ライフサイエンスコーパス: kin

1 kin-29 sleep and energy homeostasis roles map to a set o

2 ths, and for the Irish megaliths, we found a kin relation between individuals buried in different meg

3 ime and found that authors who are part of a kin tend to occupy central positions in their collaborat

4 itor relatedness, which is consistent with a kin-selected strategy of male-male competition.

5 rries fitness costs and is avoided by active kin discrimination during mate choice.

6 nes have different relatednesses to affected kin.

7 d between spouses and biological and affinal kin; and (4) knowledge of plant uses associated with for

8 e propose that long-term pair bonds, affinal kin recognition, exogamy, and multi-locality create ties

9 al benefit to nearby clonemates and allowing kin selection to favor public good production.

10 Although kin and kind discrimination are increasingly appreciated

11 Although kin recognition is a fundamental mechanism through which

12 kin is more important than competition among kin for young prairie dogs.

13 onse to more intense local competition among kin.

14 rns probably occur because cooperation among kin is more important than competition among kin for you

15 ompetition decreases inclusive fitness among kin, Hamilton and May predicted that the presence of nea

16 lso generate preferential interactions among kin, thus stabilizing multicellular lifestyles.

17 interference competition for nutrients among kin, at the cost of a slower maximum growth rate.

18 stantial number of variants are shared among kin-related people.

19 omplete picture of economic similarity among kin members.

20 on hinders the evolution of altruism amongst kin when beneficiaries gain at the expense of competing

21 de mechanisms for assortment (Figure 1), and kin selection and reciprocal altruism are the foundation

22 most influenced by inbreeding avoidance and kin cooperation, instead of competition.

23 support a role for facultative cheating and kin selection in the evolution of quorum-sensing diversi

24 when a network exhibits triadic closure and kin labels than when it does not.

25 nisms: kin priming through communication and kin assistance with childcare.

26 icity, ensuring that nonkin are excluded and kin are included, is critical and depends on the number

27 o which mutually beneficial interactions and kin selection can facilitate the evolution of cooperatio

28 achieved through reciprocity, mutualism and kin selection.

29 of crown birds-Palaeognathae (ostriches and kin), Galloanserae (landfowl and waterfowl) and Neoaves

30 extensive cranial pneumaticity of T. rex and kin but does possess the highly derived brain and inner

31 To study the genetic structure and kin relations in CWC communities, we sequenced the genom

32 Sociality is a derived trait, and kin discrimination exists in sub-social closely related

33 tions, the mitochondrial structure of WT and kin(-) S49 cells is similar.

34 icantly differed in abundance between WT and kin(-) S49 cells.

35 nd morphologic studies of wild-type (WT) and kin(-) (PKA-null) murine S49 lymphoma cells.

36 Just as kin build potent academic networks with their own resour

37 ose in whom one has a fitness stake, such as kin and allies, is a key adaptive problem for many organ

38 ble to key evolutionary adaptations, such as kin detection.

39 n but can be protected by mechanisms such as kin discrimination.

40 the absence of well known mechanisms such as kin interactions, reciprocity, local dispersal or condit

41 tionary transitions, than mechanisms such as kin selection, direct and indirect reciprocity.

42 y, which protects other individuals, such as kin.

43 membrane receptor to recognize and assemble kin cells into a cooperative multicellular community tha

44 lecular and theoretical aspects of bacterial kin recognition.

45 differentiating affiliation behavior between kin and non-kin.

46 s to facilitate cooperative behavior between kin, suggesting that these systems may have other roles

47 However, the distinction between kin and non-kin-with kin detection being a key evolution

48 ng data from competition experiments between kin discriminating strains of Myxococcus xanthus and Pro

49 anding of demarcation line formation between kin-discriminatory populations, and can be used for anal

50 Genetic interaction between kin-29 and the histone deacetylase hda-4 coupled with su

51 explosion of interest in the overlap between kin selection and sexual selection, particularly concern

52 known to detect facial similarities between kin in the faces of third parties, and there is some evi

53 They comprised both kin and non-kin, many group members were paternal rather

54 early humans may have formed ties with both kin and non-kin, based in part on their tendency to coop

55 , females with higher numbers of co-breeding kin did not increase energy income but biased energy all

56 Greater numbers of co-breeding kin had a positive effect on the number of offspring wea

57 the effects of co-breeding and non-breeding kin on the fitness and energy allocation balance between

58 s of ecological knowledge and thereby buffer kin against environmental hardships [7, 8].

