ライフサイエンスコーパス: latency period

1 veloped mature T cell leukemias after a long latency period.

2 enesis assessments were taken after 15 weeks latency period.

3 ling in the rate of leukemia, with a reduced latency period.

4 entia following styrene exposure with a long latency period.

5 up for incident lung cancer after a 10-year latency period.

6 V) of MMC (tumor evasion model) after a long latency period.

7 oise exposure even after allowing for a long latency period.

8 1.94; 1.18-3.18), mainly in the 0- to 1-year latency period.

9 ed risk of proximal colon cancer with a long latency period.

10 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after a long latency period.

11 colorectal cancer risk but only after a long latency period.

12 ho may be at risk for developing one after a latency period.

13 stratified by histologic subtype, grade, or latency period.

14 , by reduced penetrance or by extremely long latency periods.

15 with a lower risk of overall CRC after long latency periods.

16 ect on prostate cancer risk except with long latency periods.

17 when we used alcohol intakes over different latency periods (0-4, 4-8, 8-12, and 12-16 y) as exposur

18 animals develop acute leukemia after a long latency period (6-13 months).

19 e depletion of [Ca(2+) ]SR , and during this latency period a transient elevation of [Ca(2+) ]SR occu

20 ng the calcium wave front, while during this latency period a transient increase of [Ca(2+)](SR) was

21 After a latency period, a subset of mice developed spontaneous r

22 Following a 30-day latency period after asymptotic extinction was achieved;

23 icion and is also confounded by the variable latency period after ingestion of Anisakis-contaminated

24 Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has a lifelong latency period after initial infection.

25 reconstitution after freezing or during the latency period after subcutaneous injection and that los

26 All animals were subjected to a 7-day latency period and a 10-day distraction period with a ra

27 The long latency period and incomplete penetrance suggest that ad

28 isoproterenol (isoprenaline)) decreased the latency period and increased the amplitude of the transi

29 The latency period and persistence of the disease and the ap

30 ment or antibody production but prolongs the latency period and significantly impedes tumor growth.

31 ular adnexal lymphoma (OAL) and to determine latency periods and age-groups at increased risk for SPM

32 re found to be inversely correlated with the latency period (and thus predict the onset of seizures)

33 ukemia and neurological disease after a long latency period, and the mechanism by which the virus is

34 Many cancers have long latency periods, and dietary factors in adolescence may

35 ed T-cell lymphomas with similar incidences, latency periods, and phenotypes, suggesting that cis-act

36 ve average of PA (minutes/day) with a 2-year latency period applied.

37 ons to model selection, spatial control, and latency period as well as estimating the exposure-respon

38 The median latency period at diagnosis (or first suspicion of a PHD

39 f diacylglycerol to reduce the length of the latency period at temperature below the phase transition

40 lled before symptom onset and with a greater latency period before late-stage disease.

41 em on Alcohol and Health (assuming a 10-year latency period between alcohol consumption and cancer di

42 The latency period between exposure and disease onset remain

43 gradation is widely prevalent and has a long latency period between exposure and health outcome, pote

44 duration of PARP inhibitor exposure, median latency period between first drug exposure and diagnosis

45 the epidemiology of oral HPV infection; the latency period between infection and cancer; the potenti

46 However, the long latency period between infection and development of ATL,

47 tern world as well as the possibly prolonged latency period between infection with the causing pathog

48 c fever, PSReA is characterized by a shorter latency period between the inciting streptococcal infect

49 Our results strongly suggest a latency period between the initial pump-excitation and t

50 hly neurotoxic with an apparent dose-related latency period between time of exposure and the appearan

51 , particularly for diseases with substantial latency periods between first exposure and diagnosis of

52 ses a myeloproliferative disease with a long latency period but with high penetrance.

53 develop B and T cell lymphomas after a long latency period, but the incidence is dramatically enhanc

54 re, it appeared that temperature affects the latency period by alternating the binding of the enzyme

55 Direct estimation of latency periods can minimize bias and improve confidence

56 t being more infectious and having a shorter latency period, CICT remained an effective tool to slow

57 methods, this investigation revealed shorter latency periods (defined as the interval between date of

58 The surgical technique, latency period, distraction rate, and consolidation peri

59 Thus, in spite of long latency periods during which secondary alterations can a

60 tion of a few cells, which after a prolonged latency period, exhibited weak but regular base-line osc

61 late early benign lesions and suggest that a latency period exists between loss of PAX2, p53 mutation

62 The mean latency period for benign tumors was longer than that fo

63 lth due to shared environments and a shorter latency period for cancer development.

64 lth risks remains challenging because of the latency period for many chronic diseases that take years

65 h caution given the short follow-up and long latency period for most cancers, the intensive medical s

66 decades, which may explain the observed long latency period for neurological disease onset among the

67 resents a unique opportunity to describe the latency period for obstructive airway disease (OAD) diag

68 findings suggest a protracted induction and latency period for radiation-induced lymphoma mortality.

69 The latency period for the development of pleural plaques ma

70 recurrent seizures and the relatively short latency period for their development after injury, PTE s

71 r body burden and a significant delay in the latency period for tumor appearance.

72 Although latency periods for IR-induced neoplasms are relatively

73 Tumors induced by CCND1/c-Met had a longer latency period, formed at a lower frequency, and seemed

74 ected with HPV clear their lesions, the long latency period from infection to resolution indicates th

75 uicide) than for those with generally longer latency periods (heart disease, malignant neoplasm, and

76 After an extended latency period, however, pulmonary adenomas appeared in

77 formation is often undertaken to allow for a latency period in cumulative exposure-disease analyses.

