ライフサイエンスコーパス: limit of

1 Indeed, the upper annual limit of 0.25 mg/m(3) has been nearly reached during th

2 (90.14microA/(U/mL)/cm(2)) with a detection limit of 0.00113UmL(-1) concentration.

3 nge of 0.001-10.2ngmL(-1), the low detection limit of 0.001ngmL(-1), and high sensitivity of 12.044mi

4 e of 0.05-0.40microgmL(-1), with a detection limit of 0.042microgmL(-1).

5 range of 0.5-5.0microgL(-1) with a detection limit of 0.09microgL(-1) and quantification limit of 0.3

6 n the range of 0.5-1000 nM, with a detection limit of 0.18 nM, which is 5 orders of magnitude lower t

7 of 0.14muAng(-1)ml and a very low detection limit of 0.21ngml(-1) (very lower than the clinical cut-

8 g(+)) over other metal ions with a detection limit of 0.25 muM in an aqueous system.

9 tration range 1aM to 1nM and a low detection limit of 0.2aM.

10 Consequently, the detection limit of 0.2muM and good stability (4 months) were achie

11 o the analyte concentration with a detection limit of 0.2ppb.

12 limit of 0.09microgL(-1) and quantification limit of 0.3microgL(-1).

13 ibited an extremely low calculated detection limit of 0.5fg/mL with wide linear range 1.0fg/mL to 1.0

14 ymerase chain reaction (PCR), to parasitemia limits of 0.02 parasite/microL and 0.78 parasite/microL

15 values that exceed the traditional materials limits of 0.6 and 0.8, respectively.

16 ty of 191.6 muA mM(-1)cm(-2) and a detection limit of 1.1 x 10(-3) mM.

17 0(-4) to 6x10(-3)mg L(-1) with the detection limit of 1.3x10(-4)mgL(-1).

18 tions from 2.2nM to 4.64muM with a detection limit of 1.4nM (S/N = 3).

19 range from 3 mM to 100 mM with the detection limit of 1.5 mM; response time is 2-3 min.

20 amic range of 5-150mugL(-1) with a detection limit of 1.5mugL(-1) and an enrichment factor of 100.

21 .0pgmL(-1) and 20.0ngmL(-1) with a detection limit of 1.756pgmL(-1) (S/N=3).

22 of uranyl in a few minutes with a detection limit of 1.95 ppb.

23 vels comparable to current worker population limits of 1 x 10(-6) mg/m(3).

24 10(7) cfu mL(-1) which resulted in detection limits of 1.99 x 10(4) cfu mL(-1) and 50 cfu mL(-1), res

25 uifer to below the World Health Organization limit of 10 mug/L.

26 cal samples, where we achieved the detection limit of 10(3) copies/ml as compared to 10(4) copies/ml

27 on measured by BLI, with a minimum detection limit of 10(7) bacteria.

28 ial pulse voltammetric analysis, a detection limit of 100 pM with a detection range from 100 pM to 3.

29 erential pulse voltammetry reveals detection limits of 100 muM for GSH and 8.3 muM for GSSG, respecti

30 ies against PfLDH or PfIDEh showed detection limits of 100-200 parasites/microL and 200-400 parasites

31 37.1 +/- 2.4 ng mL(-1) (n = 9), a detection limit of 11.1 ng mL(-1), and a dynamic range from 17.3 t

32 range from 50.0fM to 1.0nM with a detection limit of 15fM.

33 and 14.4 muA muM(-1) cm(-2), with detection limits of 18.1 +/- 1.22 and 1.38 +/- 0.139 nM, respectiv

34 The biosensor displayed a low detection limit of 1microM/L with a wide working range of 2-80micr

35 centration decade, with the lowest detection limit of 1x10(2)cells/mL.

36 ion of thrombin in solution with a detection limit of 2.27aM.

37 o 4.1x10(-7)M (R(2)=0.9987) with a detection limit of 2.5x10(-9)M.

38 from 0.01 to 1.0ngmL(-1) and had a detection limit of 2.6pgmL(-1) with an incubation time of 15min.

39 of 1x10(2) to 1x10(6)cellsml(-1), detection limit of 20cellsml(-1) with incubation time of 20min for

40 tration range of 2-12mM with a low detection limit of 25microm.

41 (6) cells/mL, respectively, with a detection limit of 2cells/mL.

42 es higher than 72%, achieving quantification limits of 2mugkg(-1), therefore below maximum residue li

43 m 19 to 190nM (R(2) = 0.99) with a detection limit of 2nM.

