ライフサイエンスコーパス: life table

1 nd analyzed them using an age-stage, two-sex life table.

2 d Centers for Disease Control and Prevention life tables.

3 nd 10-14 years, inclusive) using appropriate life tables.

4 on comparisons of survival models with U.S. life tables.

5 ected with hazard-based modifications to the life tables.

6 d on age and sex alone, was calculated using life tables.

7 pulations at risk with census counts and NIH life tables.

8 mortality was estimated from United Kingdom life tables.

9 opulation and death rates from the Minnesota life tables.

10 and 1996 by means of Kaplan-Meier actuarial life-tables.

11 d-generated expected mortality rates from BC life-tables.

12 The life table-adjusted cumulative risk of loss after gestat

13 sease, stage at diagnosis, and survival), US life tables (all cause mortality), and the medical liter

14 In life-table analyses (log-rank test), incidence of the me

15 Life-table analyses showed that joint replacement was pe

16 Life-table analyses were used to compare 2-year overall

17 st 2 consecutive study visits) determined by life-table analyses, and at least 10 letter (>/=2 line)

18 urvival and success rates were calculated by life-table analyses.

19 Life-tables analyses were used to estimate gains in life

20 Kaplan-Meier life table analysis showed similar survival rates at 1,

21 he 1, 2, and 5-year survival estimates using life table analysis were 72, 48, and 23%.

22 By life table analysis, the probability of detecting dyspla

23 By life table analysis, we found that losartan and doxycycl

24 Results up to 4 years were evaluated by life table analysis.

25 l outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier life table analysis.

26 inical recurrence rates (intent to treat) by life-table analysis at 24 months were 50% (95% confidenc

27 and success rate (SR) were calculated using life-table analysis for both M and R short implants.

28 A Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis revealed that the incidence of zoste

29 ion of OPMD caused marked debility, although life-table analysis showed no decrease in life expectanc

30 Life-table analysis showed that in patients who survived

31 Life-table analysis showed that the cumulative proportio

32 The life-table analysis showed that the group 1 patients had

33 Life-table analysis showed the mean times to a diagnosis

34 Life-table analysis shows the ipsilateral stroke-free ra

35 We used life-table analysis to estimate gains in life expectancy

36 udy enrollment, 1661 patients died (15.9% by life-table analysis).

37 On life-table analysis, 90-day recurrence rates with mean S

38 st, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, life-table analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank t

39 With use of life-table analysis, overall primary and secondary 1-yea

40 By life-table analysis, the likelihood of remission during

41 By life-table analysis, the rate of stroke was 2.2% (95% co

42 By life-table analysis, women were significantly less likel

43 Transitions are estimated using life-table analysis.

44 Durability of PFSS was determined with life-table analysis.

45 were analyzed statistically and by means of life-table analysis.

46 Statistical analysis was conducted using a life-table analysis.

47 r within 30 days), and 5-year survival, from life-table analysis.

48 Well-known methods to do this, such as the life table and age adjustment, exist for binary nonrecur

49 e and comprehensive actuarial foundation for life table and mortality analysis, it suggests new possi

50 Life table and multivariate analysis also demonstrated t

51 re compared by means of chi-square tests and life table and random effects model analyses.

52 llivan method, which was applied to Eurostat life tables and age-specific prevalence of activity limi

53 We aimed to estimate life tables and annual numbers of deaths for 187 countri

54 er-pregnant female donors was analyzed using life tables and time-varying Cox proportional hazards mo

55 nt-level microsimulation model based on U.S. life-tables and in-trial results was used to estimate li

56 rn between 1878 (earliest year with complete life tables) and 1914 (last birth cohort for which male

57 by the time of expected patient death (1990 life tables) and whose Gleason score was less than 4 in

58 e, diabetes, and cancers were modelled using life tables, and changes in greenhouse gas emissions ass

59 Using a life-table approach, the authors quantified the degree t

60 pecific disease incidence rates and abridged life tables are examples of binned data.

61 We incorporated these estimates in the life table by the Sullivan method to produce HALE estima

62 For example, the construction of life tables, calculating the percentage mortality of pre

63 For life table calculations, we used prevalence, incidence r

64 et of Alzheimer's disease was derived from a life table constructed by using age-of-onset distributio

65 In this study, we collected life table data for the sweetpotato weevil, Cylas formic

66 er were calculated using incidence rates and life table data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemio

67 e, Epidemiology, and End Results program and life table data.

68 calculated from Berkeley Mortality Database life tables derived from population matched by gender an

69 A life table estimate of transmission at 6 to 8 weeks was

70 gery demonstrated less strabismus (29 of 50; life-table estimate, 58.0%) than the older cohort (>/= 4

71 ths of follow-up in 38 pseudophakic infants (life-table estimate, 66.7%) and 42 infants (life-table e

72 (life-table estimate, 66.7%) and 42 infants (life-table estimate, 74.5%) treated with contact lenses

73 han the older cohort (>/= 49 days; 51 of 64; life-table estimate, 80.0%; P<0.01).

74 Kaplan-Meier life-table estimates for continuous complete remission (

75 Kaplan-Meier life-table estimates indicated that 25% of RA patients w

76 Life-table estimates of event-free survival and survival

77 mity of genomic alterations, correlates with life-table estimates of the probability of overall survi

78 of pregnancies/100 person-years of use) and life-table estimates of the probability of pregnancy wer

79 Life-table estimates were used to determine disease-free

80 According to life-table estimates, the rate of successful discontinua

81 ), and survival (S) were determined by using life-table estimates.

