate the

170 erature on this subject can benefit the fair judgment of individuals in situations where gender stere

171 nked with the compelling goal of providing a judgment of liking, beauty, perfection, or similar.

172 social identity concerns may also shape the judgment of non-social properties-namely, olfactory judg

173 OFC) and rhinal (Rh) cortices influences the judgment of reward size, we reversibly disconnected thes

174 stratifying the sample according to clinical judgment of social anxiety severity and interference rev

175 intact lateral OFC may not be necessary for judgment of social traits based on physical appearance,

176 icated the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in the judgment of social traits on the one hand and economic d

177 Research has suggested that tactile judgment of speed is influenced by physical properties o

178 s hope to reduce the influence of subjective judgment of supervising physicians.

179 The experts' agreement in clinical judgment of the failure was 80%.

180 del is a quick accurate tool to aid clinical judgment of the risk of seizures in critically ill patie

181 ission tomography (FDG-PET) to make an early judgment of the success of treatment and the introductio

182 on and the stated opinion of another impairs judgment of the veracity of that statement, in the same

183 ilure during a 5-day period was the clinical judgment of three independent experts, blinded to the Ba

184 The judgment of whether to accept or to reject an offer is d

185 Third, behavioral judgments of a scene property strongly represented withi

186 ound some degree of similarity in behavioral judgments of all tested geometrical illusions, but not b

187 d from other measures, such as participants' judgments of an agent's blameworthiness.

188 IRD patients showed slower and less accurate judgments of AV and V stimuli but more accurate response

189 We show that localization judgments of briefly presented targets produce idiosyncr

190 f stereoscopic depth rely mainly on relative judgments of depth (relative binocular disparity) betwee

191 ve intelligence: Aggregating the independent judgments of doctors outperforms the best doctor in a gr

192 e whether striatal ensembles drive subjects' judgments of duration, we manipulated and recorded from

193 ss in decision making in which stress biases judgments of environmental quality.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMEN

194 were less precise and less accurate in their judgments of gaze direction.

195 tween two core domains of social perception (judgments of identity versus attractiveness) within the

196 projected on each retina, and then compared judgments of image focus through either eye and how thes

197 fMRI responses and psychophysical similarity judgments of individual face exemplars, which were gener

198 e investigate when combining the independent judgments of multiple doctors outperforms the best docto

199 l perception by having subjects make spatial judgments of number stimuli.

200 dividual operative performances into overall judgments of operative performance ability.

201 data leads to less varied and more accurate judgments of operative risk among surgeons, and thus may

202 of our stimuli and to behavioral similarity judgments of our stimuli.

203 her types of attractiveness judgments (e.g., judgments of scenes, objects).

204 bed decoding hierarchy by comparing absolute judgments of single orientations and relative/ordinal ju

205 ve forced choice tasks to examine perceptual judgments of sound location as a function of digit magni

206 Fine judgments of stereoscopic depth rely mainly on relative

207 ular disparity) between objects, rather than judgments of the distance to where the eyes are fixating

208 ficant effect of task requirements regarding judgments of the face stimuli.

209 sia review committees generally defer to the judgments of the physicians performing the EAS.

210 o override people's natural tendency to base judgments of trustworthiness on social biases.

211 xperiment 1, participants made forced-choice judgments of which of two tactile distances felt bigger,

212 ficance statement: Popular accounts of moral judgment often describe it as a battle for control betwe

213 diverse beliefs and behaviors by forbidding judgment on foreign societal codes of conduct.

214 herapy must be acknowledged before rendering judgment on the cardiovascular efficacy of these agents.

215 ubjects are universally biased to base their judgments on number as opposed to the alternatives.

216 ndividuals seem to base their sound-symbolic judgments on specific sets of acoustic cues, extracted f

217 amusics and 26 matched controls made tension judgments on Western (familiar) and Indian (unfamiliar)

218 ng on the ordering provider to exercise good judgment or because such assays are thought to be approp

219 ns in these regions are related to affective judgment or to motivation.

220 variation to individual face attractiveness judgments or face preferences.

221 they rely on a large body of expert cognacy judgments or grammatical classifications, which is curre

222 The centroid-judgment paradigm enables quick, precise measurements of

223 TMS to AG disrupted thematic judgments particularly when the link between probe and t

224 Computers outpacing humans in personality judgment presents significant opportunities and challeng

225 ce within pairs of individuals, the reach of judgment propagation across a chain rarely exceeded a so

226 The precise mechanisms of judgment propagation are not well understood, however, b

227 re two individual-level mechanisms hindering judgment propagation at the scale of the chain.

228 omputer simulations showed that the speed of judgment propagation decayed exponentially with the soci

229 a performance gap, which triggered waves of judgment propagation down the chain.

230 We evaluated the dynamics of judgment propagation experimentally.

231 d offers numerous new opportunities to study judgment propagation in the laboratory.

232 that renders possible the stringent study of judgment propagation.

