ライフサイエンスコーパス: limit of detection

1 cant increase in sensitivity (that is, lower limit of detection).

2 e or no effect on potential, sensitivity, or limit of detection.

3 ation protocols (e.g., PCR) with an improved limit of detection.

4 sis requiring high sensitivity and ultra-low limits of detection.

5 oflow HPLC exhibits improved sensitivity and limits of detection.

6 RS nanoparticles with femtomolar (10(-15) M) limits of detection.

7 thod demonstrated excellent linearity with a limit of detection 0.004mug/ml.

8 operation mode, the platform can attain the limit of detection 0.3ng/mL (1.5pM) for ERBB2 in cell ly

9 ii) appropriate selectivity and sensitivity (limit of detection 0.7muM); (iii) reusability of an elec

10 mentation, fast signal transduction, and low limit of detection (0.12 ppm) are some of the key merits

11 tivity (-0.16 +/- 0.02 nA muM(-1)) and a low limit of detection (0.33 +/- 0.20 muM).

12 this Trp-Kyn immunosensor offers an improved limit of detection (0.5nM and 120nM for Kyn and Trp dete

13 ision (CV%<2.78), recovery (91.8-105.1%) and limits of detection (0.04-0.85mgL(-1)) and quantificatio

14 0.99), selectivity (no matrix interference), limits of detection (0.08-0.30mugkg(-1)) and quantificat

15 conditions, the proposed method showed good limits of detection (0.549-0.673ppb), good analyte recov

16 mM for the determination of H2O2 with a low limit of detection, 0.5 muM.

17 inhibition ways are very sensitive with low limits of detection: 0.019microM and 0.008microM for che

18 ds directly at the PCB surface with improved limit of detection ( 10 pg/mL) over standard colorimetri

19 ace coupled to ESI-MS along with an improved limit of detection (10-fold enhancement, 100 picomole) i

20 iosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection 10ng/ml) and selectivity towards hum

21 The limit of detection, 10pg/mL, is notably improved with re

22 sensitivity (- 0.27microAcm(-2)mM(-1)), low limit of detection (126microM) and long lineal range (2-

23 Lower limits of detection (2-20 ng/mL) were obtained using the

24 6+/-7%), precision (98%), correctness (99%), limit of detection (3.9mg/L), limit of quantification (1

25 e detection with EC-SERS was found to have a limit of detection 4 orders of magnitude below its clini

26 ble in linear range [3.22-51microM] with the limit of detection 6.51microM.

27 is was validated for linearity (R(2)>0.999), limits of detection (6.23-186.66mg/L) and quantification

28 ations (120-2875mug AZA-1 equiv./kg), with a limit of detection (63mug AZA-1 equiv./kg) below the Eur

29 analytical performance was observed with the limit of detection about sixty-fold lower in neat serum

30 d for analytical phenol detection presenting limit of detection and limit of quantification 2.94nmolL

31 Limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.1

32 % increase in sensitivity, a 50% decrease in limit of detection and minimally altered electrode kinet

33 were optimized and validated for linearity, limit of detection and quantification, intra- and inter-

34 ng their SERS intensities to determine their limit of detection and the precision on the device.

35 or each tracer, the HRMS method exhibits low limits of detection and good repeatability in the tested

36 rity, trueness, precision, matrix effect and limits of detection and quantification according to Euro

37 cedure allowed the determination of tin with limits of detection and quantification of 3.4 and 11.3ng

38 The limits of detection and quantification were 0.004mugmL(-

39 The limits of detection and quantification were 0.64 and 2.1

40 The limits of detection and quantification were 0.66 and 1.0

41 Limits of detection and quantification were 0.78 and 1.5

42 The limits of detection and quantification were 12.5 and 37.

43 Limits of detection and quantification were 200 and 400p

44 The limits of detection and quantification were calculated f

45 The limits of detection and quantification were calculated.

46 Low limits of detection and quantification were obtained, ra

47 was fully validated in terms of selectivity, limits of detection and quantification, matrix effect, l

48 sulted in good linearity (R(2)>0.99) and low limits of detection and quantification, ranging from 0.0

49 namic linear range, "intra-day" accuracy and limits of detection and quantification.

