コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 evir, sofosbuvir-daclatasvir, and sofosbuvir-ledipasvir.
2 rring resistance to NS5A inhibitors, such as ledipasvir.
3 sofosbuvir combined with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir.
4 S-9451) and after 12 weeks with sofosbuvir + ledipasvir.
5 treatment groups: 12 weeks of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir; 6 weeks of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-96
6 b infection who received the combination of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) (ledipasvir/s
8 reater were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) for 12 or 24
9 reater were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) for 12 or 24
10 sation sequence to receive 12 or 24 weeks of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) once daily (c
11 were prescribed a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) once daily fo
12 re randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) or ledipasvir
13 fosbuvir (400 mg) and the HCV NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir (90 mg), with and without ribavirin--in patie
14 hat the fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone or with ribavirin has the potential to
16 a fixed-dose combination tablet of 90 mg of ledipasvir and 400 mg of sofosbuvir orally once-daily fo
17 years received a combination tablet of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir once daily for 12 weeks
18 ven a fixed-dose combination tablet of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir orally once per day for
19 aily combination fixed-dose tablets of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir plus weight-based ribav
20 eeks of anti-HCV treatment using sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and a non-nucleoside polymerase-inhibitor (GS
21 went antiviral therapy (AVT) with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and chemotherapy (14 rituximab plus cyclophos
22 single-tablet regimen of the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and NS5B nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofo
24 asvir for 8 weeks (group 1), sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir and ribavirin for 8 weeks (group 2), or sofos
25 usly demonstrated that adding a third DAA to ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) can result in high S
26 We assessed PROs in patients treated with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) with and without RBV
27 ype 1 infection without cirrhosis to receive ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (ledipasvir-sofosbuvir) for 8
28 roups given fixed-dose combination tablet of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (n = 25) or ledipasvir and sof
29 enotype 3 patients, 16 of 25 (64%) receiving ledipasvir and sofosbuvir alone achieved SVR12 compared
30 let of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (n = 25) or ledipasvir and sofosbuvir along with ribavirin (n = 26).
31 r treatment (SVR12) with regimens containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir and identify factors associate
35 One patient with HCV genotype 3 discontinued ledipasvir and sofosbuvir because of an adverse event (d
37 afety and efficacy of fixed-dose combination ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in this populatio
39 IV, administration of an oral combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks was associated wi
40 lity of 12 weeks of combination therapy with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for patients with chronic HCV
42 ents with HCV genotype 1, the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir has been shown to cure high pr
43 domly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in a fixed-dose combination ta
45 ants received a 3-drug regimen consisting of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus GS-9451 for 4 weeks, and
46 te the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients wit
47 enotype 3 infection who received 12 weeks of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, and by patient
48 with a once-daily, single-tablet regimen of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir resulted in high rates of sust
50 f a fixed-dose combination tablet containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, once daily, plus ribavirin.
51 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in
52 rrent guidelines do not recommend the use of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in
53 ons (RASs) on response to the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in
56 tion of the hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the NS5B nucleotide polymerase inhibitor
57 combination therapy with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir
58 he efficacy and safety of the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofos
59 domly assigned to receive the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofos
60 [17%] of six patients receiving sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and asunaprevir; one [17%] of six patients r
61 12 patients were assigned to sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and asunaprevir; six to sofosbuvir, daclatas
62 o one of three treatment groups (sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and asunaprevir; sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, an
63 notype 3a was less sensitive to daclatasvir, ledipasvir, and elbasvir, but equally sensitive to ombit
64 maximum concentration values for sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-331007 were within the predefined pha
66 of the 20 patients allocated to sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9451 for 6 weeks (one patient was los
68 edipasvir for 12 weeks (n = 20), sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9669 for 6 weeks (n = 20), or sofosbu
69 of the 20 patients allocated to sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9669 for 6 weeks (one patient relapse
70 buvir and ledipasvir; 6 weeks of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9669; or 6 weeks of sofosbuvir, ledip
71 luation of the concentrations of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and the sofosbuvir metabolite GS-331007.
