ライフサイエンスコーパス: linearity

1 iation with the studied outcomes (P<0.05 for linearity).

2 ates in a more reliable way without assuming linearity.

3 , repeatability, intermediate precision, and linearity.

4 se of an optically triggered N-type Kerr non-linearity.

5 f the viruses was performed, showing a clear linearity.

6 nsitivity (83.3 microA nM(-1) cm(-2)), wider linearity (0.01-50 microM) with good selectivity towards

7 ces, samples exposed to SM yielded excellent linearity (0.025-50 muM SM) and good precision (</=13%)

8 6.5% for concentration higher than 0.5 muM), linearity (0.1-10 muM, R(2)=0.9893) and sensitivity ( ap

9 This method was validated based on linearity (0.2-30 mug mL(-1), R(2) 0.998), limit of dete

10 g/L), limit of quantification (13.4mg/L) and linearity (0.993).

11 Linearity (0.995<r(2)<0.999), limit of detection (28.85-

12 Good linearities (3 orders of magnitude) were obtained using

13 erated in dyed hair matrixes and showed good linearity (40-1000 pg PhIP/g hair) with a goodness-of-fi

14 mit of detection (LOD) of 21.1ngmL(-1), wide linearity (50-500ngmL(-1)) and high specificity toward N

15 performance criteria, including selectivity, linearity, acceptable recovery (70-120%) and precision (

16 The high linearity, accuracy and rapidity of investigation enable

17 analytical parameters, such as selectivity, linearity, accuracy, dynamic linear range, "intra-day" a

18 y, LSPR results indicated good integrity and linearity, along with promising accuracy in qualitative

19 s, the present results suggest decreased non-linearity alongside an increased veridical component of

20 separation, a calibration curve of excellent linearity and a low limit of detection (0.075 ng/5 muL i

21 The linearity and accuracy of the Aptima assay in correctly

22 The observed-to-expected ratios for linearity and accuracy were 100.2+/-11.8 and 98.1+/-10.8

23 This assay had the best linearity and accuracy.

24 We report on the linearity and calibration slope characteristics of litho

25 Good linearity and detection limits in the very low ppt level

26 Linearity and good agreement with previous work for a su

27 The resulting standard curves showed good linearity and high sensitivity.

28 admission characteristics, incorporating non-linearity and interactions.

29 from images, whereas broader tuning, greater linearity and less suppression of pinwheel cells generat

30 bits much better performances in calibration linearity and limits of detection (LOD) than those of DC

31 s such as: selectivity, precision, accuracy, linearity and limits of detection and quantitation.

32 Linearity and matrix effect, accuracy, within-laboratory

33 ative ray tracing is applied to optimize the linearity and minimize the optical path differences for

34 rs in metastatic lung tumors exhibit greater linearity and organization as a result of collagen cross

35 e cutoff frequency of 35 THz and competitive linearity and power-handling capability.

36 The linearity and precision of measurements performed with t

37 on of 0.005% (w/w) with high PCR efficiency, linearity and range of amplification.

38 rong non-reciprocity, significantly enhanced linearity and real-time reconfigurability, and is integr

39 a maximum of 78% to 442 nm illumination, the linearity and saturation limit to 1060 nm light are also

40 ity (P(open)) of MET channels determines the linearity and sensitivity to mechanical stimulation.

41 variable wavelength detectors offered better linearity and sensitivity, and would be more suitable fo

42 Results show signal intensity linearity and small band shifts as long as the sample is

43 Method accuracy, repeatability, linearity and specificity were investigated.

44 After validating the linearity and the reproducibility of this method, quanti

45 ather than mass, shows considerably improved linearity and uniformity of detection, reducing the aver

46 metrics that include high sensitivity, good linearity, and low variation.

47 ic consensus sequence deviated slightly from linearity, and mutant spectrum analyses revealed a compl

48 city, and performance with negative samples, linearity, and performance with hepatitis C virus (HCV)

49 sitivity, performance with negative samples, linearity, and performance with HIV-1 groups/subtypes we

50 ty, accuracy/precision, carry-over, dilution linearity, and reproducibility.

51 ydrogen bonds, unprecedented deviations from linearity are observed, increasing the contact angle and

52 m a mixed signal and most of them follow the linearity assumption.