50 The limits of detection and quantitation of FA were 1.4ng/mL

51 kanes or alkane mixtures exhibited different limits of detection and regression slopes, indicating th

52 ion (repeatability), intermediate precision, limit of detection, and limit of quantification paramete

53 It achieves a 370 femtogram limit of detection, and we demonstrate quantitative labe

54 oward the most intense signals, achieved low limits of detection, and confidently detected the greate

55 from 540 to 580nm; the linear range and the limit of detection are 30-1000microM and 24.9microM, res

56 The sensitivity and limit of detection are improved in the cartridge with an

57 sensitivity of 0.082 mu A/mu M/cm (2) with a limit of detection as low as 3.2 +/- 0.1nM.

58 The proposed cytosensor demonstrated limits of detection as low as 10 cells mL(-1) for every

59 ation from swab samples was confirmed by the limit of detection (as low as 0.1 PFU/microL, equivalent

60 centration in the range of 60pM-6.0nM with a limit of detection at 3.5pM (3.29SB/m, according to the

61 e species level in less than 80 min with the limits of detection at 1 x 10(3) to 10 x 10(3) CFU/ml or

62 n the coating, and dramatically lowering the limits of detection attained by sole DART analysis.

63 filtering automatically determined the lower limit of detection based on the strength of the PpIX spe

64 The biosensor HL-FeNPs, with 20nM limit of detection, behaves reversibly and instantly.

65 This 2-3 order of magnitude reduction in the limit of detection brings the SAW platform into the rang

66 aspects of their preparation can shift their limit of detection by orders of magnitude.

67 he sensor was 40.0-1100.0 femtomolar and the limit of detection calculated as 13.0 femtomolar.

68 y and demonstrate a 1300-fold improvement in limit of detection compared to a standard immunoassay, i

69 igh sensitivity of 340.8microAmicroM(-1) and limit of detection corresponding to 0.11nM was achieved.

70 he collision frequency, f, increases and the limit of detection decreases.

71 ctions of medium- and high-affinities with a limit of detection down to 1 pM, regardless of the analy

72 .98) to the target DNA concentration, with a limit of detection down to 260 fM (260 x 10(-15) M), two

73 Viral RNA levels were below limits of detection during all other collections.

74 The sensor reports the best limit of detection ever reported with better stability,

75 The limit of detection for certain metals is as low as 70 nM

76 The limit of detection for counting was below 1000 bacteria

77 wn to increase the sensitivity and lower the limit of detection for DA compared to bare CFEs.

78 The array limit of detection for oxidation was 720 8-oxodG per 10(

79 The limit of detection for Pam3CSK4 attained was 7.5 mug/mL,

80 demonstrating a comparable dynamic range and limit of detection for the sensor.

81 The limit of detection for these peptides was less than 50 a

82 Furthermore, the behavior and limits of detection for acetonitrile, dimethyl methylpho

83 The limits of detection for analytes with high polarities su

84 Limits of detection for As(III) and total arsenic (in th

85 Limits of detection for both semen and blood increased w

86 The limits of detection for Br and I using the MIC method fo

87 ponse, the limits of quantifications and the limits of detection for each bisphenol.

88 thod were exhaustively checked, establishing limits of detection (from 1 to 95microg/l) and quantific

89 g mL(-1), and C = 15.1 9 nA/mug mL(-1)), low limit of detection (G, A = 0.5 mug mL(-1); T, C = 1.0 mu

90 to their high-sensitivity and extremely low limits-of-detection, have enabled the realization of hig

91 A single hs-cTnT concentration below the limit of detection in combination with a nonischemic ECG

92 ween 0.98-0.99 for each compound and similar limits of detection in terms of disbursed aerosol concen

93 MS) allows high repetition rates and reaches limits of detection in the low ppb range common for DT-I

94 tion (APPI) and laser ionization (APLI) with limits of detection in the lower pmol range.

95 more bioavailable but metastable Form I with limits of detection in the ppm regime.

96 the LC-FAIMS-MS method was performed giving limits of detection in the range 1-6 ng mL(-1), limits o

97 The method provides limits of detection in the range of 0.055-1.0 ng, and a

98 Instrumental limits of detection in the range of 14-53ngmL(-1) for nu

99 n are demonstrated through: (1) the obtained limits of detection in the ranges 2.1-24 ng mL(-1) and 0

100 protein 5 translation were reduced below the limits of detection in wStri-containing cells, demonstra

101 f optical intensity on the detector, and the limit of detection is estimated.

102 This limit of detection is suitable for practical application

103 nalytical method exhibited good sensitivity, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and selectivi

104 iterature regarding figures of merit such as limit of detection, linear range, relative standard devi

105 rated excellent reproducibility at the lower limit of detection (LLOD).