233 Subject matter experts provided judgments regarding the importance of criteria used in t

234 ior section is more active during contextual judgments regardless of stimulus category (scenes vs obj

235 Mature moral judgments rely both on a perpetrator's intent to cause h

236 Mature moral judgments rely on the consideration of a perpetrator's m

237 provide a case study of high-level cognitive judgments relying on default implicit representations of

238 ainty, but the mechanisms of such confidence judgments remain unknown.

239 s monitoring technologies, although clinical judgment remains paramount.

240 ce have suggested that the accuracy of group judgments requires individuals to be either independent,

241 Instead, moral judgments resembled the architecture of simple economic

242 e task interfered with subsequent confidence judgments, resulting in less extreme and more accurate j

243 etween perceptual judgments and interpretive judgments; second, by considering the power of expectati

244 al. (2016) demonstrate that human confidence judgments seem to arise from computations compatible wit

245 Clinical judgment should be used in determining the need for furt

246 Clinical judgment should be used when considering causes of chole

247 Although accurate personality judgments stem from social-cognitive skills, development

248 d "end the current reliance on acceptability judgments." Structural priming is an interesting and use

249 e passive, is undermined by an acceptability-judgment study of this construction.

250 as regret and relief, and they support moral judgments such as blame.

251 and suggest that even the most basic visual judgments, such as object location, can differ substanti

252 circuits, but their relevance for perceptual judgments, such as the behavioral detection of stimuli,

253 Moreover, performing a pitch-judgment task eliminated the ERAN in amusics, suggesting

254 ipants performed an audiovisual simultaneity judgment task including various AV-VA asynchronies and u

255 schizotypes were to perform a temporal order judgment task of tactile stimuli delivered on their hand

256 after completing 1 h of a speeded time-order judgment task of two successive frequency-modulated swee

257 ng the ability of training on a simultaneity judgment task to influence perception of the temporally-

258 g the performance of a visuospatial distance judgment task with three parametric levels of difficulty

259 ingle (either letter case or vowel/consonant judgment task) vs dual (switching between letter case an

260 sory binding as assessed with a simultaneity judgment task.

261 are detected by more sensitive acceptability-judgment tasks, thus yielding incorrect conclusions.

262 simultaneity judgment and the temporal order judgment tasks.

263 l space as assessed by perceptual similarity judgment tests.

264 nhibited selfies come across as having worse judgment than those who share relatively discreet selfie

265 individuals can sometimes make more accurate judgments than the average individual could make alone.

266 resulting in less extreme and more accurate judgments than when no decision was elicited.

267 longer qualifying as prodromal) or clinical judgment that the reported symptoms from the SOPS were a

268 ental details, can lead participants to make judgments that can either seem to support the effort hyp

269 eral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in norm-based judgments, the relative contribution of this region to b

270 rototypical pattern of spatial bias in their judgments, this spatial prior was severely disrupted amo

271 hnologies, structuring evidence-based expert judgment through a weighted hierarchy of topical questio

272 es on other methods, including acceptability judgments, to find the materials for priming experiments

273 nd humans performed a tactile temporal order judgment (TOJ) task, either with the hands uncrossed or

274 and an assessment of tactile temporal order judgments (TOJs) revealed a positive association between

275 al heuristics, we view social perceptions as judgment tools and assert that perceptions are ecologica

276 acity of both stereotypes and base rates, as judgment tools, can be determined solely by accuracy res

277 umber location also biased subsequent number judgments towards the opposite side.

278 activity in the angular gyrus, and vividness judgments tracked activity in the precuneus.

279 unlikely to completely capture the clinical judgment used to allocate early admission, and therefore

280 racy of human and computer-based personality judgments, using a sample of 86,220 volunteers who compl

281 ts appears to involve considerable physician judgment, usually involving multiple physicians who do n

282 s of screening, record review, and consensus judgment was performed.

283 However, when ordinal judgment was used to retrospectively decode memory repre

284 image focus through either eye and how these judgments were biased by adapting to different levels of

285 Expert judgments were collected regarding the probability of hu

286 In both experiments, judgments were greater when non-adjacent stimulated fing

287 Visual size judgments were predicted by vowel formant F1 in combinat

288 a continuous dial, and continuous vividness judgments were recorded.

289 Rather, mathematical judgments were related to an amplification of brain acti

290 Overall moral value judgments were represented in an anterior portion of the

291 Visual shape judgments were, however, predicted by formants F2 and F3

292 the orientation of one bar with a precision judgment when subsequently probed.

293 itively related to both interest and quality judgments, whereas attractiveness boosted interest but d

294 between blacks and whites to inform medical judgments, which may contribute to racial disparities in

295 pathway selectively disrupted temporal order judgments while iCA1-->mPFC pathway deactivation disrupt

296 lie detection, an exceptionally challenging judgment with accuracy rates rarely exceeding chance.

297 It does this by integrating expert judgment with available quantitative and qualitative inp

298 They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special

299 They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special

300 approach was developed to incorporate expert judgments with regional assay sensitivity and specificit