ライフサイエンスコーパス: light perception

1 t last follow-up was 20/400 (range, 20/30-no light perception).

2 visual acuity of 20/100 (range, 20/20 to no light perception).

3 reased to a median 20/40 (range, 20/20 to no light perception).

4 20/1000), and total blindness (20/1250 to no light perception).

5 ation of the primary cilium, specialized for light perception.

6 Presenting VA ranged from 7/200 to no light perception.

7 tes FT expression downstream of red and blue light perception.

8 e of a phytochrome sensor domain involved in light perception.

9 dent on shoot-derived signals resulting from light perception.

10 retinal degeneration where mutations affect light perception.

11 ents' visual acuity ranged from 20/200 to no light perception.

12 typically triggered by phytochrome-dependent light perception.

13 001), although 3.1% (n = 9) progressed to no light perception.

14 ng 201 cases with initial acuity better than light perception.

15 coma surgery (including needling) or loss of light perception.

16 COP1/SPA complex by phyA- and phyB-mediated light perception.

17 lue band peaked at 2.8 eV resulting in white light perception.

18 6 patients with visual acuity no better than light perception.

19 sual acuity ranged from hand movements to no light perception.

20 ons, de novo glaucoma procedures, or loss of light perception.

21 surgery, repeat glaucoma surgery, or loss of light perception.

22 uction strongly suggests impaired non-visual light perception.

23 s, 3 of whom had a final visual acuity of no light perception.

24 inal visual acuities ranged from 20/30 to no light perception.

25 Visual acuity in LE was no light perception.

26 opped DSAEK graft range from very good to no light perception.

27 Visual acuities ranged from 20/25 to light perception.

28 Visual acuities ranged from 20/40 to light perception.

29 superfamily to act as reversible switches in light perception.

30 here were also significantly fewer eyes with light perception (6.7%; n = 19; P < .0001), although 3.1

31 This light perception ability requires the activities of prot

32 PAS-domain regions of molecules involved in light perception and circadian rhythmicity in several or

33 ow these two regulatory mechanisms depend on light perception and interact with each other has yet to

34 metabolism, extracts of mutants defective in light perception and light responses were analyzed for p

35 The expression of several genes involved in light perception and signaling is altered in the high or

36 lecular mechanism by which they might impact light perception and signaling.

37 Light perception and temporal resolution with the implan

38 A mechanism for integrating light perception and the endogenous circadian clock is c

39 re, we give an overview of the mechanisms of light perception and the subsequent regulation of nuclea

40 osa (RP), remaining vision no more than bare light perception, and an implanted Argus II epiretinal p

41 abiotic stress, transcriptional regulation, light perception, and development.

42 On neurological examination, he had no light perception bilaterally.

43 lection of biliproteins that enable cellular light perception by photoconverting between a red-light-

44 e most frequently cited sensations included: light perception, changes in light brightness, movements

45 ypotony, explantation of implant, or loss of light perception compared with 22 eyes (47% of failures)

46 During follow-up, no light perception developed in 17 cases (11.6%), mostly a

47 d from retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and with no light perception each received a chronically implanted o

48 Following the initial light-perception event, the phytochromes initiate a sign

49 len equivalent 20/3000-20/4000, range 20/400-light perception); final BCVA was 0.318 (Snellen equival

50 9 (Snellen equivalent 20/347, range 20/60 to light perception); final median BCVA was logMAR 0.301 (S

51 1 (Snellen equivalent 20/400, range 20/20 to light perception); final median BCVA was logMAR 0.477 (S

52 excludes the hypocotyl apex as the site for light perception for phototropism and shows that phot1-m

53 of severity: from mild visual acuity loss to light perception; from full kinetic fields with relative

54 Final vision improved to Light perception/ Hand movement (LP/HM) in 2(7.4%) eyes,

55 al acuities of no light perception (NLP) and light perception/hand motion (LP/HM), respectively.

56 three classes of photoreceptors that mediate light perception have been characterized at the molecula

57 axis impingement, and 5% of patients had no light perception in 1 or both eyes.

58 20/200 or better in 12 patients (33%) and no light perception in 11 of 36 patients (31%).

59 13% (2/16), >/=20/400 in 50% (8/16), and no light perception in 25% (4/16).

60 ved in relevant biological functions such as light perception in plants and as protective agents agai

61 mes are multidomain photoswitches that drive light perception in plants and microorganisms by couplin

62 family of photoreceptors responsible for red light perception in plants, fungi and bacteria.

