戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 : 42% for total knee arthroplasty to 96% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy).
2 users regarding surgical treatment (open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy).
3 pic cholecystectomies) or novice groups (<10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies).
4  require endoscopic removal prior to planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
5 bjectively assessed intraoperative errors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
6 roved the OR performance of residents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
7 almost immediately after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
8  from the introduction and widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
9 r laparoscopy for another procedure, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
10 er two-dimensional systems in the conduct of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
11 atients with major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
12 te cholecystitis and underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
13 ype II in whom kernicterus developed after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
14 cavity may rarely occur during the course of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
15 with gallbladder and biliary problems due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
16 iew Program, is the second complete audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
17 giography has intensified with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
18 graphy in a series of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
19 eaths, and 90-day readmissions for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
20 ry bowel disease, but did not increase after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
21 eaths, and 90-day readmissions for inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
22 f acute cholecystitis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
23           Both groups then performed another laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
24 , many tumors are discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
25 er has been commonly reported to occur after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
26  of the arteria hepatica dextra induced by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
27 rmance between the 2 groups during the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
28 ances the quality of performance based on VR laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
29 sful reorientation when disorientated during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
30 tients would prefer NOTES cholecystectomy to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
31  outcomes of hospitals in inpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
32  ligation are now being joined by ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
33  after a surgeon had performed more than 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
34 e "grabbed" from the video feed during these laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
35 fied biliary and arterial anatomy during six laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
36 he training program and performed 270 of 288 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
37 ), third (P = 0.021), and fourth (P = 0.023) laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
38        Laparoscopic appendectomy (35.2%) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (19.3%) were the most commo
39 nd nontechnical performance standard for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, (2) assess the classificat
40 emoval of bile-duct stones within 30 days of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4.9 percent).
41              All surgeons in group A learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy after residency, and all th
42                                   Twenty-six laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 22 carotid endarterec
43 be transferable to the operative setting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy.
44  to the operating room for the procedures of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy.
45               These patients did not undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were explored electivel
46 ty-two of these patients underwent a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were found to have gall
47 tively (n = 6) and those who had a completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were re-explored at a l
48  divided into 13 experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) and 6 inexperienced (per
49 rship, 30% could not independently perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and 66% were deemed unable
50 OR, technical proficiency of each sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and nontechnical skills.
51 minal cavity is the first step to successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the arrangement of sec
52 entually become a 'gold standard' as has the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and which will fall by the
53 t for a higher common bile duct injury rate, laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be at least as s
54                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to have a higher co
55                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to have resulted in
56 ntraoperative cholangiography as adjuncts to laparoscopic cholecystectomy are evolving.
57                                  Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are examined for 78,747 pat
58 flect fundamental errors in the technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as practiced by a broad pop
59 attention strategies used by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy associated with successful
60 al antibiotic treatment, followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy at days 7 to 45 (group DLC)
61 erations for many years, only recently has a laparoscopic cholecystectomy been possible.
62 roposed advantages and potential problems of laparoscopic cholecystectomy before referring them to a
63 a were collected on 9130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 1993 and Ma
64 ccurrence of a major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (bile leaks without a major
65 n of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, biliary tract disorders, p
66  are beyond their initial learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but the majority of iatrog
67                           Procedures such as laparoscopic cholecystectomies can safely be performed w
68 tudy was to perform a meta-analysis of large laparoscopic cholecystectomy case-series and compare res
69 bsets of patients with pancreatic resection, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectom
70 including statements about the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those of open
71  clinical outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing them with patien
72 ned included practice description, number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency
73                 Independent of the number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies completed since residency
74            The impact and appropriateness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy continue to debated, and st
75 scovered with gallbladder carcinoma during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy do not have to be converted
76 ve mortality was higher during the first ten laparoscopic cholecystectomies done by a surgeon (compar
77 erved and traced to a rare complication of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to a gallbladder empyem
78 ds of 343 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during a 1-year period.
79  residency, and all those in group B learned laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency.
80             It is not known whether learning laparoscopic cholecystectomy during surgery residency in
81 hree hundred forty- three patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the period reviewed.
82  and 13 experienced) performed a median of 2 laparoscopic cholecystectomies each (range 1-5) on 53 pa
83     In recent years (since the popularity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy), endoscopic sphincterotomy
84 pic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP+LC) vs laparoscopic c
85 nalysis of the charts of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in
86 to prevent recurrence, the precise timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild disease remains co
87 al and three-dimensional imaging in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone d
88  rates of other types of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy generally were low.
89 thin 48 hours of admission) versus a control laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (performed after reso
90  prospectively randomized to either an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (within 48 hours of a
91 ts was 15%; those discovered incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a 5-year survival of 33
92 construction after injury or stricture after laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a better overall outcom
93 o have gallbladder carcinoma incidentally at laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a significant increase
94                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard of
95 of injury of major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been clearly defined.