53 The limits of detection (LODs) and linearity at lower concentrations (5 to 1000 IU/ml) were

54 contradictory results by accounting for non-linearity at the macro scale.

55 The response of biosensor showed linearity between 0.1 and 1.0mM for both of two substrat

56 ed by the as prepared immunosensor (range of linearity between 2.5 and 1000pgmL(-1) TGF-beta1; detect

57 rom the horizontal level, confirming the non-linearity between arterial volume distensibility and ext

58 28,455 gene models, and we utilized macro-co-linearity between perennial ryegrass and barley, and syn

59 Under optimal conditions, a good linearity between the electrochemical signal and the log

60 Linearity between the widely varying projected area of a

61 The linearity between V cr and the transition diffuseness is

62 methods had good accuracy, repeatability and linearity, but the UPLC-MS method proved more sensitive.

63 of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), linearity, carry-over effect, reinjection reproducibilit

64 of detection, lower limit of quantification, linearity, carry-over, partial validation of specificity

65 ity data and (b) morphologic (width, volume, linearity) characterization of each resultant cluster.

66 This linearity contrasts with the typical description of hydr

67 This behavioral linearity despite neurons' nonlinearities can be explain

68 This method was validated in respect to linearity, detection limit, quantification limit, accura

69 armonisation (ICH) guidelines which evaluate linearity, detection limit, quantification limit, accura

70 t for APN was constructed showing a range of linearity extending between 0.05 and 10.0 mug/mL which i

71 The calibration plot allowed a range of linearity extending between 15 and 3000pg/mL TGF-beta1 w

72 e responsive and did not change the response linearity (F1/F0 ratios) of visually responsive CG neuro

73 oposed sensor has a wide dynamic range, high linearity, fast operation and low-cost.

74 DA-d4 and DOPAC-d5 result in standard curve linearity for DA from 0.05-100 ng/mL (LOD = 6 pg/mL) and

75 Linearity for spiked polymer samples was achieved over a

76 ctively, and these models also had excellent linearity for the training and test sets between 0 and 1

77 As with two-photon, quadratic non-linearity from two-step fluorescence improves resolution

78 ctions (between 0.012 and 0.042 mug/L), good linearity (from 0.1 to 20 mug/L and from 0.2 to 50 mug/L

79 imaging can be combined to give quartic non-linearity, further improving imaging in challenging samp

80 ation (median, approximately 0.5 ng mL(-1)), linearity (>/=0.99), and accuracy (80-120%) over the eva

81 Linearity has been studied in the range of 10-6130 ng mL

82 Next, we consider how non-linearities in the neural activation function affect the

83 n has been constructed with the experimental linearity in 0.04-0.4 mM range and having the limit of d

84 r, pH 7.0, the immunosensor showed excellent linearity in a range of 10(2)-10(9)cfu of UPEC mL(-1) wi

85 PM value from Kallisto and Salmon shows high linearity in all analyses.

86 ing a standard addition approach showed good linearity in concentration ranges 0-250, 0-125, and 0-25

87 d was evaluated for precision, accuracy, and linearity in different food matrices and carbohydrate st

88 es and a stronger enhancement due to the non-linearity in excitation.

89 LC/MS provides linearity in response, data processing automation, impro

90 Linearity in the analytical blank was obtained by using

91 The sensor showed good linearity in the concentration range from 19 to 190nM (R

92 A perfect linearity in the current-concentration profile under opt

93 The developed aptasensor showed a good linearity in the range 0.15-5 ng/mL with the limit of de

94 L) was obtained for streptomycin with a good linearity in the range 0.3-10 ng/mL for PBS and 0.3-50 n

95 Studies of linearity in the range 2.5-40ngg(-1) produced determinat

96 oriented anti-OTA immunosensors which showed linearity in the range of 0.01-5ng/mL OTA.