63 ease resistance, protein phosphorylation and light perception, including the phytochrome (Phy) A and

64 The first step toward light perception is 11-cis to all-trans photoisomerizati

65 No light perception is a devastating but uncommon outcome o

66 The first event in light perception is absorption of a photon by an opsin p

67 The first event in light perception is absorption of a photon by the retina

68 Our data show that in these fungi, light perception is accomplished by the function of a no

69 pendently of the degree of childhood vision, light perception level, or Braille reading.

70 Light perception liberates their protein kinase domain f

71 c patients who presented with vision of only light perception (LP) had better visual results with imm

72 ne, the change in vision in OD improved from light perception (LP) to counting fingers (CF).

73 Eight patients with bare light perception (LP) vision due to retinitis pigmentosa

74 ecorded before surgery ranged from 20/600 to light perception (LP), and vision in 2 eyes was fix and

75 eye was 20/40 to 20/60 (n = 5) or 20/400 to light perception (n = 3).

76 76% and 14% had final visual acuities of no light perception (NLP) and light perception/hand motion

77 His bilateral visual acuity was no light perception (NLP) despite prescribed IV erythropoie

78 es varied from 20/200 in the best eye, to no light perception (NLP) in each eye.

79 An eye injury that causes no light perception (NLP) typically carries an unfavorable

80 s, and clinical course of eyes developing no light perception (NLP) visual acuity (VA) following Bost

81 visual acuity and 8 of 36 eyes (22%) had no light perception (NLP).

82 ith open globe injury 27 (15.7%) eyes had no light perception (NLP).

83 tients have an increased sensitivity to blue light; perception of blue light is mediated by what is n

84 l acuity was variable, ranging from 6/7.5 to light perception on initial presentation to the oncology

85 However, patients who presented with light-perception-only visual acuity had substantial bene

86 erval [CI], 0.32/EY to 1.22/EY); the rate of light perception or no light perception vision was 0.07/

87 Blind subjects (bare light perception or worse in both eyes) with retinitis p

88 99 eyes (47%) had a visual acuity of light perception or worse.

89 our of 15 cases had loss of visual acuity to light perception or worse.

90 Together with light perception, oxygen sensing therefore allows an int

91 77 (Snellen equivalent 20/60, range 20/20 to light perception, P < .001).

92 ellen equivalent of 20/40-20/50, range 20/20-light perception, P < .001).

93 ponsive growth by integrating the clock with light perception pathways through modulating daily phyB-

94 either phytochrome- or cryptochrome-mediated light perception prevents damping of the oscillations in

95 Loss of light perception, requirement for additional glaucoma su

96 Argus II System in patients with bare or no light perception resulting from end-stage RP.

97 r-UV to blue light and a common mechanism of light perception: reversible photoisomerization of the b

98 Regarding treatment, all patients with light perception should receive pars plana vitrectomy, w

99 born without eyes and thus deprived from all light perception since conception.

100 ity during last follow-up was 20/231 (range, light perception to 20/20).

101 e of presentation was variable, ranging from light perception to 20/20.

102 fingers to 20/100, hand motion to 20/5, and light perception to 20/80, as suggested by the endoscopy

103 t the cellular signaling cascades connecting light perception to cell cycle activation and progressio

104 argue that COL7 is a critical factor linking light perception to changes in auxin level in Arabidopsi

105 can allow RP patients with no more than bare light perception to guide fine hand movement visually.

106 Visual acuity was light perception to hand movements (n = 18) and 20/50 to

107 e guard-cell-signaling pathway coupling blue light perception to ion channel activity is relatively w

108 ciated, performs a critical role in coupling light perception to signal transduction by plant phytoch

109 the signal transduction pathway linking blue light perception to the induction of GSAT mRNA.

110 ation experiments have localized the site of light perception to the upper hypocotyl.

111 Here, we determined that light perception triggers a switch between two different

112 repair of severely traumatized eyes with no light perception vision as preoperative visual acuity.

113 1.22/EY); the rate of light perception or no light perception vision was 0.07/EY (95% CI, 0.02/EY to

114 Hg, additional glaucoma surgery, or loss of light perception vision).

115 r less, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision.

116 mHg, no reoperation for glaucoma, no loss of light-perception vision).

117 nstitutionalized US population with at least light-perception vision.

118 The interaction of light perception with development is the subject of inte

119 nown about the molecular events that connect light perception with increased growth in shade avoidanc

120 iving, recognition tasks, and assessments of light perception with the implant ON compared with OFF.