44 sor chip to detect cortisol with a detection limit of 3 pg/mL was achieved by conjugating anticortiso

45 critical thickness can reach the theoretical limit of 3.5 unit cells.

46 ous determination of A and G, with detection limits of 3.48 and 1.59nM, respectively.

47 for A and 0.01-25.0muM for G with detection limits of 3.90 and 1.58nM for A and G, respectively.

48 ation coefficient of (0.998) and a detection limit of (3.2x10(-10)molL(-1)).

49 A conservative estimate places a lower limit of 345 +/- 70 PgC year(-1) on the cycling flux bet

50 proportional in response with the detection limit of 377nM.

51 rong quenching efficiency with the detection limit of 39 or 48 ppb along with other nitroaromatics su

52 mean power consumption of 1.8 W, a detection limit of 40 nM, a dynamic range of 0.14-10 muM, and an i

53 nsitivity towards malathion with a detection limit of 4pM.

54 fold preconcentration factor and a detection limit of 5.0ng/L were achieved.

55 ere in all cases within permitted Regulatory limits of 500 or 1000microg.kg(-1) in fishery products a

56 range of 20-160microgL(-1) with a detection limit of 6.4microgL(-1) and excellent recognition specif

57 The F6P-biosensor demonstrates a detection limit of 6.6 fM and high selectivity when compared to ot

58 fast recognition for CN(-) with a detection limit of 6.8 muM.

59 ar range from 0.1-1600microm and a detection limit of 60nM with a sensitivity of 0.172microAmicroM(-1

60 nce interval contained within the confidence limits of 80.00% and 125.00%.

61 Exploiting these capabilities, a detection limit of 800 attomolar (aM) is achieved without target a

62 orbed particles and surrounding fluid in the limit of a low surface coverage, which can be used to ex

63 onization mass spectrometry with a detection limit of about 10(4)-10(5) molecules cm(-3).

64 t fibers, which operate at the physiological limit of action potential generation, precision, and spe

65 heavily myelinated and operates at the upper limits of action potential generation frequency and spee

66 elation coefficient (CCC) was 0.785; and the limit of agreement (LOA; mean difference +/-2 standard d

67 Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to evaluate agreemen

68 s 66.9% (mean absolute difference 19.6%, 95% limits of agreement 4.3 to 35.1%).

69 Bias and limits of agreement for temperature using zero-heat-flux

70 nt bias was 1.47% (95% CI, -2.5 to 5.4) with limits of agreement of upper equal to 33.4% (95% CI, 26.

71 Ninety-five percent limits of agreement were calculated in a pairwise fashio

72 wer than Goldmann applanation tonometry (95% limits of agreement, -3.48 to 8.80 mm Hg).

73 6 texture features, and mean difference, 95% limits of agreement, within-subject coefficient of varia

74 and the three reviewers were within the 95% limits of agreement.

75 y can enumerate AuNPs with a lower detection limit of approximately 10 AuNPs (3 nm core size) in a si

76 g a significant improvement on the detection limit of approximately two orders of magnitude, compared

77 r scattering rates determine the fundamental limits of carrier transport and electronic coherence.

78 bral saturation >15%) and explored the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation at patient and populati

79 l quantitative analysis, which has its lower limit of chromatographic resolution Rs at some minimum c

80 ds directly at the PCB surface with improved limit of detection ( 10 pg/mL) over standard colorimetri

81 mentation, fast signal transduction, and low limit of detection (0.12 ppm) are some of the key merits

82 ace coupled to ESI-MS along with an improved limit of detection (10-fold enhancement, 100 picomole) i

83 sensitivity (- 0.27microAcm(-2)mM(-1)), low limit of detection (126microM) and long lineal range (2-

84 6+/-7%), precision (98%), correctness (99%), limit of detection (3.9mg/L), limit of quantification (1

85 g mL(-1), and C = 15.1 9 nA/mug mL(-1)), low limit of detection (G, A = 0.5 mug mL(-1); T, C = 1.0 mu

86 rated excellent reproducibility at the lower limit of detection (LLOD).

87 The assay limit of detection (LOD) and dynamic range were determin

88 The assay limit of detection (LOD) and dynamic range were determin

89 ptimized specimen processing to maximize the limit of detection (LOD) by matrix-assisted laser desorp

90 can tailor the assay effectiveness improving limit of detection (LOD) down to 10CFUmL(-1) of E. coli

91 n terms of response value, response time and limit of detection (LOD) for each platform.