106 tection response from 0.01pg/mL to 2pg/mL, a limit of detection LOD of 3.7 fg/mL and a limit of quant

107 The assay limit of detection (LOD) and dynamic range were determin

108 The assay limit of detection (LOD) and dynamic range were determin

109 detects LCN2 from 0.6 to 5120pgmL(-1) with a limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LO

110 The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LO

111 Under optimized conditions, the limit of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were 1

112 ucose and kinetic parameters (KM(app), Imax, limit of detection (LOD) and sensitivity) were estimated

113 An LC-MS/MS method was developed, with the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (

114 The limit of detection (LOD) and the sensitivity range of an

115 The limit of detection (LoD) based on 3sigma is 28 pM Hg(2+)

116 ptimized specimen processing to maximize the limit of detection (LOD) by matrix-assisted laser desorp

117 can tailor the assay effectiveness improving limit of detection (LOD) down to 10CFUmL(-1) of E. coli

118 or urea in the range of 1-1000microm, with a limit of detection (LOD) down to 1microm, fast response

119 Therefore, T2MR enables a low limit of detection (LoD) for Borrelia spp. in whole bloo

120 n terms of response value, response time and limit of detection (LOD) for each platform.

121 The limit of detection (LOD) for ETTA following 300s of an a

122 ous results using streptavidin beads and the limit of detection (LOD) improves 10x.

123 f p,p' isomers of DDT and DDE were above the limit of detection (LOD) in >/=98% of the samples, where

124 rior performance in terms of sensitivity and limit of detection (LOD) in a blood plasma-containing sa

125 imately 10(7) to 10(12) particles/mL; with a limit of detection (LOD) in the lowest ng/microL range)

126 The most sensitive sensor has a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.11 mug/L and the upper det

127 The methodology achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.12 pM (3.0 attomoles) for

128 icroM(-1) with a linear range of 3-30microM, limit of detection (LOD) of 0.24microM, limit of quantif

129 uorogenic detection of PPi having a very low limit of detection (LOD) of 0.60x10(-7)M based on the st

130 The proposed device achieves a limit of detection (LOD) of 1.35ngmL(-1) in standard buf

131 arge linear range from 1 fM to 10 pM, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 152.93 aM.

132 r range of detection between 0.01-20ng/mL, a limit of detection (LOD) of 18pg/mL and an analysis time

133 this system exhibits high sensitivity with a limit of detection (LOD) of 21.1ngmL(-1), wide linearity

134 sed with a dynamic range of 7-500pg/mL and a limit of detection (LOD) of 2pg/mL.

135 The system showed a limit of detection (LOD) of 3 x 10(-5)ngmuL(-1) DNA by a

136 The device exhibited a limit of detection (LOD) of 3.4x10(6)EVs/microL when ant

137 ptimized by experimental design, achieving a limit of detection (LOD) of 4 ng of (99)Tc (2.5 Bq), a r

138 s show a very high sensitivity for DO with a limit of detection (LOD) of 60 nm and can be readily use

139 Here, we report a limit of detection (LOD) of 7.7 x 10(-7) U.mL(-1) for CA

140 up to 10 Plaque forming unit (PFU)/mL with a limit of detection (LOD) of 8.75 PFU/mL.

141 Our system detects ATP with a limit of detection (LoD) of 8nM and an analytical dynami

142 gray intensity were obtained to determine a limit of detection (LOD) of each assay.

143 selective electrical detection of CEA with a limit of detection (LOD) of less than 100pg/ml.

144 The limit of detection (LOD) of the MGNT arrays for detectio

145 The limit of detection (LOD) of the sensor for PSMA-based PC

146 The limit of detection (LOD) of the technique could reach 11

147 d 3mg/kg, with correlation coefficient 0.99, limit of detection (LOD) ranges between 0.02 and 4.5ng/g

148 The demonstrated limit of detection (LOD) reaches 5 ng/L and 22 ng/g in w

149 nce its catalytic activity, sensitivity, and limit of detection (LOD) to NO(*).

150 concentration of analytes, thus lowering the limit of detection (LOD) to the nanograms per milliliter

151 y sources of irreproducibility were the near limit of detection (LOD) typical abundance of some metab

152 ve recognition response toward L-Alanine and limit of detection (LOD) value is determined as 0.77mM.

