ライフサイエンスコーパス: keratoplasty

1 g to 20/25 with over-refraction (P = .006 vs keratoplasty).

2 had performed fewer grafts (<100 registered keratoplasties).

3 tion or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

4 ion and 3 eventually received an endothelial keratoplasty.

5 ignificantly with a poor visual outcome from keratoplasty.

6 spread and growing acceptance of endothelial keratoplasty.

7 atoconus eyes and in the planning of corneal keratoplasty.

8 educed when compared to standard penetrating keratoplasty.

9 stpone penetrating or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

10 tained after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

11 No eyes required subsequent penetrating keratoplasty.

12 ell keratoplasty (DSAEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty.

13 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

14 lete visual rehabilitation after endothelial keratoplasty.

15 ovascularization after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

16 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

17 ting for penetrating or endothelial lamellar keratoplasty.

18 ual acuity before and after PROSE fitting or keratoplasty.

19 ve for performing laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty.

20 atoplasty have begun to supplant penetrating keratoplasty.

21 o Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

22 ctasia was better and more rapid compared to keratoplasty.

23 Six eyes had more than 1 keratoplasty.

24 mplants at the time of high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

25 </= 20/80, corneal perforation, or need for keratoplasty.

26 last is changing the practice of endothelial keratoplasty.

27 stpone penetrating or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

28 d at regular intervals through 3 years after keratoplasty.

29 visual deficits before and after endothelial keratoplasty.

30 in terms of visual improvement and need for keratoplasty.

31 ith Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

32 factors that limit vision after endothelial keratoplasty.

33 Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

34 l perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

35 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

36 n predicting graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

37 reasing or delaying the need for penetrating keratoplasty.

38 n for safety, and can eliminate the need for keratoplasty.

39 ease progression and predicting the need for keratoplasty.

40 sive surgery such as lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty.

41 orneal melt required therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

42 ase the pool of corneal tissue available for keratoplasty.

43 =20/80, corneal perforation, or the need for keratoplasty.

44 nd unscrolling in the eye during endothelial keratoplasty.

45 a whole corneal graft button unsuitable for keratoplasty.

46 dingly and only 1 patient needed penetrating keratoplasty.

47 descemetopexy and a few ended in penetrating keratoplasty.

48 d to analyze risk factors for glaucoma after keratoplasty.

49 ould be the procedure of choice in high-risk keratoplasties.

50 Twelve patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 1 month after CXL (group A) and the remaini

51 ) underwent penetrating or anterior lamellar keratoplasty, 10 of whom (20%) underwent repeat procedur

52 ent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (1255 eyes [94.4%] for Fuchs endothelial co

53 remaining 12 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 3 months after CXL (group B).

54 Two patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 3 months after inadequate visual rehabilita

55 ur eyes of 22 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty: 4 had granular dystrophy, 12 had keratocon

56 or Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: 40 clear, 23 actively rejecting, 24 reject

57 transplantation register, 13 920 penetrating keratoplasties, 858 deep anterior lamellar keratoplastie

58 ty was the most common diagnosis for primary keratoplasty (89.1%).

59 Experienced surgeons (>100 registered keratoplasties) achieved significantly better survival o

60 f infectious keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty admitted to the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear

61 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after failed PK combines greater wound stab

62 th of 400 mu m was set for anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) and endothelial lamellar keratoplasty

63 plasty (PK) in 1209 cases, anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) in 165 cases, and Descemet stripping

64 (PK), 37 (35.2%) underwent anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK), 22 (21.0%) underwent lamellar cornea

65 icle will review indications for endothelial keratoplasty, along with the current evidence for Descem

66 Subjects were examined before keratoplasty and at regular intervals through 3 years af

67 ublished for Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty and better than those reported after DSAEK

68 mising graft clarity in combined endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery.

