ライフサイエンスコーパス: laparoscopic surgery

1 tor antagonists) and surgical therapies (eg, laparoscopic surgery).

2 ts who lack an absolute contraindication for laparoscopic surgery.

3 urgeons with experience in hepatobiliary and laparoscopic surgery.

4 s, without substantial outcome benefits over laparoscopic surgery.

5 The randomization ratio was 2:1 in favor of laparoscopic surgery.

6 e means to overcome this major impediment of laparoscopic surgery.

7 task efficiency, and surgeon comfort during laparoscopic surgery.

8 t been observed in pregnant women undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

9 the unique requirements and complications of laparoscopic surgery.

10 ragm near the phrenic nerve motor points via laparoscopic surgery.

11 ted real-time intraoperative consultation in laparoscopic surgery.

12 nses for surgery in general may not apply to laparoscopic surgery.

13 s relating to the immune responses evoked by laparoscopic surgery.

14 ng of the local inflammatory response during laparoscopic surgery.

15 appears to retain other patient benefits of laparoscopic surgery.

16 for long-term complications in both open and laparoscopic surgery.

17 vent-free recovery occurred frequently after laparoscopic surgery.

18 ransanal total mesorectal excision (TME) and laparoscopic surgery.

19 e sufficient evidence for the routine use of laparoscopic surgery.

20 established to assist local colleagues with laparoscopic surgery.

21 into better patient outcomes associated with laparoscopic surgery.

22 tivity, for training health professionals in laparoscopic surgery.

23 y represent an improvement over conventional laparoscopic surgery.

24 ing open, laparoscopic, and robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

25 additional damage due to prolonged PP during laparoscopic surgery.

26 nd best practices of simulation training for laparoscopic surgery.

27 to compare its outcomes to those of open and laparoscopic surgery.

28 of augmented reality and its application to laparoscopic surgery.

29 alize the target organ, in particular during laparoscopic surgery.

30 ols, fecal incontinence, and single incision laparoscopic surgery.

31 estigates whether MP enhances performance in laparoscopic surgery.

32 term results comparable to those of open and laparoscopic surgery.

33 omerular filtration rate (eGFR) with PPCs in laparoscopic surgeries.

34 Although laparoscopic surgery accounts for >2 million surgical pr

35 Revisional laparoscopic surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYG

36 abscess formation was more common following laparoscopic surgery, although this was not statisticall

37 l comparing robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery among 471 patients with rectal aden

38 Five recurrences occurred after laparoscopic surgery and 1 in the open group (P < 0.112)

39 Of them, 80.3% patients had laparoscopic surgery and 19.5% had open surgery.

40 uded 6594 patients, 3751 (57%) had undergone laparoscopic surgery and 2843 (43%) open nephrectomy.

41 .In univariable logistic regression analyses laparoscopic surgery and male sex predicted an event-fre

42 sadvantages of RALS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for commonly perfo

43 However, robust evidence to conclude that laparoscopic surgery and open surgery have similar outco

44 ally invasive surgeries such as conventional laparoscopic surgery and robotic assisted laparoscopic s

45 se in open surgeries, a 3.5 fold increase in laparoscopic surgeries, and a 41.3 fold increase in robo

46 appreciating the limitations and pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery, and by carefully dissecting the he

47 ents were grouped by approach [open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery (RS)] on an in

48 n training, the unique and complex nature of laparoscopic surgery, and the increasing demand that sur

49 Increasing numbers of successful cases of laparoscopic surgery are being reported.

50 agement of perianal disease, and the role of laparoscopic surgery are topics of debate.

51 emodynamic and physiological consequences of laparoscopic surgery as well as a defined operative plan

52 ble for curative resection, robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, as compared with conventional lapa

53 d clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 200

54 The use of armrests in simulated laparoscopic surgery brings measurable comfort and task

55 During laparoscopic surgery, carbon dioxide insufflation may pr

56 ic teaching, telesimulation, Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery certification, yearly workshops, an

57 by several hours of CO2 pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery characterized by upregulation of is

58 were searched systematically for studies on laparoscopic surgery compared with open abdominal surger

59 with T1-T3 rectal tumors, noninferiority of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for succ

60 copic surgery, as compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, did not significantly reduce the r

61 We hypothesized that immediate laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal abscess would resul

62 s from randomized trials have indicated that laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is as effective as

63 ve study of 165 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery for colonic and upper rectal cancer

64 In consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, complete com

65 After laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, extended ant

66 postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

67 compared with no or sham acupuncture, after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

68 he potential benefits and adverse effects of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy.

69 perienced in both GC management and advanced laparoscopic surgery for laparoscopic resection.

70 omise oncologic and functional outcome after laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer and seems as

71 s confirms the long-term oncologic safety of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

72 To compare robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery for risk of conversion to open lapa

73 should be focused on further development of laparoscopic surgery for the growing obese population.