82 l (DDFS), and survival were determined using life-table estimates.

83 second relapse (FF2R) were determined using life-table estimates.

84 in time-dependent models using Kaplan-Meier life-table estimation.

85 Selfing and life-table experiments were performed for two such Daphn

86 nomas was compared among the groups with the life-table extension of the Mantel-Haenszel test.

87 ze goals of care for geriatric patients, but life tables fail to account for the great variability in

88 The results provide the first estimate of a life table for a population of ant colonies and the firs

89 evalence of the health measure to a standard life table for the same period.

90 2)=0.78) of Ne/N in an empirical data set of life tables for 63 animal and plant species with diverse

91 County-level death rates and national life tables for each year were obtained from the U.S. Ce

92 Life tables for single year of age, sex, calendar year,

93 County, Minnesota, and mortality rates from life tables for the general population, we estimated the

94 Life-tables for contralateral breast cancers, which cons

95 This paper describes the major life table formulae and mortality models used to analyze

96 We constructed abridged life tables from age-specific mortality rates and life e

97 nosed in 111 patients (9.3% +/- 0.9%, 3-year life-table incidence).

98 fer and 100% IDDM by 32 days post-transfer), life-table (log-rank) analyses revealed that IDDM can be

99 groups was compared by means of Kaplan-Meier life-tables, log-rank test, and multivariate proportiona

100 d using conditional probability based on the life table method.

101 se and cardiac survival was estimated by the life-table method and compared by the log-rank test.

102 -square analysis; rates were computed by the life-table method and compared using Mantel-Cox log-rank

103 months of follow-up was calculated using the life-table method and was compared across treatment grou

104 culated for the study cohort by the standard life-table method.

105 ll in-hospital deaths) were estimated by the life-table method.

106 Cumulative POF risk was estimated using the life-table method.

107 of cardiac death or AMI was estimated by the life-table method.

108 Long-term survival was estimated by the life-table method.

109 ive treatments employed before intervention; life-table methodology on an intent-to-treat basis with

110 We used multistate life table methods and transition rates estimated from p

111 bserved survival was calculated by actuarial life table methods for three new node-positive subgroups

112 -specific mortality rates is calculated with life table methods that are among the oldest and most fu

113 We calculated HALE with life table methods, incorporating estimates of average h

114 obability of dying before age 70 years, with life table methods.

115 tion was not significant when analyzed using life table methods.

116 rtality rates for all causes of death, using life table methods.

117 ) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by life-table methods according to clinical and biologic fe

118 We used multistate life-table methods and microsimulation to estimate life

119 Four UK centres have used life-table methods to analyse the long-term results of c

120 Application of standard life-table methods to calculate life expectancy by year,

121 We used life-table methods to calculate the burden of cancer mor

122 Outcome analysis used standard life-table methods.

123 oronary heart disease) by multiple-decrement life-table methods.

124 Outcome analyses used standard life-table methods.

125 Life tables of female baboons (Papio hamadryas) in two w

126 n be elucidated via several stage-structured life tables of plant populations manipulated by herbivor

127 idated via several methods: stage-structured life tables of plant populations manipulated by herbivor

128 parison, expected survival was obtained from life tables of the population of British Columbia, Canad

129 om the National Center for Health Statistics life tables on the white population in Minnesota, using

130 age- and gender-matched group obtained from life tables (p < 0.0001).

131 Hosts and conditions similarly affect life table performance.

132 ectancy and mortality data were derived from life tables, previous studies, and national databases.

133 pregnancy in these women, we used cumulative life-table probabilities and proportional-hazards analys

134 tment-free survival rates were determined by life-table product limit estimates.

135 Survival probabilities from the U.S. life tables providing the most similar survival experien

136 With the use of clinically determined life tables, reductions in radiation-attributable lung c

137 CD2 expression level (> 75% positivity), the life table relative event rate (RER) was 1.22 for patien

138 Retrospective life table response experiment analysis revealed that th

139 and undisturbed conditions were evaluated as Life Table Response Experiment and showed that C. microp

140 raphic theory, we develop a set of transient life table response experiments (LTREs) for decomposing

141 Life-table response experiments with the crustacean Ceri

142 Life tables revealed no statistical difference between t

143 Life table statistics and factors affecting population g

144 Life-table stroke-free rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were s

145 1981-1984 and followed to age 10 years, via life table survival and Cox multivariate analyses.

146 Life-table survival analysis was performed, and proporti

147 ts as input parameters in a relational model life table system.

148 sex, and length of follow-up using modified life table technique and surveillance epidemiology end r

149 scipline of classical demography that brings life table techniques, mortality models, experimental sy

150 ops the "Life-Event Table," an analog of the life table that can analyze occurrence of diverse types

151 We developed a multistate life table to calculate life expectancy for individuals

152 relative survival, constructing 252 complete life tables to control for background mortality by age,

153 We developed synthetic cohort life tables to estimate the cumulative prevalence of con

154 d Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Life Tables to project age- and cause-specific mortality

155 "baseline" age-specific hazards in the local life tables to reflect the life expectancy associated wi

156 cancer than with the census-derived national life tables used by the SEER Program.

157 ive survivors and the expected survival from life tables was not statistically significant.

158 appropriate race-specific and state-specific life tables was up to 2% lower for breast cancer and up

159 Abridged cohort life tables were constructed to calculate life expectanc

160 as well as moderate hypothermia (p < .01 by life table), without a significant difference between mi