97 aCl and Na concentrations, which showed good linearity in the range of 0.025-3.5% NaCl and 0.01-1.4%

98 MMP-9 in saliva samples was determined, with linearity in the range of 10-200ng/mL.

99 The proposed method provides a linearity in the range of 5-200microgL(-1), and the line

100 The method showed excellent linearity in the studied concentration range (0.1-25 mg

101 We offer a mechanism for non-linearity in the topography of accessible pathways by ca

102 optogenetics, how the spinal modules follow linearity in their combinations, but also provide a refe

103 The calibration curves showed perfect linearity in water and food matrices.

104 This method provides high linearity, in all cases higher than 98.65%, and high sen

105 The methods were validated in terms of linearity, instrument precision, limits of detection (LO

106 dation was performed on spiked specimens for linearity, intra-assay precision, interassay precision,

107 t usually expected but rather deviation from linearity is encountered at alkaline pH values; absence

108 Linearity is evaluated through parameter estimation, con

109 The linearity is higher than 0.9899 in the range MDL - 100 n

110 were obtained for the following parameters: linearity, limit of detection (0.005mg/kg) and limit of

111 The method was validated in terms of linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantifica

112 procedures were optimized and validated for linearity, limit of detection and quantification, intra-

113 The method was validated by calculating the linearity, limit of detection and quantification.

114 The assay was validated for linearity, limit of detection, sensitivity, and specific

115 eactors in mind, and was checked in terms of linearity, limits of detection and quantification, fidel

116 ters, the method was validated by evaluating linearity, limits of detection and quantification, preci

117 ethod was validated in-house by calibration, linearity, limits of detection and quantification, preci

118 imized method was validated for selectivity, linearity, limits of detection and quantification, recov

119 Validation parameters (selectivity, linearity, LOD, LOQ, accuracy and precision) were determ

120 out in the selected matrices, providing good linearity, LODs in the low mug/kg or mug/L range, good p

121 ures with multi-level analog states, "write" linearity, low-voltage switching, and low power dissipat

122 e latter system was validated by testing the linearity (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, 0.25-10

123 ethod was effective in terms of selectivity, linearity, matrix effect, accuracy and precision, provid

124 Validation parameters; linearity, matrix effect, LOQ, specificity, trueness and

125 methods were validated for the parameters of linearity, matrix effects, precision, and accuracy.

126 cision (2%-6% coefficient of variation), and linearity (mean correlation coefficient of r2 = 0.99).

127 g partial response plots, and identified non-linearity modeled using FFNN.

128 t sensing response characteristics with good linearity of 1aM to 1pM and low limit of detection of 0.

129 Here, we explore the inherent non-linearity of a biological signaling system to identify f

130 nchmark RNA-seq dataset, we investigated the linearity of abundance estimated from seven most popular

131 epeatability, reproducibility, recovery, and linearity of both methods.

132 Linearity of calibration curves from 5.0 to 25 ng muL(-1

133 hin-laboratory reproducibility, specificity, linearity of detector response, the limits of quantifica

134 ime (theta50 ) for each species based on the linearity of germination rate with temperature.

135 Thus, the stringent linearity of halogen bonding is a powerful tool for the

136 standards was 37 nM (range 1.5-250 nM), with linearity of R(2) > 0.99.

137 tivity limit (3 ng/mL in serum) and over the linearity of response of the assay's dynamic range.

138 To examine the non-linearity of restoration, we used moderate resolution im

139 smoothing approaches demonstrated a similar linearity of risk over all ages and provided close measu

140 The linearity of sensor response was found to be between 0.0

141 Inter- and intraslide variation, linearity of signal and working range, sensitivity and a

142 Linearity of the Aptima assay was tested on each of 6 ma

143 Linearity of the automated BSI interpretations in the ra

144 The good linearity of the calibration curves for PBS and lysate s

145 The linearity of the calibration curves yielded the R(2)0.99

146 idation of the method developed included the linearity of the calibration plots, the detection and qu

147 It is found that through the non-linearity of the CARS process in combination with the fo

148 Detection and linearity of the fifth isotopologue (i.e., 0.05 fmol on

149 Detection and linearity of the instrument routinely spanned three orde

150 the accuracy, precision, repeatability, and linearity of the method were assessed, the method demons

151 The linearity of the permittivity increase allows us to expr

152 ws detection of PDGF BB down to 0.5 pM, with linearity of the Raman signal of 4-MBA against the conce

153 The linearity of the system toward uric acid was in the conc

154 The precision, accuracy, and linearity of the uMRM MS technology were found to be com

155 based on automated Capillary Western and has linearity of two logs, >80% spike recovery (accuracy), i

156 A published SUV correction based on local linearity of uptake-time dependence was applied in a sep

157 ndlich isotherm parameters revealed isotherm linearity or nonlinearity was not significantly differen

158 The method demonstrated satisfactory linearities over a concentration range of 0.09-50 mug mL

159 ection LOD=8 microg/mL (S/N=3), with semilog linearity over 3 orders of magnitude.

