戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ffraction-limited resolution of conventional light microscopy.
2 -throughput neuroanatomy in Drosophila using light microscopy.
3 bril-like structures like those observed via light microscopy.
4  20-60 mum in diameter and readily imaged by light microscopy.
5  and light "tiger tail" banding on polarized light microscopy.
6  from 18 RAs were histologically examined by light microscopy.
7 o changes to the meat matrix were evident by light microscopy.
8 e limited spatial resolution of conventional light microscopy.
9 bronectin-coated microslides, Liu stain, and light microscopy.
10  eosin, periodic acid-Schiff, Congo red, and light microscopy.
11 sualize synapses in identified neurons using light microscopy.
12 90 days, specimens (n = 6) were obtained for light microscopy.
13 esolvable by traditional diffraction-limited light microscopy.
14 ffraction-limited resolution of conventional light microscopy.
15 ta and histopathologic specimens examined by light microscopy.
16 Only 50% of these cases could be detected by light microscopy.
17 icrospheres and could be easily monitored by light microscopy.
18 l and mesenchymal components identifiable by light microscopy.
19       Cytologic analysis was performed using light microscopy.
20 mall to be properly resolved by conventional light microscopy.
21 nd (ii) compare these findings with standard light microscopy.
22 otion estimation of biological structures in light microscopy.
23  during implant placement and analyzed under light microscopy.
24 raphic reconstructions, directly by standard light microscopy.
25 was analyzed by a new method using polarized light microscopy.
26 ing were quantified using special stains and light microscopy.
27 n patterns of MreB-RFP(SW), even by standard light microscopy.
28 alized with conventional and superresolution light microscopy.
29 nd quantified by toluidine blue staining and light microscopy.
30 ested and evaluated by scanning electron and light microscopy.
31  cytoplasmic particle movements" apparent by light microscopy.
32 unction, and retinal damage was evaluated by light microscopy.
33  magnitude gain in the spatial resolution of light microscopy.
34 ice, glomerulomegaly, and minimal changes on light microscopy.
35 luorescent confocal immunohistochemistry and light microscopy.
36 to 96 days postcoital (dpc) were examined by light microscopy.
37 gen fiber orientation, measured by polarized light microscopy.
38  electron analysis in an SEM (qBSE-SEM), and light microscopy.
39 c field of a quadruple electrode array using light microscopy.
40 specific imaging capabilites of fluorescence light microscopy.
41 arasites and be of interest to many users of light microscopy.
42  a reference standard of positive culture or light microscopy.
43 at or below the 250 nm diffraction limit of light microscopy.
44  displacement technique were evaluated using light microscopy.
45 erely restricted by the diffraction limit of light microscopy.
46  visualized in detail by taking advantage of light microscopy.
47 r genetic or exogenous contrast labeling for light microscopy.
48 ba) but had negative results via culture and light microscopy.
49 for analyzing neuronal MT organization using light microscopy.
50 c membranoproliferative pattern of injury on light microscopy.
51 uding proteomics, ionomics, and fluorescence light microscopy.
52 icult to visualize using diffraction-limited light microscopy.
53 deal with practical challenges in biological light microscopy.
54 ion was evaluated with scanning electron and light microscopies.
55 ely to the diffraction limit of conventional light microscopy (200-300 nm).
56 ontrol kidneys appeared relatively normal by light microscopy; 3 of 20 specimens showed focal injury
57 s, and therefore that evaluation by means of light microscopy after hematoxylin and eosin staining mi
58 e examined for the presence of fibrin, using light microscopy after Maurits, Scarlet and Blue stainin
59 spray ionization (nanoDESI), interfaced with light microscopy allows for protein profiling directly o
60                              Superresolution light microscopy allows the imaging of labeled supramole
61 f the 21st century has seen a renaissance in light microscopy and anatomical tract tracing that toget
62  were characterized for size and shape using light microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to es
63 tify single cells in the Drosophila calyx by light microscopy and compared these with cell shapes, sy
64                                              Light microscopy and confocal microscopy were used for i
65 ed analyses done that have used conventional light microscopy and direct IF in diagnosis to document
66 ng new genetic tags developed for correlated light microscopy and electron microscopy (the tetracyste
67                                Here, we used light microscopy and electron microscopy to examine Nest
68              By integrating same-kinetochore light microscopy and electron microscopy, we demonstrate
69 nal histology or visual function as shown by light microscopy and electroretinogram recording, respec
70                                 Quantitative light microscopy and EM revealed that the NL3(R451C) mut
71       Using a combination of high-resolution light microscopy and flow cytometry, we show that the tr
72 rens junction complex assembly in situ using light microscopy and Fluorescence Covariance Analysis.