92 The most sensitive sensor has a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.11 mug/L and the upper det

93 The methodology achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.12 pM (3.0 attomoles) for

94 this system exhibits high sensitivity with a limit of detection (LOD) of 21.1ngmL(-1), wide linearity

95 The device exhibited a limit of detection (LOD) of 3.4x10(6)EVs/microL when ant

96 selective electrical detection of CEA with a limit of detection (LOD) of less than 100pg/ml.

97 nce its catalytic activity, sensitivity, and limit of detection (LOD) to NO(*).

98 f Ti level with 0.985 of R(2) and 33.9ppm of limit of detection (LOD) value, while PLS has 0.989 of R

99 ensitivity of 11.86nm/microM and 28nM as the limit of detection (LOD).

100 red all 4 hs-cTnI-based rule-out strategies: limit of detection (LOD, hs-cTnI<2 ng/L), single cutoff

101 thod demonstrated excellent linearity with a limit of detection 0.004mug/ml.

102 operation mode, the platform can attain the limit of detection 0.3ng/mL (1.5pM) for ERBB2 in cell ly

103 gadolinium enhancement (>/=7.42 ng/L versus <limit of detection [<3 ng/L]; adjusted odds ratio, 2.87;

104 Limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.1

105 % increase in sensitivity, a 50% decrease in limit of detection and minimally altered electrode kinet

106 from 540 to 580nm; the linear range and the limit of detection are 30-1000microM and 24.9microM, res

107 sensitivity of 0.082 mu A/mu M/cm (2) with a limit of detection as low as 3.2 +/- 0.1nM.

108 filtering automatically determined the lower limit of detection based on the strength of the PpIX spe

109 he sensor was 40.0-1100.0 femtomolar and the limit of detection calculated as 13.0 femtomolar.

110 y and demonstrate a 1300-fold improvement in limit of detection compared to a standard immunoassay, i

111 igh sensitivity of 340.8microAmicroM(-1) and limit of detection corresponding to 0.11nM was achieved.

112 he collision frequency, f, increases and the limit of detection decreases.

113 .98) to the target DNA concentration, with a limit of detection down to 260 fM (260 x 10(-15) M), two

114 wn to increase the sensitivity and lower the limit of detection for DA compared to bare CFEs.

115 The limit of detection for Pam3CSK4 attained was 7.5 mug/mL,

116 The limit of detection for these peptides was less than 50 a

117 A single hs-cTnT concentration below the limit of detection in combination with a nonischemic ECG

118 tection response from 0.01pg/mL to 2pg/mL, a limit of detection LOD of 3.7 fg/mL and a limit of quant

119 The oxidation potential and limit of detection obtained using this sensor are much s

120 e presence of KI in artificial saliva with a limit of detection of 3 x 10(-8) capital EM, Cyrillic.

121 25 to 124.3muM and 124.3muM to 1.67mM with a limit of detection of 0.15muM.

122 A limit of detection of 0.2 ng/mL (3.3 pM) capsid proteins

123 y shows an IC50 of 4.5 +/- 1.2 ng/mL, with a limit of detection of 0.2 ng/mL, comparable to GC/MS.

124 1), sensitivity of 0.012muALmumol(-1), and a limit of detection of 0.21mumolL(-1) for TBHQ, under opt

125 ive concentration of TNT, giving an averaged limit of detection of 0.37 mug/mL (aqueous phase concent

126 ighly sensitive and specific for SPy, with a limit of detection of 0.4ngL(-1).

127 cs with good linearity of 1aM to 1pM and low limit of detection of 0.5aM.

128 The proposed device showed a limit of detection of 0.65pM for the complementary ssDNA

129 ar range that spans from 1microM to 10mM and limit of detection of 10(-6.2)M.

130 ne to human error and infection risk, with a limit of detection of 10(4) cells/mL.

131 ed that the developed system could achieve a limit of detection of 10ng/mL, comparable to a sophistic

132 tio, with a dynamic range of 0-1000 nM and a limit of detection of 112 nM.

133 e range 50nM to 0.5muM and 0.5-35muM, with a limit of detection of 12.8nM.

134 The GC/N-CDs electrode shows the limit of detection of 13x10(-10)M (S/N=3) and the sensit

135 globin (HbS) in newborn blood samples with a limit of detection of 2% HbS.

