ライフサイエンスコーパス: lightness

1 as concomitant with the highest L( *)-value (lightness).

2 ced muscle pH, cathepsin activity and fillet lightness.

3 achieve accurate and invariant judgments of lightness.

4 eports of simple surface attributes, such as lightness.

5 for logarithm NFX concentration against Hue+Lightness.

6 minance onto a much smaller range of surface lightness.

7 s, such as viscoelastic behaviour, colour L (lightness), -a(*) (greenness), b(*) (yellowness), DeltaE

8 nsumer characteristics in terms of increased lightness and decreased red and yellow color components.

9 n animals suggest that the perception of the lightness and depth of visual surfaces develops through

10 sed a( *) (red/green), colour saturation and lightness and increased b( *) (yellow/blue), and hue ang

11 es, raisining decreases a(*) (red/green) and lightness and increases b( *) (yellow/blue), colour satu

12 Lightness and redness values gradually decreased over ti

13 tional influences related to categorical and lightness and saturation factors, the model explains mor

14 r in loaf volume and coloured, and had lower lightness and white index values.

15 Lightness and yellowish color were intensified in the NC

16 Color, luminance ("perceived lightness") and pattern information have never been simu

17 ng depth discontinuities to infer the depth, lightness, and opacity of stereoscopically viewed surfac

18 biguous visual stimuli, in which percepts of lightness/brightness are determined by the probabilistic

19 wer differences in colourimetric properties (lightness, chroma and hue angle) under darkness and 4 de

20 such as edge detection, image segmentation, lightness computation and estimation of three-dimensiona

21 This perceptual lightness constancy is thought to be important behaviora

22 It also suggests that lightness constancy, which is sometimes thought to invol

23 grays in a counterbalanced sequence in which lightness cues were irrelevant.

24 , 18, 19] and a variant that led to a weaker lightness effect, as well as a pattern with actual lumin

25 The lightness effects did not occur in the absence of enclos

26 challenge models that account for perceived lightness entirely through the action of image-encoding

27 ecting a color that differs in saturation or lightness from distractors are much less selective than

28 ata rule out theories that predict perceived lightness from luminance ratios or Weber contrast.

29 Lightness, greenness and yellowness of LHA dried sample

30 The range of perceived surface reflectance (lightness), however, can be well approximated by the Mun

31 isual cortex carry information about surface lightness in addition to information about form.

32 Under noisy conditions, lightness induction alters visually completed shape.

33 When lightness induction was minimized, luminance noise had n

34 ackground-a process sometimes referred to as lightness induction.

35 t experiments suggest that our perception of lightness involves a sophisticated interpretation of ill

36 Lightness is the apparent reflectance of a surface, and

37 cs apple and grass, and higher values of the lightness L( *) in filtered samples).

38 The lightness 'L' of flour decreased from 88.48 (unroasted)

39 The lightness 'L' of flour decreased significantly (p0.05) f

40 We characterized how the luminance-to-lightness mapping changes with stimulus context.

41 the luminance of the fixated region and the lightness match for the whole object.

42 the loaves after cooking and an increase of lightness of crumb with respect to the control was obser

43 to the success of the folding process is the lightness of the chain.

44 Despite this, the perceived lightness of the objects generally remains constant.

45 nt light reflect the perceived brightness or lightness of the scene and not simply the amount of phys

46 The perceptions of lightness or brightness elicited by a visual target are

47 ants while they observed visual illusions of lightness or brightness.

48 n to many different approaches to brightness/lightness phenomena; furthermore, object-size representa

49 The cortical mechanisms of lightness processing are largely unknown, and the role o

50 Lightness range (DeltaL*) for all groups together was 26

51 two groups arose mainly from differences in lightness, rather than chromaticity of the colours they

52 ng was accompanied by noticeable decrease in lightness, red/yellow color and total color change.

53 ge of 5,905:1 can be mapped onto an extended lightness scale that has a reflectance range of 100:1.

54 varied according to perceived brightness and lightness strength.

55 The relevance of lightness to two-dimensional shape completion supplies a

56 The lightness value L( *) and yellowness value b( *) indicat

57 We studied the cortical responses to lightness variations in early stages of the human visual

58 x (V1), is correlated with context-dependent lightness variations.

59 a gaze-contingent display setup, the matched lightness was higher when observers fixated bright regio

60 of the collected image (Hue, Saturation and Lightness) were obtained by simple image management (ena