ライフサイエンスコーパス: laboratory strain

1 onfer PZA resistance when reconstructed in a laboratory strain.

2 pecies, and C. psittaci Cal10, a widely used laboratory strain.

3 idative stress significantly better than the laboratory strain.

4 into the 5'-flanking region of CYP6B8 in the laboratory strain.

5 with the same kinetics as H37Rv, a virulent laboratory strain.

6 iffers from the closely related E. coli K-12 laboratory strain.

7 nic mosquitoes relative to the untransformed laboratory strain.

8 strain CFT073 that is absent from an E. coli laboratory strain.

9 s and compared results to the nontransformed laboratory strain.

10 , but researchers typically use one standard laboratory strain.

11 d with similar specificities as those of the laboratory strain.

12 higher fraction of the population than in a laboratory strain.

13 a sets composed of almost 200 distinct mouse laboratory strains.

14 gins and substructure of these commonly used laboratory strains.

15 me amplification and sequencing using common laboratory strains.

16 that describes the lineage of commonly used laboratory strains.

17 equencing in a common subset of 12 classical laboratory strains.

18 lved the manipulation of individual genes in laboratory strains.

19 SA and those of hospital-associated MRSA and laboratory strains.

20 ant allele is present in multiple C. elegans laboratory strains.

21 ese SNPs are valid resistance markers in the laboratory strains.

22 ffered from that previously determined using laboratory strains.

23 , a self-adherence phenotype lacking in most laboratory strains.

24 een found among wild isolates and created in laboratory strains.

25 -gp120-blocking Ab activity measured against laboratory strains.

26 tic treatment and could be reassociated with laboratory strains.

27 missing from a number of common high passage laboratory strains.

28 These variant loci distinguish laboratory strains.

29 ates are more hypercyanogenic than nonmucoid laboratory strains.

30 Tcf7l2 and wild-type females from 30 inbred laboratory strains.

31 neralizing the results of studies based upon laboratory strains.

32 ifferences observed is found among classical laboratory strains.

33 ing was not found in any of several standard laboratory strains.

34 ributed in a mosaic pattern among the extant laboratory strains.

35 2 structural variants among 39 commonly used laboratory strains.

36 most in independent populations of the same laboratory strains.

37 wild-derived populations and inbred isogenic laboratory strains.

38 netic background, which differs from that of laboratory strains.

39 as in immunodeficient mice but not in common laboratory strains.

40 om the "smooth" colonies typically formed by laboratory strains.

41 sequences of 34 HSV-2 low-passage-number and laboratory strains, 14 of which were collected in Uganda

42 Laboratory strain 168 and a number of natural isolates o

43 Previous work has shown that the laboratory strain 168 forms markedly attenuated biofilms

44 eous phage-resistant mutants of our virulent laboratory strain, 197N, were attenuated.

45 Laboratory strain 3153A and two C. albicans strains isol

46 clinical isolate SD90e from South Africa or laboratory strain 333.

47 teins of chondroitin sulfate A (CSA)-binding laboratory strains (3D7-CSA and FCR3-CSA) and a clinical

48 The commonly used Staphylococcus aureus laboratory strain 8325-4 bears a naturally occurring 11-

49 with TX WT and our previously characterized laboratory strain A/PR/8/34 (PR8) and its NS1 knockout s

50 Conversely, the spherical laboratory strain A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) was passag

51 eosinophil responses to the virus using the laboratory strain (A/PR/08/1934) or the pandemic strain

52 variation in recombination rate among common laboratory strains, a result that carries important impl

53 way mucin expression than infection with RSV laboratory strain A2.

