ライフサイエンスコーパス: ligase chain reaction

1 amydia trachomatis such as the plasmid-based ligase chain-reaction and polymerase chain-reaction test

2 dia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction as well as to determine the preval

3 eatment by a polymerase chain reaction-based ligase chain reaction assay (sensitivity 0.01%).

4 tis infection detected in urine specimens by ligase chain reaction assay and leukocyturia detected by

5 First-void urine specimens using ligase chain reaction assay were available for 12,548 (8

6 The urine ligase chain reaction assay will permit widespread scree

7 ucleic acid amplification tests, such as the ligase chain reaction assay, provides new opportunities

8 or gonococcal or chlamydial infection by the ligase chain reaction assay; secondary outcome measure w

9 populations was determined using urine-based ligase chain reaction DNA amplification assays (DAAs).

10 rmy recruits from 50 states were screened by ligase chain reaction for C. trachomatis infection.

11 e specimens from both cohorts were tested by ligase chain reaction for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neiss

12 s by using COBAS PCR (Roche Diagnostics) and ligase chain reaction LCR (Abbott laboratories) and comp

13 Ligase chain reaction (LCR) (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott

14 bott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) uses a ligase chain reaction (LCR) amplification in the LCx pro

15 Ligase chain reaction (LCR) and first-generation uniplex

16 tability of this enzyme are exploited in the ligase chain reaction (LCR) and ligase detection reactio

17 Urine ligase chain reaction (LCR) and PCR tests and urethral s

18 women, we compared the results of commercial ligase chain reaction (LCR) and PCR tests performed on c

19 The Abbott LCx ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay for the simultaneous d

20 We compared the ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay to cell culture for di

21 cation of the standard Chlamydia trachomatis ligase chain reaction (LCR) detection assay resulted in

22 of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific gap ligase chain reaction (LCR) DNA amplification assay as w

23 f the sensitivity and specificity of PCR and ligase chain reaction (LCR) for detecting Chlamydia trac

24 nt-antibody assay (DFA), commercial PCR, and ligase chain reaction (LCR) for the verification of EIA

25 of nucleic acid amplification tests such as ligase chain reaction (LCR) have the potential to simpli

26 Ligase chain reaction (LCR) is both highly sensitive and

27 For diagnosis, we used Abbott's ligase chain reaction (LCR) on urine specimens and isola

28 f a set of short oligonucleotides, either by ligase chain reaction (LCR) or by assembly PCR.

29 gonorrhoeae; evaluated the agreement between ligase chain reaction (LCR) performed on PreservCyt and

30 Conjunctival swabs were tested using ligase chain reaction (LCR) to detect chlamydial DNA.

31 This is achieved by using the ligase chain reaction (LCR) to recognize and amplify a C

32 Ligase chain reaction (LCR) was compared with ACCESS imm

33 rrhoeae infection in pooled urine samples by ligase chain reaction (LCR) was examined in three popula

34 f genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection by ligase chain reaction (LCR) was examined.

35 e no laboratory routinely used NAAT in 1995, ligase chain reaction (LCR) was used in 23% of laborator

36 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR) were compared for the diagno

37 n by the ligase detection reaction (LDR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR), respectively.

38 er mycobacterial infections were tested by a ligase chain reaction (LCR)-based assay and acid-fast st

39 lified and typed from 60 of 126 samples from ligase chain reaction (LCR)-positive women and 3 samples

40 Chlamydia trachomatitis was identified by ligase chain reaction (LCR).

41 The initial patient tested positive by ligase chain reaction (LCR); 17 others tested positive b

42 ults of C. trachomatis detection obtained by ligase chain reaction (LCR; Abbott Laboratories).

43 time PCR with molecular beacon, and Abbott's ligase chain reaction (LCx).

44 le (October 1996 to October 1999) were used (ligase chain reaction [LCx Probe System; Abbott Laborato

45 rase chain reaction/restriction endonuclease/ligase chain reaction mutation assay.

46 py, all animals were positive for culture or ligase chain reaction (or both), and laparoscopy demonst

47 ithromycin-treated monkeys (P<.01); cervical ligase chain reaction remained positive in 15 placebo-,

48 Neisseria gonorrhoeae (n=884), using a urine ligase chain reaction test to determine prevalence and p

49 witched from a nucleic acid probe assay to a ligase chain reaction test.

50 s were invited to provide a urine sample for ligase chain reaction testing for C trachomatis infectio

51 rom BAL specimen cell pellets, and PCR-based ligase chain reaction was performed for mutations in the

52 e for gonococcal and chlamydial infection by ligase chain reaction, weighted to reflect variations in

53 egative samples were positive when tested by ligase chain reaction, which suggests persistence.