69 r Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratop

70 The incidence of elevation of IOP after keratoplasty and development of glaucoma are significant

71 oth Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and DMEK, it is likely both procedures will

72 Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and PK did not show a statistically signifi

73 orneoscleral donor rim fungal cultures after keratoplasty and to report clinical outcomes of grafts w

74 ore keratoplasty, vitrectomy associated with keratoplasty, and filtering surgery associated with kera

75 more rapidly in the PROSE cohort compared to keratoplasty, and mean visual acuity was significantly b

76 aser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), thermal keratoplasty, and orthokeratology.

77 al collagen cross-linking (CXL), penetrating keratoplasty, and photorefractive keratectomy.

78 ury, severe symblepharon, SLET combined with keratoplasty, and postoperative loss of transplants (P <

79 heir incomplete resolution after endothelial keratoplasty, and understanding the onset of these may h

80 l perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty; and time to re-epithelialization.

81 tcomes when cataract surgery and endothelial keratoplasty are performed together.

82 lication when planning for anterior lamellar keratoplasty, as endothelial cell density may be subnorm

83 patients with PBK underwent CXL followed by keratoplasty at 1 or 3 months.

84 atients who underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty at a tertiary eye care center for advanced

85 a that were evaluated for PROSE or underwent keratoplasty at our institution.

86 d with microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty at the National Taiwan University Hospital

87 h the repeat expansion (55.3%) had undergone keratoplasty at the time of recruitment, compared with 1

88 or younger who underwent primary penetrating keratoplasty at Wills Eye Hospital Cornea Service betwee

89 terior segment-related (eg, post-penetrating keratoplasty), bleb-associated, glaucoma drainage device

90 Penetrating keratoplasty can commonly restore vision in corneal blin

91 tissue configurations in 69 of 144 lamellar keratoplasty cases (48%) and 63 of 146 membrane peeling

92 A total of 3414 keratoplasty cases were included in the statistical anal

93 00 consecutive Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cases with at least 6 months of follow-up w

94 ng the course of the trial, the landscape of keratoplasty changed due to the rise of Descemet Membran

95 Two eyes required therapeutic keratoplasty, combined with a scleral patch graft in 1 e

96 rd of perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty compared with placebo after controlling for

97 e-bank preparation of endothelial tissue for keratoplasty continues to evolve.

98 related publications by using the key words 'keratoplasty', 'corneal transplantation' or 'keratoprost

99 dications for surgery, evolution of lamellar keratoplasty, current surgical techniques, and future di

100 keratoplasty (EK), or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) between 1999 and 2012.

101 long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) performed after Descemet stripping a

102 he outcomes of a 9-mm deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with removal of the deep stroma limi

103 mplication rate after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

104 g keratoplasties, 858 deep anterior lamellar keratoplasties (DALKs), and 2287 endokeratoplasties perf

105 Penetrating keratoplasty (date range, 1992-2013), ALK (date range, 2

106 oscopy that was performed before penetrating keratoplasty demonstrated an acellular zone with a hyper

107 The prognosis of keratoplasty differs markedly when performed for therape

108 etry following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED

109 nd outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the surgical treatment of cornea

110 e longevity of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts in terms of endothelial survi

111 recent years, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has gained interest as it eliminates

112 t two cases of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in patients with existing scleral-fi

113 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a challenging procedure for the s

114 unction, but Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) now provides better vision with lowe

115 outcomes of a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) technique that could increase the av

116 adhesion after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to reduce the rebubbling rate.

117 s transit to Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), eye banks have risen to the challen

118 In Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), lamellar splitting of the Descemet

119 ve cases after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), we extended the analysis in this st

120 s (IOLs) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

121 to the rise of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).

122 who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

123 episodes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

124 al tissues for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

125 The average citation count per keratoplasty documents was 9.34.

126 in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) f

127 ent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and the relationship between these

128 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for isolated endothelial dysfunctio

129 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in cases of visually significant st

130 ing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is independent of donor cornea pres

131 escemet stripping automated endothelial cell keratoplasty (DSAEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty.

132 her Descemet-stripping-automated-endothelial-keratoplasty (DSAEK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) fo

133 of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using imported donor corneas.

134 ing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using intraoperative optical cohere

135 t Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), tissue preparation and tissue tran

136 ent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

137 treated with Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

138 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

139 was Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK, n = 135).