54 heliotropic strain VR1814 and the attenuated laboratory strain AD169 in human placental villi as expl

55 ere than those seen with a Delta97 mutant of laboratory strain AD169, which harbors extensive deletio

56 When UL133/8 was restored to HCMV laboratory strain AD169, which otherwise lacks the locus

57 22 to 39 clinical isolates, as well as with laboratory strains AD169, Towne, and Toledo, to determin

58 Here, we utilized two laboratory strains (AD169 and Towne) of human cytomegalo

59 galovirus have been sequenced, including two laboratory strains (AD169 and Towne) that have been exte

60 ith a clinical CMV strain, VR1814, but not a laboratory strain, AD169, downregulates MMP activity in

61 n with the hallmarks of latency, whereas the laboratory strains, AD169 and Towne, replicated producin

62 n addition to an extended bacterial panel of laboratory strains, all 3 molecules rapidly accumulated

63 RME1 that affects sporulation efficiency in laboratory strains also cosegregates with significant ph

64 A 3-day-old biofilm either a laboratory strain (American Type Culture Collection [ATC

65 Both a laboratory strain and a clinical isolate of C. albicans

66 ide expression patterns in a cross between a laboratory strain and a wild strain of Saccharomyces cer

67 The laboratory strain and most other S. pombe strains contai

68 rom a natural population, plus one reference laboratory strain and one strain of Drosophila simulans.

69 y two genomes have been determined, the HG52 laboratory strain and the newly sequenced SD90e low-pass

70 0 domains blocked mosquito transmission of a laboratory strain and two field isolates using an ex viv

71 ions was identified in the lpd gene of the 5 laboratory strains and 13 clinical isolates.

72 or amplifications are a prominent feature of laboratory strains and appear to have originated under l

73 Indeed, supernatants from laboratory strains and clinical isolates of S. aureus ca

74 e biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus laboratory strains and clinical isolates.

75 d by inflammasome activation induced by both laboratory strains and clinical isolates.

76 shown to be associated in PAS resistance in laboratory strains and clinical isolates.

77 hat CDF can support the long-term culture of laboratory strains and demonstrate that this formulation

78 PIA (PIA-AMV) induced mucoidy in both these laboratory strains and early lung colonizing non-mucoid

79 Among 16 laboratory strains and field isolates, the extent of fac

80 00 high-quality SNPs in 631 Pf isolates from laboratory strains and four malaria-endemic regions (Wes

81 This effect was observed in laboratory strains and in clinical isolates from a recen

82 trate that a rare population of HSV, both in laboratory strains and in primary clinical isolates from

83 lls using a panel of wild-type P. falciparum laboratory strains and invasion ligand knockout lines, a

84 sh genomes, representing three commonly used laboratory strains and one native population, we constru

85 layed potent anticytopathic activity against laboratory strains and primary isolates of HIV-1 with EC

86 displayed potent antiviral activity against laboratory strains and primary isolates of T- and M- tro

87 hanced specific ADCML of HIV-1 virions (both laboratory strains and primary isolates) and provirus-ac

88 e challenge this dogma by showing that yeast laboratory strains and strains isolated from grapes unde

89 e biofilm-forming abilities of the prototype laboratory strains and the currently circulating isolate

90 We found that all laboratory strains and the majority of field strains tes

91 ho did mechanistic research using homozygous laboratory strains and those who studied patterns of gen

92 it is detected during infections with three laboratory strains and two low-passage clinical isolates

93 rgely predicts fusibility within and between laboratory strains and wild-type isolates.

94 pyrG sequences were identical to one of the laboratory strains, and an additional 12% (6/51) differe

95 0 also contains an 80-kb plasmid absent from laboratory strains, and mutations in a plasmid-encoded h

96 (UL128 to UL150) that are largely mutated in laboratory strains, and recent studies have indicated th

97 Five of the eight founders are common laboratory strains, and three are wild-derived.

98 rotein encoded by NL4-3, a widely used HIV-1 laboratory strain, antagonizes human BST-2 but not monke

99 Laboratory strains are characteristically unable to prod

100 We show that classical laboratory strains are derived from a few fancy mice wit

101 ation that exists among wild mice, classical laboratory strains are derived from a limited set of fou

102 Haploid laboratory strains are enabling a deep integration of cl

103 Although laboratory strains are extremely sensitive to aneuploidy

104 Although laboratory strains are restricted to growth in fibroblas

105 fficult to measure because mating tests with laboratory strains are usually required to identify C. e

106 usly reported to be required for swarming in laboratory strains, are dispensable for robust swarming

107 ction procedure and occurred in a variety of laboratory strains as well as a freshly obtained clinica