136 e measured with a high reproducibility and a limit of detection of 2.05 pg.mL(-1).

137 uman plasma with same high sensitivity and a limit of detection of 2.3aM.

138 multiple patient outbreak isolates and had a limit of detection of 3.40 +/- 0.20 log10 genomic copies

139 direct immunoassay of urine samples, with a limit of detection of 300 colony forming units (CFU)/mL

140 cDNA molecules of L-gene Ebola virus with a limit of detection of 33 cDNA molecules.

141 The method achieved a limit of detection of 9.8pg of soybean DNA (8.6 copies),

142 Use of this framework was shown to lower the limit of detection of an influenza A nucleoprotein immun

143 Using this system, the limit of detection of S. typhimurium was found to be 10(

144 The limit of detection of the proposed procedure was 3.10(-8

145 It is also capable of improving the limit of detection of the sensors by an order of magnitu

146 The limit of detection of this regime is defined with a seco

147 ) may amplify the SPR signal and improve the limit of detection to the desired sensitivity.

148 Limit of detection was 0.015microgL(-1).

149 of testosterone from 0muM to 280muM and the limit of detection was 0.51muM.

150 The limit of detection was 2.35mgg(-1) and the precision, ev

151 After 1000x dilution, the limit of detection was lowered 500-fold (0.22 mug/mL) an

152 oped microfluidic chip within 30min, and the limit of detection was only 11 copies with a volume of 3

153 standard deviation, adsorption capacity and limit of detection were 2.3%, 80.0mgg(-1) and 0.31mugL(-

154 to 20 ng/m(3) for chlorpyrifos-oxon, < LOD (limit of detection) to 7.3 ng/m(3) for azinphos-methyl,

155 mM for the determination of H2O2 with a low limit of detection, 0.5 muM.

156 The biosensor HL-FeNPs, with 20nM limit of detection, behaves reversibly and instantly.

157 er the optimal conditions of the method, the limit of detection, preconcentration factor and precisio

158 ASV) of Pb, our sensor shows 21 nM (4.4 ppb) limit of detection, resistance to interfering metals suc

159 The assay was validated for linearity, limit of detection, sensitivity, and specificity by usin

160 llows identifying LYS with a 44.6 femtomolar limit of detection, using sample volume as low as 1muL a

161 ation protocols (e.g., PCR) with an improved limit of detection.

162 se in LV mass >12% (highest category versus <limit of detection; odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence int

163 ision (CV%<2.78), recovery (91.8-105.1%) and limits of detection (0.04-0.85mgL(-1)) and quantificatio

164 conditions, the proposed method showed good limits of detection (0.549-0.673ppb), good analyte recov

165 Lower limits of detection (2-20 ng/mL) were obtained using the

166 is was validated for linearity (R(2)>0.999), limits of detection (6.23-186.66mg/L) and quantification

167 With sub-ppm theoretical limits of detection (LOD for NO = 0.16 ppm and for H2S =

168 During validation limits of detection (LOD) and quantification, linearity,

169 The calculated limits of detection (LOD) based on calibration curves we

170 Achievable limits of detection (LOD) for TATP are equivalent to the

171 Limits of detection (LOD) for the PAH4 varied between 0.

172 inic acid (DMAA), but this was usually below limits of detection (LoD).

173 t melting temperature analysis with enhanced limits of detection (LODs).

174 or each tracer, the HRMS method exhibits low limits of detection and good repeatability in the tested

175 cedure allowed the determination of tin with limits of detection and quantification of 3.4 and 11.3ng

176 The limits of detection and quantification were 0.004mugmL(-

177 The limits of detection and quantification were 0.64 and 2.1

178 The limits of detection and quantification were 0.66 and 1.0

179 The limits of detection and quantification were 12.5 and 37.

180 Limits of detection and quantification were 200 and 400p

181 The limits of detection and quantification were calculated f

182 The limits of detection and quantification were calculated.

183 sulted in good linearity (R(2)>0.99) and low limits of detection and quantification, ranging from 0.0

184 kanes or alkane mixtures exhibited different limits of detection and regression slopes, indicating th

185 e species level in less than 80 min with the limits of detection at 1 x 10(3) to 10 x 10(3) CFU/ml or

186 Viral RNA levels were below limits of detection during all other collections.

187 Furthermore, the behavior and limits of detection for acetonitrile, dimethyl methylpho

188 Limits of detection for As(III) and total arsenic (in th

189 The limits of detection for Br and I using the MIC method fo

190 MS) allows high repetition rates and reaches limits of detection in the low ppb range common for DT-I

191 tion (APPI) and laser ionization (APLI) with limits of detection in the lower pmol range.