140 n Group I, 93 Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) (51%), 84 penetrating keratoplasty (

141 the form of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) is rapidly replacing traditional ful

142 Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) is the most popular treatment for en

143 cuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) ranged from 20/34 to 20/66 at 9 mont

144 ity following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).

145 ty-six eyes of 35 children underwent primary keratoplasty during the study period.

146 a penetrating keratoplasty (PK), endothelial keratoplasty (EK), or deep anterior lamellar keratoplast

147 keratoplasty (ALK) and endothelial lamellar keratoplasty (ELK).

148 dvanced corneal ectasia before proceeding to keratoplasty, especially if the ectasia is deemed stable

149 not a factor in survival of most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.

150 not an important factor in most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.

151 ic characteristics of patients who underwent keratoplasty for AK were compared with those who did not

152 were compared with those undergoing optical keratoplasty for baseline characteristics, management de

153 All consecutive patients undergoing first keratoplasty for FED and PBK between 1998 and 2014 were

154 ly affect the visual outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty for the disease.

155 corneal ectasia while 37 patients underwent keratoplasty for the same indication.

156 laser-assisted sutureless anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of anterior stromal scars

157 Eighty-two eyes of 54 patients requiring keratoplasty for the treatment of macular corneal dystro

158 long-term graft survival following pediatric keratoplasty for various indications.

159 emaining 24 patients (48%) underwent optical keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation.

160 Eyes in the keratoplasty group had more severe ectasia than eyes in

161 Thirty-seven (80.4%) patients in the keratoplasty group initially were misdiagnosed as having

162 Suboptimal visual acuity after endothelial keratoplasty has been attributed to increased anterior c

163 f Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty has been validated in the management of end

164 ned by a need for endothelial or penetrating keratoplasty, has not been investigated.

165 past decade, anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty have begun to supplant penetrating keratopl

166 ore likely to fail compared with endothelial keratoplasty (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.08-2.41; P = 0.02) adj

167 ohort, Snellen acuity was 20/28 (P = .108 vs keratoplasty), improving to 20/25 with over-refraction (

168 Repeat keratoplasties in turn are associated with increased ris

169 first 6 months (re-bubbling in 15, secondary keratoplasty in 11).

170 ses, and Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 64 cases.

171 f Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in many complex endothelial keratoplasty sc

172 plasty techniques especially the endothelial keratoplasty in the last decade.

173 toplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty in their management.

174 ce of elevated IOP requiring treatment after keratoplasty in univariate analysis but not in multivari

175 tabase for risk factors associated with post-keratoplasty infection identified an increased risk of p

176 tures, associated with a higher rate of post keratoplasty infection, is seen in endothelial keratopla

177 is significantly impaired but improves after keratoplasty, irrespective of the technique.

178 from donor tissues processed for endothelial keratoplasty is a growing concern, prompting analysis of

179 Although pediatric penetrating keratoplasty is challenging, successful transplantation

180 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is greater with longer PT, the effect of PT

181 e on complex Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty is limited, the utility of Descemet's strip

182 mpt before a complex surgical procedure like keratoplasty is offered.

183 l cell density at 6 months after penetrating keratoplasty is predictive of graft failure, whereas CV

184 of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is similar across donor cornea preservation

185 Keratoplasty is the primary treatment to cure blindness

186 The refractive shift after endothelial keratoplasty is well known and can negatively affect ach

187 iitis (32 eyes of 31 subjects) who underwent keratoplasty (January 1, 2008-December 1, 2009).

188 nts with xeroderma pigmentosum who underwent keratoplasty (lamellar/full-thickness) for corneal invol

189 Infectious keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty leads to a high graft failure rate.

190 dothelial dystrophy that require endothelial keratoplasty manifest anterior corneal structural and ce

191 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty may be further facilitated by using control

192 However, Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty may be more challenging in the management o

193 nor endothelium after DMEK or other forms of keratoplasty may be used to anticipate a rejection episo

194 cceptance of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty, may alter the indications for Descemet's s

195 KPro exchange (n = 8), penetrating keratoplasty (n = 1), or evisceration (n = 2) were perfo

196 cell transplantation (n = 26), and lamellar keratoplasty (n = 14).

