ライフサイエンスコーパス: juxtacellular

1 59% of the neurons recorded in the DRN; the juxtacellular administration of MCH reduced the discharg

2 Juxtacellular and extracellular recordings from LD neuro

3 With combined intra- or juxtacellular and extracellular recordings, we examined

4 By juxtacellular and whole-cell-recordings in awake mice, w

5 e local application of hypocretin-1; (5) the juxtacellular application of hypocretin-1 induced motone

6 after both hypothalamic stimulation and the juxtacellular application of hypocretin-1.

7 The juxtacellular application of vehicle (saline) and denatu

8 hile recording in whole-cell patch-clamp and juxtacellular configuration from CA3 pyramidal cells and

9 with a combination of two stimuli: (1) local juxtacellular current that excited the recorded cell and

10 a pigs), one tone was paired with excitatory juxtacellular current, applied to a single postsynaptic

11 d, different tone was paired with inhibitory juxtacellular current, decreasing covariance between the

12 issue by combining anatomical analysis with juxtacellular identification of single layer 3 neurons i

13 ayer 3 by combining anatomical analysis with juxtacellular identification of single neurons in freely

14 Juxtacellular in vivo recordings of sound-evoked activit

15 lasses of cells based on firing patterns and juxtacellular labeling (of a subset).

16 of recorded neurons was determined by their juxtacellular labeling and immunohistochemical detection

17 Furthermore, by extracellular recording and juxtacellular labeling in vivo, we identified an ENK-exp

18 These results demonstrate that the juxtacellular labeling method can be combined with in si

19 led individually with biotinamide by using a juxtacellular labeling method.

20 zed BOTZ neurons with biotinamide by using a juxtacellular labeling method.

21 This region was identified by juxtacellular labeling of neurons with respiratory-relat

22 y using combined extracellular recording and juxtacellular labeling of unit respiratory rhythmic neur

23 We used a juxtacellular labeling technique to individually fill sp

24 were labeled with Lucifer yellow by using a juxtacellular labeling technique, and amacrine cells kno

25 We have used the juxtacellular labeling technique, in conjunction with Ni

26 VRG and filled with biotinamide by using the juxtacellular labeling technique.

27 Here we used a combination of juxtacellular labeling techniques with recordings from a

28 nd interneurons in folia 8-10, identified by juxtacellular labeling with Neurobiotin.

29 We identified all neuronal types by juxtacellular labeling with neurobiotin.

30 Based on action potential duration, juxtacellular labeling, and immunostaining results, neur

31 Bulbospinal A5 neurons, identified by juxtacellular labelling in anaesthetized rats, had a slo

32 Extracellular recording and juxtacellular labelling of bulbospinal barosensitive neu

33 Juxtacellular labelling of recorded neurons revealed tha

34 ties, and identification was confirmed using juxtacellular labelling of single neurones (n = 16).

35 ese were labelled with Neurobiotin using the juxtacellular method, and visualised with fluorescence m

36 By using the juxtacellular method, we labeled these cells with biotin

37 O neurons in the cat in conjunction with the juxtacellular microinjection of hypocretin-1 onto intrac

38 were markedly enhanced as were responses to juxtacellular, microiontophoretic applications of glutam

39 nsfer at DG-CA3 interneurons recorded in the juxtacellular mode was efficient at low presynaptic stim

40 Micropipette recording with juxtacellular Neurobiotin ejection, linked micropipette-

41 in vivo electrophysiological recordings, and juxtacellular neuronal labeling in rats that underwent a

42 Here, we used the technique of juxtacellular recording and labeling in head-fixed rats

43 By applying juxtacellular recording and labeling in naturally sleepi

44 lations were identified by using the in vivo juxtacellular recording and labeling technique.

45 We used optogenetics and in vivo juxtacellular recording and labeling to examine the infl

46 lay neurons in the MGV were labeled with the juxtacellular recording method, and their dendritic arbo

47 of SNc dopamine neurons in vivo measured by juxtacellular recording of neurochemically identified ne

48 Multiple tetrode recordings, supported by juxtacellular recording techniques, showed that granule

49 the rat by anatomical analysis combined with juxtacellular recording/labeling and tetrode recordings

50 erization of rat L-ITCcs, as identified with juxtacellular recording/labeling in vivo.

51 Here, we have used in vivo juxtacellular recordings and transgenic mice showing MSN

52 In this study, we used juxtacellular recordings in anesthetized Mongolian gerbi

53 cells (GCs) while performing whole-cell and juxtacellular recordings of CA3 neurons in vivo In CA3 p

54 g and ITD tuning during in vivo loose-patch (juxtacellular) recordings from principal neurons of the

55 ethod for precise control of spike timing by juxtacellular stimulation, confirm and extend earlier co

56 ed in additional experiments with sinusoidal juxtacellular stimulation.

57 logically characterized and labeled with the juxtacellular technique.