192 more bioavailable but metastable Form I with limits of detection in the ppm regime.

193 the LC-FAIMS-MS method was performed giving limits of detection in the range 1-6 ng mL(-1), limits o

194 The method provides limits of detection in the range of 0.055-1.0 ng, and a

195 Instrumental limits of detection in the range of 14-53ngmL(-1) for nu

196 Lower limits of detection may be further achieved if the detec

197 The resolutions and limits of detection measured are suitable for such kinds

198 The limits of detection obtained for the studied compounds w

199 The assay produced limits of detection of 1000 copies/mL in semen and 275 c

200 The limits of detection of the assay at a 95% detection prob

201 Recovery ranged from 96 to 99% and the limits of detection were 0.012ngg(-1).

202 The limits of detection were 15microg/kg for DON, 24microg/k

203 In fact, sub-ppm-limits of detection were achieved with a solvent volume

204 The limits of detection were below 0.5mg/L.

205 Ultimately, the limits of detection were reduced to levels comparable to

206 RS nanoparticles with femtomolar (10(-15) M) limits of detection.

207 of 1003 microC m(-2), which is close to the limit of dielectric breakdown, is attained.

208 ntal system which represents the biophysical limit of Earth's biosphere.

209 cal electric fields reach 0.8 V/m, the lower limit of effectiveness in animal studies.

210 We improved the detection limit of eSHHA, taking advantage of nanostructured surfa

211 from Batang Toru, at the southernmost range limit of extant Sumatran orangutans south of Lake Toba,

212 The limit of fraud detection of lower grade oils in EVOO was

213 the mathematical expression for the capacity limit of FTN non-orthogonal frequency-division multiplex

214 breeders may be able to exploit the thermal limits of G. pallida by developing potato cultivars able

215 In a survey conducted along the southern limit of its known range, we established a likely presen

216 graph, for fixed population size and at the limit of large populations, respectively.

217 sing in the 0-95% RH range with a detection limit of less than 0.1% RH.

218 odel has been constrained by the diffraction limit of light microscopy, as the cisternae are only 10-

219 ures lie at or below the 250 nm diffraction limit of light microscopy.

220 The limits of lowering Vt have not yet been established, and

221 ; and in biotechnologies that operate at the limits of microbial function.

222 imaging, it is unknown how far the detection limit of MPI can be lowered.

223 ncentration to more than ten times the upper limit of normal (eight [11%] in the simvastatin group vs

224 phosphatase of at least 1.67 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) despite treatment with ursodeoxych

225 had substantially lower predicted and lower limit of normal values for FVC and FEV1 than those in ot

226 ine aminotransferase 4.5-5.9 times the upper limit of normal) with a normal bilirubin 28 days after s

227 nolase less than or equal to 17 mug/L (upper limit of normal).

228 gen 125 concentration of less than the upper limit of normal, had a performance status of 0-1, and ha

229 equations for the predicted value and lower limit of normal.

230 inotransferase elevations >2 times the upper limit of normal.

231 -bronchodilator FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

232 egulatory process that affects the detection limit of oscillating light according to the light rearin

233 Finally, we explored the limit of our architecture in terms of bytes per molecule

234 melanocytes and melanoma cells, suggesting a limit of pharmacological ascorbate in treating cancer.

235 ncy tones (>8 kHz), well beyond the putative limit of phase locking.

236 Satisfactory results in terms of limit of quantification (0.03-0.4 g/100g honey), precisi

237 m contained enrofloxacin at levels above the limit of quantification (12.53-19.01microg.kg(-1)) but b

238 ectness (99%), limit of detection (3.9mg/L), limit of quantification (13.4mg/L) and linearity (0.993)

239 oducts was developed and validated down to a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.1mg/kg.

240 a limit of detection LOD of 3.7 fg/mL and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 12.4 fg/mL were achieve

241 nsing range of 1pM to 1nM is reported, and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 2.03x10(-13)M is deduce

242 de risk taking also concentrations below the limit of quantification into account.