73   Simultaneous acquisition of phase-contrast light microscopy and fluorescently labeled bacteria, mov
74 echnology, such as combining high resolution light microscopy and genetically encoded Ca(2+) reporter
75                  By using immunofluorescence light microscopy and immunoelectron microscopy, we exami
76 nfluenza B virus infection were evaluated by light microscopy and immunohistochemical assays for infl
77 day 14, and enucleated eyes were analyzed by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry.
78                                  Here we use light microscopy and in vivo immunogold labeling to dire
79 ctroscopic techniques, scanning electron and light microscopy and infrared spectroscopy were used to
80 comedullary-junction tubules by conventional light microscopy and Kim-1 immunostains, respectively (P
81                                  Correlative light microscopy and liquid-phase scanning transmission
82 n distinct tissue regions identified by both light microscopy and MS imaging.
83                                    While our light microscopy and mutant studies show that microtubul
84                    Subdiffraction-resolution light microscopy and negative-staining electron microsco
85                      We used superresolution light microscopy and platinum replica transmission elect
86 he limitations of the official methods (i.e. light microscopy and Polymerase Chain Reaction) suggest
87 n T. gondii tachyzoites, which is visible by light microscopy and possesses a broad similarity to the
88 lasmodium parasitaemia was carried out using light microscopy and qPCR.
89 the 200-nm diffraction limit of conventional light microscopy and reaches a lateral resolution of at
90                                              Light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
91   Morphological evaluation performed by both light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy showed
92 The explants were analyzed quantitatively by light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
93  transformations provide correlation between light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy/FIB.
94 tic because of the axial resolution limit of light microscopy and the difficulty in preserving and an
95 itions for Z-ring assembly with fluorescence light microscopy and then prepared specimens for negativ
96                     Fluorescence microscopy, light microscopy and time domain nuclear magnetic resona
97 ans and should be useful for a wide range of light microscopy and tomography techniques applied to bi
98                   Morphology was assessed by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (T
99 tion, the ciliary epithelium was analyzed by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (T
100            Autophagy was characterized using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy fo
101             Immunostaining was quantified by light microscopy and with a computerized image analysis
102 xylem anatomy and function using fluorescent light microscopy and x-ray computed microtomography.
103 e samples was assessed by bacterial culture, light microscopy, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
104 as observed by scanning electron microscopy, light microscopy, and changes in carbohydrate compositio
105 sites months after the initial presentation, light microscopy, and comprehensive immunohistochemistry
106 onfocal elastography, quantitative polarized light microscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared imaging
107 divisions were examined using tract tracing, light microscopy, and immunoelectron microscopy at four
108 oned at 3 to 4 mm intervals and evaluated by light microscopy, and morphometric analysis was performe
109 rinogen, x-ray crystallography, electron and light microscopy, and other biophysical approaches, has
110 um covering these areas by stereomicroscopy, light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
111              We used microspectrophotometry, light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy to ch
112 s in the corneal epithelium were detected by light microscopy, and the MUC5AC transcript was detected
113  used a combination of molecular techniques, light microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy t
114 nological developments of ophthalmoscopy and light microscopy, and with the introduction of surgical
115 ge, there are two more critical links in the light microscopy approach: labeling and quantitative ana
116                                              Light microscopy approaches aimed to indirectly determin
117 ffraction-limited resolution of conventional light microscopy ( approximately 200-300 nm) has been ov
118               More sensitive techniques than light microscopy are available to analyze the presence o
119             Third, particles identified from light microscopy are compositionally mapped at high defi
120  fibrillar protein aggregates and visible by light microscopy, are responsible for cell death in thes
121 been constrained by the diffraction limit of light microscopy, as the cisternae are only 10-20 nm thi
122 at allow them to be readily distinguished by light microscopy, as well as distinct suites of proteins
123 yo-stage allowing for spinning-disk confocal light microscopy at cryogenic temperatures and describe
124  allowing nearly any protein to be imaged by light microscopy at submicrometer spatial resolution and
125 action limits the resolution of conventional light microscopy at the lateral focal plane to 0.61lambd
126 ructure that is too small to be imaged using light microscopy), but the field of view is limited and
127 38 patients, crystals were not detectable by light microscopy, but they were visible by electron micr
128 the percentage of lymphoblasts detectable by light microscopy by 10-fold in samples of fresh bone mar
129 M), a method for improving the resolution of light microscopy by physically expanding a specimen, has
130 otein) fusions and complementation-activated light microscopy (CALM) for subresolution imaging of ind
131                        However, conventional light microscopy can only achieve a resolution of approx
132                                     Although light microscopy can provide much higher throughput, syn
133 s for detection and typing of HSV, including light microscopy, culture, serology, and nucleic acid-ba
134  tailored to the specific characteristics of light microscopy datasets: super-voxels help registratio
135 e synthesized and characterized by polarized light microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, 2D
136 advances in high-throughput cell analysis by light microscopy, electron microscopy, and flow cytometr
137 y clinical examination, electroretinography, light microscopy, electron microscopy, and TUNEL.
