ライフサイエンスコーパス: leaf area

1 ndicating drought intolerance (high specific leaf area).

2 t light, which represent a small fraction of leaf area.

3 p between photosynthesis and leaf N per unit leaf area.

4 e contributed to the decrease in Arabidopsis leaf area.

5 xylation rate of photosynthesis and specific leaf area.

6 a but no relationship between Delta(13)C and leaf area.

7 spite their lower assimilation rate per unit leaf area.

8 maintain their photosynthetic rates per unit leaf area.

9 ve ground biomass, and 24% to 31% less total leaf area.

10 the rates of starch synthesis and cumulative leaf area.

11 ificantly associated with the predictions of leaf area.

12 ues used to infer seasonal changes in canopy leaf area.

13 of crops to rising [CO2 ] is an increase in leaf area.

14 reduction in the ratio of fine root mass to leaf area.

15 otosynthesis and plant growth is affected by leaf area.

16 ea to mass, rather than fast growth per unit leaf area.

17 s in leaf area growth and leaf mass per unit leaf area.

18 n biomass (1.9-fold), height (1.5-fold), and leaf area (1.6-fold) than untransformed plants.

19 35%) cannot be explained by the reduction of leaf area ( 15%) and associated carbohydrate production

20 days of treatment decreased stem length 21%, leaf area 17%, and plant dry weight 18% relative to undi

21 nness may be insensitive to small changes in leaf area accompanying drought.

22 essing lines showed, on average, 27% reduced leaf area and 25% smaller rosettes versus 30% increased

23 nd 25% smaller rosettes versus 30% increased leaf area and 33% larger rosette size, respectively.

24 dioxide (CO2) assimilation rate per unit of leaf area and a 50% increase in leaf biomass as well as

25 carbon model with satellite observations of leaf area and biomass (where and when available) and soi

26 parameters including height, tiller number, leaf area and biomass were generally higher in plants ex

27 SGC plants outperform wild type with larger leaf area and biomass.

28 r than wild-type plants, with both increased leaf area and biomass.

29 hrub abundance and associated shifts in both leaf area and canopy phenology on tundra carbon flux.

30 ter-conserving strategy by reducing specific leaf area and developing thicker roots and moderate till

31 rresponding to the traits leaf mass per unit leaf area and height at maturation.

32 ima were driven by reductions in whole-plant leaf area and increased respiratory carbon losses.

33 however, were more than offset by the larger leaf area and its longer duration in Miscanthus.

34 rain yield, ear height, plant height and ear leaf area and largely environment dependent for days to

35 icant increase in number of leaves with more leaf area and larger siliques as compared to wild type p

36 l traits - leaf dry matter content, specific leaf area and lateral spread - of plant communities domi

37 relation between retrievals of leaf mass per leaf area and leaf lifespan (r = 0.64-0.80) that matches

38 QTLs) responsible for growth trajectories of leaf area and leaf mass in the common bean (Phaseolus vu

39 d petiole elongation, and changes in overall leaf area and leaf mass per area, are the stereotypical

40 tested the hypothesis that canopy structure (leaf area and light availability) - remotely estimated f

41 sat and P50 x RR when Ksat was normalized by leaf area and mass (P = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively).

42 ey functional traits--wood density, specific leaf area and maximum height--consistently influence com

43 use increased in proportion to increases in leaf area and productivity but precipitation was still a

44 y, likely due to the higher productivity and leaf area and reduced water-use efficiency we observed i

45 d plant (15) N uptake, while higher specific leaf area and root tissue density increased microbial (1

46 itant decline in total leaf protein per unit leaf area and Rubisco as a percentage of leaf N.

47 Leaf area and seed production of SSP were greater and in

48 concentration) vs. leaf morphological (e.g. leaf area and thickness) traits.

49 han those of the wild type, with 40% greater leaf area and twice the biomass when plants were grown w

50 soybean simulations at 550 ppm overestimated leaf area and yield.

