戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  keratectomy or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis.
2 hotorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis.
3 rrations than wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
4 and reduced pain experience of laser in situ keratomileusis.
5 decreased by 90% 1 month after laser in-situ keratomileusis.
6 ions for corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.
7 ma and 2.9% had prior laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.
8 y and cellular integrity after laser in-situ keratomileusis.
9 risk factors for ectasia after laser in-situ keratomileusis.
10 ased interest in ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.
11 hotorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.
12 t status of hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.
13 lar pressure, poor response to laser in situ keratomileusis after incisional surgery, intracorneal ri
14  complications associated with laser in situ keratomileusis and decreasing postoperative pain and cor
15 view outlines the rationale for sub-Bowman's keratomileusis and describes the efficacy, tolerability
16 esidual refractive error after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
17                       Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy are safe
18                                Laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy have prov
19 e wound healing cascades after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy may be si
20 tely in eyes with prior myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy, with no
21 fer the combined advantages of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
22  known complication after both laser in situ keratomileusis and PRK.
23           Surface ablation and laser in situ keratomileusis are comparable in terms of safety and qua
24 ctive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis are discussed.
25 active keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis are few and far between.
26 ctive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis are now both approved for nonaviators and
27 atients who are candidates for laser in situ keratomileusis can be candidates for surface ablation, b
28 photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis can dramatically reduce postoperative ast
29 hotorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis can induce or exacerbate dry eye after su
30 large studies of microkeratome laser in-situ keratomileusis cases report a similar set of complicatio
31 xamination of the cornea after laser in-situ keratomileusis demonstrated that the keratocyte density
32 ients with keratoconus and postlaser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia.
33  keratocyte density within the laser in-situ keratomileusis flap and anterior residual corneal bed co
34 ng a microkeratome (similar to laser in situ keratomileusis flap), and posterior stromal tissue is ex
35 es, and evaluation of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flaps after cataract surgery.
36 ratomes in the construction of laser in-situ keratomileusis flaps and to see whether there is a signi
37 iority of femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis flaps compared with microkeratome-assiste
38 l stroma and previous laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flaps.
39 ved after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia with consequent stabilization
40 ations and improved keratomes, laser in situ keratomileusis has become a realistic alternative for co
41                                Laser in-situ keratomileusis has been tremendously successful in treat
42 flap LASIK, also referred to as sub-Bowman's keratomileusis, has the advantage of preserving more str
43 hotorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis have been the most popular refractive sur
44 ce dry eyes that develop after laser in situ keratomileusis, improve wound healing, and reduce flap c
45 phakic intraocular lenses over laser in-situ keratomileusis in patients with moderate and high myopia
46 raft-vs-host disease (2 eyes), dry eye after keratomileusis in situ (2 eyes), and undifferentiated oc
47 the residual corneal bed after laser in-situ keratomileusis, in a noninvasive manner, highlights the
48 ment options for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis include intraocular pressure reduction, r
49 chniques offer advantages over laser in situ keratomileusis, including expanded potential patient pro
50                                 Sub-Bowman's keratomileusis is a new procedure that provides the biom
51 active keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis is discussed, and the potential causal as
52 that each cornea's response to laser in situ keratomileusis is unique.
53                          Laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) is a relatively new refractive su
54                             Laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) is a surgical technique that may
55 ve keratectomy (PRK) and laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK).
56 surgery in children, including laser in-situ keratomileusis, laser epithelial keratomileusis, photore
57                                Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (
58 dly combines the advantages of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (
59 fractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are also used to treat myopia, hy
60 ted outcome (PRO) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed.
61  a microkeratome, and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) compared with unwounded controls
62                       Although laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enjoys a high success rate, posto
63 trating keratoplasty, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap or interface complications,
64 excimer laser and the laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap.
65         Long-term studies with laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) have continued to show good safet
66 outcome of wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with low myopia and compo
67 tome and femtosecond flaps for laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of accuracy and complica
68 vention cause and treatment of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) infections.
69      Wavefront-guided Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a widespread and effective sur
70               The corneal flap laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is among the most important deter
71 nnaires prior to and following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery.
72 ate current trends in resident laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) training in the USA.
73 ility, and safety of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a 213 nm wavelength solid-s
74 eviously treated with laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with residual error of refraction
75 higher degree of safety versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), it does not achieve the same vis
76 ive procedures, including PRK, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), thermal keratoplasty, and orthok
77 xtraction (SMILE) and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
78 e worldwide who have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
79 hotorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
80 ace complications occurs after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
81 following cataract surgery and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
82 n of creating corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
83 MILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
84  for starbursts after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
85  complications associated with laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
86 er two phakic IOLs followed by laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy (bioptics)
87  IOL implantation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy were enrol
88 l relaxing incisions, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy and conducti
89 ser in-situ keratomileusis, laser epithelial keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, and refract
90 eratoconus and progressive postlaser in-situ keratomileusis (post-LASIK) keratectasia.
91 e of corneal ectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis procedures, together with increased under
92 nd lasers for corneal flaps in laser in-situ keratomileusis seem to induce fewer signs and symptoms o
93             Complications from laser in-situ keratomileusis surgery are extremely rare.
94 s to the cornea after laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis surgery make Goldmann applanation tonomet
95     The critical components in laser in-situ keratomileusis surgery remain the same, however: safety,
96 n a constant safety concern in laser in-situ keratomileusis surgery.
97 t between 3 and 6 months after laser in-situ keratomileusis, the sub-basal nerves began to recover an
98 active keratectomy or laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis) to use depends on surgeon preference and
99 aterally treated, suitable for laser in situ keratomileusis, with monocular corrected distance visual

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。