160 or cortisol capture, this assay shows signal linearity over a five-log analyte concentration range (1

161 on for quantifying ChIP-seq profiles, namely linearity over a wide range.

162 mination against potential interferences and linearity over the 90-300mg/L range, with a sensitivity

163 7.4 ng.g(-1), respectively, and an excellent linearity over the concentration range from 0.01 to 46 m

164 alibration of each analyte, indicates a good linearity over the concentration ranges found in honeys,

165 tion selectivity, direction selectivity, and linearity over the following week.

166 The Aptima assay demonstrated good linearity over the quantification range tested (2 to 5 l

167 The linearity over three orders of magnitude was demonstrate

168 HPLC-DAD provided suitable linearity, precision and accuracy.

169 HPLC-DAD provided suitable linearity, precision and accuracy.

170 Both methods were validated with respect to linearity, precision, accuracy and sensitivity, enabling

171 Linearity, precision, accuracy, and limits of detection

172 imits of detection (LOD) and quantification, linearity, precision, accuracy, recovery, matrix effect,

173 lytical performance in terms of specificity, linearity, precision, recovery and robustness.

174 Good linearities (R(2) > 0.999) were obtained up to 10 mug mL

175 The proposed method resulted in good linearities (R(2)>0.9915) over the ranges of 1-10,000ngk

176 ange of 1.0x10(-11)M to 1.0x10(-6) with good linearity (R =0.9927), high sensitivity with low detecti

177 od in which all calibration curve shows good linearity (r>0.95).

178 -99.2%), good repeatability (CV<10.4%), high linearity (r>0.9915) and offers practical advantages ove

179 -99.2%), good repeatability (CV<10.4%), high linearity (r>0.9915) and offers practical advantages ove

180 s, including enrichment factors (1600-2075), linearity (r>0.994), limits of detection (0.82-2.72ngmL(

181 The method showed linearity (R>0.9995), good precision (CV%<2.78), recover

182 ere obtained with good accuracy (>/=90%) and linearity (R(2) > 0.99) over the range evaluated for all

183 btained by nephelometry and showed excellent linearity (r(2) > 0.99).

184 with reproducibility (%RSD < 10%; n = 6) and linearity (R(2) > 0.99).

185 hich displayed in both matrices an excellent linearity (R(2) > 0.990), recoveries ranging from 93% to

186 mits of detection (1.85-3.63 ng/L) with good linearity (r(2) > 0.9989) and high enrichment factors ra

187 Good linearity (R(2) > 0.999) and significance with F > 25,00

188 r milliliter with good accuracy (>/=90%) and linearity (R(2) > 0.999) were attained for all the studi

189 rinting was verified, demonstrating adequate linearity (R(2) >/= 0.90) for 75.3% and acceptable repea

190 approximately 2.5%), accuracy (>/=90%), and linearity (R(2) >/= 0.99) were attained for all the stud

191 ss all lipid categories, revealing excellent linearity (R(2) >/= 0.9921), acceptable repeatability (c

192 Method validation results showed good linearity (R(2) >/= 0.9963) ranging from 5 to 1000 ng/mL

193 and excellent repeatability (RSD </= 3.9%), linearity (r(2) >/= 0.9989), and limits of detection (</

194 Good linearity (R(2) 0.99) and no lack of fit was observed (9

195 RSD% 0.80 and 8.68, respectively) as well as linearity (R(2) 0.999) and mass accuracy ( 5 ppm).

196 ptable limit of detection (LOD) (0.1 IU/mL), linearity (R(2) = 0.959), accuracy (16%), and precision

197 The method shows good linearity (R(2) = 0.986) and repeatability (%RSD 8-10%)

198 sensitivity (LODs below 0.16mg/L), and good linearity (r(2) higher than 0.995), precision (RSD below

199 s confirmed the satisfactory selectivity and linearity (r(2)>/=0.99) within the mass ranges.

200 high selectivity and specificity, excellent linearity (R(2)>0.988) low decision limits and detection

201 The method resulted in good linearity (R(2)>0.99) and low limits of detection and qu

202 r and teflubenzuron, and displayed very good linearity (R(2)>0.99) for nearly all the analytes.