51 outpace declines in productivity per unit of leaf area and, among other factors, age-related reductio

52 Specific leaf areas and leaf area ratios remained similar in both

53 SUT4-RNAi plants had larger leaf areas and lower photosynthesis rates than wild-type

54 ny other predictions, including how specific leaf areas and resource stress impact biomass and leaf a

55 bution of nicotine was measured for selected leaf areas and variation in the relative nicotine levels

56 es for enhanced propagule dispersal, greater leaf area, and deep-rooting access to nutrients and the

57 les in light regulation of hypocotyl length, leaf area, and flowering time are demonstrated for heter

58 hole plant parameters including leaf number, leaf area, and leaf and root biomass.

59 aits (height, individual leaf area, specific leaf area, and leaf dry matter content) were evaluated a

60 tioles, larger leaf area, increased specific leaf area, and reduced leaf epinasty.

61 CO2] on morphological development, primarily leaf area, are the sources of model uncertainty.

62 ariation, CV = 36%) than when expressed on a leaf area basis (CV = 66%), and relationships for broadl

63 on a chlorophyll and a dry-mass basis, on a leaf area basis they were not affected by UV-B exposure.

64 he leaf hydraulic conductance expressed on a leaf area basis was similar for the dAS compared with th

65 Growth (fresh weight and leaf area basis) was highest in wt plants, lower in TL46

66 e phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase content of leaves (area basis) in the elevated CO(2)-grown plants,

67 Is this increase in leaf area beneficial, with respect to increasing yield,

68 relative differences in height and specific leaf area between plant species selected in mixtures (mi

69 sitive isometric scaling between K(Leaf) and leaf area but no relationship between Delta(13)C and lea

70 d LMA had minimal effect on K(Leaf) per unit leaf area, but a negative correlation exists among LMA,

71 reases carbon uptake not only due to greater leaf area, but also due to an extension of the period of

72 miting maximum stomatal conductance per unit leaf area, but also, at least in the case of sp5, develo

73 d final leaf size resulted from an effect on leaf area, but not leaf length, demonstrating changed le

74 Consumption of leaf area by prescribed fire was associated with reducti

75 The increased leaf area can be attributed to increased cell division a

76 e epidermal cells and a reduction in overall leaf area compared to wild-type plants.

77 Breeding or bioengineering for lower leaf area could, therefore, contribute very significantl

78 Net CO2 exchange rates per unit leaf area declined rapidly until all viable leaves had a

79 e SAPs, having wider leaf blades and greater leaf area, dense and evenly distributed vertical canopie

80 t to explore how heterogeneity in horizontal leaf area density (LAD) within the canopy impacts the ul

81 The process-based model of the dynamics of leaf area described here is a key element to quantify th

82 The ability to predict leaf area development is critical to predict crop growth

83 he inability to synthesize starch restricted leaf area development under both low N (N(L)) and high N

84 other forest FACE sites and replacing L with leaf area duration (LD) to account for differences in gr

85 mbined from the four FACE experiments, using leaf area duration (LD) to account for differences in gr

86 n many cases, a positive correlation between leaf area duration and yield has been observed, although

87 ieback to whole-tree mortality reduce canopy leaf area during the stress period and for a lagged reco

88 transgenic lines showed reduced leaf number, leaf area, dwarf phenotype and delayed seed germination.

89 e were used to develop a simulation model of leaf area dynamics at the canopy level that was integrat

90 The model accurately predicts leaf area dynamics under different scenarios of nitrogen

91 -humid) and limiting factors (soil moisture, leaf area, energy).

92 uted to reduced relative rates of growth and leaf area expansion early in development; all plants att

93 Nicotiana benthamiana leaf areas expressing basal resistance no longer elicite

94 ning by generating dynamic carbon demands in leaf area growth and leaf mass per unit leaf area.

