ライフサイエンスコーパス: light intensity

1 s by manipulating symbiont load according to light intensity.

2 mediate light levels and were lowest at high light intensity.

3 and respond to the daily changes in ambient light intensity.

4 em I for the first seconds after a change in light intensity.

5 cell elicited exocytosis that was graded to light intensity.

6 preventing state transitions upon changes in light intensity.

7 ntal factors such as temperature and average light intensity.

8 anism for enabling visual orientation at any light intensity.

9 -resolution imaging of living cells with low light intensity.

10 sponse to nitrogen starvation and changes in light intensity.

11 n pupillary constriction with increasing log light intensity.

12 ctor of approximately 5, independent of bias light intensity.

13 with control plants under conditions of high light intensity.

14 takes place when plants are shifted to lower light intensity.

15 rent growth-associated pathways to increased light intensity.

16 preventing state transition upon increase in light intensity.

17 not associated with acclimation to changing light intensity.

18 lized to transmit graded signals that encode light intensity.

19 ws plants to respond to fast fluctuations in light intensity.

20 synaptic responses that emphasize changes in light intensity.

21 ficiency increased linearly as a function of light intensity.

22 CO2 levels, is also influenced by changes in light intensity.

23 otyl elongation increases incrementally with light intensity.

24 contributions do not change as a function of light intensity.

25 quinol is possible after a rapid increase in light intensity.

26 to reconstruct historical changes in surface light intensity.

27 red in the dark just prior to an increase in light intensity.

28 erated during abrupt short-term increases in light intensity.

29 iod and appeared to be related to changes in light intensity.

30 ing in near complete photoinhibition at high light intensity.

31 wed an increased growth rate with increasing light intensity.

32 rate can be tuned: it is linearly related to light intensity.

33 me and how the response kinetics varies with light intensity.

34 enerally expected to respond to the absolute light intensity.

35 which is continuously adjusted to changes in light intensity.

36 of qE in improving plant fitness in variable light intensity.

37 ssion could also be controlled by modulating light intensity.

38 serving PSI upon rapid fluctuations in white light intensity.

39 ich are likewise strictly regulated by white light intensity.

40 ound that the mode of inhibition depended on light intensity.

41 otosynthesis-related processes to changes in light intensity.

42 to reduced recombination loss under diluted light intensity.

43 tyl elongation depends on the day length and light intensity.

44 ative demand as well as dynamic responses to light intensity.

45 narrowband gamma oscillation increased with light intensity.

46 initiate reversals in response to changes in light intensity.

47 roplast function to unpredictable changes in light intensity.

48 ght intensity, or combined high CO2 and high light intensity.

49 of reaction can be controlled by varying the light intensity.

50 al D1 protein turnover under moderate growth light intensity.

51 bute to the response over several decades of light intensity.

52 enters in var1 or var2 under moderate growth light intensity.

53 the rate of the reaction is dependent on the light intensity.

54 in response to environmental fluctuations in light intensity.

55 of reactions by which rods signal changes in light intensity.

56 states allowing plants to survive under high light intensities.

57 mals must operate under an enormous range of light intensities.

58 s may be achieved using higher (16-33%) blue light intensities.

59 r natural viewing conditions and at moderate light intensities.

60 siological hyperpolarization of cells at low light intensities.

61 itch exclusively to polarized light at lunar light intensities.

62 on over an approximately 6-log-unit range of light intensities.

63 anglion cells (ipRGCs) are active at daytime light intensities.

64 l efficiencies for growth at low versus high light intensities.

65 ls easily outcompete D1:1-PSII cells at high light intensities.

66 ame sample to a sequence of distinct actinic light intensities.

67 osynthetic organisms can adapt to changes in light intensities.

68 he photocycle and high pump turnover at high light intensities.

69 e first steps in vision over a wide range of light intensities.

70 simulate the kinetics of qE at low and high light intensities.

71 (RWCs), COS concentrations, temperatures and light intensities.

72 de irradiance across a wide range of ambient-light intensities.

73 cells to encode motion over a wide range of light intensities.