203 ucibility (RSD<10.5%), recovery (87-97%) and linearity (R(2)>0.99) were recorded.

204 The method was validated for linearity (R(2)>0.99), limits of detection (2.67-4.83 mu

205 ormed according to the following parameters: linearity (R(2)>0.99, p-value<10(-4), F>725), LOD (3-7 m

206 The validated methodology showed good linearity (r(2)>0.993) and precision (<5.6%); high recov

207 n of 0.4-3.3 ng/kg for 2g of sample and good linearity (r(2)>0.995) throughout the studied concentrat

208 cision 2002/657/EC in terms of: specificity, linearity (r(2)>0.995), limit of detection and decision

209 Good linearity (r(2)>0.9979) was achieved using standard addi

210 r chromatographic analysis was validated for linearity (R(2)>0.999), limits of detection (6.23-186.66

211 the calibration curves showed high levels of linearity (R(2)>0.9993) for acrylamide in the range of 2

212 , calibration range (0.01-0.05 to 0.5mg/kg), linearity (r(2)>0.9998), trueness (89.3-105.1%), precisi

213 Linearity (r(2)) and repeatability (%RSD of migration ti

214 Linearity (r(2)) of analytical curves, accuracy (truenes

215 vity (S), low limit of detection (LLoD), and linearity (R(2)) of this enzymatic sensor were establish

216 PAS assay quantified alginate with excellent linearity (R(2)=0.99), and optical density range (0.02-0

217 ange of between 0.05 and 50mg/100g, and good linearity (r(2)=0.9921).

218 n equations of these parabens exhibited good linearity (r(2)=0.998, 0.1-10mug/mL), good precision (RS

219 Good linearity (R(2)=0.9990) was achieved for all samples usi

220 The technique showed an acceptable linearity (R(2)=0.9998), limit of detection (6.03mg GAE/

221 nalytical performance with good selectivity, linearity (R(2)=99.9%, r>0.99), accuracy and low limits

222 mission Decision 2002/657/EC are as follows: linearity (r0.99), recovery (75-108%), repeatability (CV

223 matrix match calibration curves showed good linearity (r0.994) over a concentration range of 1-500pp

224 ation range of 0.1-0.6ngg(-1) obtaining good linearity (r0.998) and precision (RSD)10%.

225 aluated according to the INMETRO Guidelines: linearity (r2 >0.99), selectivity (no matrix interferenc

226 cording to SANCO/12571/2013 criteria in wide linearity range (limit of quantification - 400 mug L(-1)

227 owest DNA detection limit of 1x10(-14)M with linearity range 1x10(-13) to 1x10(-9)M.

228 The linearity range and the detection limit were obtained as

229 The linearity range and the detection limit were obtained as

230 s done by external standard calibration with linearity range between 0.5 and 3mg/kg, with correlation

231 ich scale with anti-tTG concentration with a linearity range between 1.5 ng.mL-1 and 10 mug.mL-1 and

232 With a linearity range from 9.9muM to 43muM, the concentration

233 By using the liquid drop of 50 muL, the linearity range of 1-1000 mug L(-1) was achieved.

234 d impedimetric immunosensor displayed a wide linearity range towards 2,4-D (1-100ppb), good repeatabi

235 The linearity range was obtained as 0.10-1.25 nM.

236 ood statistical and analytical parameters as linearity range, LOD, LOQ and sensitivity.

237 he HPLC method was accordingly validated for linearity range, LOD, LOQ, accuracy and precision.

238 1.06 ng g(-1) AS and 27.02 ng g(-1) GL with linearity ranged between 2.2 and 1800 ng g(-1).

239 ce characteristics were as follows: suitable linearity ranges for all 23 mycotoxins with p-value >0.0

240 The linearity ranges for the basic and acidic drugs were 10-

241 oduced good analytical figures of merit with linearity ranging from 1 to 500 mug/kg with correlation

242 ized conditions, the procedure provided good linearity (ranging from a minimum of 0.1-0.5 mug/L to a

243 S method demonstrated high sensitivity, good linearity, recovery, and enrichment factor.

244 In order to validate the method, linearity, recovery, precision (repeatability), intermed

245 essed with statistical estimates of bias and linearity relative to ex vivo histologic findings.