138  with other microscopy techniques, including light microscopy, electron microscopy, cryomicroscopy, a
139 on retinal structure or function examined by light microscopy, electron microscopy, rhodopsin measure
140                           Using quantitative light microscopy, electron tomography, laser-mediated ab
141 oses the gap between electron tomography and light microscopy, enabling both molecular specification
142                                              Light microscopy evaluation confirmed the presence of th
143  were procured after death and processed for light microscopy evaluation.
144                                              Light microscopy examination of blood slides is the main
145                                    Polarized light microscopy experiments not only proved the SCSC na
146 spatiotemporal information from fluorescence light microscopy (fLM) with high-resolution structural d
147                           Using fluorescence light microscopy (fLM), direct stochastic optical recons
148 ies to Hsp60 on H. capsulatum yeast cells by light microscopy, flow cytometry, dynamic light scatteri
149 d discusses several of the major advances in light microscopy for imaging cleared tissue.
150 andard cytochemical biomarkers and polarized light microscopy for microplastic tracking in tissue.
151           Here, we combine the efficiency of light microscopy for revealing cellular functions using
152  describe here a strategy based on polarized light microscopy for the quick and accurate measurement
153 NTB phase has been confirmed using polarized light microscopy, freeze fracture transmission electron
154            Samples were imaged using visible light microscopy fresh, 1-minute and 24-hours post-fixat
155       General eye structure was evaluated by light microscopy, gap junctions were analyzed by electro
156                                           By light microscopy, GPER1-immunoreactivity (IR) was most n
157         However, the imaging of bacteria via light microscopy has been limited by their small sizes.
158                                              Light microscopy has historically been a central method
159                                              Light microscopy has long been an indispensable tool for
160           Since the work of Golgi and Cajal, light microscopy has remained a key tool for neuroscient
161                                              Light microscopy has several features that make it ideal
162 ign and flexibility have enabled its use for light-microscopy, high-content-screening, electron-micro
163 frequently manifested as dots or rings using light microscopy; however, the nature of these structure
164            Conventional and super-resolution light microscopy identified significantly elevated frequ
165                                      Routine light microscopy identifies two distinct epithelial cell
166                Compared with Congo-red-based light microscopy, IEM was equally sensitive (75% to 80%)
167                             Super-resolution light microscopy images of integrin-mediated adhesions h
168                                              Light-microscopy images of the same samples were correla
169 ative PCR (qRT-PCR) confirmed the results of light microscopy immunochemical analysis.
170            Guidelines for the report format, light microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy, electro
171 tion following renal injury as determined by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and intrarenal m
172       Histopathological examination included light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and morphometry.
173        The autopsied eyes were examined with light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and transmission
174 s were preserved in fixative and analyzed by light microscopy/immunostaining or electron microscopy f
175 n all cases, no organisms were identified by light microscopy in any of the 7 specimens.
176 Here I provide a brief introduction to using light microscopy in cell biology, with particular emphas
177 tion there (visualized by silver enhancement light microscopy in combination with transmission electr
178 ne the utility of direct IF and conventional light microscopy in establishing a definitive diagnosis.
179 ny disorders afflict tissues inaccessible to light microscopy in live subjects.
180                                              Light microscopy in one patient demonstrated scarring li
181                                    Polarized light microscopy in Sirius red-stained sections demonstr
182       Morphological changes were observed by light microscopy in the treated cells, which grew as ind
183   The core samples were evaluated by routine light microscopy, including immunohistochemical/immunofl
184                       Alamar blue assays and light microscopy indicate that the compound protects cul
185                                    Polarized light microscopy indicated alterations in collagen fiber
186  dark material observed using phase contrast light microscopy (indicative of a change in refractive i
187 nary microvascular disease was classified by light microscopy into four grades based on thickening of
188       The examination of tissue histology by light microscopy is a fundamental tool for investigating
189                                              Light microscopy is a key tool in modern cell biology.
190             Multi-label electron or confocal light microscopy is required to examine specific types o
191  emerge but brain morphology, as assessed by light microscopy, is still normal.
