ライフサイエンスコーパス: land plant

1 estor of streptophytes (charophyte algae and land plants).

2 thought, and maybe even before embryophytes (land plants).

3 on tolerant spores, evolved in the ancestral land plant.

4 resembling that predicted for the ancestral land plant.

5 ing desiccation-responsive pathways in early land plants.

6 ntrol the exchange of CO2 and water vapor in land plants.

7 iven the evolution of RPW8-encoding genes in land plants.

8 emerged as a crucial adaptive trait of early land plants.

9 e Ca(2+) signalling machinery has evolved in land plants.

10 ilization of PSII under high-light stress in land plants.

11 vity and intensified weathering by the first land plants.

12 sition by the most recent common ancestor of land plants.

13 dvanced systems biology approaches among all land plants.

14 functions and are extensively distributed in land plants.

15 hich may be conserved among a variety of the land plants.

16 r during the transition from chlorophytes to land plants.

17 ails represent an enigmatic clade within the land plants.

18 lls with rooting functions among most extant land plants.

19 this study might be generally applicable to land plants.

20 hing the earliest mutualistic symbiosis with land plants.

21 m (SAM) structure varies markedly within the land plants.

22 tremendous insight into network evolution of land plants.

23 ome size through the evolutionary history of land plants.

24 gae, the group of green algae giving rise to land plants.

25 in the common progenitor of green algae and land plants.

26 day-night cycle has measurable benefits for land plants.

27 nsport during the evolution of multicellular land plants.

28 ellulose biosynthesis is a common feature of land plants.

29 ate fungal associations in four extant lower land plants.

30 lytic domain, the Loop is highly variable in land plants.

31 -32) that are widely conserved in MAPKs from land plants.

32 PR protein is encoded in the genomes of most land plants.

33 eological time scales since the emergence of land plants.

34 A families as well as small RNA machinery in land plants.

35 ted molecular phylogeny (32,223 species) for land plants.

36 an adhesive middle lamella in multicellular land plants.

37 ry clades that have been highly conserved in land plants.

38 to the physiology, ecology, and evolution of land plants.

39 a crucial barrier on the aerial surfaces of land plants.

40 rast, the type-A RRs seemed to be limited to land plants.

41 arose and to what extent it was conserved in land plants.

42 perate in parallel in extant early diverging land plants.

43 roposed to be the closest living relative of land plants.

44 esenting the smallest plastome reported from land plants.

45 a key determinant of the form and posture of land plants.

46 ctivities, have successfully co-evolved with land plants.

47 ipid transfer proteins (nsLTP) are unique to land plants.

48 clear and mitochondrial genomes from diverse land plants.

49 y been conserved throughout the evolution of land plants.

50 of stomata in the ancestor to all stomatous land plants.

51 can be far more productive than other living land plants.

52 iverworts, the earliest diverging lineage of land plants.

53 uridines during organelle gene expression of land plants.

54 significant impact on the diversification of land plants.

55 oplast genomes and is ubiquitous across most land plants.

56 ellular structures in the common ancestor of land plants.

57 subfamilies diverged prior to the origin of land plants.

58 ve evolutionary perspective on small RNAs in land plants.

59 s that evolved during the diversification of land plants.

60 h consists of freshwater green algae and the land plants.

61 pidermal cells in the common ancestor of the land plants.

62 lularly within the roots of more than 80% of land plants.

63 hlorophyll degradation likely coevolved with land plants.

64 estral mutualism between soil fungi and most land plants.

65 e data that span the phylogenetic breadth of land plants.

66 ancestral charophytes prior to the origin of land plants.

67 ort belonging to the basal lineage of extant land plants [14-17].

68 have arisen once, early in the evolution of land plants(2-4).

69 evolutionary perspective as it diverged from land plants a billion years ago.

70 from symbiosis in the roots of the 80-90% of land plants able to develop rhizobial and/or mycorrhizal

71 ator of three-dimensional body patterning in land plants acting via mitotic cell plane positioning.

72 The factor is highly conserved between land plants, algae, and cyanobacteria.

73 Land plants (also known as embryophytes) are a monophyle

74 Unlike in animals, the life cycle of land plants alternates between two multicellular generat

75 he specific phylogenetic relationships among land plants and (other) charophyte green algae.

76 nificant for research on polysaccharide-rich land plants and algae (Viridiplantae).

