ライフサイエンスコーパス: left ventricular end-diastolic volume

1 25), including after adjustment for baseline left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

2 defined as an increase of 15% or more in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

3 tolic dysfunction by reducing the unstressed left ventricular end-diastolic volume.

4 Greater mean LVMT was associated with lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (0.01 mm/mL; P<0.0

5 ic response (defined as percent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume 1 year after CRT-D

6 se in stroke volume (SV) without a change in left ventricular end diastolic volume (102+/-16% change

7 me (10.4 +/- 2 to 7.7 +/- 4 mL; p < .05) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (18.5 +/- 3 to 14.

8 ared with placebo, a significant decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-18 mL; P=0.009)

9 ng as shown by increased E-wave velocity and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, 2) exhibit a high

10 left ventricular remodeling (>20% change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume; 21.91 [2.75-174.2

11 -diastolic pressure by 40% to 60% (p < .05), left ventricular end-diastolic volume 25 +/- 8%, and str

12 hysema was linearly related to reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-4.1 ml; 95% conf

13 significantly (P<0.05) greater reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (-49+/-16% versus

14 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (72.5 to 77.4 mL/m

15 ated with change in RV ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, although correlat

16 On echocardiography, left ventricular end diastolic volume and deceleration t

17 icity was evaluated as the change in indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume and LVEF.

18 d venodilation reflected by a 10% decline in left ventricular end-diastolic volume and a 30% fall in

19 raction compared with placebo did not change left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricul

20 Secondary end points, including structural (left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricul

21 Indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume and mass correlate

22 1 and 10 weeks after infarction showed that left ventricular end-diastolic volume and mass increased

23 +/-7 and 24+/-5 g/m(2); P<0.001) and indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume and right ventricu

24 ality-of-life score, 6-minute walk distance, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricu

25 d rats showed a borderline (16%) increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (angiography), whe

26 The limits of agreement between the left ventricular end-diastolic volume as estimated by bi

27 r ejection fraction (beta=-0.02/%; P=0.015), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (beta=0.01/mL; P<0

28 and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (left ventricular end-diastolic volume/body surface area,

29 icular end-diastolic pressure by 30% to 40%, left ventricular end-diastolic volumes by 33 +/- 9%, and

30 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes by use of echocar

31 The relation between stroke volume and left ventricular end-diastolic volume, by the Frank-Star

32 dence interval, -4.02 to -0.23; P=0.028) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (coefficient, 7.85

33 ular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), but not left ventricular end-diastolic volume, consistent with i

34 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased (from 12

35 Cardiac index increased and left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased signific

36 al clipping led to a significant increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume, demonstrating inc

37 The mean change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume differed significa

38 Patients who increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume during lower-body

39 ic resonance imaging demonstrated increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volumes, end-systolic vol

40 ds, prior hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume >/=125 mL/m(2), an

41 rse remodeling was defined as an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume >/=20% at 6 months

42 CMR-derived left ventricular end-diastolic volume >246 mL had good,

43 icular pressure increase and dilatation, but left ventricular end-diastolic volume improved because o

44 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume improved from 172

45 atients, there was a paradoxical increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume in association wit

46 by 30 mm Hg lower-body suction, on right and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes in 21 patients wi

47 +/-33 to 43+/-14 mL/m(2), P<0.0001), whereas left ventricular end diastolic volume increased (66+/-12

48 After 17 cycles of trastuzumab, indexed left ventricular end diastolic volume increased in patie

49 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume increased in the r

50 urviving without surgery at 5 years, 90% for left ventricular end-diastolic volume index <100 mL/m(2)

51 RT-plus-ICD group had greater improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (-26.2 versu

52 plasma brain natriuretic peptide (79 pg/mL), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (110 mL/m2),

53 did not correlate with six-month changes in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (p = 0.26),

54 iography showed a small, stable reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (P<0.001), w

55 ely), RV stroke volume index (P<0.0001), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (P=0.0015).

56 ilure 3.2 +/- 2.9 years, LVEF 0.21 +/- 0.07, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index 180 +/- 64 m

57 The relationship between left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and stroke v

58 The left ventricular end-diastolic volume index decreased (9

59 ex, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index failed to co

60 Resting left ventricular end-diastolic volume index increased (P

61 ors of SCA were PET sympathetic denervation, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, creatinine,

62 vated B-type natriuretic peptide, and larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume index.

63 larger left atrial volume index, and larger left ventricular end-diastolic volume index.

64 farct zone and its percentage of myocardium, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular

65 myocardial scar volume by CMR is superior to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular

66 gnificant improvements in ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular

67 eft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) on cardiac

68 antagonist tolvaptan (30 mg/day) on reducing left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) compared w

69 Gated SPECT measurements for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index, lef

70 lmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), SV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left

71 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left vent

72 ponse with CRT, defined as percent change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), was analy

73 of left ventricular end-systolic volume and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV).

74 odds ratio, 1.16; P=0.002), exercise indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (odds ratio, 1.04;

75 ients) was the only predictor of increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (p < 0.001).

76 cular end-diastolic volume, as expected, but left ventricular end-diastolic volume paradoxically incr

77 ntricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (preload) in CHF r

78 ce method (n=53, r=0.85, P<0.0001), and with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.81, P<0.0001)

79 ctron-beam computed tomography for measuring left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.96; standard

80 ts displayed an additional decline in the RV/left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio (P=0.05) and

81 airflow obstruction are inversely related to left ventricular end-diastolic volume, stroke volume, an

82 ing hearts increased relaxation velocity and left ventricular end diastolic volume to produce higher

83 ena caval occlusion (VCO) was used to reduce left ventricular end-diastolic volume to 70 +/- 5% of ba

84 ng was minor, and a decrease in the ratio of left ventricular end-diastolic volume to body weight ref

85 c volume (angiography), whereas the ratio of left ventricular end-diastolic volume to body weight was

86 The mean left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 108 +/- 47 mL,

87 At 6 months follow-up, left atrial and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes were significantl

88 hat heat stress did not significantly change left ventricular end-diastolic volume, while ventricular

89 n the most recent echocardiogram, the median left ventricular end-diastolic volume z score was +1.7 (

90 dimension z-score (OR=2.2, P=0.02) or lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume z-score (OR=1.9, P