246 out in the selected matrices, providing good linearity, relative recovery values in the range 70-120%

247 Satisfactory linearity, reproducibility, and accuracy were also obtai

248 The new methods demonstrated good linearity-reproducibility, providing reliable data about

249 The results obtained regarding linearity, robustness, repeatability and accuracy show t

250 d when selecting a functional form: low-dose linearity, scalability, concavity, and whether it is a s

251 solids) in terms of limit of quantification, linearity, selectivity, matrix effects, recovery (53-120

252 The method was validated by determining linearity, sensitivity and recovery.

253 s) with no impairment of analytical quality (linearity, sensitivity and variance).

254 Linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, and precision of the m

255 The new method is tested for linearity, sensitivity, precision, reproducibility and a

256 profile method were satisfactory in terms of linearity, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, repeatabi

257 boratory reproducibility, LOD, LOQ, range of linearity, standard measurement uncertainty parameters f

258 k, the coefficient of determination from the linearity test was greater than 0.95.

259 ysis of eluting peaks can establish isotherm linearity, thereby enabling a less labor intensive means

260 r serial dilutions of the standard indicated linearity to 3.9).

261 Here, we use Padron's quadratic non-linearity to demonstrate the principle of two-step micro

262 ty and run length of dynein, and we use this linearity to predict the effect of mutating each glutami

263 detection and quantification, matrix effect, linearity, trueness and precision.

264 dation included experiments for specificity, linearity, trueness, precision, matrix effect and limits

265 zation showed a sensitivity of 5.8 muA/mM, a linearity up to 0.12 mM of L-lactate, and a detection li

266 layed a sensitivity of 9.4 muA/mM, retaining linearity up to 0.18 mM of L-lactate with a detection li

267 Linearity up to 0.9995, low detection limits (between 0.

268 nsitivity 1.627 +/- 0.138 muA mM(-1) mm(-2); linearity up to 500 muM; LOD=5.8 muM.

269 The assay demonstrated linearity upon dilution with all HCV genotypes.

270 Linearity using patient samples was shown from 1.34 to 6

271 Linearity using patient samples was shown from 1.54 to 6

272 For ADI-OPA-S variant of the assay, the linearity varies from 0.7 muM to 50 muM with the detecti

273 Good linearity was achieved for all amino acids (r(2)>0.9981)

274 Linearity was achieved in the region (correlation coeffi

275 Linearity was between 1 and 500mg/L.

276 The linearity was found satisfactory on the range of 0-6.95m

277 Excellent linearity was observed 0.99227-0.99999 and limit of dete

278 Under optimal operational conditions, linearity was observed for glucose concentrations up to

279 Excellent linearity was observed over standard calibration curve c

280 Good linearity was obtained ranging from 0.05 to 1500microgL(

281 Lowest amount dependence (good linearity) was obtained (i) in H-containing fragment ion

282 Linearities were established in the matrix and the coeff

283 The linearities were in the range of 0.1 and 50 mug/L and 0.

284 Also good linearities were obtained in the range of 2.5-1200ngmL(-

285 Good selectivity and linearity were also observed.

286 Detection limits, sensitivity and linearity were comparable to a spectrophotometric method

287 Good linearity were obtained for SPI in a range of 24-965mugk

288 Specificity in detection and linearity were verified.

289 The method demonstrated excellent linearity with a limit of detection 0.004mug/ml.

290 assay performed well, detecting and showing linearity with all HIV-1 genotypes tested.

291 Calibration graphs showed good linearity with coefficients of determination (R(2)) high

292 Excellent linearity with correlation coefficient value of 0.94 was

293 The validated method showed good linearity with correlation coefficients, r(2)>0.9990 for

294 Four standards showed a good linearity with high correlation coefficient values (over

295 ide highly similar results and in both cases linearity with R(2) values of 0.99.

296 /kg for each individual amino acid, and good linearity with regression coefficients greater than 0.99

297 The detection showed excellent linearity with stray light down to 0.6%, and an effectiv

298 The validation parameter showed a very good linearity, with a correlation coefficient of 1.00 for al

299 Validation parameters exhibited adequate linearity, with relative standard deviation values betwe

300 TDCS WB showed a high linearity within a 6-log2 dynamic range for detecting 90