153 f Ti level with 0.985 of R(2) and 33.9ppm of limit of detection (LOD) value, while PLS has 0.989 of R

154 The limit of detection (LOD) was 4.6microM.

155 Under optimized conditions, the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.7 pM miR-221 (15% RSD).

156 The response time (RT), limit of detection (LOD), and linear dynamic range (LDR)

157 From the gradient of the calibration plot, limit of detection (LOD), and sensitivity were calculate

158 ameters were measured including sensitivity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ),

159 method was validated in terms of linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ),

160 g 12 targeted metabolite standards where the limit of detection (LOD), linear dynamic range, resolvin

161 high sensitivity and selectivity, and a low limit of detection (LOD).

162 ensitivity of 11.86nm/microM and 28nM as the limit of detection (LOD).

163 red all 4 hs-cTnI-based rule-out strategies: limit of detection (LOD, hs-cTnI<2 ng/L), single cutoff

164 centration (LDR: 0.05nM-0.5mM), an ultra-low limit of detection (LOD: 14.0 +/- 0.05p.M.; S/N = 3), lo

165 The limit of detection (LOD=3sigma) of the all-in-one dual-a

166 The limit of detection (LOD=3xSD/m) obtained was 0.061-2.89m

167 The limit of detections (LOD) for the dipeptides in the mixt

168 The limit-of-detection (LOD) in analytical instruments with

169 With sub-ppm theoretical limits of detection (LOD for NO = 0.16 ppm and for H2S =

170 Linearity, precision, accuracy, and limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were

171 The correlation coefficient, and limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were

172 During validation limits of detection (LOD) and quantification, linearity,

173 The calculated limits of detection (LOD) based on calibration curves we

174 The limits of detection (LOD) for Cys, Hcy and GSH were 0.15

175 Achievable limits of detection (LOD) for TATP are equivalent to the

176 Limits of detection (LOD) for the PAH4 varied between 0.

177 inic acid (DMAA), but this was usually below limits of detection (LoD).

178 The limits of detection (LODs) and linearity at lower concen

179 Limits of detection (LODs) in the low nanomolar range an

180 Limits of detection (LODs) of 20, 40, and 50 mumol L(-1)

181 The limits of detection (LODs) were 0.13, 0.09 and 0.08mgL(-

182 t melting temperature analysis with enhanced limits of detection (LODs).

183 00nM in both buffer and undiluted serum with limits of detection lower than 1pM.

184 analysis times of less than 11 min provided limits of detection lower than 50 ng L(-1) for all targe

185 of a single hs-cTnT concentration below the limit of detection (<0.005 microg/L) and a nonischemic e

186 </= 3.9%), linearity (r(2) >/= 0.9989), and limits of detection (</= 0.15 mug/mL) were achieved for

187 gadolinium enhancement (>/=7.42 ng/L versus <limit of detection [<3 ng/L]; adjusted odds ratio, 2.87;

188 Lower limits of detection may be further achieved if the detec

189 The resolutions and limits of detection measured are suitable for such kinds

190 reviously reported chips include an improved limit of detection, no need for additional redox medium

191 The oxidation potential and limit of detection obtained using this sensor are much s

192 The limits of detection obtained for the studied compounds w

193 se in LV mass >12% (highest category versus <limit of detection; odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence int

194 e presence of KI in artificial saliva with a limit of detection of 3 x 10(-8) capital EM, Cyrillic.

195 of 4000 rpm, the AFB1 can be detected with a limit of detection of 0.04 ng/mL and a linear range of 1

196 linear range of 10-5000muM which exhibited a limit of detection of 0.04muM (S/N=3).

197 (OTA), chosen here as a model target, with a limit of detection of 0.05nM and a relative standard dev

198 ad a high affinity (KA) of 6.37x10(12)M(-1), limit of detection of 0.065nM and ultra-high sensitivity

199 25 to 124.3muM and 124.3muM to 1.67mM with a limit of detection of 0.15muM.

200 in the relevant physiological range, with a limit of detection of 0.1mmolL(-1).

201 A limit of detection of 0.2 ng/mL (3.3 pM) capsid proteins

202 y shows an IC50 of 4.5 +/- 1.2 ng/mL, with a limit of detection of 0.2 ng/mL, comparable to GC/MS.

203 1), sensitivity of 0.012muALmumol(-1), and a limit of detection of 0.21mumolL(-1) for TBHQ, under opt

204 concentration range of 1-400ngmL(-1) with a limit of detection of 0.23ngmL(-1).

