ライフサイエンスコーパス: language function

1 brupt and mild and affected motor-sensory or language function.

2 pecific influence of structure and myelin on language function.

3 le paradigms that probe different aspects of language function.

4 ranscription factor implicated in speech and language function.

5 lities potentially underlying differences in language function.

6 ave debated the role of key brain regions in language function.

7 d resection will spare areas associated with language function.

8 nization insufficiently account for observed language function.

9 eurodegenerative disease primarily affecting language function.

10 as of Foxp2 expression are critical to human language function.

11 ed by an isolated and gradual dissolution of language function.

12 cal tissue can take on visual perception and language functions.

13 losal inhibition that does not contribute to language functions.

14 ort specific cognitive capabilities, such as language functions.

15 of the role of the hemispheres in different language functions.

16 es is not known but may relate to speech and language functions.

17 dentified the lateralization and location of language functions.

18 tical representation that underlies multiple language functions.

19 ntal areas in a task emphasizing "receptive" language functions.

20 of language is not uniformly detrimental to language functioning.

21 les, and this decline differentially affects language functioning.

22 c tissue without compromising post-operative language functioning.

23 e causal relations between brain regions and language functions absent in functional neuroimaging, bu

24 the right hemisphere actively contribute to language function after a focal left hemisphere lesion.

25 e suggested that recovery or compensation of language function after a lesion in the left hemisphere

26 To study language function after brain-tumor resection with langu

27 in the white matter, and how these relate to language function after surgery remain unknown.

28 Maintaining language functions after left hemisphere lesions has bee

29 tion at a site interrupted motor, sensory or language function, afterdischarges were more likely to o

30 ere less likely to lose their gross motor or language function and demonstrated significantly lower M

31 Cerebral dominance of language function and hand preference are suggested to b

32 ned into two cognitive composites -- one for language functions and the other for executive functions

33 aled that his literacy skills, certain basic language functions and vocabulary development were arres

34 Function Classification in MLD), loss of any language function, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

35 reatment optimize outcome, and that gains in language function are most likely to be seen years, rath

36 In central alexic syndromes, where other language functions are also involved, the emphasis has b

37 Normal sex differences in language functions are disrupted in schizophrenia.

38 eft hemisphere sustained in early childhood, language functions are likely to reorganize and develop

39 udies of healthy people have shown that some language functions are mediated by the right hemisphere

40 Christiansen & Chater (C&C) envision language function as a hierarchical chain of transformat

41 schizophrenia is associated with deficits in language function, as well as structural and functional

42 F), are responsible for the deterioration in language functioning associated with age.

43 ng and dissociations from other frontal lobe language functions, (b) the organization of categories o

44 ve provided 3-D and 4D mapping of speech and language function based upon the results of direct corti

45 rome characterized by progressive decline in language function but relative sparing of other cognitiv

46 ocal dementia syndrome with deterioration of language functions but relative preservation of other co

47 by impairments in social, behavioral, and/or language function, but postmortem studies indicate that

48 right hemisphere may actively contribute to language functions by supporting disrupted processing in

49 brain plasticity process with acquisition of language functions by the non-dominant hemisphere speech

50 icated in autism spectrum disorder, in which language function can be severely affected.

51 the stability of intellectual, academic and language functioning during development in children with

52 characterized by the gradual dissolution of language functions, especially in the early stages of di

53 also time and patient age, sites specific to language function for presurgical evaluation of focal ep

54 ighlights the importance of right hemisphere language functions for successful social communication a

55 es while other aspects of cognition, such as language functioning, have received less attention.

56 the left hemisphere, which typically support language functions, have a more protracted course of mat

57 ort here a direct demonstration of preserved language function in a stroke patient (LF1) apparently d

58 rences for future identification of aberrant language function in children with various disorders.

59 intracranial tumours significantly improves language function in dysphasic patients, and is unlikely

60 d in some centres to lateralize and localize language function in epilepsy surgery candidates.

61 al systems, which play a significant role in language function in modern humans, originally evolved t

62 cephalography offers the prospect of mapping language function in real time.

63 motor functioning than with either memory or language functioning in men.

64 he immediate effects of resective surgery on language functions in a heterogeneous group of patients

65 her asymmetric brain regions associated with language functions in humans including the planum tempor

66 of domain-general capacities underlying core language functions in humans.

67 ific communication in non-human primates and language functions in humans.

68 ysphasic patients, and is unlikely to impair language functions in non-dysphasic patients.

69 ization of eloquent cortex enables rescue of language functions in patients who sustain brain injury.

70 igate neurofunctional correlates of improved language functions induced by atDCS over a core language

71 Research into the recovery of language function is almost exclusively focused on monol

72 eceptive and, to a lesser extent, expressive language functions is attributed to plasticity of the ri

73 jority of participants in the SLI groups had language function lateralized to the right hemisphere (5

74 n characterized as a selective impairment in language function, left hemisphere lesions may cause imp

75 The higher order language functions mediated by the right hemisphere are

76 f abnormal lateralization of left hemisphere language functions need to take account of the consequen

77 emporal processing tasks predicted receptive language function (p<0.05).

78 Many studies of language function rely on priming paradigms that use pai

79 One week after surgery, baseline language function remained in 194 patients (77.6%), it w

80 Other language functions remained severely impaired until at l

81 In patients with behavioural evidence of language function, responses to language and music were

82 aphasic patients, who have largely recovered language function, show increased frontoparietal integra

83 e findings are consistent with the different language functions subserved by subcomponents of the lan

84 quired to localize accurately those specific language functions that are most at risk following surge

85 mary progressive aphasia (PPA), a decline in language functions that remains isolated for at least 2

86 oral connectivity displayed better receptive language function; these patients also showed greater th

87 nsequences of a failure of lateralization of language functions to the right as well as the left hemi

88 Study 1 examined IQ, academic skills and language functions using the same test version over the

89 In contrast, language function was relatively preserved in the female

90 t predictor of postoperative improvements in language function was that of length of time since surge

91 Language functioning was measured using the Peabody Pict

92 mporale volumes with performance on tests of language function were examined.

93 entia characterized by gradual impairment of language function with initial sparing of the memory dom