77 ualistic symbioses with the vast majority of land plants and are major drivers in almost all terrestr

78 TAL genes are only present in land plants and bacteria.

79 inked to critical events in the evolution of land plants and can result from changes in patterns of e

80 xplored the breadth of IR boundary shifts in land plants and demonstrate that synonymous substitution

81 wall maturation, and reported homologues in land plants and excavate protists, including trypanosoma

82 ycorrhizal fungi form associations with most land plants and facilitate nutrient uptake from the soil

83 is suggests that DUF593 emerged in primitive land plants and founded a multigene family that is conse

84 MS), a widespread mutualistic association of land plants and fungi(1), is predicted to have arisen on

85 features that illuminate the ancestor of all land plants and give insights into how plant systems fun

86 ponse to osmotic stress is conserved between land plants and green algae, but the distinct spatial an

87 amenopiles, which are not closely related to land plants and green algae.

88 MAX2 is tightly conserved among land plants and is more diverged from its nearest sister

89 ion of phytochrome predates the emergence of land plants and likely represents a widespread signaling

90 Both land plants and metazoa have the capacity to reprogram d

91 Its conservation across land plants and RNA editing events, which restore conser

92 s information on nuclear DNA contents across land plants and some algal groups, the second is focused

93 MiR408 is highly conserved in land plants and targets several transcripts encoding cop

94 re the most diverse of all major lineages of land plants and the dominant autotrophs in most terrestr

95 t of conservation in PIN function within the land plants and the mechanisms regulating bryophyte game

96 standing phytochrome functional evolution in land plants and their algal relatives.

97 y into microfibrils within the cell walls of land plants and their charophyte algal progenitors.

98 aden our understanding of miRNA functions in land plants and their contribution to the latter's evolu

99 tip-growing rooting cells is conserved among land plants and was active in the earliest land plants t

100 algae, mosses, and ferns), universal (U; all land plants), and three in specific organs or phylogenet

101 lved in aquatic charophyte algae or in early land plants, and have been conserved throughout land pla

102 Receptor-like kinases expanded massively in land plants, and leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinas

103 ed mechanism of cutin polyester synthesis in land plants, and suggest that elaborations of the linear

104 erworts may be the sister taxon to all other land plants, and the genome shows features that illumina

105 ersification took place before the origin of land plants, and the land plants are unambiguously membe

106 Ferns are the largest group of homosporous land plants, and the significance of extreme inbreeding

107 ition from single-celled algae to modern-day land plants, and will highlight the bright promise study

108 ching is one of the most striking aspects of land plant architecture, affecting resource acquisition

109 ching is one of the most striking aspects of land plant architecture, affecting resource acquisition

110 and are well over a billion years old, while land plants are about 450-500 million years old.

111 e patterns of veins that adorn the leaves of land plants are among the most important networks in bio

112 The roots of most land plants are colonised by mycorrhizal fungi that prov

113 The primary aerial surfaces of land plants are covered with a cuticle, a protective lay

114 ce before the origin of land plants, and the land plants are unambiguously members of a strictly fres

115 CASPLs were found in all major divisions of land plants as well as in green algae; homologs outside

116 magnitude of net primary production (NPP) by land plants both now and into the future.

117 mainly present in charophyte green algae and land plants but absent from glaucophytes, red algae and

118 phytes, which arose soon after the origin of land plants but exhibit substantially lower species rich

119 erved from cyanobacteria, and green algae to land plants but not existing in the other bacteria.

120 netic position as the immediate ancestors of land plants but, paradoxically, are less well-studied th

121 ontain all of the polysaccharides typical of land plants, but also contain polyanionic, low-methylate

122 r interactions that were based on studies of land plants, but in this case using direct observation i

123 y were established in the common ancestor of land plants, but the 24-nucleotide siRNA pathway that gu

124 us or mesogenous development is ancestral in land plants cannot yet be answered definitively based on

125 tens, serving as a model for early divergent land plants, carries a single member of each family.

126 omogalacturonan (HG) is a major component of land plant cell walls and is especially abundant in the

127 Chloroplasts of land plants characteristically contain grana, cylindrica

128 In land plants, chlorophyll is broken down to colorless lin

129 six different eukaryotic lineages: animals, land plants, chlorophyte green algae, demosponges, slime

130 , and the resulting plastome architecture in land plants confers organizational stability, as evidenc

131 During drought, vascular land plants conserve water via stomatal closure.

132 ly conserved among chlorophytes, whereas all land plants contain cpSRP proteins with typical interact

133 The chloroplast genome of land plants contains only a single gene for a splicing f

134 es of L1 retrotransposons from 29 genomes of land plants covering a wide range of taxa.