205 y in the range 1-1000 pM of miRNA-21, with a limit of detection of 0.3 pM, good reproducibility (Rela

206 s ranging from 1.0 and 10.0mumolL(-1) with a limit of detection of 0.36mumolL(-1), 0.61mumol L(-1), a

207 ive concentration of TNT, giving an averaged limit of detection of 0.37 mug/mL (aqueous phase concent

208 ighly sensitive and specific for SPy, with a limit of detection of 0.4ngL(-1).

209 th the sensitivity of 0.7 nA muM(-1) and the limit of detection of 0.5 muM (3 sB/m).

210 cs with good linearity of 1aM to 1pM and low limit of detection of 0.5aM.

211 dioxide in the range of 30-300mgL(-1) with a limit of detection of 0.5mgL(-1).

212 The proposed device showed a limit of detection of 0.65pM for the complementary ssDNA

213 We achieved a limit of detection of 1 fg/ml in saliva buffer for the M

214 e between 1 nM and 100 nM of tenofovir and a limit of detection of 1.2 nM.

215 linked immunosorbent assay (ULISA) reaches a limit of detection of 1.2 pg mL(-1) (42 fM) PSA in 25% b

216 ar range that spans from 1microM to 10mM and limit of detection of 10(-6.2)M.

217 ne to human error and infection risk, with a limit of detection of 10(4) cells/mL.

218 An ultralow limit of detection of 10.0 fg mL(-1) was obtained with t

219 2 x 10(2) to 2.0 x 10(5) cellsmL(-1) with a limit of detection of 100 cellsmL(-1).

220 Defining a lower limit of detection of 1000 copies/ml when including a sp

221 ed that the developed system could achieve a limit of detection of 10ng/mL, comparable to a sophistic

222 tio, with a dynamic range of 0-1000 nM and a limit of detection of 112 nM.

223 e range 50nM to 0.5muM and 0.5-35muM, with a limit of detection of 12.8nM.

224 The GC/N-CDs electrode shows the limit of detection of 13x10(-10)M (S/N=3) and the sensit

225 s, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was detected at a limit of detection of 1ngmL(-1) and assessed with the na

226 Limit of detection of 1pg/mL in human serum was achieved

227 globin (HbS) in newborn blood samples with a limit of detection of 2% HbS.

228 e measured with a high reproducibility and a limit of detection of 2.05 pg.mL(-1).

229 uman plasma with same high sensitivity and a limit of detection of 2.3aM.

230 r range between 0.075 and 7.5mmolL(-1) and a limit of detection of 22.2micromolL(-1).

231 multiple patient outbreak isolates and had a limit of detection of 3.40 +/- 0.20 log10 genomic copies

232 direct immunoassay of urine samples, with a limit of detection of 300 colony forming units (CFU)/mL

233 cDNA molecules of L-gene Ebola virus with a limit of detection of 33 cDNA molecules.

234 ect of the acoustic wave sensor to achieve a limit of detection of 37pg/mL.

235 r range from 0.05pgmL(-1) to 60ngmL(-1) with limit of detection of 3fgmL(-1).

236 ion over seven consecutive days, achieving a limit of detection of 40 copies of human genomic DNA per

237 hod performance was satisfactory with a mean limit of detection of 50 ng/L, relative standard deviati

238 RT-PCR quantified the target HAV cDNA with a limit of detection of 6.4fg/microL.

239 r demonstrates an ultrahigh sensitivity with limit of detection of 7ng/mL, which is 10-fold better th

240 rds Hx with linear range of 20muM to 512muM, limit of detection of 9.5muM, and sensitivity of 4.1nA/m

241 The method achieved a limit of detection of 9.8pg of soybean DNA (8.6 copies),

242 Use of this framework was shown to lower the limit of detection of an influenza A nucleoprotein immun

243 a scan rate of 0.025Vs(-1) for 20 cycles, a limit of detection of approximately 10ngmL(-1) for the s

244 2 ] = 1 ppm with the UVO-treated TFTs, and a limit of detection of approximately 400 ppb is achieved

245 in increased sensitivity characterized by a limit of detection of approximately 400 zmol, while prov

246 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) DNA, the limit of detection of culture, process >/=1 ml of sputum

247 The limit of detection of E. coli in synthetic urine was 1.2

248 The linear range and the limit of detection of Fe(3+) were from 37.5nM to 21.53mi

249 Limit of detection of IL-6 in human sweat was 0.2 pg/mL

250 By using the acidification module, the limit of detection of nitrite-selective electrodes signi

251 results in a significant improvement in the limit of detection of potentiometric anion-selective ele