108 This gH complex is notably missing from HCMV laboratory strains as well as HCMV vaccines previously e

109 t and have achieved excellent results in two laboratory strains as well as in evolved Ty1 high-copy s

110 We present data for laboratory strains, as well as pfcrt transfectants expre

111 as expressed in controls and in F. nucleatum laboratory strain ATCC cocultures throughout the epithel

112 disseminated isolates (RST3), and a standard laboratory strain (B-31) were established in a murine cy

113 Separate models were developed for laboratory strain bacteria cultured in the laboratory an

114 esent in clinical samples and in widely used laboratory strains (BH10), and it profoundly affects HIV

115 with adaptive evolution were detected in the laboratory strain, but they do not account for the major

116 gene and quantitative trait locus studies of laboratory strains, but with greater availability of gen

117 genome of CBS 2777 is related to that of the laboratory strain by a complex chromosome rearrangement.

118 iae genome encodes several proteins that, in laboratory strains, can take up a stable, transmissible

119 The three laboratory strains carried the Xpr1(n) receptor variant

120 Some strains, including most laboratory strains, carry an allele of GPA1 (an upstream

121 mes (ORFs) in the genomic DNA of C. albicans laboratory strains carrying one (CAI-4) to three (BWP17)

122 in the central core sequences present in the laboratory strain centromeres, but lack adjacent heteroc

123 by use of 2 representative MRSA strains: the laboratory strain COL and the community-acquired clinica

124 e species most closely related to the common laboratory strains contain proviral env genes of the xen

125 Many S. cerevisiae strains, including common laboratory strains, contain only a partial biotin synthe

126 Haemolytic activity in the mutant laboratory strains could be restored by the addition of

127 ed placentas as well as those from different laboratory strains could bind to CSPG but not to HA.

128 imbriae in UPEC cystitis isolate F11 and the laboratory strain E. coli K-12 MG1655 also resulted in d

129 y infection of these cell types because HCMV laboratory strains (e.g., AD169 and Towne) have lost the

130 in human AM in response to infection with a laboratory strain, early and late clinical isolates of P

131 A laboratory strain engineered to carry this mutation did

132 ion of the potassium and proton pumps in the laboratory strain enhances performance to levels exceedi

133 icated strains of Bacillus subtilis, but not laboratory strains, exhibit robust swarming motility on

134 h level of genome instability in C. albicans laboratory strains exposed to the stress of transformati

135 , we obtained the genome sequences of both a laboratory strain (F) and a low-passage clinical isolate

136 recombination into a cloned cytomegalovirus laboratory strain, followed by reporter-based yield redu

137 compared with strain Erdman, a commonly used laboratory strain for studies of pathogenesis.

138 t wild mice will be a valuable complement to laboratory strains for studying the genetics of complex

139 epsC, swrA, and degQ, the resulting repaired laboratory strain forms biofilms that are as robust as a

140 North America more closely resemble the HG52 laboratory strain from Scotland than the low-passage-num

141 compared with other clinical strains and the laboratory strain H37Rv.

142 lates and its env gene cloned into the NL4-3 laboratory strain had similar fitness, and both were mor

143 tilis, surfactin disrupted vesicles while in laboratory strains harbouring a mutation in the gene sfp

144 Some laboratory strains have been sub-cultured for decades si

145 In addition, these two laboratory strains have been suggested to express very d

146 es utilizing prototypical EBV type 1 (EBV-1) laboratory strains have generally failed to readily infe

147 However, the antecedents of today's laboratory strains have undergone extensive mutagenesis

148 In both clinical S. aureus isolates and laboratory strains, high Sak-producing strains formed le

149 While laboratory strains (HIV-1NL4.3 and HIV-1IIIB) are sensit

150 1 and PreXMRV-2 were found together in three laboratory strains, Hsd nude, NU/NU, and C57BR/cd, consi

151 revious studies of the Escherichia coli K-12 laboratory strain identified a group of effector protein

152 n isolated from decaying fruit, and a common laboratory strain in a mouse infection model.

153 ies biofilms formed by clinical isolates and laboratory strains in the presence and absence of clinic

154 n increase of 0.35 sternopleural bristles in laboratory strains in two large samples of wild-caught D

155 six isolates replicated as well as standard laboratory strains in vitro.

