ライフサイエンスコーパス: latency period

1 enesis assessments were taken after 15 weeks latency period.

2 veloped mature T cell leukemias after a long latency period.

3 ling in the rate of leukemia, with a reduced latency period.

4 V) of MMC (tumor evasion model) after a long latency period.

5 oise exposure even after allowing for a long latency period.

6 1.94; 1.18-3.18), mainly in the 0- to 1-year latency period.

7 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after a long latency period.

8 colorectal cancer risk but only after a long latency period.

9 ho may be at risk for developing one after a latency period.

10 stratified by histologic subtype, grade, or latency period.

11 ect on prostate cancer risk except with long latency periods.

12 , by reduced penetrance or by extremely long latency periods.

13 when we used alcohol intakes over different latency periods (0-4, 4-8, 8-12, and 12-16 y) as exposur

14 animals develop acute leukemia after a long latency period (6-13 months).

15 e depletion of [Ca(2+) ]SR , and during this latency period a transient elevation of [Ca(2+) ]SR occu

16 ng the calcium wave front, while during this latency period a transient increase of [Ca(2+)](SR) was

17 Following a 30-day latency period after asymptotic extinction was achieved;

18 reconstitution after freezing or during the latency period after subcutaneous injection and that los

19 All animals were subjected to a 7-day latency period and a 10-day distraction period with a ra

20 The long latency period and incomplete penetrance suggest that ad

21 isoproterenol (isoprenaline)) decreased the latency period and increased the amplitude of the transi

22 The latency period and persistence of the disease and the ap

23 ment or antibody production but prolongs the latency period and significantly impedes tumor growth.

24 re found to be inversely correlated with the latency period (and thus predict the onset of seizures)

25 ukemia and neurological disease after a long latency period, and the mechanism by which the virus is

26 Many cancers have long latency periods, and dietary factors in adolescence may

27 ed T-cell lymphomas with similar incidences, latency periods, and phenotypes, suggesting that cis-act

28 ve average of PA (minutes/day) with a 2-year latency period applied.

29 The median latency period at diagnosis (or first suspicion of a PHD

30 f diacylglycerol to reduce the length of the latency period at temperature below the phase transition

31 lled before symptom onset and with a greater latency period before late-stage disease.

32 The latency period between exposure and disease onset remain

33 the epidemiology of oral HPV infection; the latency period between infection and cancer; the potenti

34 However, the long latency period between infection and development of ATL,

35 c fever, PSReA is characterized by a shorter latency period between the inciting streptococcal infect

36 hly neurotoxic with an apparent dose-related latency period between time of exposure and the appearan

37 , particularly for diseases with substantial latency periods between first exposure and diagnosis of

38 ses a myeloproliferative disease with a long latency period but with high penetrance.

39 develop B and T cell lymphomas after a long latency period, but the incidence is dramatically enhanc

40 re, it appeared that temperature affects the latency period by alternating the binding of the enzyme

41 Direct estimation of latency periods can minimize bias and improve confidence

42 methods, this investigation revealed shorter latency periods (defined as the interval between date of

43 The surgical technique, latency period, distraction rate, and consolidation peri

44 Thus, in spite of long latency periods during which secondary alterations can a

45 tion of a few cells, which after a prolonged latency period, exhibited weak but regular base-line osc

46 late early benign lesions and suggest that a latency period exists between loss of PAX2, p53 mutation

47 The mean latency period for benign tumors was longer than that fo

48 h caution given the short follow-up and long latency period for most cancers, the intensive medical s

49 decades, which may explain the observed long latency period for neurological disease onset among the

50 resents a unique opportunity to describe the latency period for obstructive airway disease (OAD) diag

51 findings suggest a protracted induction and latency period for radiation-induced lymphoma mortality.

52 The latency period for the development of pleural plaques ma

53 r body burden and a significant delay in the latency period for tumor appearance.

54 Although latency periods for IR-induced neoplasms are relatively

55 Tumors induced by CCND1/c-Met had a longer latency period, formed at a lower frequency, and seemed

56 ected with HPV clear their lesions, the long latency period from infection to resolution indicates th

57 After an extended latency period, however, pulmonary adenomas appeared in

58 formation is often undertaken to allow for a latency period in cumulative exposure-disease analyses.

59 The median latency period in the 14 patients was 66 months (range,

60 imate the severity of exposure; the extended latency period in the lagged analysis, which could have

61 However, following a latency period in which the CS is not presented, the CTA

62 dance) occurs when the CS is offered after a latency period in which the CS was not presented.