197 t-cataract surgery (n = 6), post-penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2), and post-trabeculectomy (n = 2).

198 ry (n = 4), and occurrence after penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2).

199 perforate or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio: 6.27; 95% CI: 2.73-14.40; P <

200 rforation or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio=0.42; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.80; P=.

201 Documents related to penetrating keratoplasty only have been decreased, whereas the docum

202 ine eyes (96 corneal grafts post penetrating keratoplasty or Descemet stripping automated endothelial

203 m endothelial health after PK or endothelial keratoplasty, or both, warrants further study with more

204 ually required cataract surgery, endothelial keratoplasty, or penetrating keratoplasty, respectively.

205 is study affirms an advantage of endothelial keratoplasty over PK with respect to patient-reported ou

206 us 59 (41.8%) patients who did not require a keratoplasty (P < 0.001).

207 d 20/25 visual acuity after PROSE than after keratoplasty (P = .003).

208 014) and concurrent operation during primary keratoplasty (P = .049) were independent prognostic fact

209 On the other hand, age of primary keratoplasty (P = .626) and operation before or after pr

210 .626) and operation before or after primary keratoplasty (P = .800 and P = .104, respectively) were

211 ith a history of glaucoma before penetrating keratoplasty, particularly with prior glaucoma surgery (

212 odds ratios of a poor visual outcome in all keratoplasty patients.

213 Medicare patients) was analyzed for rate of keratoplasty performed for FECD (International Classific

214 A total of 5115 keratoplasties (PK = 2390; EK = 2725) were identified.

215 al keratoplasty (DSEK) (51%), 84 penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (46%), and 4 keratoprosthesis procedur

216 rd ratio [HR], 1.56; P < 0.001), penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (adjusted HR, 1.12 vs. ALK and 1.10 vs

217 rneal blindness caused by failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and inability to accurately assess vis

218 acing traditional full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for endothelial disease.

219 othelial-keratoplasty (DSAEK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for endothelial dysfunction and age-ma

220 thelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED)

221 Surgical technique was penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 1209 cases, anterior lamellar kerat

222 outcomes included comparisons to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) published results and comparisons to v

223 Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) ranks among the oldest and most common

224 = 13,644) undergoing their first penetrating keratoplasty (PK) registered on the United Kingdom Trans

225 orty-four eyes (41.9%) underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK), 37 (35.2%) underwent anterior lamella

226 keratoconus who had undergone a penetrating keratoplasty (PK), endothelial keratoplasty (EK), or dee

227 ors of microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

228 jection and failure after failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

229 eyes that are not candidates for penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

230 ere keratoconus and submitted to penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

231 ompared with those of eyes after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) as well as control eyes.

232 ho had undergone a first DALK or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for keratoconus.

233 To report a patient with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) graft endothelial failure implanted w

234 ration necessitating therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or evisceration.

235 and conventional management with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) when indicated in managing keratoconu

236 taract surgery in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

237 atients that underwent pediatric penetrating keratoplasty (PPK) for herpes simplex virus (HSV) kerati

238 these 50 patients, 26 (52%) had therapeutic keratoplasty, predominantly for corneal perforation.

239 ce of elevated IOP requiring treatment after keratoplasty: preoperative glaucoma or IOP >20 mmHg (adj

240 orbid conditions including prior penetrating keratoplasty, prior glaucoma surgery, iridocorneal endot

241 ) approach, adapted from routine endothelial keratoplasty procedure for corneal transplantation in hu

242 tions of the Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty procedure have also served to crystallize t

243 om a previous Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty procedure or cut from a whole corneal graft

244 1) as in the clinical deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty procedure with the big bubble (BB) techniqu

245 kely to be positive for fungi in endothelial keratoplasty-processed eyes (1.14%) than for other uses

246 (P = .002) and a nominal association of the keratoplasty proportion with triplet repeat number (P =

247 ed with the Krachmer grade of FECD severity, keratoplasty proportion, and central corneal thickness i

248 strates that Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty provides better and faster visual outcomes

249 The total keratoplasty publication counts had been increased from

250 After keratoplasty, quality of life was correlated with uncorr

251 Consecutive donor corneas and keratoplasty recipients at a single tertiary referral ce

252 A bibliometric filter was used to capture keratoplasty related publications by using the key words

253 All of the keratoplasty research articles, letters, case reports, r

254 ry, endothelial keratoplasty, or penetrating keratoplasty, respectively.