135 In land plants, crystals often reach high amounts, up to 80

136 The growth of land plants depends on stem cell-containing meristems wh

137 cterization of tRNA-derived RNA fragments in land plants" describes the identification and characteri

138 cterization of tRNA-derived RNA fragments in land plants" describes the identification and characteri

139 Land plants develop filamentous cells-root hairs, rhizoi

140 nction was instrumental in the generation of land plant diversity.

141 constriction of the cortex inward, cells of land plants divide by initiating a new cell-wall segment

142 Early diverging land plants do not form lignin, but already have element

143 pothesized to have promoted the evolution of land plants during the middle Paleozoic.

144 exception for the psaA-psaB-rps14 operon of land plant (embryophyte) chloroplasts, where the first t

145 In addition to canonical SUMOs, land plants encode a loosely constrained noncanonical is

146 y have lower specificity toward CO2 than the land plant enzyme.

147 llen wall development was recruited early in land plant evolution but the continued increase in polle

148 auxin transport mechanisms in the context of land plant evolution has been controversial.

149 A major event in land plant evolution is the origin of vascular tissues,

150 rmination assumed much greater importance as land plant evolution progressed.

151 n mediated by CMT has been employed early in land plant evolution to control developmental programs d

152 We found that dual targeting arose early in land plant evolution, as it was evident in many cases wi

153 rget genes has been largely conserved during land plant evolution, with evidence of lineage-specific

154 conservation of MET1 and CMT families during land plant evolution.

155 DNA methylation by MET1 is conserved through land plant evolution.

156 placing the divergence point at the dawn of land plant evolution.

157 f stomatal development and patterning across land plant evolution.

158 ndrial paralogs to the nuclear genome during land plant evolution.

159 ular framework to study the role of auxin in land plant evolution.

160 amily indicate that GPAT4/6/8 arose early in land-plant evolution (bryophytes), whereas the phosphata

161 A potentially key factor in land-plant evolution is the presence (mesogenous type) o

162 Land plants evolved from an ancestral charophycean alga

163 rophyte green alga Spirogyra pratensis Since land plants evolved from charophytes, this implies conse

164 Land plants evolved more than 450 million years ago from

165 ne how Class I KNOX function was modified as land plants evolved, phylogenetic analyses and cross-spe

166 and water status in a diversity of vascular land plants exposed to a symmetrical, mild transition in

167 as observed in angiosperms occurred early in land plants followed by parallel expansion of the AGO fa

168 Given the requisite presence of CPSs in all land plants for gibberellin phytohormone biosynthesis, s

169 ncentrosomal cortical microtubules (CMTs) of land plants form highly ordered parallel arrays that med

170 hey provide a blueprint for the radiation of land plant forms.

171 e transfer (HGT) events before the origin of land plants from charophytes.

172 Relative to charophycean algae, land plant genomes are characterized by genes encoding n

173 ements to correspond to the needs of various land plant groups over the past 400 million years.

174 gous maturases are rarely shared among major land plant groups.

175 A new study finds that, in an ancient land plant, growth rate variation patterned by meristema

176 Our data suggest that many of the earliest land plants had exceptionally large genome sizes and tha

177 During the transition from water to land, plants had to cope with the loss of water through

178 uenced chloroplast genomes from a variety of land plants has enhanced our understanding of chloroplas

179 gramming in metazoans but its function(s) in land plants has remained relatively unexplored.

180 Our results suggest that land plants have evolved an MKK-independent phosphorylat

181 is result implies that, at the global scale, land plants have regulated their stomatal conductance so

182 Among land-plant hemicelluloses, xyloglucan is ubiquitous, whe

183 Land plants, however, are a notable exception, because t

184 Among land plants, HTG appears to be confined to Equisetum, bu

185 new opportunities to study key properties of land plants in closely related model.

186 increase in carbon isotope fractionation by land plants in response to increasing atmospheric CO(2)

187 gent streptophyta (including green algae and land plants) in which both proteins are active.