59 male behaviours at an individual level, but kin discrimination intensifies sexual conflict at the po

60 (Acrocephalus sechellensis) are mitigated by kin-selected (genetic relatedness) or mutualistic (socia

61 Constantly surrounded by kin or alien organisms in nature, eukaryotes and prokary

62 ediate apoptotic cell death in WT S49 cells, kin(-) cells resist this response because of lower level

63 Close kin provide many important functions as adults age, affe

64 ould be smaller for interactions among close kin.

65 Ancient Caribbean people avoided close kin unions despite limited mate pools that reflect small

66 developing when they are surrounded by close kin.

67 Need appeared more influential in close kin, suggesting indirect benefits, while reciprocity pro

68 When individuals marry close kin, we find that (i) both husbands and wives have sligh

69 n to discriminate between the calls of close kin and nonkin, and they favor first-order kin in cooper

70 tates may have unequal availability of close kin and that this gap in availability will widen in the

71 g that colonies only fuse with self or close kin.

72 The ability to recognize close kin confers survival benefits on single-celled microbes

73 The genetic data show close kin relationships among the individuals buried within th

74 The inability to cooperate with close kin, due to their absence, prompts a search for a new te

75 ts of associating and cooperating with close kin, or close maternal kin as in some whale societies, i

76 This perspective allows us to combine kin selection and reciprocal altruism into a general mat

77 nderstanding mother-offspring communication, kin recognition, and mate choice.

78 ze and low relatedness of these communities, kin directed.

79 m for how groups beget new groups comprising kin.

80 of cooperation, empiricists should consider kin selection and reciprocal altruism together rather th

81 e show that while unrelated males cooperate, kin-selected benefits are ultimately essential for the m

82 Our finding that bacteria sense damaged kin and respond via a widely distributed pathway to moun

83 and social status each played a role, as did kin dynamics and familiarity.

84 ped with an evolvable probability to discern kin from non-kin.

85 is not sufficient to precisely discriminate kin.

86 bacterium Bacillus subtilis to discriminate kin from nonkin in the context of swarming, a cooperativ

87 ver, despite shared genes, close and distant kin interactions were also contingent on reciprocity.

88 Kin recognition, the ability to distinguish kin from non-kin, can facilitate cooperation between rel

89 turn, how the bacteria use QS to distinguish kin from nonkin in bacterial communities.

90 dependent inhibition proteins to distinguish kin from nonkin.

91 host cells, the import of extracellular DNA, kin recognition, and cell motility (twitching).

92 uke) and recipients (abdomen flukes) enables kin selection of the parasite's host-manipulating trait,

93 al plasticity among individuals encountering kin or genetically diverse neighbourhoods.

94 ispersion) = -0.82 per thousand, and epsilon(kin)(biodegradation) = -2.15 per thousand.

95 equ)(sorption) = -0.31 per thousand, epsilon(kin)(transverse-dispersion) = -0.82 per thousand, and ep

96 This study firmly establishes kin discrimination in a bacterial multicellular setting

97 uggesting interstrain variation in the exact kin discrimination mechanism used.

98 mpsia cespitosa - a species known to exhibit kin recognition via root exudation - to investigate the

99 Co-breeding female kin ground squirrels maintain close nest burrows, likely

100 ness, lower risks of infanticide from female kin and greater protection of territorial boundaries may

101 tion if the resulting traits benefit fertile kin, and that worker traits provide the primary mechanis

102 iated cell adhesion is a major mechanism for kin discrimination at species and sub-species levels.

103 which uses the dual-purpose TraA protein for kin recognition and outer membrane and lipoprotein excha

104 h Hamilton's rule, indicating a key role for kin selection in the evolution of cooperative investment

105 into ants, and, as such, we find support for kin selection to drive the evolution and maintenance of

106 Here we explore whether predictions from kin selection, reciprocity, learning-to-mother and costl

107 Friends may be a kind of "functional kin." Finally, homophilic genotypes exhibit significantl

108 onment, is sufficient to repeatedly generate kin-discriminatory behaviors between evolved populations

109 ently manipulate sharing of putative genetic kin recognition markers, with the animal itself or known

110 les at many key points, such as within-group kin discrimination and mechanisms to actively repress co

111 outside of customary court sessions to help kin, pursue economic agendas, or gain reputation.

112 thereby gaining indirect benefits by helping kin.

113 hat postreproductive females gain by helping kin.

114 exual selection, particularly concerning how kin selection can put the brakes on harmful sexual confl

115 We show how kin selection and reciprocal altruism can promote cooper

116 philic cell surface receptor that identifies kin based on similarities in a polymorphic region, and t

117 orphic cell surface receptor that identifies kin by homotypic binding, and in so doing exchanges oute

118 raA, we show how these myxobacteria identify kin and transition towards multicellularity.