63 y used approaches to allow for induction and latency periods in analyses of exposure-disease associat

64 d by study design, exposure data source, and latency period, indicating that these factors affect stu

65 ias that occurs when the assumption that the latency period is a fixed constant does not hold.

66 ancer progression after a comparatively long latency period is primarily driven by the mobilization o

67 bias toward the null if the distribution of latency periods is not a fixed constant.

68 rrent metastases, developing within a 6-year latency period, lacked HLA class I expression.

69 (<1 cm) and as a dominant nodule had similar latency periods (mean, 34.0 and 28.0 years P = 0.29; med

70 rning program begins to be expressed after a latency period of 0.30 sec.

71 The odds ratio for a latency period of 13 or more years since the first loud

72 occurred in 83% (10/12) of the cases with a latency period of 3 months.

73 d in MoFe2-MuLV-infected animals following a latency period of 4 to 10 months (average, 6 months).

74 njected weanling BALB/c mice with an average latency period of 5.7 (+/- 1.5) months.

75 median age of 12 years (3-35 years), with a latency period of 9.5 years (2.5-34 years).

76 by a reduction of contractile force having a latency period of about 15 s.

77 After a latency period of approximately 10 min, we observed an a

78 led to produce tumors even at five times the latency period of controls.

79 ro-oncogenic molecular events throughout the latency period of disease progression.

80 In both models, LID mice exhibited a delayed latency period of mammary tumor development.

81 The molecular mechanisms underlying the long latency period of mesothelioma and driving carcinogenesi

82 changes drive carcinogenesis during the long latency period of mesothelioma development and shows tha

83 inflammation, and proliferation in the long latency period of MM development that may be perpetuated

84 Given the long latency period of pancreatic cancer, exploring the influ

85 ce of prostate cancer and an increase in the latency period of prostate cancer in TRAMP mice.

86 Melanoma often recurs after a latency period of several years, presenting a T cell-edi

87 tially contributes to the indolence and long latency period of this disease.

88 multiplicity (55%; P < 0.001), and extended latency period of tumor development relative to DMBA-tre

89 osure to SAC following a 15-, 30-, or 60-day latency period of water drinking.

90 ith respect to in vitro immortalization, the latency period required for the onset of acute leukemia

91 cer, tumors arise stochastically following a latency period, suggesting that additional events are re

92 wins is thought to be 100% with a very short latency period, suggesting that either the MLL fusion it

93 The latency period suggests a requirement for at least 1 com

94 The long latency period suggests that additional genetic alterati

95 were less leukemogenic and had a longer mean latency period than MCF 247-W.

96 ne-induced plasma cell tumors over a shorter latency period than the traditionally susceptible BALB/c

97 population, not just during the longer tumor latency period that follows; (b) weekend treatment gaps

98 Diabetic nephropathy (DNP) develops after latency periods that may vary by several years in approx

99 However, after a latency period, they become susceptible when sufficient

100 However, after a latency period, they become susceptible when sufficient

101 The latency period to diagnosis after transplant was 10-19 m

102 hogenicity, as it only slightly extended the latency period to disease onset.

103 Furthermore, the latency period to erection was at least doubled by DPAT

104 Buspirone and gepirone, however, reduced the latency period to erection.

105 MTV-Neu-driven mammary tumors with a similar latency period to mice with one or two wild-type ErbB4 a

106 came larger and shorter in duration, and the latency period to the onset of Ca waves shortened with r

107 ltk(-) cells confirm a channel that has long latency periods to opening (1.67 +/- 0.073 s at +60 mV)

108 After a latency period, tumors eventually arose and were establi

109 ncidence (5-15%; P < 0.01) and delayed tumor latency period (up to 4 weeks; P < 0.01-0.001).

110 bility of generating triggered activity, the latency period variance and SR Ca load had the greatest

111 The median latency period was 40 minutes from beginning eating to f

112 After injection of (125)I-MIP1095, a 16-h latency period was allowed for tracer clearance from the

113 eper regions at higher temperature where the latency period was greater.

114 egree of binding of enzyme at the end of the latency period was greatest near the phase transition te

115 elin/kg of body weight dose level, the tumor latency period was significantly increased.

116 After a long latency period, we find epithelial-specific PTEN deletio

117 Other rats entered a 30-day latency period where they drank water only.