188 of both EPA and DHA has been engineered into land plants, including Arabidopsis, Camelina sativa and

189 ARABIDILLO homologues exist throughout land plants, including early-diverging species lacking t

190 Asexual reproduction is widespread in land plants, including ferns where 10% of all species ar

191 shown that SFR2 homologs are present in all land plants, including freezing-sensitive species, raisi

192 reappraisal of fungal associations in early land plants indicates that they are more diverse than as

193 We conclude that land plants inherited two Pi uptake mechanisms - mediate

194 s from streptophyte algae, sister species to land plants, instead use phycocyanobilin (PCB).

195 Land plants interact with microbes primarily at roots.

196 hat tetrads were the archetypal condition in land plants is challenged.

197 The aerial epidermis of all land plants is covered with a hydrophobic cuticle that p

198 e default growth pattern of primary roots of land plants is directed by gravity.

199 The vegetation red edge from terrestrial land plants is often used as a direct signature of life,

200 ulating stomatal development in non-vascular land plants is poorly understood(2-4) and their function

201 nin present in the spore/pollen walls of all land plants is regarded as one of the most recalcitrant

202 Unlike land plants, it is a haploid with very few gene duplicat

203 -LIKE) transcription factors form an ancient land plant kernel controlling caulonema differentiation

204 We show that all known land plant L1 retrotransposons can be grouped into five

205 cation within the charophyte sister group to land plants led to distinct Class I and Class II KNOX ge

206 Dispersal is a key step in land plant life cycles, usually via formation of spores

207 Early land plants like moss Physcomitrella patens have develop

208 Liverworts are the most ancient land plant lineage and have a flattened, creeping body (

209 we show that already in the early diverging land plant lineage, as exemplified by the moss Physcomit

210 mains, the Linker is highly conserved in the land plant lineage, the similarity dropping sharply comp

211 cific rooting function evolving later in the land plant lineage.

212 ing DEK1 as the sole calpain in the evolving land plant lineage.

213 t Marchantia polymorpha, a member of a basal land plant lineage.

214 s (mitogenomes) are available from all major land plant lineages except ferns.

215 nd extent of heterochromatic siRNAs in other land plant lineages has been unclear.

216 ey arose independently across newly evolving land plant lineages has long been a matter of debate.

217 Insights from sequenced genomes of major land plant lineages have advanced research in almost eve

218 and an important evolutionary factor in most land plant lineages, but it is rare in gymnosperms.

219 her nucleus-encoded maturases exist in other land plant lineages.

220 versification of branching forms in distinct land plant lineages.

221 Most land plants live in association with arbuscular mycorrhi

222 Land plants lose vast quantities of water to the atmosph

223 charophyte algae that evolved into ancestral land plants lost cytosolic calpains, retaining DEK1 as t

224 Compared with other sequenced land plants, M. polymorpha exhibits low genetic redundan

225 Unlike land plants, many eukaryotic algae are auxotrophic for c

226 he single WIP protein in the early-diverging land plant Marchantia polymorpha L. is required for the

227 s with members only from the early diverging land plants Marchantia polymorpha and Physcomitrella pat

228 We find that a basal land plant, Marchantia polymorpha, lacks any evident sig

229 ganic material through the photosynthesis of land plants-may provide a negative feedback for climate

230 ganic matter types (types III and IV; mainly land plant, metamorphosed or degraded, displaying some s

231 Among land plants, mitochondrial and plastid group II introns

232 a factor of more than three and the smallest land plant mitogenome.

233 intron groups of angiosperms, and 15,726 of land plants (moss and angiosperms).

234 he genomes of diverse groups of bacteria and land plants, most of which do not undergo chromatic accl

235 ingly, the phytochrome portions of algal and land plant neochromes, a chimera of phytochrome and phot

236 f plants may have originated in the earliest land plants or in their ancestors, the Charophycean alga

237 a-like pores were present on the surfaces of land plants over 400 million years ago.

238 Based on the debate surrounding land plant phylogeny and on our analysis of these intere

239 MG1 by homologous recombination in the basal land plant Physcomitrella patens reveals that SMG1 has a

240 Here we show that in the basal land plant Physcomitrella patens, mutation of the GLR ge

241 The RPW8 domain first emerged in the early land plant, Physcomitrella patens, and it likely origina

242 Here, we show that an early diverging land plant, Physcomitrella patens, can be continuously c

243 anonical and non-canonical forms, whereas in land plants, phytochrome structure is highly conserved.

