ライフサイエンスコーパス: laser in situ keratomileusis

1 gher order aberrations than wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

2 isual results and reduced pain experience of laser in situ keratomileusis.

3 esearch directions for corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.

4 ulted in increased interest in ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.

5 ore recently photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

6 ations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis.

7 -basal nerves decreased by 90% 1 month after laser in-situ keratomileusis.

8 ctive stability and cellular integrity after laser in-situ keratomileusis.

9 ecognition of risk factors for ectasia after laser in-situ keratomileusis.

10 aised intraocular pressure, poor response to laser in situ keratomileusis after incisional surgery, i

11 g flap-related complications associated with laser in situ keratomileusis and decreasing postoperativ

12 L power accurately in eyes with prior myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratec

13 edures that offer the combined advantages of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratec

14 in managing residual refractive error after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratec

15 or example, the wound healing cascades after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratec

16 Laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratec

17 ive error is a known complication after both laser in situ keratomileusis and PRK.

18 Surface ablation and laser in situ keratomileusis are comparable in terms of

19 irtually all patients who are candidates for laser in situ keratomileusis can be candidates for surfa

20 sections, and photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis can dramatically reduce pos

21 Photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis can induce or exacerbate dr

22 Several large studies of microkeratome laser in-situ keratomileusis cases report a similar set

23 Examination of the cornea after laser in-situ keratomileusis demonstrated that the kerat

24 is created using a microkeratome (similar to laser in situ keratomileusis flap), and posterior stroma

25 rated that the keratocyte density within the laser in-situ keratomileusis flap and anterior residual

26 anical microkeratomes in the construction of laser in-situ keratomileusis flaps and to see whether th

27 eter laser ablations and improved keratomes, laser in situ keratomileusis has become a realistic alte

28 Laser in-situ keratomileusis has been tremendously succe

29 past decade, photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis have been the most popular

30 eyes may reduce dry eyes that develop after laser in situ keratomileusis, improve wound healing, and

31 l outcomes of phakic intraocular lenses over laser in-situ keratomileusis in patients with moderate a

32 thickness of the residual corneal bed after laser in-situ keratomileusis, in a noninvasive manner, h

33 Management options for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis include intraocular pressur

34 ce ablation techniques offer advantages over laser in situ keratomileusis, including expanded potenti

35 hich suggests that each cornea's response to laser in situ keratomileusis is unique.

36 or refractive surgery in children, including laser in-situ keratomileusis, laser epithelial keratomil

37 Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed.

38 Although laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enjoys a high succe

39 ve and visual outcome of wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with low my

40 idated questionnaires prior to and following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery.

41 accuracy, stability, and safety of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a 213 nm wave

42 does offer a higher degree of safety versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), it does not achiev

43 lions of people worldwide who have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

44 y and precision of creating corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

45 Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive

46 that purportedly combines the advantages of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive

47 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are also used to tr

48 Long-term studies with laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) have continued to s

49 ical microkeratome and femtosecond flaps for laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of accurac

50 arding the prevention cause and treatment of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) infections.

51 The corneal flap laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is among the most i

52 urvey to evaluate current trends in resident laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) training in the USA

53 keratorefractive procedures, including PRK, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), thermal keratoplas

54 lications of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

55 common interface complications occurs after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

56 e of diplopia following cataract surgery and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

57 postoperative complications associated with laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

58 er of the latter two phakic IOLs followed by laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratect

59 sification and IOL implantation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratect

60 asing incidence of corneal ectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis procedures, together with i

61 Femtosecond lasers for corneal flaps in laser in-situ keratomileusis seem to induce fewer signs

62 Complications from laser in-situ keratomileusis surgery are extremely rare.

63 The critical components in laser in-situ keratomileusis surgery remain the same, ho

64 ficiency remain a constant safety concern in laser in-situ keratomileusis surgery.

65 At some point between 3 and 6 months after laser in-situ keratomileusis, the sub-basal nerves began

66 2 myopic), bilaterally treated, suitable for laser in situ keratomileusis, with monocular corrected d