1 were assessed by histochemical staining with leukocyte esterase and morphometrics, respectively.

2 ility of UTI, a negative dipstick result for leukocyte esterase and nitrites excludes infection.

3 I symptom; of these patients, 31 had urinary leukocyte esterase and pyuria (others not tested), 50 (8

4 ion, including an absence of protein, blood, leukocyte esterase, and nitrites.

5 in same-strain bacteriuria (from 7% to 69%), leukocyte esterase (from 31% to 64%), and symptoms (from

6 as synthesized and tested as a substrate for leukocyte esterase (LE), an enzyme produced by leukocyte

7 d an abnormal UA finding (greater-than-trace leukocyte esterase level, positive nitrite test result,

8 nclude dipstick analyses for the presence of leukocyte esterase or nitrites, microscopic analysis for

9 les daily and recorded measurements of urine leukocyte esterase, symptoms, and sexual intercourse dai

10                  We evaluated the use of the leukocyte esterase test (LET) on first-catch urine speci

11 widespread screening for C. trachomatis, but leukocyte esterase testing had low sensitivity for selec

12 ion in male participants, the sensitivity of leukocyte esterase testing was 58.9%, the specificity wa

13 ion field were seen or if either nitrates or leukocyte esterase testing was positive.

14  reaction assay and leukocyturia detected by leukocyte esterase testing.

15 ly supported by a combination of nitrite and leukocyte esterase tests can be used.

16                                     Nitrite, leukocyte esterase tests, and urine microscopy alone wer

17 rine samples were evaluated with nitrite and leukocyte esterase tests, using urine culture and/or dip