72 paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir; sofosbuvir/ledipasvir; and daclatasvir/sofosbuvir, respectively, to
76 the half-maximal effective concentration to ledipasvir by more than 100-fold reduced the rate of SVR
78 py with the nonstructural (NS) 5A inhibitor, ledipasvir, combined with the NS5B polymerase inhibitor,
80 ing sofosbuvir, simeprevir, daclatasvir, and ledipasvir cost $7000, $5500, $5500, and $875 per week,
82 aclatasvir, but no RASs were associated with ledipasvir failure, pointing to a limited efficacy of le
84 inhibitor regimen to receive sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks (group 4) or sofosbuvir plus led
85 avirin for 24 weeks (n = 55), sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks (n = 20), sofosbuvir, ledipasvir
86 All 14 patients treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks achieved a sustained virologic r
88 , 95% CI 83-100) allocated to sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks; in 19 (95%, 75-100) of the 20 p
89 nt-naive patients to receive sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 8 weeks (group 1), sofosbuvir plus ledipa
92 ed SVR rates it was necessary to assume that ledipasvir, GS-9669 and GS-9451 rapidly reduce virus inf
96 ed the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in renal transplant patients with chronic HCV
97 valuated the effectiveness of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced
98 and P7977-2025) and 5 studies of combination ledipasvir (LDV) and SOF (LDV/SOF; LONESTAR, ELECTRON [L
99 ve was to identify drug interactions between ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) against a genotype
100 tudy, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) for 12 weeks in HC
101 tor sofosbuvir (SOF) with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir (LDV) or the NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitor GS
102 nt, particularly the use of sofosbuvir (SOF)/ledipasvir (LDV) without RBV in this patient population.
103 f the nonstructural protein (NS)5A inhibitor ledipasvir (LDV), NS3 protease inhibitor vedroprevir (VD
104 l trial to assess the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir (LDV)-SOF plus RBV in patients with genotype
105 We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir (LDV)-sofosbuvir (SOF) in treating HCV genoty
108 + RBV, n = 25; SOF + RBV, n = 36; and SOF + ledipasvir, n = 6) between January and November 2014.
109 of different concentrations of daclatasvir, ledipasvir, ombitasvir, elbasvir, ruzasvir, velpatasvir,
110 dy, direct-acting antiviral therapy with SOF/ledipasvir, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvi
112 dasabuvir, or combinations of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir or sofosbuvir and velpatasvir had decreased e
113 ntly associated with failure of daclatasvir, ledipasvir, or ombitasvir in patients with genotype 1b i
114 ed interferon and ribavirin, sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks ar
115 inhibitor sofosbuvir and the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir resulted in high rates of sustained virologic
116 type) and were treated with sofosbuvir (SOF)/ledipasvir +/- ribavirin (85%) followed by SOF + daclata
120 , for genotype 1 infections, sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir, sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir, or ombitasvir,
121 edipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) or ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin (dosed according t
124 d 25 received a 4-drug regimen consisting of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, GS-9451, and GS-9669 for 4 weeks
125 e analyzed data from 1788 patients receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (282 for 8 weeks, 910 for 12 weeks
127 received a fixed-dose combination tablet of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (90/400 mg) once daily for 12 week
128 nd 88 of 88 treatment experienced) receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (95% CI 98-100) and 167 (98%) of 1
130 5%] of 170), and headache in those receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin (15 [8.8%] of 170).