74 ntum yield was as high as 0.73, and moderate light intensity (10(2) mumol.m(2).s(-1)) is sufficient f

75 Salt stress and high light intensity accelerated biosynthesis of the pigments

76 N cells are capable of reporting the average light intensity across the whole visual field.

77 vior, with additional benefit conferred from light-intensity activities and sleep duration when reall

78 sis model assessment of beta-cell function), light-intensity activity (1.9% lower triglycerides, 2.4%

79 r-based measurements suggest that increasing light-intensity activity and reducing sedentary time are

80 moderate-intensity activity over one day and light-intensity activity over three days induce a transi

81 amounts of time spent in sedentary behavior, light-intensity activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physi

82 summer conditions of cycling temperature and light intensity, an additional prominent afternoon (A) c

83 They operate over a similar range of light intensities and adapt to backgrounds and bleaches

84 rctic domain, fungal parasitism is linked to light intensities and algal stress that can elevate dise

85 nities and are linked in their occurrence to light intensities and algal stress.

86 and absorbance spectroscopy under different light intensities and CO2, to test predictions of the mo

87 cus on seeking planets with similar incident light intensities and environments.

88 cy in the whole plant, conditional upon high light intensities and low relative humidity.

89 Growing conditions combining high light intensities and low temperatures lead to anthocyan

90 dtii-PSII WOC cycles less efficiently at all light intensities and produces less O(2) than either cya

91 ranching or tillering in response to varying light intensities and ratios of red and far-red light ca

92 rotenoid protein (OCP) serves as a sensor of light intensity and an effector of phycobilisome (PB)-as

93 CC 6803 moves with Type IV pili and measures light intensity and color with a range of photoreceptors

94 e evaporation rate increased with increasing light intensity and decreased with increasing salinity.

95 uired the combination of two factors: higher light intensity and habituation to the testing chamber.

96 is known about the neural representation of light intensity and how it covers the necessary range.

97 PQ allows for a rapid response to changes in light intensity and in vascular plants, is primarily tri

98 onveys information about changing background light intensity and increases the signal:noise for fast

99 antly influenced by the interactions between light intensity and maternal wing morphs.

100 The higher light intensity and NO3-N concentration in Muskegon Lake

101 on and CO(2) isotope exchange in response to light intensity and O(2) were used to determine the effi

102 smonic metallic nanostructures increase with light intensity and operating temperature.

103 In mammals, daily variations in light intensity and other cues are integrated by a hypot

104 s been implicated in the dynamic response to light intensity and plays a role in switching off the OC

105 n by measuring the dependence of its rate on light intensity and point mutations.

106 Reversals were modulated by changes in light intensity and preceded by the migration of HmpF-GF

107 ell-known dose-response relationship between light intensity and pupil contraction.

108 sed to characterize the relationship between light intensity and pupillary response.

109 Depending also on the light intensity and regardless of the package permeabili

110 To improve the light intensity and resolution of TRUE focus, we develop

111 MT9 gene was found to be upregulated by high light intensity and salt stress.

112 of plants responds dynamically to changes in light intensity and temperature, leading to the modifica

113 tially underlying the computation of ambient light intensity and temporal light changes already withi

114 The higher light intensity and total nitrogen concentration may hav

115 na membranes occurs under conditions of high light intensity and triggers a major photoprotection mec

116 with (11) CO(2) and examined the effects of light intensity and water stress on metabolism by using

117 Tuning the light intensity and wavelength of the irradiation can re

118 . PCC 6803 under different nitrogen sources, light intensities, and CO2 concentrations.

119 We assessed the dependence on temperature, light intensity, and atmospheric [CO2].

120 oduction at different conditions of voltage, light intensity, and electrolyte pH.

121 s method is capable of reducing the required light intensity, and thus minimizing the photothermal da

122 simple linear regression model based on UVB light intensity appears to be a useful tool for predicti

123 However, cells acclimated to low light intensity are indeed able to produce more biomass

124 y investigated, particularly when changes in light intensity are too fast to allow the phosphorylatio

125 The traditional ELISA employing light intensity as the sensing signal often encounters l

126 g the OS does not increase linearly with the light intensity as with diffuse light.

127 mproved in carbon-limited cultures at higher light intensities, as they did in the DeltaCpcC1C2:pcpcT

128 The sample temperature and the incident light intensity at 355 nm tune the characteristic switch

129 ckscattering configuration and show that the light intensity at the focus is progressively enhanced b

130 Light intensity at the time an experimental sample is co

131 Irrespective of the light intensity at time of harvest, the highest leaf dry

132 o reversible phosphorylation upon changes in light intensity (being under control of redox-regulated

133 the transmission of a physical quantity, say light intensity-between any two points in space is ident

134 rs are then used to causally estimate random light intensities both at the front and back end of the

135 ow visual neurons enhance sensitivity at low light intensities, but they could pose a challenge for m

136 not respond to a spatiotemporal gradient in light intensity, but rather they directly and accurately

137 Photosynthetic organisms flourish under low light intensities by converting photoenergy to chemical

138 near unity quantum efficiency and under high light intensities by safely dissipating excess photoener

139 cumulation during exposure of plants to high light intensity by modulating the expression of transcri

140 shoot-to-root ratio in response to changing light intensities, by modulating root growth.