156 s and ethanol fermentation in commercial and laboratory strains (including a xylose-fermenting strain

157 plant isolate is lethal in mice, whereas the laboratory strain is avirulent.

158 Linear plasmid 25, which is often lost in laboratory strains, is required for the infection of mic

159 E. faecalis isolates, the well-characterized laboratory strain JH2-2 and a human-derived fecal isolat

160 clinical HCMV isolates, extensively passaged laboratory strains lack the UL/b' region and hence do no

161 been performed with even the most conserved laboratory strains, let alone the highly divergent prima

162 ortant topic areas in Candida biology; and a laboratory strain lineage page that describes the lineag

163 Two prophages found in the common laboratory strain LT2 were absent.

164 pathogenic strain 14028 but not in avirulent laboratory strain LT2.

165 on of the CCGTTCACA DnaA box sequence of the laboratory strain M. tuberculosis H37Ra with a mutant se

166 heckerboard screens were performed using the laboratory strain M. tuberculosis H37Rv, lead spectinami

167 rom laboratory isolates revealed that mucoid laboratory strains made sevenfold more HCN than their no

168 FT073, enterohemorrhagic E. coli EDL933, and laboratory strain MG1655 reveals that, amazingly, only 3

169 one of the most divergent from the canonical laboratory strain N2 and has been widely used in develop

170 Using the laboratory strain N2, we identify a novel C. elegans inn

171 spread dosage compensation occurs neither in laboratory strains nor in natural variants of S. cerevis

172 es we analysed, it is not detectable in some laboratory strains notably the genome reference strain 9

173 t of mature biofilms formed by the sequenced laboratory strain of B. bronchiseptica We hypothesized t

174 When approximately 10(8) CFU/ml of a laboratory strain of B. pertussis was cultured in vitro,

175 olates of bacilli all closely related to the laboratory strain of B. subtilis.

176 inical isolate had a growth advantage over a laboratory strain of E. faecalis in the kidneys but not

177 strain, we identified a mutation in the main laboratory strain of EBV that impairs virus function, an

178 marsh water enhanced photoinactivation of a laboratory strain of Enterococcus faecalis, but depresse

179 because its expression in a serum-sensitive laboratory strain of Escherichia coli conferred both of

180 on system, but none of its effectors, into a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli is sufficient to p

181 ped a synthetic genetic system that allows a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli to sense and kill

182 ns and show that they can be reproduced in a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli.

183 Exposure of an avirulent laboratory strain of H. capsulatum to A. castellanii sel

184 t in the genomes of a midgut cell line and a laboratory strain of H. zea.

185 Based on the comparison of derivatives of a laboratory strain of Haemophilus influenzae expressing e

186 epair of the mutated UL131 gene in the AD169 laboratory strain of HCMV restored its ability to infect

187 ically inhibited replication of an R5-tropic laboratory strain of HIV in a multicycle infection assay

188 o reassess the coding potential of the AD169 laboratory strain of human cytomegalovirus and sequences

189 Here, we show that a laboratory strain of mouse (Mus musculus, C57BL/6J) robu

190 ulated with either the Me7 or Rocky Mountain Laboratory strain of murine prions.

191 on B95-8 marmoset B cells, and the Edmonston laboratory strain of MV infected hSLAM-expressing cells.

192 We show that DEP and H37Ra, an avirulent laboratory strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, were bo

193 rchy of inhibitory activity against the NF54 laboratory strain of P. falciparum in Anopheles stephens

194 in the Toledo strain that are missing in the laboratory strain of the virus.

195 When inserted into a laboratory strain of WHV, each of the mutations, or comb

196 and possible industrial manipulations of the laboratory strain of yeast could have had a strong effec

197 y in Bacillus subtilis, and we reassert that laboratory strains of B. subtilis do not swarm.

198 acid), the siderophore precursor produced by laboratory strains of B. subtilis, is of secondary impor

199 For example, domesticated laboratory strains of Bacillus subtilis are renowned for

200 Previous studies of laboratory strains of budding yeast had shown that when

201 s between the genotypes of two commonly used laboratory strains of D. melanogaster (Canton-S and Oreg

202 interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8 in response to laboratory strains of E. coli in vitro.