119 for the detection of chemicals that identify kin and conspecifics.

120 poptosis involves an increase in Bim, but in kin(-) cells, Dex-promoted cell death appears to occur b

121 By contrast, in kin(-) cells, expression of PKA-RIalpha and Bim is promi

122 Therefore TraA functions in kin recognition and, in turn, OME helps regulate social

123 gradient fractionation, we show here that in kin(-) S49 cells PKA-Calpha is not only depleted but the

124 cell surface adhesins from social yeasts in kin discrimination.

125 tion and stability of cooperation, including kin selection, pleiotropic constraints, and metabolic pr

126 l model of sexual conflict that incorporates kin discrimination and different patterns of dispersal.

127 acterium, Myxococcus xanthus, to investigate kin recognition at the molecular level.

128 multiple social learning pathways involving kin and non-kin can foster the emergence of cultures.

129 olerae uses CAI-1 to verify that some of its kin are present before committing to the high-cell-densi

130 onetheless, resume full cooperation with its kin when it is fixed in the population.

131 telomere attrition when living next to male kin.

132 als in a community seek to live with as many kin as possible, within-camp relatedness is reduced if m

133 ooperating with close kin, or close maternal kin as in some whale societies, including killer and spe

134 is possibly due to two proximate mechanisms: kin priming through communication and kin assistance wit

135 rs have evolved in microorganisms to mediate kin discrimination.

136 As the missing kin are replaced by non-kin friends, local clustering in

137 Although living near kin did not enhance fitness, familiarity with neighbors

138 s perhaps provides protection against nearby kin bacteria in which the old effector was not replaced.

139 nd May predicted that the presence of nearby kin should induce the dispersal of individuals from the

140 Consistent with our model, negative kin discrimination is restricted to eviction attempts of

141 e use game theory to show that such negative kin discrimination can be explained by selection for unr

142 o evolve even in populations with negligible kin structure and no synergies.

143 m social ties to individuals who are neither kin nor mates, and these ties tend to be with similar pe

144 capable of resistance; dominants exhibit no kin discrimination when attempting to evict younger fema

145 cial learning pathways involving kin and non-kin can foster the emergence of cultures.

146 s may have formed ties with both kin and non-kin, based in part on their tendency to cooperate.

147 They comprised both kin and non-kin, many group members were paternal rather than matern

148 However, the distinction between kin and non-kin-with kin detection being a key evolutionary adaption

149 ing affiliation behavior between kin and non-kin.

150 As the missing kin are replaced by non-kin friends, local clustering in the social network drop

151 onbreeding females direct help away from non-kin female pups to preserve future breeding opportunitie

152 uffer against territorial invasions from non-kin ground squirrels.

153 Discrimination of kin from non-kin has been observed in swarms of the bacterium Bacillu

154 stem (T6SS) to actively acquire DNA from non-kin neighbors.

155 ion, the ability to distinguish kin from non-kin, can facilitate cooperation between relatives.

156 volvable probability to discern kin from non-kin.

157 ity proved to be a stronger influence in non-kin, pointing to direct benefits.

158 ss to lay down one's life for a group of non-kin, well documented historically and ethnographically,

159 show that protracted exposure to kin or non-kin odorants changes the number of dopamine (DA)- or gam

160 for eggs they did not sire and which are not kin.

161 and size and loss of cristae) in WT, but not kin(-) cells.

162 nd proton efflux are decreased in WT but not kin(-) cells.

163 WT, but not kin(-), S49 cells incubated with the cAMP analog 8-(4-ch

164 When an opponent was not kin, agents evolved strategies that were similar to thos

165 enerally, our results confirm the ability of kin selection theory to explain the biology of eusocial

166 In the absence of kin selection, reciprocal altruism may be an evolutionar

167 ged and disadvantaged in the availability of kin support.

168 t with dominance rank or the availability of kin.

169 ever, the evolutionary origins and causes of kin-discriminatory behavior remain largely obscure.

170 udation - to investigate the consequences of kin interactions for root litter decomposition and negat

171 ores corrects adiposity and sleep defects of kin-29 mutants.

172 erae autoinducers suggests that detection of kin fosters a distinct outcome from detection of nonkin.

173 Discrimination of kin from non-kin has been observed in swarms of the bact

174 The indirect evolution of kin discrimination in an asexual microbe is analogous to

175 breeding, a prerequisite to the evolution of kin-based cooperation.

176 ion-diffusion models for colony expansion of kin-discriminatory strains.

177 Humans also bias cooperation in favor of kin and reciprocating partners, but the scope, scale, an

178 Behaviors which support the fitness of kin provide indirect benefits in the form of evolutionar

179 eproductive females may boost the fitness of kin through the transfer of ecological knowledge.