141 Spatial variation in light intensity, called spatial contrast, comprises much

142 ereas hosts benefited from symbiosis at high light intensity, carrying endosymbionts was costly to ho

143 vation energy and super-linear dependence on light intensity cause the unheated photocatalytic methan

144 ng in thylakoid protein phosphorylation upon light intensity changes, the excitation balance between

145 ed, such as under salt stress or upon sudden light intensity changes.

146 The ability to control reactivity with light intensity combined with the orthogonality of ATRA

147 action potentials while using 9 times lower light intensity compared with other Arch-based voltage s

148 s lost after prolonged incubation under high light intensity conditions.

149 motif that enhances sensitivity to different light intensity contrasts.

150 ere well correlated to the daily average UVB light intensity corrected for light screening incorporat

151 that transcriptional responses to changes in light intensity could occur within seconds, rates for wh

152 hanisms for intensity encoding to a range of light intensities covering 6 log10 units were investigat

153 lysed with a bioluminescent method using the light intensity decay constant.

154 High and low light intensities, delivered via a realistic dynamic flu

155 so exhibited the quadratic increase with the light intensity, demonstrating the effectiveness of the

156 c tract (RHT) was stimulated to simulate the light intensity-dependent discharges of intrinsically ph

157 ange of rod vision is thought to depend upon light intensity-dependent switching between two parallel

158 The formation of NPQ in soq1 was light intensity-dependent, and it exhibited slow relaxat

159 ient light sensor (ALS) of the smartphone as light intensity detector and its LED flash light as an o

160 Here, we present evidence that light intensity determines the subtype of AMPAR that is

161 rent signals exhibit similar patterns to the light-intensity distribution of the waveguide calculated

162 that the recruitment of CI-AMPARs at higher light intensity does not require cone stimulation.

163 exhibits lower WOC cycling efficiency at low light intensities due to a 40% faster charge recombinati

164 re likely to experience caused by changes in light intensity during daylight.

165 a dynamic response to small fluctuations in light intensity during the day.

166 ff cells respond more strongly to changes in light intensity during the subjective night than during

167 the local environment, such as temperature, light intensity, electrochemistry, and mechanical force.

168 xposure of ch1 plants to moderately elevated light intensities eliminated photooxidative damage witho

169 1 mm thick chicken tissue and cartilage, and light intensity enhancements of the same order were also

170 ve fields and preclude any bias toward local light-intensity fluctuations.

171 fibers on a rotating benchtop apparatus, the light intensity from different angles of incident light

172 Animals use vision over a wide range of light intensities, from dim starlight to bright sunshine

173 can be controlled by three parameters: input light intensity, gain and loss amplitude, and input beam

174 es such as heat and drought or cold and high light intensity have profound effects on crop performanc

175 It is demonstrated that the influence of light intensity I can be included in the model in a powe

176 Coding a wide range of light intensities in natural scenes poses a challenge fo

177 chamber experiments irradiated with varying light intensities in order to mimic realistic indoor lig

178 ent-voltage (J-V) characteristics at various light intensities in the BHJ solar cell layer reveals th

179 chiometry, evolutionarily adapted to the low light intensities in the habitat of purple bacteria, is

180 phenotypic growth defects observed under low light intensities in the presence of glucose, whereas un

181 ent to control LH4 expression in response to light intensity in conjunction with other signal transdu

182 ruitment of NMDARs is important for encoding light intensity in retinal ganglion cells.

183 response and 50% modulation of the reflected light intensity in the near infrared part of the spectru

184 rons excited by increments and decrements of light intensity in the visual scene, respectively.

185 The pace of the clock is insensitive to light intensity in YHB plants, indicating that light inp

186 mouse retinas under physiologically relevant light intensities, in an intensity-dependent manner, wit

187 racea L.) over a 24 h period to determine if light intensity (including dark periods) at time of harv

188 axis that desensitizes the eyespot when blue light intensities increase.

189 As background light intensity increased, the RB's role changed from en

190 e transitions from extrinsic to intrinsic as light intensity increases.

