ライフサイエンスコーパス: laparoscopic technique

1 c [LAP] approach, and the hand-assisted [HA] laparoscopic technique).

2 y, morbidity, and patient recovery after the laparoscopic technique.

3 e specifically related to limitations of the laparoscopic technique.

4 sacrocolpopexy and various transvaginal and laparoscopic techniques.

5 section may be performed at the same time by laparoscopic techniques.

6 te experience of radical vaginal surgery and laparoscopic techniques.

7 ted appendicitis can be treated with open or laparoscopic techniques.

8 on have been related to the advances made in laparoscopic techniques.

9 prosthetic materials, and the development of laparoscopic techniques.

10 ures, as well as comparisons between various laparoscopic techniques.

11 , with 5 patients successfully treated using laparoscopic techniques.

12 ent types of mesh repair with either open or laparoscopic techniques.

13 rgical morbidity has been sharply reduced by laparoscopic techniques.

14 all of the reports to date have used hybrid laparoscopic techniques.

15 (0.25%) compared with procedures utilizing a laparoscopic technique (0.09%, P < 0.001).

16 cystectomy was typically performed using the laparoscopic technique (72.9%), followed by the open (19

17 Laparoscopic techniques, although feasible, have not gai

18 Ongoing advances in laparoscopic techniques and operator skills have allowed

19 The technique requires advanced laparoscopic techniques, and great care must be taken to

20 lts of 10 cases performed using the original laparoscopic technique are compared with the results of

21 Laparoscopic techniques are being applied more frequentl

22 Pure laparoscopic techniques are being employed for the extir

23 As in other areas of general surgery, laparoscopic techniques are being used with increasing f

24 left pancreatectomy differ when open versus laparoscopic techniques are employed.

25 Although laparoscopic techniques are increasingly used in colorec

26 rrently, the percutaneous, ureteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques are recommended by individual in

27 surgery was dominated by the development of laparoscopic techniques during the last decade.

28 The laparoscopic technique for living donor nephrectomy is a

29 The open technique is superior to the laparoscopic technique for mesh repair of primary hernia

30 ion regimen, and we encourage the use of the laparoscopic technique for SCA patients undergoing elect

31 These data call into question whether laparoscopic techniques for aortic surgery have a signif

32 Although the use of laparoscopic techniques for bilateral or recurrent herni

33 The use of laparoscopic techniques for the pancreas continues to ad

34 Modifications in the laparoscopic technique have increased the length of the

35 esophageal reflux disease (GERD); similarly, laparoscopic techniques have allowed less morbidity in p

36 Recently, laparoscopic techniques have been applied to transplant

37 of laparoscopy for general surgery, various laparoscopic techniques have been developed for inguinal

38 Hybrid laparoscopic techniques have been developed to allow han

39 ery technology with alternative conventional laparoscopic techniques, have been described in human cl

40 ve randomized study to determine the optimal laparoscopic technique in children.

41 Use of laparoscopic techniques in colorectal cancer surgery in

42 ner, there were no significant benefits over laparoscopic techniques in operative outcomes.

43 progressively more widespread application of laparoscopic techniques in pediatric urology, which has

44 lecystectomy procedures reported, use of the laparoscopic technique increased from 59% in 1992 to 79%

45 The pure laparoscopic technique of left lateral sectionectomy was

46 If unsuccessful, laparoscopic techniques offer good outcomes and quick re

47 my exceeded that for patients undergoing the laparoscopic technique (P < 0.001).

48 The modifications of the laparoscopic technique presented here provide measurable

49 expertise in percutaneous, ureteroscopic and laparoscopic techniques provide the urologist with the b

50 after adjusting for significant covariates (laparoscopic technique, surgical site, postoperative com

51 for SSI was lower in patients undergoing the laparoscopic technique than the open technique.

52 With the advent of laparoscopic techniques, the frequency of bile duct inju

53 epair using mesh performed by either open or laparoscopic techniques vs open repair without use of me

54 A laparoscopic technique was employed in 16,315 (6.3%).

55 Satisfactory repair using video-laparoscopic techniques was achieved in all cases.

56 Patients undergoing a laparoscopic technique were, however, more likely to be

57 ntraindications to the pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques where found.

58 hnology simulations currently being used are laparoscopic techniques, which provide surgeons with an

59 nd $4,221 (P<0.001 for the comparison of the laparoscopic technique with both other techniques).

60 eminations were performed by an intrauterine laparoscopic technique with fresh or cryopreserved elect

61 : The aim of the trial was to compare laparoscopic technique with open technique regarding sho

62 n be successfully placed using endoscopic or laparoscopic techniques with low complication rates.