133 o 99) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin; 99% (95% CI, 95 to
135 hronic HCV genotype 1 infection; the dose of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir currently used in adults was well
136 No patient who received 8 weeks of only ledipasvir-sofosbuvir discontinued treatment owing to ad
139 r treatment-naive and -experienced patients, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12 weeks is highly effective f
141 r-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks and ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 24 weeks provided similarly hi
142 svir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 24 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosb
143 svir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 24 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosb
144 s were achieved by 96% of patients receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 8 weeks (95% CI, 93%-98%), 97%
146 sessed the efficacy and safety of 6 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for acute genotype 1 or 4 HCV in H
147 ate of cure with a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for patients with acute genotype 1
149 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in adolescents with chronic HCV ge
150 f the interferon- and ribavirin-free regimen ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in kidney transplant recipients wi
151 f the interferon- and ribavirin-free regimen ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in kidney transplant recipients wi
155 quentially assigned to either treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus riba
157 plus weight-based ribavirin for 12 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus placebo once daily for 24 wee
158 for a different duration) and 311 receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (212 for 12 weeks a
159 nd 87 of 87 treatment experienced) receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (95% CI 95-100).
160 d randomisation, 77 were assigned to receive ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin and 78 ledipasvir-s
162 combination tablet once daily for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks, ledip
163 fixed-dose combination tablet for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks, ledip
166 osbuvir (ledipasvir-sofosbuvir) for 8 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 8 weeks, or led
167 were 96% (95% CI 89-99) for patients in the ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin group and 97% (91-1
169 ther treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in a 1:1 ratio with
170 uvir, 93% (95% CI, 89 to 96) with 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, and 95% (95% CI, 9
172 o 99) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin; 98% (95% CI, 95 to
174 ve patients with genotype 3 HCV, 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir provided a high level of SVR in th
175 sults indicated noninferiority of the 8-week ledipasvir-sofosbuvir regimen, on the basis of a noninfe
176 ty, and absence of drug-drug interactions of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir suggest that it could be an import
177 dosing required adjustment during and after ledipasvir-sofosbuvir therapy but antiretroviral regimen
181 The single patient receiving 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir who did not reach SVR12 did not co
183 e rate in the group that received 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir with ribavirin was 1 percentage po
184 rhosis to receive ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (ledipasvir-sofosbuvir) for 8 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvi
185 nce interval [CI], 90 to 97) with 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, 93% (95% CI, 89 to 96) with 8 wee
186 sponse in the group that received 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, the rate in the 12-week group was
192 o 97) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; 96% (95% CI, 91 to 99) in the gro
193 100) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; 97% (95% CI, 94 to 99) in the gro
194 100) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; and 99% (95% CI, 95 to 100) in th
195 o 99) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; and 99% (95% CI, 97 to 100) in th
196 e (nine [5.3%] of 171) in patients receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; and nasopharyngitis (40 [23.5%] o
199 /ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir (PrOD) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) regimens upon mortality.
200 the ION-4 study, black patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) were significantly less
201 once-daily fixed-dose combination tablet of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) with and without ribavir
203 began treatment with sofosbuvir (n = 2986), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (n = 11,327), or PrOD (n = 3174),
205 tudies evaluated a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir +/- ribavirin administered for 8,
207 eeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and only a small effect in patient
208 infection (no significant difference between ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and PrOD regimens), 86.2% (95% CI,
209 e of SVR12 in treatment-naive patients given ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8 weeks (P = .011), but not fo
211 y was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in black patients using data from
212 se RASs had a small effect in patients given ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin for
215 ng genotype 1-infected patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir monotherapy, black patients had si
217 enotype 3 infection (77.9% in patients given ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, 87.0% in patients
222 afety and efficacy of 8, 12, and 24 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin for the
223 ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) once daily, with or without ribav
224 is study was to model the impact of LDV/SOF (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir), the first Peg-IFN- and RBV-free
225 the real-world effectiveness of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombita
226 taining sofosbuvir, simeprevir + sofosbuvir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, or paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritona
227 en all these drugs and sofosbuvir/ribavirin, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvi
229 e assessed treatment with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir, the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuv
230 and $875 per week, respectively, sofosbuvir-ledipasvir was cost-effective for genotype 1 and cost $1
231 he fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir was efficacious in a small cohort of patients
235 Among patients treated with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir with or without GS-9669 or GS-9451, 100% (59/
239 rect-acting antiviral drug to sofosbuvir and ledipasvir would allow a shorter treatment duration.
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。