203 of the anti-CMY-2 antibody was seen against laboratory strains of E. coli possessing TEM-1, SHV-1, K

204 Importantly, O antigen production enables laboratory strains of E. coli to enter the gut of the Ca

205 ated by XO activity was effective at killing laboratory strains of E. coli, commensal microbiotas, an

206 Laboratory strains of Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa

207 exerts antibacterial effects on clinical and laboratory strains of Escherichia coli and report that d

208 ynthesis has been studied most thoroughly in laboratory strains of Escherichia coli and Salmonella en

209 ynthesis is coordinated with vesiculation in laboratory strains of Escherichia coli to yield glycosyl

210 data resource that integrates information on laboratory strains of Escherichia coli, its phages, plas

211 LS activity using heterologous expression in laboratory strains of Escherichia coli.

212 however, protection is largely restricted to laboratory strains of FIV and does not extend to primary

213 degree of conservation in clinical isolates, laboratory strains of HCMV, and even in chimpanzee CMV.

214 cells (HFLC) reliably support infection with laboratory strains of hepatitis C virus (HCV), although

215 n immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2), and laboratory strains of HIV-1.

216 ng highly resistant to infection with common laboratory strains of influenza A virus.

217 hibitor clavulanate, potent activity against laboratory strains of M. tuberculosis was observed [mini

218 V-A59) demonstrated replication identical to laboratory strains of MHV-A59 in tissue culture; however

219 In comparisons to published studies of laboratory strains of mice that were artificially select

220 ut do not cause similar disease in wild-type laboratory strains of mice unless first adapted to these

221 However, MmuPV1 failed to grow in common laboratory strains of mice with an intact immune system.

222 NVs) in homozygous organisms, such as inbred laboratory strains of mice, from short read sequence dat

223 rily from detailed studies on a few selected laboratory strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycoba

224 on transformation and DNA uptake for several laboratory strains of N. gonorrhoeae.

225 n inhibition assays on clinical isolates and laboratory strains of P. falciparum in the presence of a

226 nds of activity as previously determined for laboratory strains of S. aureus: SodM, SodA, and a hybri

227 sion regulation between natural variants and laboratory strains of S. cerevisiae, we evaluated the ka

228 Distributions of polymorphisms in laboratory strains of S. rosetta provided independent ev

229 Genetically modified laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are exten

230 However, laboratory strains of SB can be rendered neurovirulent f

231 Cell culture-adapted laboratory strains of Sindbis virus (SB) exhibit efficie

232 framework for studying aggression in common laboratory strains of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanoga

233 12 field isolates and eight commonly studied laboratory strains of the model organism Chlamydomonas r

234 However, laboratory strains of the virus, many of which were deve

235 Consistent with previous findings using laboratory strains of the virus, the mutant replicated n

236 Here, we demonstrate that two commonly used laboratory strains of the yeast Candida albicans, CAI-4

237 f CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive systems in wild and laboratory strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

238 w this is not just a property of vaccine and laboratory strains of virus, because an association betw

239 in Vero cells infected with three different laboratory strains of wild-type HSV-1.

240 e regions of genetic identity between common laboratory strains of yeast.

241 for Corneal Ulcers Trial (SCUT) and for two laboratory strains, PA103 and PAO1.

242 molecular basis for such differences in two laboratory strains, PAK and PAO1.

243 E. coli laboratory strains, particularly E. coli K-12, are far f

244 ns of FIV derived from molecular clones; the laboratory strain PET(F14) and the primary strain GL8(41

245 h recurrent bottlenecks in the S. cerevisiae laboratory strain population.

246 We used both the laboratory strain PR8 and a set of viruses engineered to

247 at are prevented from replicating within the laboratory strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 by the end

248 -i5 and A32) strongly reacted to three HIV-1 laboratory strains (R5, X4, and R5/X4), six primary isol

249 ants expressing different amounts of PcsB in laboratory strain R6 and virulent serotype 2 strain D39

250 In contrast, laboratory strain R6 contains 71 single-base-pair change

251 In contrast, laboratory strain R6 contains suppressors that allow the

252 4, a recent serotype 4 clinical isolate, and laboratory strain R6, an avirulent, unencapsulated deriv

253 ogroup 19 middle ear strain 5093 against the laboratory strain R6.

