ライフサイエンスコーパス: linguistic

1 rical time when nonlinguistic systems become linguistic.

2 metabolism) and also discuss an example from linguistics.

3 ment with established findings of historical linguistics.

4 in the process of revolutionizing historical linguistics.

5 acrofamilies contested in current historical linguistics.

6 straints on that variation is a core goal of linguistics.

7 hili pepper reconstructs based on historical linguistics.

8 atistical mechanics instead of computational linguistics.

9 ntal question for historical and comparative linguistics.

10 ms in the left hemisphere that underlie core linguistic abilities such as phonology, syntax, and sema

11 in the signed modality, as suggested by both linguistic acquisition and pathologies.

12 ternal models that repeatedly predict future linguistic actions and perceptions are implausible.

13 esults suggest that Cape Verdean genetic and linguistic admixture have followed parallel evolutionary

14 This structure correlates neither with linguistic affiliation nor subsistence strategy, but wit

15 ons of these valleys, who share cultural and linguistic affinities with peoples found today on the Ti

16 nformation predictively to ensure that local linguistic ambiguities are dealt with "Right-First-Time"

17 nflicting preferences at different levels of linguistic analysis (phonology vs. morphology).

18 e' regions in the brain, and, in the case of linguistic analysis, their relationship to candidate gen

19 d Broca's region) partake in a more abstract linguistic analysis.

20 ation using automated computerized semantic, linguistic and acoustic analyses.

21 Linguistic and cognitive phenotypes that were highly ass

22 visuo-motor content can affect deaf signers' linguistic and cognitive processing.

23 Linguistic and cultural evidence suggest that Madagascar

24 allow us to begin to establish the impact of linguistic and educational factors on the neural systems

25 n-day Basques, who have long been considered linguistic and genetic isolates linked to the Mesolithic

26 we took in the target article: namely, that linguistic and gestural components are two distinct yet

27 Every day we communicate using complex linguistic and musical systems, yet these modern systems

28 comprehension-related processing within both linguistic and nonlinguistic areas, exposing the surpris

29 mbinatoriality, better carve up the range of linguistic and nonlinguistic human communication.

30 des the acoustic similarity of phonemes, and linguistic and nonlinguistic information are best repres

31 Linguistic and psycholinguistic tests will be more usefu

32 We varied the linguistic and visuospatial processing demands in three

33 Evidence from linguistics and archaeology indicates that the 'Austrone

34 he interaction between applied computational linguistics and cognitive science.

35 like spoken languages" - the view from sign linguistics and developmental research in cognition pres

36 from three main sources - (i) studies of the linguistics and neuropsychology of dysfunction after bra

37 sets of sequences resemble those observed in linguistics and other branches of inquiry, and dynamics

38 knowledge representation, cognitive science, linguistics and philosophy.

39 d new light on old questions from historical linguistics and provide clear targets for psychological

40 f an interdisciplinary programme integrating linguistics and psychology as part of the cognitive scie

41 ations on FOXP2, confer human motor-control, linguistic, and cognitive capabilities.

42 ienced neglect, including social, emotional, linguistic, and cognitive impoverishment.

43 opulations selected to represent geographic, linguistic, and ethnic diversities, and (ii) individuals

44 Archaeological, linguistic, and ethnobotanical data suggest that prehist

45 ast of Africa, Madagascar exhibits cultural, linguistic, and genetic traits from both Southeast Asia

46 for how the increasing wealth of ecological, linguistic, and historical data can be leveraged to unde

47 auditory system as being shaped by acoustic, linguistic, and musical experience and training.

48 of cognitive stimulation and sensory, motor, linguistic, and social experiences common among children

49 Archaeology, linguistics, and existing genetic studies indicate that

50 extensive evidence in cognitive psychology, linguistics, and philosophy.

51 These results are in agreement with some linguistic, archaeological, and anthropological data ind

52 en the subject of numerous genetic, medical, linguistic, archaeological, and anthropological investig

53 Linguistic, archaeological, and genetic studies have sho

54 wn and others' structural choices supports a linguistic architecture involving a single shallow level

55 Methods of computational linguistics are used to demonstrate that a natural langu

56 habitable land that other datasets (genetic, linguistic) are also still trying to resolve.