180 One form of kin discrimination observed in microbes is the failure o

181 Diverse forms of kin discrimination, broadly defined as alteration of soc

182 nge of reproductive partners among groups of kin.

183 We demonstrated the importance of kin effects on a fundamental life-history trade-off.

184 with phylogenetic relatedness, indicative of kin discrimination.

185 rgely focussed on measuring the influence of kin on reproduction in natural fertility populations.

186 between different strains as a mechanism of kin discrimination, but it is not clear whether this kil

187 ith relatives, they rely on the mechanism of kin-selection, and by forming highly clustered social ki

188 This includes mechanisms of kin selection, single-cell sensing of nutrient depletion

189 However, the next of kin (NoK) decline to consent in 43% of cases-the second

190 nfronted with raised expectations of next of kin and the necessity to provide early predictions of lo

191 Eleven of 30 screened patients and 9 next of kin completed study procedures.

192 in 251 missed potential donors whose next of kin could not be approached regarding organ donation bec

193 is-induced locked-in state and their next of kin in a fully unbiased manner using eye-tracking comput

194 ontacting patients with CRC or their next of kin in five states.

195 ondents were aware that consent from next of kin or family is sought for all deceased organ donation.

196 Next of kin rated their own or patients' QoL similarly, but they

197 In 438 cases where next of kin was approached, consent rates reached 47.5%.

198 mental and private programs that pay next of kin who give permission for the removal of their decease

199 to Jan 1, 2011, through contact with next of kin, collection of death certificates, and searches of t

200 informed consent postmortem from the next of kin.

201 ollowing informed consent from their next of kin.

202 gene flow discontinuities from their next of kin.

203 o be at the cost of the QoL of their next of kin.

204 theses regarding the evolutionary origins of kin discrimination.

205 Pairs of kin strains were able to cocolonize roots and formed a m

206 atorial effect derived from this plethora of kin discrimination genes creates a tight relatedness cut

207 We asked whether the presence of kin might act on energy allocation, a central aspect of

208 alls, which are thought to be the product of kin or individual selection (e.g., [10, 11]).

209 sis' seems not to have brought proponents of kin selection and group selection any closer together.

210 ological disagreements between proponents of kin selection and group selection really lie.

211 ings provide direct evidence for the role of kin recognition in cheater control and suggest a mechani

212 a that might allow for the relative roles of kin selection and mutualistic benefits to be disentangle

213 ism to sustain the evolutionary stability of kin-recognition genes and to suppress cheating.

214 jor insights of inclusive fitness studies of kin selection.

215 reavement multipliers by age group, types of kin loss, and race to illuminate prospective disparities

216 ow-up, telephoning each woman or her next-of-kin (NOK) trimonthly on her mobile phone to update infor

217 ent registrations are honored by the next-of-kin in 90% of cases, so increasing registrations will in

218 vely collected survey data from 1985 next-of-kin surrogates of Health and Retirement Study (HRS) part

219 otential brain-dead donors and their next-of-kin, and these data highlight the need for further resea

220 ent was obtained from the patient or next-of-kin.

221 conditions and beyond the mother-offspring, kin or pair bond broadens the generality of the social b

222 unt explains several specific constraints on kin classification proposed previously.

223 This protection depends on kin-recognition-mediated segregation because it is compr

224 Whilst empirical work has focused on kin-discriminating behaviour, theoretical models have as

225 lution but current understanding focusses on kin selection (inclusive fitness).

226 ndividuals, with no evidence for age, sex or kin bias.

227 is consistent with avoidance of first-order kin as partners.

228 anism for discrimination against first-order kin during mate choice.

229 e kin and nonkin, and they favor first-order kin in cooperative contexts, so we conclude that long-ta

230 than random individuals in the population ("kin selection").

231 resistance, the usual prediction of positive kin discrimination can be reversed.

232 asitoid wasps without invoking or precluding kin selection effects.

233 family of OME-delivered toxins that promote kin discrimination of OME partners.

234 benefits of cooperation result in pronounced kin discrimination and nepotism in many social species a

235 ation, In contrast, CPT-cAMP did not protect kin(-) cells or WT cells treated with the PKA inhibitor

236 rve to facilitate inter-sexual provisioning, kin provisioning, and risk reduction reciprocity, three

237 more general processes such as reciprocity, kin selection, and multi-level selection acting on genes

238 The ability of bacteria to recognize kin provides a means to form social groups.

239 und 49,000 bp, constituted a closely related kin group, making these Neandertals an appropriate case

240 to bacterial diversity, genetic relatedness, kin selection theory, and mechanisms of recognition.