191 ON) and outer (OFF) sublayers in response to light intensity increments and decrements, respectively.

192 Changes in light intensity induce a complex set of molecular events

193 nimals estimate visual motion by integrating light intensity information over time and space.

194 s highest level for the 24 h period when the light intensity initially increased, then decreased to i

195 Background light intensity (irradiance) substantially impacts the v

196 ut very high amplitude changes in background light intensity (irradiance).

197 at 25 degrees C, and in parallel under high light intensity irradiation (30 W/m(2)) at 3 different t

198 , an accelerated test carried out under high light intensity irradiation that can be related to norma

199 of total internal reflection, the reflected light intensity is attenuated when the incident frequenc

200 TP production rate as a function of incident light intensity is determined after identifying quinol t

201 with induction/relaxation kinetics (actinic light intensity is fixed and the response is followed ov

202 ole of LHCII phosphorylation upon changes in light intensity is less thoroughly investigated, particu

203 is to respond rapidly to these variations in light intensity is restricted by the relatively slow ope

204 In particular, high light intensity is shown to affect lipid biosynthesis, i

205 by combining the measurement of LCs (actinic light intensity is varied while measuring time is fixed)

206 generating significant photocurrent at white light intensity levels close to ambient daylight conditi

207 ocation in photoreceptors in response to low light intensity levels, and protection from light induce

208 selected leafy vegetables in relation to the light intensity (low and high Photosynthetically Active

209 In adults, IR peaked at light intensities matching irradiation from the evening

210 ostreatus were illuminated with UV-B with a light intensity maximum at 310-320 nm and 11.5 W/m(2) fo

211 modulation of TCP15 activity in vivo by high light intensity may serve to adjust anthocyanin accumula

212 m yielded OH radical peak values at moderate light intensity measured at evenings of 1.8 x 10(6) cm(-

213 s, a situation that is exacerbated at higher light intensity measurements; and (2) that an alternativ

214 s (typically considered to encode background light intensity) modestly over that encountered during s

215 Conversely, higher light intensities, most likely carried by secondary rod

216 hough direction selectivity is robust across light intensities, motion discrimination for OFF signals

217 For this, the applied light intensity must be sufficient to guarantee the stat

218 nt voltage analysis of the EPSC we show that light intensities near RGC threshold, intensities that t

219 ectors with a minimum detectable ultraviolet light intensity of 2.6 photons/mum(2)s at room temperatu

220 min illumination with an 808 nm laser in the light intensity of 4 W/cm(2).

221 At a growth light intensity of 600 mumol m(-2) sec(-1) , the carboxy

222 es a fast tuning time of 0.36 ns, a low pump light intensity of 9.6 muW/mum(2), and a large tunable w

223 tion temperature) in just 0.37 ns with a low light intensity of 95 nW/mum(2), owing to the enhanced b

224 to the enhanced levels of oxygen and excess light intensity of land environments.

225 endence of the response of NPQ to changes in light intensity on the presence and accumulation of zeax

226 addition appears to reinforce the effect of light intensity on the quantity of photoassimilates avai

227 Changes in light intensity or quality induce changes in the reducti

228 rrupted sitting and sitting interrupted with light-intensity or moderate-intensity walking every 20-m

229 tabolism was limiting, such as low CO2, high light intensity, or combined high CO2 and high light int

230 th the LEP 19 GG genotype spent more h/wk in light intensity PA (39.7 +/- 1.6) than A allele carriers

231 where it experiences daily extremes of heat, light intensity (PAR) and high vapour pressure deficit (

232 asil (2777 ppm) occurred around 3h after the light intensity peaked and had low values (165-574 ppm)

233 Light intensity photocurrent measurements, charge select

234 Light intensities (photons s(-1) mum(-2) ) in a natural

235 Above a threshold light intensity, photosynthetic electron transport rates

236 (haze) was measured from the confocal image light intensity profile.

237 accumulation dynamics over a broad range of light intensities proves that the classic Keller-Segel m

238 ilms in microcosms grown under a gradient of light intensities (range: 5-152 mumole photons s(-1) m(-

239 e photoreceptors support vision across large light intensity ranges.

240 Light intensities required to drive behavior were low (a

241 currents at less than one-thousandth of the light intensity required by previously available optogen

242 kinetics at less than one-thousandth of the light intensity required by the most efficient currently

243 The acclimation of plants to changes in light intensity requires rapid responses at several diff

244 thod provides a powerful alternative for low light intensity RESOLFT nanoscopy, which enables biologi

245 es for photosynthetic growth at low and high light intensities, respectively.