192 -moving cells on flat surfaces, conventional light microscopy lacks the spatial and temporal resoluti
193 o unique and extremely beneficial aspects of light microscopy: live-cell imaging in multiple colors.
194  multiscale imaging studies using correlated light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) techn
195 o separate microscope platforms: fluorescent light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM).
196 ermeabilization, thereby enabling correlated light microscopy (LM) and EM studies.
197 eri-implantitis biopsies were analyzed using light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (
198                We conducted super-resolution light microscopy (LM) imaging of the distribution of rya
199 y culture or fungal structures identified by light microscopy (LM) of scrape material, histopathology
200      Iridocorneal angles were examined using light microscopy (LM), immunofluorescence (IF), and tran
201      Iridocorneal angles were examined using light microscopy (LM).
202 uits, including electron microscopy (EM) and light microscopy (LM).
203 ft tissue interface were carried out using a light-microscopy (LM) examination of ground sections and
204 because the nucleolinus is easily visible by light microscopy, making it accessible by laser microsur
205 large carotenoid crystals clearly visible by light microscopy, mango and papaya contained different t
206 e processing including: electron microscopy, light microscopy, medical X-ray imaging, astronomy, etc.
207 hotography, subjective clinical improvement, light microscopy, melanin index, reflectance spectroscop
208 hores, we developed a two-color fluorescence light microscopy method that measures average label sepa
209               We developed a high-throughput light microscopy method, validated by electron microscop
210                                          Low-light microscopy methods are receiving increased attenti
211 o enable clearing and 3D tissue imaging with light microscopy methods, we developed a colorimetric, n
212 rther study from bright-field and dark-field light-microscopy modes, respectively.
213                                           On light microscopy, no significant differences were found
214  recent development of super-resolution (SR) light microscopy now allows the visualisation of viral s
215 erent neoplasms, and for correlation between light microscopy observations and computerized image ana
216  tomography scanning of intact livers and by light microscopy of hepatic tissue, hepatic cystic volum
217                                              Light microscopy of immunostained TbHrg indicated locali
218 tion, enzyme assays, chlorophyll content and light microscopy of leaves were used to characterize acc
219                                      SEM and light microscopy of M. penetrans and M. iowae showed the
220                             Super-resolution light microscopy of mutants, cryo-electron tomography, b
221                           Standard gross and light microscopy of specimens, complete histopathologic
222  transport in combination with the polarized light microscopy of structural domains in mesoscopic LAO
223                                    Preceding light microscopy of the living cells allowed correlating
224 emonstrate direct, real-time observations by light microscopy of the pathway to helical microtubules
225 der of magnitude better than achievable with light microscopy on pristine cells.
226  the biopsy yielded at least 10 glomeruli at light microscopy, one glomerulus at immunofluorescence m
227 s advice on how to identify microcrystals by light microscopy or by negative-stain electron microscop
228 iled to detect the presence of endospores by light microscopy or by testing for heat-resistant colony
229 y and--being designed almost exclusively for light microscopy or electrophysiology studies--seldom in
230 variable expanses of empty tubule as seen by light microscopy or EM.
231 ions: either histological sections imaged by light microscopy, or electron micrographs of single ultr
232  chondrocytes using fluorescence microscopy, light microscopy, or immunoassay, respectively.
233 examination of two smears with Ziehl-Neelsen light microscopy over 2 days, examination of two smears
234                                           By light microscopy, pDOR-immunoreactivity (ir) was located
235                           Recent advances in light microscopy permit visualization of the behavior of
236 to conduct a clinicopathologic and polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis of 14 new I-RLs and comp
237 ensile stress-strain curves and polarization light microscopy (PLM) of the polymer electrolyte film r
238 ive real-time polymerase chain reaction- and light microscopy-positive P. vivax reinfections by 44% (
239 is about as wide as the theoretical limit of light microscopy, quantitatively measuring the localizat
240 laria in pregnancy was not confirmed by PCR, light microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, or histology.
241                                           In light microscopy, refractive index mismatches between me
242          Although bone marrow aspiration and light microscopy remain the current standard of care for
243 ria is endemic and are often undetectable by light microscopy, rendering their study in human populat
244 ochemistry by autofluorescence and polarized light microscopy, respectively.