243 A limit of quantification of 5microg.kg(-1) for both solid

244 BA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification to each test strain, compared wi

245 The lower limit of quantification was 94 and 90 amol for dG-gx-dC

246 Limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.1 and 0.3mugL(-1), respec

247 annels to demonstrate that there is an upper limit of quantification, defined by the time resolution

248 owed BPA levels ranging from <1microgkg(-1) (limit of quantification, LOQ) to 62microgkg(-1), with va

249 UV spectroscopy showed the lowest limits of quantification (LOQ) (0.96 ng muL(-1)) and fea

250 its of detection in the range 1-6 ng mL(-1), limits of quantification in the range 3-20 ng mL(-1), wi

251 was most sensitive for metominostrobin with limits of quantification of 1ngL(-1) and 5ngkg(-1) in wa

252 Results showed that their limits of quantification were 0.1-10ng/g, with recoverie

253 With on-chip desalting, the limit of quantitation for histidine spiked in aCSF is ap

254 he NBOMe concentration with an average lower limit of quantitation of 0.01 mg/mL for both of them.

255 ee CNP-based biosensor capable of ultra-low (limit of quantitation: 0.1 pM) detection.

256 ained for all the studied compounds, and the limits of quantitation (LOQs) were within the range of 0

257 furthermore, the tests yielded satisfactory limits of quantitation (median, approximately 0.5 ng mL(

258 ation of banned doping substances, achieving limits of quantitation below the minimum required perfor

259 Based on maximum discard limits of rancidity indices (25% TPC and 10% TGDP), the

260 cerebral perfusion pressure less than lower limit of reactivity was associated with unfavorable outc

261 s ratio %cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; p < 0.001)

262 wer" and "upper" cerebral perfusion pressure limits of reactivity, respectively.

263 ciencies (PCEs) beyond the Shockley-Queisser limit of single-junction solar cells; however, they are

264 In the limit of slow synaptic kinetics the spike-synchrony mech

265 ze (35 mm, axial length), we estimated upper limits of spatial resolving power of 8 cycles/deg (tempo

266 tural intricacies may indicate the detection limit of synchrotron diffraction and TEM.

267 riggers telomere trimming, setting the upper limit of telomere length.

268 was 1.3% lower than during usual care (upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI, 2.1% [within the noninferio

269 Noninferiority required the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the differe

270 12; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.58; P=0.53); the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference

271 sensitivity, response time and the detection limit of the biosensor for CC is 0.932 muMmuA(-1) cm(-2)

272 As measured, the detection limit of the biosensors for glucose and cholesterol is 5

273 The single-atom bit represents the ultimate limit of the classical approach to high-density magnetic

274 g solution to overcome the fundamental speed limit of the current electronic switches.

275 In the high-frequency limit of the drive, topology is described by standard to

276 s mechanism is ill constrained, as the lower limit of the electron energy distribution, or low-energy

277 The hydrogen peroxide detection limit of the flexible MSM photodetector was 2.47mM.

278 The detection limit of the immunosensor was as low as 2.2pM and within

279 ies arise for metabolites far from the lower limit of the mass scan range, due to the weaker containm

280 minotransferase level (to >3 times the upper limit of the normal range) occurred in 38 of 681 patient

281 h performance well exceeding the theoretical limit of the optimized time-frequency filtering.

282 xtracted by this method represents the upper limit of the potentially dispersible nanoparticulate fra

283 are often below or close to the diffraction limit of the probe light.

284 s found to already be operating at the upper limit of the recommended direct filtration thresholds fo

285 The detection limit and the quantification limit of the sensor are found to be 1.62x10(-3)microM an

286 c salmon populations located at the southern limit of the species' distribution with a complicated de

287 inferior to that of active yaws if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in rate

288 roup; non-inferiority was shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the local relapse haza

289 s, and thin films, nanolattices redefine the limits of the accessible material-property space through

290 The upper limits of the confidence interval for the difference bet

291 egmentation schemes in which upper and lower limits of the heart were determined from CT and the left

292 nctional flow data above and beyond standard limits of the optical system.

293 s, revealed that outbreaks located along the limits of the rainforest biome were significantly associ

294 Within the limits of the study, endocan may be considered as a pote

295 t with lower progression indexes, within the limits of these types of indexes.

296 In doing so, we push the technical limits of this information storage system and optimize s

297 Within the limits of this systematic review, NCFs affecting the ref

298 guarantee that this example is an inductive limit of unital copies of the Cuntz algebra [Formula: se

299 However, in the limit of vanishing particle-to-wall mass ratio, the equi

300 model are the diffusion-coefficients at the limits of very short and long times, and the distance be