96                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been prevalent in the U
97                   The widespread adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to an increased fre
98 a resource limited country, the expansion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has transformed the care of
99                              The benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been largely unavailab
100 ion, all participants performed 5 sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomies in the OR.
101                        Surgeons performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Ecuador or the Dominican
102 c and thromboembolic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Sweden has decreased by
103                      Both groups performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the OR that was video-re
104  of a complete patient population undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state.
105 raining in laparoscopy, and annual volume of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the surgeon's hospital.
106                    Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the United States, hundr
107 d on abdominal MRI performed two years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a patient with only a m
108 ones for the majority of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, IOUS is cost-effective rel
109                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a lower
110 evious investigations have demonstrated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a shorte
111                      Clinical recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is known to be more rapid t
112                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly
113                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported to be safe for
114 h stone extraction performed before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice
115                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice
116 gical procedures (ie, varicose vein removal, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy,
117 articipants performed 5 Virtual Reality (VR) laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC).
118 his study was to compare learning curves for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after training on a pr
119 all-incision open cholecystectomy (SIOC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) concerning costs and h
120  trained on a validated virtual reality (VR) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) curriculum.
121 wing evidence in support of performing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystiti
122                The widespread application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has led to a rise in t
123 re clinical outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in acute cholecystitis
124 y with sentinel lymph node biopsy (PM SLNB), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic inguinal
125                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), when performed effici
126 te the total costs associated with repair of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-related bile duct inju
127 is of gallbladder malignancy who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC; n = 80,924) or open ch
128 paroscopic common bile duct exploration with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+LC).
129 f the present trial was to ascertain whether laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) can prevent recurrent
130 titution with major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy managed between July 1, 199
131 y was randomly matched with 4 other elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies (n = 8312) performed by t
132                                          For laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 10 studies) and endosc
133 nce 1991, 12 cases have been described after laparoscopic cholecystectomy of unsuspected gallbladder
134 en novice and 10 expert surgeons performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a porcine model in the D
135 e assessed the effect of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on surgical outcomes in rou
136 erioperative VTE than patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2-3.3;
137  classified into experienced (performed >100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies) or novice groups (<10 la
138 ned to routine preoperative ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic cholecyste
139 CEA), lung lobectomy/pneumonectomy, open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, and tot
140  The same QOL questionnaire was also sent to laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients and healthy contro
141 OL scores were comparable to those of the 37 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients and the 31 healthy
142  and psychological domains compared with the laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients and the healthy co
143 ne hundred fifteen open herniorrhaphy and 26 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients had attempted tele
144 complete records of 9054 (99.2%) of the 9130 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at 94 military
145 ts were 2078 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by surgeons who
146 te, despite an increase in the percentage of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed for nonmalignan
147                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 2 days of
148                         We hypothesized that laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours o
149              In mild gallstone pancreatitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 48 hours o
150 ost frequently performed procedures included laparoscopic cholecystectomy (PFS, 30.3-43.5), upper gas
151 the "gold standard." Overall mortality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy ranges from 0-1%, and the r
152  night before, matched with 4 other elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy recipients (n = 8312).
153 49 patients who have completed treatment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries
154 common bile duct (CBD) clearance followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy] remains the standard way o
155 of bile duct injuries (BDI) sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy require formal surgical rec
156         Therefore, we believe that immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy should become therapy of ch
157 ate motility is the only parameter for which laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed an improvement in po
158                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy surpassed open cholecystect
159                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy takes longer to do than sma
160 rall rate of SSI was significantly lower for laparoscopic cholecystectomy than for open cholecystecto
161            Shortly after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the rate of injury to the
162 ective review of the transition from open to laparoscopic cholecystectomy throughout Mongolia.
163    The primary outcome was conversion from a laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy.
164                                              Laparoscopic cholecystectomy took significantly longer t
165 bserved General Surgery residents performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies using the Objective Struc
166 idents, and 5 attendings) reviewed simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, determined the next
167 idents, and 5 attendings) reviewed simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, determined the next
168                  The mean operation time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 10% shorter for the pat
169 rol group who underwent outpatient, elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed.
170 st number of wRVUs (wRVUs, 491.0-618.2), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was regularly the next high
171  Between August, 1995, and August, 1997, 471 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were done in our departme
172           In total, 94,183 eligible elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed between 20
173 lled trial, patients undergoing standardized laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to separate
174 ction for gallbladder carcinoma diagnosed at laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed retrospective
175 uccessfully orientate at various stages of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy were unveiled, and a repres
176 g port tracks is a potential complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy when gallbladder carcinoma
177 hows that there are only a few points within laparoscopic cholecystectomy where the complication-caus
178                       All subjects performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an attending surgeon b
179 followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy with selective postoperativ
180                      Men and women underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the same frequency (41
181 esented with 8 images of various stages of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the task of interpreti
182             In this large, randomized trial, laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of hospital

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top