78 The median latency period in the 14 patients was 66 months (range,

79 imate the severity of exposure; the extended latency period in the lagged analysis, which could have

80 However, following a latency period in which the CS is not presented, the CTA

81 dance) occurs when the CS is offered after a latency period in which the CS was not presented.

82 y used approaches to allow for induction and latency periods in analyses of exposure-disease associat

83 d by study design, exposure data source, and latency period, indicating that these factors affect stu

84 t for causes of death with generally shorter latency periods (infectious disease and suicide) than fo

85 ias that occurs when the assumption that the latency period is a fixed constant does not hold.

86 ancer progression after a comparatively long latency period is primarily driven by the mobilization o

87 bias toward the null if the distribution of latency periods is not a fixed constant.

88 rrent metastases, developing within a 6-year latency period, lacked HLA class I expression.

89 (<1 cm) and as a dominant nodule had similar latency periods (mean, 34.0 and 28.0 years P = 0.29; med

90 ime equal to log phase M. tuberculosis, with latency period modeled as a continuous variable).

91 rning program begins to be expressed after a latency period of 0.30 sec.

92 ut around, over several centimeters, after a latency period of 1-40 years.

93 The odds ratio for a latency period of 13 or more years since the first loud

94 l sarcoma development in mice, with a median latency period of 16.2 +/- 2.8 weeks.

95 Most deaths (59.0%) occurred within the latency period of 2 years after diagnosis of metastatic

96 occurred in 83% (10/12) of the cases with a latency period of 3 months.

97 d in MoFe2-MuLV-infected animals following a latency period of 4 to 10 months (average, 6 months).

98 njected weanling BALB/c mice with an average latency period of 5.7 (+/- 1.5) months.

99 median age of 12 years (3-35 years), with a latency period of 9.5 years (2.5-34 years).

100 by a reduction of contractile force having a latency period of about 15 s.

101 After a latency period of approximately 10 min, we observed an a

102 ilateral disease, pineal gland tumors, and a latency period of at least 1 year.

103 led to produce tumors even at five times the latency period of controls.

104 ro-oncogenic molecular events throughout the latency period of disease progression.

105 In both models, LID mice exhibited a delayed latency period of mammary tumor development.

106 The molecular mechanisms underlying the long latency period of mesothelioma and driving carcinogenesi

107 changes drive carcinogenesis during the long latency period of mesothelioma development and shows tha

108 inflammation, and proliferation in the long latency period of MM development that may be perpetuated

109 Given the long latency period of pancreatic cancer, exploring the influ

110 ce of prostate cancer and an increase in the latency period of prostate cancer in TRAMP mice.

111 Melanoma often recurs after a latency period of several years, presenting a T cell-edi

112 tially contributes to the indolence and long latency period of this disease.

113 multiplicity (55%; P < 0.001), and extended latency period of tumor development relative to DMBA-tre

114 After a latency period of up to 4 years, 20% to 30% develop myel

115 osure to SAC following a 15-, 30-, or 60-day latency period of water drinking.

116 ith respect to in vitro immortalization, the latency period required for the onset of acute leukemia

117 els of >=85 dB for at least 15 years (5-year latency period), showed no increased risk of VS (odds ra

118 s 9.8 months (IQR 3.6-17.4; n=96) and median latency period since first exposure to a PARP inhibitor

119 cer, tumors arise stochastically following a latency period, suggesting that additional events are re

120 wins is thought to be 100% with a very short latency period, suggesting that either the MLL fusion it

121 The latency period suggests a requirement for at least 1 com

122 The long latency period suggests that additional genetic alterati

123 cal course, involved drugs, daily drug dose, latency periods, test results of skin test and cellular

124 were less leukemogenic and had a longer mean latency period than MCF 247-W.

125 ne-induced plasma cell tumors over a shorter latency period than the traditionally susceptible BALB/c

126 population, not just during the longer tumor latency period that follows; (b) weekend treatment gaps

127 Diabetic nephropathy (DNP) develops after latency periods that may vary by several years in approx

128 During all latency periods, the most common noncancer causes of dea

129 However, after a latency period, they become susceptible when sufficient

130 The latency period to diagnosis after transplant was 10-19 m

131 hogenicity, as it only slightly extended the latency period to disease onset.

132 Furthermore, the latency period to erection was at least doubled by DPAT

133 Buspirone and gepirone, however, reduced the latency period to erection.

134 MTV-Neu-driven mammary tumors with a similar latency period to mice with one or two wild-type ErbB4 a

135 came larger and shorter in duration, and the latency period to the onset of Ca waves shortened with r

136 ltk(-) cells confirm a channel that has long latency periods to opening (1.67 +/- 0.073 s at +60 mV)

137 After a latency period, tumors eventually arose and were establi

138 ncidence (5-15%; P < 0.01) and delayed tumor latency period (up to 4 weeks; P < 0.01-0.001).

139 bility of generating triggered activity, the latency period variance and SR Ca load had the greatest

140 The median latency period was 40 minutes from beginning eating to f

141 After injection of (125)I-MIP1095, a 16-h latency period was allowed for tracer clearance from the

142 eper regions at higher temperature where the latency period was greater.

143 egree of binding of enzyme at the end of the latency period was greatest near the phase transition te

144 elin/kg of body weight dose level, the tumor latency period was significantly increased.

145 After a long latency period, we find epithelial-specific PTEN deletio

146 Other rats entered a 30-day latency period where they drank water only.