245 rganisms in deep ulcers in which culture and light microscopy results were negative.
246 d on synchrotron X-ray data and transmission light microscopy results, we present evidence for a two-
247             Live-imaging approaches based on light microscopy reveal the intricate dynamics of this p
248                                 Quantitative light microscopy revealed a significant increase in pDOR
249                                              Light microscopy revealed clear healing of the corneal e
250                                    Polarized light microscopy revealed large amounts of birefringent
251 ng produced micropores in the cell walls and light microscopy revealed that NaOH steeping increased d
252                      Time-lapse fluorescence light microscopy reveals that sheaths of the type VI sec
253 al, several analytical techniques (reflected light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with ener
254 136 nonatherosclerotic swine and examined by light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, pharmaco
255                                              Light microscopy showed loss of normal stromal collagen
256                                              Light microscopy showed on average 97% osteoblastic grow
257 calized with virus budding structures, while light microscopy showed that they excluded a freely diff
258                       SEM analysis confirmed light microscopy similar cellular adhesion and osteoblas
259  Dermal-epidermal separation was assessed by light microscopy studies and quantified using Fiji softw
260 d around the cartwheel, and super-resolution light microscopy studies have measured the average radii
261                                              Light microscopy studies showed marked edema of the papi
262          Research modalities include various light microscopy techniques (confocal, multiphoton, tota
263                        Existing electron and light microscopy techniques are limited either in molecu
264 on Mass Spectrometry (NanoSIMS) approach and light microscopy techniques to follow formation of NR by
265 reflection (DFSR) are advanced but expensive light microscopy techniques with limited availability.
266 able, we provide guidance for using standard light microscopy techniques, as well as recommending sta
267 nctional analysis with standard and advanced light microscopy techniques.
268                Here, we show by quantitative light microscopy that the protein abundance of NHE6 is d
269                              In the field of light microscopy, the Bio-Formats library was designed t
270                               In addition to light microscopy, the majority of the biopsies were asse
271 e has drastically improved the resolution of light microscopy to approximately 10 nm, thus creating e
272 ctions were viewed under epifluorescence and light microscopy to detect FR-labeled neurons containing
273 d serial block-face electron microscopy with light microscopy to determine the cell types targeted by
274 t synchrotron X-ray imaging and transmission light microscopy to directly visualize internal soft-tis
275    Test and control groups were monitored by light microscopy to evaluate cellular growth.
276 l electron microscopy, electrophysiology and light microscopy to illustrate the wiring patterns in mo
277 ns were studied by confocal and conventional light microscopy to quantify hair cells, cochlear neuron
278 P-MS), transmission electron microscopy, and light microscopy to quantify, localize, and assess the e
279 th energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and light microscopy to quantify, localize, and assess the e
280        Electroretinography (ERG), histology, light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and
281 e opsin expression in B. mysticetus, whereas light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and
282     Autopsy tissue samples were evaluated by light microscopy, Warthin-Starry stain, immunohistochemi
283 the number of fractures per scaffold seen on light microscopy was 6.0 (5.0-10.5) when overexpanded 1.
284 ickness were measured for all specimens, and light microscopy was performed for those surviving surge
285                                              Light microscopy was used to evaluate specimens for infl
286                                    Polarized light microscopy was used to localize crystallinity indu
287                       In parallel, polarized light microscopy was used to observe the microstructure.
288 ching reconstructed neurons to examples from light microscopy, we assigned neurons to cell types and
289 h cells are easy to identify and quantify by light microscopy, we evaluated the mean number of Paneth
290 cerevisiae Using cell-free fusion assays and light microscopy, we find that GTPase activation and tra
291  tag for electron microscopy and ratiometric light microscopy, we go on to show that bulk membrane pr
292 EM, electron tomography, and superresolution light microscopy, we have analyzed the spatial architect
293                    The changes observed with light microscopy were typical of FSGS and were morpholog
294        E. coli filamentation was observed by light microscopy when cells were grown in the presence o
295                The approach was designed for light microscopy, which is compatible with the mild fixa
296 tion is below the resolution of conventional light microscopy, which makes analysis of these interact
297               Comparison of our results from light microscopy with a mathematical model suggests that
298              Here, we combine photoactivated light microscopy with quantitative statistical analysis
299 enty years there have been great advances in light microscopy with the result that multidimensional i
300 ividual virus-associated objects observed in light microscopy with ultrastructural features seen by e

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top