254 l mechanistic complications in commonly used laboratory strain R6.

255 these genes compared to the sequenced model laboratory strain RB50, a rabbit isolate.

256 own, however, whether hotspots identified in laboratory strains reflect the hotspot diversity of natu

257 rA mutation, as well as the mutation in sfp, laboratory strains regained the capacity to swarm and di

258 In contrast, wild-derived laboratory strains represent a broad sampling of diversi

259 Larvae from a laboratory strain resistant to Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab in diet

260 e RSV line 19 strain but not with the RSV A2 laboratory strain results in lung IL-13 and mucus expres

261 hat mutation of traP in the prototype 8325-4 laboratory strain RN6390 results in reduced expression o

262 comparison to sarA mutants generated in the laboratory strain RN6390.

263 mutations in the sarA and agr loci of three laboratory strains (RN6390, Newman, and S6C) and four cl

264 ransformation experiments with the sensitive laboratory strain S. pneumoniae R6 as recipient.

265 brid diploids formed by outcrossing with the laboratory strain S288c also displayed good spore viabil

266 the phenotypic spectrum: the widely studied laboratory strain S288C and the vineyard isolate RM11-1a

267 Expression of the gene FLO1 in the laboratory strain S288C restores flocculation, an altere

268 oid segregants from a cross between a common laboratory strain (S288c) and a clinically derived strai

269 tionary rates in the lineages leading to the laboratory strain (S288c) and a wild strain (YJM789) of

270 relative to those of a wild-type serotype O1 laboratory strain (stO1).

271 ion at each gene predicts allorecognition in laboratory strains such that colonies reject if they do

272 foscarnet resistance when incorporated into laboratory strain T2294.

273 myces cerevisiae and found that genes in the laboratory strain tend to evolve faster than in the wild

274 lococcus aureus strain RN4220, a widely used laboratory strain that carries a nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)

275 arch in this field uses a few dozen standard laboratory strains that are reported to share a common a

276 By use of clinical and laboratory strains that had been exposed to vancomycin,

277 Because of this, HSV laboratory strains that produce extensive cell fusion (s

278 We find that laboratory strains that show little differences in drug

279 icological tests may be biased by the use of laboratory strains that usually contain very limited gen

280 Unlike wild-type laboratory strains, the desert strain fails to respond t

281 ne population was an insecticide-susceptible laboratory strain; the other two populations originated

282 his behaviour has been lost or attenuated in laboratory strains through the accumulation of multiple

283 d sufficient to explain the inability of the laboratory strain to produce robust biofilms.

284 tionally, we analyzed diversity in zebrafish laboratory strains to find areas of elevated diversity a

285 The failure of laboratory strains to swarm is caused by a mutation in a

286 Pfs47 modulates resistance of some parasite laboratory strains to TEP1-mediated killing.

287 he variants of the genes coding for gCIII in laboratory strains Towne, AD169, and Toledo were differe

288 xpressing wild-type deltasg, or the standard laboratory strain w(1118), Drosophila expressing deltasg

289 This collection, which was generated with a laboratory strain, was screened for mutants that were im

290 visiae strain, the PCA1 allele of the common laboratory strains we have examined possesses a missense

291 Using a panel of five mutant laboratory strains, we show the effect of the Mitf gene

292 gainst 7 heterologous primary isolates and 1 laboratory strain were compared between 32 untreated HIV

293 Laboratory strains were found to harbour a frameshift mu

294 the nearly 60 years since the first standard laboratory strains were isolated, numerous crosses and e

295 ratory and wild mouse strains, we found that laboratory strains were predominantly selected for passi

296 additional ExPEC strains, but not an E. coli laboratory strain, were also capable of survival within

297 The AD169 laboratory strain, which lacks a functional UL131 protei

298 t was surprising to detect that VZV32, a VZV laboratory strain with no discernible growth defect in t

299 pic evaluation of clinical isolates and of a laboratory strain with the rtI233V mutation demonstrated

300 ious lesions, which is extensively used as a laboratory strain worldwide.