255 ial keratoplasty in many complex endothelial keratoplasty scenarios.

256 Where possible, keratoplasty should be delayed until such time as the ey

257 was consistent with shorter-term endothelial keratoplasty studies and was distinct from the biexponen

258 Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty surgery is a viable option for macular corn

259 All Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgical procedures could be completed usin

260 opathy using a tissue-engineered endothelial keratoplasty (TE-EK) approach, adapted from routine endo

261 There is a growing interest to the lamellar keratoplasty techniques especially the endothelial kerat

262 In comparison with earlier endothelial keratoplasty techniques, DMEK may consistently give high

263 orneal transplantation using human cadaveric keratoplasty techniques.

264 During lamellar keratoplasty, the iOCT data provided information that al

265 ermine whether eyebank-processed endothelial keratoplasty tissue is at higher risk of contamination t

266 ratoplasty infection, is seen in endothelial keratoplasty tissue vs other uses at the time of transpl

267 ss penetrating keratoplasty towards lamellar keratoplasty to only remove and replace damaged layers o

268 r Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, to a procedure reserved for complex endoth

269 past decade, from full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty towards lamellar keratoplasty to only remov

270 tion or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) within 3 months.

271 the need to undergo therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK).

272 f eyes with bullous keratopathy, endothelial keratoplasty under a previously failed PK provided bette

273 and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using posterior lamella prepared with a 300

274 perative diagnosis, filtering surgery before keratoplasty, vitrectomy associated with keratoplasty, a

275 results in tissue processed for endothelial keratoplasty vs unprocessed tissue.

276 Conclusions and Relevance: In 2014, keratoplasty was 1.9 times more likely in US Medicare fe

277 iciaries who obtained medical care for FECD, keratoplasty was 1.9 times more likely in white than Afr

278 The mean age at the time of primary keratoplasty was 24.6 +/- 39.9 months.

279 re for all eyes with Fuchs' dystrophy before keratoplasty was 72 +/- 11 (n = 63) and did not differ b

280 group 2), and in cases in which penetrating keratoplasty was associated with vitrectomy (57 eyes, gr

281 vascularization developing after penetrating keratoplasty was found between treatment groups and plac

282 ing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was high irrespective of PT.

283 Keratoplasty was more commonly required in cases (47.82%

284 In this way, the indication for keratoplasty was more than halved in our keratoconus pop

285 Conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary in 1 case (1.1%).

286 No conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary.

287 Keratoplasty was performed in 21 of 36 eyes (58%), 9 the

288 Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed using the big-bubble techniqu

289 going a therapeutic, rather than an optical, keratoplasty were associated significantly with a poor v

290 Patients undergoing therapeutic keratoplasty were compared with those undergoing optical

291 ovascularization occurring after penetrating keratoplasty were evaluated in a substudy (LX201-01 stud

292 whereas the documents related to endothelial keratoplasty were increased in the last decade.

293 lasty, and filtering surgery associated with keratoplasty were significantly associated with a higher

294 The rate of air injection and repeat keratoplasty were similar in DMEK and DSEK after the lea

295 Lamellar keratoplasty, when indicated, should be the procedure of

296 l results comparable to those of penetrating keratoplasty, while sparing a healthy endothelial graft.

297 has resulted in the necessity of performing keratoplasty with imported donor corneas.

298 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with random assignment of a donor cornea wi

299 Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with the big-bubble technique provided comp

300 aocular lenses in the setting of endothelial keratoplasty with variable results.