244 Land plant phytochromes perceive red and far-red light t

245 eawater than the red/far-red light sensed by land plant phytochromes.

246 Land plants possess myosin classes VIII and XI.

247 All land plants possess such walled spores (or their derived

248 This is the first report of a land plant possessing selenocysteine insertion machinery

249 d successively during the diversification of land plants, predominantly via gene duplication.

250 In arid lands, plant productivity is limited by water and N avai

251 M) fungi associate with the vast majority of land plants, providing mutual nutritional benefits and p

252 M) fungi associate with the vast majority of land plants, providing mutual nutritional benefits and p

253 m a mutualistic symbiosis with two-thirds of land plants, providing phosphorus and/or N in exchange f

254 ayer that covers the aerial epidermis of all land plants, providing protection against desiccation an

255 d plants, and have been conserved throughout land plant radiation.

256 In several land plants, recent duplication events created a separat

257 VPD) are a principal means by which vascular land plants regulate daytime transpiration.

258 Chloroplast transcription in land plants relies on collaboration between a plastid-en

259 Land plants rely mainly on gravitropism and phototropism

260 The reported land plant resistance to rapamycin and the embryo lethal

261 hert and fungal colonization in extant lower land plants reveal several features characteristic of bo

262 Replacement of land plant Rubisco by faster bacterial variants with low

263 The shoot epidermis of land plants serves as a crucial interface between plants

264 In land plants several transporters are involved in ion and

265 In land plants, several exocyst subunits are encoded by dou

266 of glaucophytes, red algae, green algae, and land plants, share a common ancestor that lived approxim

267 DNA barcodes (rbcL + matK) for about 15% of land plant species and that comprehensive species covera

268 Most land plant species live in symbiosis with arbuscular myc

269 tomatal development in model dicot and basal land plant species.

270 gene function in early divergent and derived land plant species.

271 Here we identified the role of a land plant-specific subgroup of PPI phosphatases, the su

272 ave promoted dehiscence in the first complex land-plant sporophytes.

273 quired to gain insight into the evolution of land plant stomatal responses.

274 for fertilization in both animals and early land plants such as bryophytes and pteridophytes.

275 pathways are not well characterized in other land plants such as lycophytes and ferns, preventing a c

276 ess is known of MPK functions in nonvascular land plants such as the moss Physcomitrella patens Here,

277 mbers in maize and homologs even among early land plants such as the moss Physcomitrella patens or th

278 r pattern was found in each major lineage of land plants, suggesting that these subfamilies diverged

279 Phylogenetic analyses suggest that land plant TAL genes are derived from Actinobacteria thr

280 Further evidence reveals that land plant TAL genes have undergone positive selection a

281 Here, we investigate the evolution of the land plant TAL-type transaldolase (TAL) gene and its pot

282 phyceae seemed to be more closely related to land plants than to other groups of green algae.

283 g land plants and was active in the earliest land plants that existed sometime more than 470 million

284 re dispersed pores found in the epidermis of land plants that facilitate gas exchange for photosynthe

285 ering-negative feedback and the expansion of land plants that together ensured Earth's long-term habi

286 n the chlorophyte green algae and most basal land plants, the bryophytes, we evaluated the presence o

287 TRIMs in 48 plant genome sequences, spanning land plants to algae.

288 enetic analyses indicate the sister taxon of land plants to be the Zygnematophyceae, a group of mostl

289 fugia, traditionally confined to survival of land plants to sites above and beyond glacier margins.

290 stomata arose very early in the evolution of land plants, until now it has been unclear whether the e

291 synthetic plasticity in DMNT biosynthesis in land plants via the assembly of triterpene gene clusters

292 The emergence and radiation of multicellular land plants was driven by crucial innovations to their b

293 hyte green algae, the immediate ancestors of land plants, was shown to be important for cell adhesion

294 II PKSs played during the early evolution of land plants, we cloned and characterized PpORS from the

295 growth of the rooting system in the earliest land plants, we identified genes that control the develo

296 argest and most polymorphic gene families in land plants, where its frequent lineage-specific expansi

297 rved only in cyanobacteria, green algae, and land plants, whereas the other key amino acids are absol

298 Marchantia polymorpha is a basal terrestrial land plant, which like most liverworts accumulates struc

299 In total, 1628 CLE genes were identified in land plants, with none recognizable from green algae.

300 s forms the basis of vascular development in land plants, with xylem tissues constituting the vast ma