74 The role of laparoscopic surgery for treatment of perforated peptic

75 ticles dealing with diagnostic and operative laparoscopic surgery from mid 2002 to late 2003 have bee

76 on was achieved in 194 patients (82%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and 208 patients (89%) in the

77 on was complete in 206 patients (87%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and 216 patients (92%) in the

78 argin was clear in 222 patients (93%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and in 228 patients (97%) in

79 argin was clear in 236 patients (99%) in the laparoscopic surgery group and in 234 patients (99%) in

80 l of 1044 patients were included (699 in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 345 in the open-surgery g

81 isease-free survival rates were 74.8% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 70.8% in the open-surgery

82 Overall survival rates were 86.7% in the laparoscopic-surgery group and 83.6% in the open-surgery

83 The laparoscopic-surgery group had less pain initially than

84 The rate of complications was higher in the laparoscopic-surgery group than in the open-surgery grou

85 Those undergoing laparoscopic surgery had lower costs in the first few ye

86 Simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery has become a mainstay of surgical t

87 Laparoscopic surgery has gained rapid acceptance based o

88 Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has had considerable impact on the

89 o reduce the number of trocars necessary for laparoscopic surgery has the potential to revolutionize

90 Pioneers of laparoscopic surgery have continually striven to replica

91 Advancements in laparoscopic surgery have primarily focused on enhancing

92 However, compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery imposes greater ergonomic constrain

93 Laparoscopic surgery in experienced hands is safe and fe

94 e risk of abdominal abscesses was higher for laparoscopic surgery in half of six meta-analyses.

95 Laparoscopic surgery in obese patients reduces surgical

96 Laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer was

97 The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology has been limit

98 Laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology is beginning t

99 s review is to evaluate recent literature on laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy and make recommendatio

100 Present evidence suggests laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy is a safe option.

101 ion and AR, and support the continued use of laparoscopic surgery in these patients.

102 Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in urology has gained immense popul

103 mpliance with an ERAS program and the use of laparoscopic surgery independently improve outcome.

104 It is assumed that laparoscopic surgery is associated with less pain, quick

105 Laparoscopic surgery is associated with minimal pain, fe

106 rology is rapidly advancing, and single-site laparoscopic surgery is being explored clinically.

107 Laparoscopic surgery is being used more widely to manage

108 Laparoscopic surgery is compared with the traditional la

109 Furthermore, laparoscopic surgery is now being applied to a broad spe

110 Laparoscopic surgery is preferred to open approaches.

111 Acute cholecystitis is a common disease, and laparoscopic surgery is the standard of care.

112 L-17A and that the removal of the lesion via laparoscopic surgery leads to the significant reduction

113 Technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery may limit patient eligibility and r

114 with intramuscular diaphragm electrodes via laparoscopic surgery may provide a less invasive and les

115 The use of single-incision laparoscopic surgery may represent an improvement over c

116 ospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopic surgery (median: laparoscopy, 5; interquart

117 are enabling devices for minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery (MIS).

118 Technical skills for laparoscopic surgery must be acquired within a competenc

119 eal abscess were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic surgery (n = 30) or conservative treatment

120 hese, 91% involved hand-assisted or straight laparoscopic surgery, occasionally combined with open su

121 combining upper endoscopy with intragastric laparoscopic surgery offers advantages of both.

122 aralleled increasing rates of CT imaging and laparoscopic surgery on the appendix.

123 tly lower surgical site infection rate after laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.19; 95% CI [0.08-0.45]; P =

124 successful to identify sentinel nodes during laparoscopic surgery per hemipelvis to be acceptably con

125 ll bowel obstruction (SBO) after open versus laparoscopic surgery performed for suspected acute appen

126 PP during laparoscopic surgery produces increased intra-abdominal

127 al laparoscopic surgery and robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) have significant advantages

128 Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is evolving rapidly in the p

129 Laparoscopic surgery reduces pain after donor nephrectom

130 Complex laparoscopic surgery requires precise movements, and usu

131 Laparoscopic surgery revealed an inflamed and edematous

132 With challenges of pure laparoscopic surgery, robotic assistance may provide mor

133 Enthusiasts of laparoscopic surgery show that this type of lower urinar

134 other PROs were similar in both groups, but laparoscopic surgery significantly reduced length of hos

135 xities that may be prohibitive with standard laparoscopic surgery such as intracorporeal suturing.

136 erformed in a specially equipped and staffed laparoscopic surgery suite, and all patients were superv

137 ring the performance of 3 tasks: 2 simulated laparoscopic surgery tasks (peg transfer and precision c

138 tions, surgical site infections are fewer in laparoscopic surgery than in open surgery.

139 s prospective study was to validate, through laparoscopic surgery, the accuracy of the isotopic senti

140 ate higher costs when using the robot during laparoscopic surgery, the costs of initial purchase and

141 In hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon inserts a hand into th

142 Simulation-based laparoscopic surgery training of health professionals ha

143 to intestinal surgery, including new data on laparoscopic surgery, treatment of enterocutaneous fistu

144 The ACDC ("Acute Cholecystitis-early laparoscopic surgery versus antibiotic therapy and Delay

145 Recently, an advanced robotic system for laparoscopic surgery was approved for use in the United

146 Laparoscopic surgery was associated with reduced complic

147 s, a national project for the development of laparoscopic surgery was organised.

148 cluding patients with advanced tumor grades, laparoscopic surgery was still associated with better ou

149 of the utility of robotics from the field of laparoscopic surgery, we can anticipate the emerging rol

150 prevalence of MSDs among surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery, we performed a systematic review o

151 However, patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were generally at lower risk for de

152 bilateral incisional wounds (>/=10 mm) after laparoscopic surgery were randomized to receive acute tr

153 These findings suggest that robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, when performed by surgeons with va

154 ne function of HLA-DR in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with fast track care remains highes

155 Superiority or even equality of NOTES to laparoscopic surgery would be the best argument for adva