95 gh alterations in carbon partitioning to new leaf area growth and leaf mass per unit leaf area; howev

96 We measured traits such as leaf area, growth rate, flowering time, main stem branch

97 Net CO2 exchange rates per unit leaf area, however, were not affected, and the decreased

98 new leaf area growth and leaf mass per unit leaf area; however, CGR-mediated pectin methylesterifica

99 g seedlings and to a significant increase in leaf area in mature plants.

100 all biomes, and positively with its specific leaf area in most biomes.

101 rate of photosynthesis was constant per unit leaf area in parents and hybrids.

102 he expected decrease in respiration per unit leaf area in response to long-term growth in the field a

103 hese plants also had longer petioles, larger leaf area, increased specific leaf area, and reduced lea

104 We measured leaf area index (L) and volumetric soil water content (t

105 We show that at a FACE site where leaf area index (L) of Pinus taeda L. was altered throug

106 availability, through its control on canopy leaf area index (L).

107 GPPSIF and chlorophyll content; P < 0.0001), leaf area index (LAI) (R(2 ) = 0.35 for canopy GPPSIF an

108 -harvesting adaptations (e.g., variations in leaf area index (LAI) and increasing leaf-level assimila

109 original ED2 produced unrealistically small leaf area index (LAI) and underestimated cumulative leaf

110 rst investigated trends in the seasonal mean leaf area index (LAI) at northern latitudes (north of 30

111 We present a method for reconstructing leaf area index (LAI) based on light-dependent morpholog

112 ving systems are now routinely used to infer leaf area index (LAI) given its significance in spatial

113 The removal rate dependence on the Leaf Area Index (LAI) is also investigated.

114 We used a tundra plant-community-specific leaf area index (LAI) model to estimate LAI throughout t

115 he long-term performance of global satellite leaf area index (LAI) products is important for global c

116 (delta) coordinates with total canopy N and leaf area index (LAI) to maximize whole-crown carbon (C)

117 We tested the following hypotheses: (1) Leaf area index (LAI) will be highly correlated with ann

118 synthetic rate, transpiration, plant height, leaf area index (LAI), biomass, and yield were measured.

119 g biomass, biomass allocation, canopy cover, leaf area index (LAI), carbon and nitrogen content, and

120 ost three weeks of increased community-level leaf area index (LAI), indicating greater competition an

121 ics limiting thaw (shallower ALTs) were tree leaf area index (LAI), moss layer thickness and understo

122 CO2 fluxes of wetlands were also related to leaf area index (LAI).

123 oss all treatments with increasing overstory leaf area index (LAI).

124 P < 0.05) pools are strongly correlated with leaf area index (LAI, leaf area per unit ground area).

125 o main drivers of P in sub-Arctic tundra are leaf area index (LT ) and total foliar nitrogen (NT ).

126 on showed that leaves within a 3.3-m canopy (leaf area index = 8.3) show a progressive increase in bo

127 edicted soil moisture, groundwater depth and leaf area index agreed with the observations.

128 oil nitrate concentrations, crop dry matter, leaf area index and grain yields all agreed well with me

129 -use efficiency lead to increases in maximum leaf area index at elevated carbon dioxide concentration

130 ne egress from A. glutinosa, suggesting that leaf area index is not a suitable approach for scaling t

131 atures for photosynthesis and a high minimum leaf area index needed for the forest to compete for spa

132 Canopy light interception and leaf area index were greater in HS93-4118 in ambient [CO

133 ings due to stomatal closure, and changes in leaf area index) effects of elevated CO2 across a variet

134 y of the surface area of leaf cohorts, total leaf area index, and total green area index, respectivel

135 a plant that grows more biomass adds to the leaf area index, creating negative feedback in the form

136 primarily driven by increases in vegetation leaf area index, dominated by greening.

137 reflectance seasonality: seasonal changes in leaf area index, in canopy-surface leafless crown fracti

138 asured the seasonality of canopy structural (leaf area index, LAI) and biochemical properties (leaf c

139 Leaf quantity (i.e., canopy leaf area index, LAI), quality (i.e., per-area photosynt

140 Leaf area index, leafless crown fraction and leaf demogr

141 Leaf area index, MAT and MAP, predicted 74% of variation

142 ge in forest canopies after normalization on leaf area index.