246 mitation, quorum sensing, light quality, and light intensity (self-shading) were not the main factors

247 or copious numbers of pair creation requires light intensities several orders of magnitude higher tha

248 sing scheme to quantify consistent reflected light intensity signals under variable lighting and chan

249 A power function (light intensity) simulation of elastic Mie scatter confi

250 cy of electron transport in a broad range of light intensities, simultaneously ensuring high photosyn

251 rotein provides the required nonlinearity at light intensities six orders of magnitude lower than tho

252 Light intensity, spectra, and timing are important for S

253 rescence parameters under a range of actinic light intensities (steady-state fluorescence yields, Ft

254 orine concentration is confirmed by variable light intensity studies, a plausibly suppressed geminate

255 We demonstrate that natural changes in light intensity substantially affect the expression of h

256 rostheses, allowing them to be used at lower light intensities such as those encountered in everyday

257 The OCP-TMR complex was sensitive to the light intensity, temperature, and viscosity of the solve

258 phonull animals is only observed at brighter light intensities that activate melanopsin phototransduc

259 anopsin phototransduction, but not at dimmer light intensities that activate only the rod/cone pathwa

260 Using ultralow light intensities that are well suited for investigating

261 ntrc is highly sensitive to rapidly changing light intensities that probably do not involve the chlor

262 ," a specific nonlinear response function to light intensity that drives algae toward beneficial ligh

263 h after dawn and in response to decreases in light intensity that occurred >10 h after dawn.

264 When grown under fluctuating light intensities, the Arabidopsis MET1 null mutant (met

265 der constant-light conditions, regardless of light intensity, the Flv1 and Flv3 proteins are dispensa

266 At each light intensity, the green laser return intensity (GLRI)

267 Following decreases in light intensity, the rate of accumulation of starch decl

268 For increasing light intensity, the treated pupil started to show reduc

269 sis is accelerated in response to increasing light intensity, thereby enhancing the carbon fixation a

270 e in enabling plants to adapt to fluctuating light intensity through a mechanism distinct from photos

271 s information about fast and slow changes in light intensity through separate neural pathways.

272 an sample more information from naturalistic light intensity time series (NS) than from Gaussian whit

273 it requires no special fluorophores or high light intensities to achieve twice diffraction-limited r

274 leaves from five plant species to increasing light intensities to induce NPQ and de-epoxidation of vi

275 nversion rate and require a 2.5 times higher light intensity to reach maximum photosynthetic efficien

276 al. (2017) show that increases in background light intensity trigger proportional increases in narrow

277 At laser-light intensities typical of conventional wide-field flu

278 At laser-light intensities typical of localization-based nanoscop

279 tures showed two-fold increase in diffracted light intensity under monochromatic light illumination.

280 trees, grasses, and shrubs, under a range of light intensities, using mid-infrared laser spectroscopy

281 urons in the retina signal graded changes in light intensity via sustained release of neurotransmitte

282 equilibria of the two open states depend on light intensity, voltage, and the ionic composition of t

283 hree days of either uninterrupted sitting or light-intensity walking interruptions (n = 5).

284 Light intensity was a strong predictor of pupillary resp

285 Over time (1992-2012), an increase in mean light intensity was found for the ranges of the majority

286 s of starch occurred if the same decrease in light intensity was imposed more than 10 h after dawn.

287 at a chloroplast transcriptional response to light intensity was mediated by SIG5; a chloroplast tran

288 s grown for various times under a variety of light intensities, we demonstrate that AHA2 localization

289 Cultivars capable of higher ETR at midrange light intensities were shown to produce greater leaf are

290 inity as well as orbitally-driven changes in light intensity were all responsible for the observed te

291 The changes in the light intensity were measured by a photodiode at the rea

292 Under low light intensities, where only synaptically driven rod/co

293 rella densities increased monotonically with light intensity, whereas per-host symbiont load and symb

294 mination were measured on plants under a low light intensity, which is considered to affect C4 operat

295 Rods operate in the lower range of light intensities while cones operate at brighter intens

296 Nitrate was correlated to changes in light intensity with a 3h lag time.

297 , rods and cones, which signal increments in light intensity with graded hyperpolarizations.

298 development to integrate photosynthesis and light intensity with requirements for access to water an

299 These responses could be elicited at light intensities within the physiological range and sub

300 target PIF3 degradation under wide ranges of light intensity without affecting the abundance of phyB.