252 Using this system, the limit of detection of S. typhimurium was found to be 10(

253 The limit of detection of the fuel cell sensor was 10muM, wi

254 onstrate that, under optimum conditions, the limit of detection of the immunoassay (0.005mugkg(-1)) i

255 The limit of detection of the proposed procedure was 3.10(-8

256 It is also capable of improving the limit of detection of the sensors by an order of magnitu

257 preparation and detection took 23min and the limit of detection of this chemosensor was 4ppm for thia

258 The limit of detection of this regime is defined with a seco

259 This is exemplified by limits of detection of 1.2%, 1.0%, and 1.2% of oxidation

260 The assay produced limits of detection of 1000 copies/mL in semen and 275 c

261 gh sensitivity and applicability, with lower limits of detection of 12CFUmL(-1) in broth samples and

262 ared to the antibody based assay, with lower limits of detection of 3.54 x 10(7) and 1.34 x 10(7) CEI

263 .0-1000nmolL(-1) and 40.0-770nmolL(-1), with limits of detection of 40.0nmolL(-1) and 7.0nmolL(-1), r

264 ly" detection (2 min) with high sensitivity (limits of detection of 7 and 0.4 ng/mL for OTA and FB1,

265 g any specialized laboratory instrument, the limits of detection of a few DNA copies per LAMP zone fo

266 The limits of detection of the assay at a 95% detection prob

267 The limits of detection of the two devices were 0.1mugmL(-1)

268 ensemble methods because they are below the limit of detection or not conducted on an appropriate ti

269 er the optimal conditions of the method, the limit of detection, preconcentration factor and precisio

270 The limit of detection ranged from 0.74 to 6.07mumoll(-1) Tr

271 ASV) of Pb, our sensor shows 21 nM (4.4 ppb) limit of detection, resistance to interfering metals suc

272 The assay was validated for linearity, limit of detection, sensitivity, and specificity by usin

273 ive to safflower, though at levels below the limit of detection, suggesting cross-contamination rathe

274 high sensitivity, IC50 = 0.28 mug/L, with a limit of detection that is well below the most rigorous

275 ough nucleic acid lateral flow showed higher limit of detection, this strategy was able to clearly di

276 This sensor attains the limit of detection to 0.194microg/ml, and the linear dyn

277 ) may amplify the SPR signal and improve the limit of detection to the desired sensitivity.

278 , incorporated into biosensors can allow the limits of detection to be improved or negate the need fo

279 to 20 ng/m(3) for chlorpyrifos-oxon, < LOD (limit of detection) to 7.3 ng/m(3) for azinphos-methyl,

280 llows identifying LYS with a 44.6 femtomolar limit of detection, using sample volume as low as 1muL a

281 Limit of detection was 0.015microgL(-1).

282 In the selected conditions, the limit of detection was 0.48ngmL(-1), preconcentration fa

283 of testosterone from 0muM to 280muM and the limit of detection was 0.51muM.

284 The limit of detection was 2.35mgg(-1) and the precision, ev

285 The limit of detection was 25 target copies per reaction, on

286 The limit of detection was found 0.5%, while the limit of qu

287 ncentrations of spirochetes, and the assay's limit of detection was found to be in the single-cell-pe

288 After 1000x dilution, the limit of detection was lowered 500-fold (0.22 mug/mL) an

289 oped microfluidic chip within 30min, and the limit of detection was only 11 copies with a volume of 3

290 standard deviation, adsorption capacity and limit of detection were 2.3%, 80.0mgg(-1) and 0.31mugL(-

291 Sensitivity range and limit of detection were determined as 0.1-1ng/ml and 10(

292 Recovery ranged from 96 to 99% and the limits of detection were 0.012ngg(-1).

293 The limits of detection were 0.03; 0.24; 0.8; 0.008; 0.026 a

294 The limits of detection were 0.5ng/ml of genomic DNA and 10

295 The limits of detection were 15microg/kg for DON, 24microg/k

296 In fact, sub-ppm-limits of detection were achieved with a solvent volume

297 The limits of detection were below 0.5mg/L.

298 ed assays displayed very high sensitivities (limits of detection were near 0.01microg/L).

299 Ultimately, the limits of detection were reduced to levels comparable to

300 The low-coverage sensor has a lower limit of detection, wider optimal AC frequency range, an