143 r growth, tree size class distributions, and leaf area index.

144 roductivity, temperature, precipitation, and leaf area index.

145 duced structural changes, such as increasing leaf-area index (LD), may cause, or compensate for, redu

146 utable to increased light absorption, but as leaf area indices increased, the response to elevated [C

147 At low leaf area indices, a large portion of the response was a

148 areas and resource stress impact biomass and leaf area indices.

149 re approximately distributed proportional to leaf area instead of mass, as expected for a light- and

150 on of all other photosynthetic complexes per leaf area is less affected.

151 whole leaf, cell and airspace thickness, and leaf area) is associated with reduction in K(leaf) at de

152 By modifying total canopy leaf area, its vertical profile and angular distribution

153 partly compensates for their relatively low leaf area : leaf mass ratio.

154 sitive response to elevated CO2 (in biomass, leaf area, leaf mass per area, and photosynthesis), but

155 rease in antioxidant capacity while reducing leaf area, light absorption, specific leaf mass, primary

156 ping") declines with lower plant biomass and leaf area, limiting deposition in secondary forest.

157 trade-offs between NM and leaf mass per unit leaf area (LM ).

158 was closely linked to leaf dry mass per unit leaf area (LMA) and that whole-tree biomass reductions w

159 Leaf dry mass per unit leaf area (LMA) is a central trait in ecology, but its a

160 chlorophyll, nitrogen (N) and mass per unit leaf area (LMA) were also determined.

161 drier climate, including lower mean specific leaf area, lower relative cover by species of northern b

162 ss, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) per unit leaf area (Ma , Na and Pa , respectively), and chlorophy

163 For three leaf traits (specific leaf area, maximum carboxylation rate at 25 degrees C, a

164 These seasonal swings in leaf area may be critical to initiation of the transitio

165 Forest trees accumulate leaf area more rapidly than savanna trees, thereby accel

166 a similar advantage over OP in nitrogen per leaf area (Narea), even in arid climates, despite diazot

167 rd after accounting for mean annual climate, leaf area, nitrogen deposition and changes in CO(2) meas

168 ent satellite data, seasonal swings in green leaf area of approximately 25% in a majority of the Amaz

169 effect of the longer peak season and greater leaf area of deciduous shrub canopies almost tripled the

170 The average leaf area of Miscanthus was double that of maize, with t

171 est GEP responses largely reflect changes in leaf area of Salix arctica, rather than changes in leaf-

172 atory ant), increased herbivory, and reduced leaf area of the plant.

173 te dry season that coincides with increasing leaf area of the understory layer.

174 umber through development, leading to larger leaf areas of all leaves in the hybrid, suggest a centra

175 green-up phenomenon, including increases in leaf area or leaf reflectance, using a sophisticated rad

176 t of dissimilarity was detected for specific leaf area or wood density, and only a weak benefit for m

177 were detected in mature cell size, specific leaf area, or relative photosynthetic electron transport

178 ht intensities were shown to produce greater leaf area over time, estimated by noninvasive imaging.

179 rongly correlated with leaf area index (LAI, leaf area per unit ground area).

180 growth was primarily mediated by changes in leaf area per unit plant mass, photosynthesis, and whole

181 The 200 mM NaCl significantly reduced the leaf area, plant dry mass, net photosynthetic rate (PN),

182 r axes of plant strategy variation (specific leaf area, plant height, and seed mass) in tree assembla

183 ith low light extinction coefficients and/or leaf area, pointing toward a novel direction for future

184 Partitioning leaf area profiles into size-class components, we found

185 that could use LiDAR remote sensing to link leaf area profiles with tree size distributions, compari

186 (r(2) = 0.56) than to stomatal flux per unit leaf area (r(2) = 0.42).

187 iques was strongly correlated with overstory leaf area (r(2) = 0.92).