241 ters limited their prevalence by restricting kin availability.

242 conclude that long-tailed tits use the same kin discrimination rule to avoid inbreeding as they do t

243 l traits, without requiring group selection, kin selection, or reciprocity.

244 per capita productivity, stable group size, kin structure and stability of the social group.

245 ties of being present in other relatives, so kin selection could act on them differently.

246 Even so, kin(-) cells undergo apoptosis in response to treatment

247 tion, and by forming highly clustered social kin-networks, they can efficiently use reputation dynami

248 m is consequently deemed to require stronger kin selection, or trait-selected synergies, or elastic p

249 In higher taxa, kin recognition occurs via visual, chemical, or tactile

250 volution of altruism to a pathway other than kin selection and/or deny the role of relatedness.

251 We therefore conclude that kin may influence the progression to a second birth.

252 We find that kin discrimination and group dispersal inhibit harmful m

253 Further, we find that kin discrimination pervasively evolves indirectly betwee

254 of interpopulation discrimination imply that kin discrimination phenotypes evolved via many diverse g

255 Recent theory proposes that kin selection may modulate female harm by relaxing compe

256 Furthermore our data reveals that kin recognition in birds can develop without any associa

257 Here we show that kin recognition protects cooperators against cheaters.

258 ative hypotheses, these results suggest that kin selection and conflict are important in plants, that

259 nepotism in the social species suggests that kin discrimination has been lost or is irrelevant in com

260 for transformation, such as fratricide, the kin-discriminatory killing of neighboring cells, and com

261 edictions of two alternative hypotheses, the kin selection and mutual benefits hypotheses [14], to un

262 solated from renal tissue of a member of the kin who died while on renal dialysis.

263 mutualism or reciprocity).(2) Because of the kin-structured nature of many animal societies, it has b

264 Chondrichthyans (sharks and their kin) are the living sister group of osteichthyans and ha

265 iffers from those of known mammals and their kin.

266 by which postreproductive females help their kin remain enigmatic.

267 ters and victims that differed only in their kin-recognition genes, tgrB1 and tgrC1, and in a single

268 r environment to protect themselves or their kin from parasitism.

269 organisms regulate their social life through kin recognition, but the underlying mechanisms are poorl

270 ving conflict over territorial space through kin-selected or mutualistic pathways can reduce both imm

271 ies had been carefully laid out according to kin relationships by someone who evidently knew the dece

272 combined with the known benefits conveyed to kin by post-reproductive females can explain why killer

273 We show that protracted exposure to kin or non-kin odorants changes the number of dopamine (

274 This logic extends to kin other than grandmothers.

275 This limits germline stem cell predation to kin, as the locus has hundreds of alleles.

276 Two explanatory variables related to kin influence significantly increase the odds of a femal

277 repertoires, but in this case in response to kin selection favoring sharing of information among rela

278 inbreeding as they do to direct help toward kin.

279 that humans act more altruistically towards kin.

280 tomic, and bioinformatic analyses to uncover kin recognition factors in this organism.

281 es by facultative cheating can persist under kin-selection conditions that select against "obligate c

282 ic loci that allow recognition of unfamiliar kin have proven elusive.

283 Swarming bacteria use kin discrimination to preferentially associate with thei

284 to show that sterile castes could evolve via kin selection, in which a gene for altruistic sterility

285 We visualize kin selection as non-random interactions with like-strat

286 t empathy likely evolved in a scenario where kin- and other indirect benefits co-opt strategies origi

287 Kin selection theory predicts that, where kin discrimination is possible, animals should typically

288 behavior of outer membrane exchange, wherein kin share outer membrane contents.

289 w-fertility population, by analysing whether kin affect parity progression in the British Household P

290 wever, greatly reduce the threshold at which kin selection promotes cooperation, and vice-versa.

291 itness benefits gained from associating with kin are an important pathway to conflict resolution,(1)

292 gical detail while remaining consistent with kin- and multilevel selection frameworks.

293 sexual behaviour in a manner consistent with kin-selection theory.

294 bserved patterns of emotional contagion with kin or group members.

295 favouring the evolution of cooperation with kin.

296 ilarity of male song-phrases correlates with kin in both time and frequency parameters, while, for fe

297 ies showed benefits of communal feeding with kin, indicating nepotistic cooperation.

298 the distinction between kin and non-kin-with kin detection being a key evolutionary adaption-is often

299 benefits of the public good are shared with kin and that cooperative investment is, despite the larg

300 Those without kin report higher rates of loneliness and experience ele

301 uctive individuals to the fitness of younger kin.