188 Specific leaf areas and leaf area ratios remained similar in both genotypes.

189 On soil, leaf area reduction in E. salsugineum was mainly due to

190 SSA relationship to the leaf Amass -specific leaf area relationship, we suggest the existence of a ph

191 er parameterization based on metrics such as leaf area, senescence state, stomatal conductance, soil

192 conservative functional traits (low specific leaf area, short stature) were replaced by species with

193 species with denser wood and lower specific leaf area showed lower mortality responses.

194 tive osmotic pressure at full turgor, as did leaf area shrinkage between full turgor and oven desicca

195 g niche differences associated with specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC).

196 chlorophyll (Chl) concentration and specific leaf area (SLA) of 25 grassland species were measured.

197 al traits (seed mass, wood density, specific leaf area (SLA), maximum height, and longevity of a tree

198 cies-specific traits (plant height, specific leaf area (SLA), root aerenchyma, starch content) and so

199 it (% below turgid saturation), and specific leaf area (SLA, cm(2) g(-1)) on new growth of sapling br

200 area exposed to intercellular air space per leaf area (Sm ) is closely associated with CO2 diffusion

201 xylation rate of photosynthesis and specific leaf area, soybean simulations at 550 ppm overestimated

202 our plant species traits (height, individual leaf area, specific leaf area, and leaf dry matter conte

203 g time) and drought avoidance (e.g. specific leaf area, succulence) traits exhibited geographic or cl

204 oderate, reflecting both the large amount of leaf area supported by culms and diurnal loss of hydraul

205 acquisitive functional traits (high specific leaf area, tall stature).

206 respectively, by increases in a tree's total leaf area that outpace declines in productivity per unit

207 cues but not on the accompanying changes in leaf area that regulate vegetation-atmosphere exchanges

208 ure and an allometry that allows substantial leaf area to be supported on relatively slender culms, a

209 ncement is driven largely by a high ratio of leaf area to mass, rather than fast growth per unit leaf

210 tials, wood density, leaf mass per area, and leaf area to sapwood area ratio to provide insight into

211 ty margin and negatively correlated with the leaf area to sapwood area ratio.

212 tained similar photosynthetic rates per unit leaf area to square wave-grown plants.

213 conductivity, leaf/needle size, tree height, leaf area-to-sapwood area ratio), and drought tolerance

214 hosphate dikinase (PPDK) protein content per leaf area transiently declined in M. x giganteus but the

215 tent, the extractable PPDK activity per unit leaf area (V(max)(,ppdk)) in cold-grown M. x giganteus l

216 Leaf vein length per unit leaf area (VLA; also known as vein density) is an import

217 eather), but attribution to the expansion of leaf area vs. changes in vegetation composition remains

218 e canopy stomatal conductance (gs ) per unit leaf area was 12% higher in females in May : June, but w

219 ve effect on neighbours, while high specific leaf area was correlated with a low competitive effect.

220 e-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase per leaf area was in plants grown under high CO(2)/N(L).

221 VDE activity based on chlorophyll or leaf area was low in the youngest leaves, with the level

222 a salt-mediated reduction in E. salsugineum leaf area was unmasked.

223 Plant performance, in terms of branching and leaf area, was both reduced and enhanced by different qu

224 rom 30 to 37% when wood density and specific leaf area were included).

225 Net CO2 exchange rates per unit leaf area were measured on attached leaves by infrared g

226 Species average height and specific leaf area were the most useful traits, predicting severa

227 ast-targeted genes were not up-regulated and leaf areas were only marginally increased.

228 bstantial lateral CO(2) diffusion rates into leaf areas where stomata were blocked by grease patches

229 ins of larger diameter, but lower length per leaf area, whereas minor vein traits were independent of

230 n reduced gs is not offset by greater canopy leaf area, which could potentially result in a greater E

231 considerable low R:FR-mediated increases in leaf area, with reduced low R:FR-mediated petiole elonga

232 today's and future [CO2 ] and that reducing leaf area would give higher yields.