57 In this review, I discuss linguistic aspects of PPA syndromes that may prove infor

58 The predicted global geographic-linguistic association is shown to operate within contin

59 The extent to which non-linguistic auditory processing deficits may contribute t

60 nts that convey iconic information tied to a linguistic base morpheme.

61 Linguistics-based analysis appears well-suited to the an

62 et al. underscore the importance of studying linguistic behavior from within the motivated, socially

63 As such, understanding the ways in which linguistic bias reinforces gender and other stereotypes

64 r inequality and offers strategies to reduce linguistic bias.

65 umans possess early, experience-independent, linguistic biases concerning syllable structure that sha

66 of the language faculty is further shaped by linguistic biological biases remains controversial.

67 uggest that using ML algorithms for learning linguistic biomarkers from the verbal utterances of elde

68 arned several syntactic, lexical, and n-gram linguistic biomarkers to distinguish the probable AD gro

69 eveloping a complete picture of our species' linguistic capabilities.

70 y feedback control of speech is sensitive to linguistic categories learned through auditory experienc

71 -fold improvement in the characterization of linguistic change over a simpler model of sporadic chang

72 bitrary associations have been documented in linguistics, cognitive science, and anthropology, but th

73 dence for differences in neural responses to linguistic competition between versus within languages,

74 hod addresses all entity types and relies on linguistic components of SemRep, a broad-coverage biomed

75 ology can evolve even in the absence of rich linguistic components, like syntax and semantics.

76 erence alone on selective listening, free of linguistic confounds.

77 ion independently from motor, cognitive, and linguistic confounds.

78 e technology provides less information about linguistic constraints and categories.

79 emocratic Republic of Congo, in terms of its linguistic content and underlying communicative intentio

80 nties in affective prosody and propositional linguistic content of language production and comprehens

81 titive motor task, which did not include any linguistic content, with their dominant hand.

82 One hallmark of speech is that linguistic context affects both how speech sounds are ca

83 internal models-should be enhanced when the linguistic context leads terminal words to be predictabl

84 istinctiveness of the spatial, temporal, and linguistic contexts in which a word appears, and show th

85 y data yield insight into a deeper past than linguistic data can, while linguistic data provide clari

86 seen as only one of the tools available for linguistic data collection.

87 individual genetic variation [11-23], their linguistic data have not considered corresponding long-r

88 deeper past than linguistic data can, while linguistic data provide clarity to ancestry data.

89 adults depend on dynamic neural responses to linguistic demands.

90 standardized tests of cognitive, motor, and linguistic development were also collected.

91 her person's gaze is critical for social and linguistic development, but functions atypically in auti

92 In this way, a simple linguistic device serves a powerful meaning-making funct

93 strate that this ubiquitous but understudied linguistic device, known as "generic-you," has important

94 e one entailing cultural diffusion biased by linguistic differences is the most plausible.

95 Many of the linguistic distinctions often used to support complex (o

96 n does not necessarily limit the genetic and linguistic diversity of human societies.

97 ent centres, and the economic, cultural, and linguistic diversity of the populations served.

98 t cultivation 10 ka, and great cultural and linguistic diversity today.

99 g whether language control is uniform across linguistic domains (production and comprehension) and wh

100 During speech perception, linguistic elements such as consonants and vowels are ex

101 Although linguistic, ethnographic, and genetic evidence points cl

102 Data analysis adopted the perspective of linguistic ethnography.

103 14 open populations and 10 geographic and/or linguistic European isolates.

104 on their expected perceptual effects (i.e., linguistic events).

105 tance of population dynamics in cultural and linguistic evolution, as well.

106 Linguistic evolution, unlike the genetic substitutional

107 ition networks derived from our model mirror linguistic expectations.

108 To eliminate influences from specific linguistic experience, we studied preverbal, 6-mo-old in

109 tions are incorrect for cognitive-functional linguistics, exposing converging perspectives on form/me

110 The nature of mental representations of linguistic expressions in relation to the time course fr

111 y across continents and linguistic lineages (linguistic families or isolates).

112 , it has been unclear whether this essential linguistic feature is encoded differentially in specific

113 motor planning and execution, as well as for linguistic features and working memory load; it also all

114 automated diagnostic models using low-level linguistic features resulting from verbal utterances cou

115 inferior frontal gyrus were associated with linguistic features such as voice onset time, duration o

116 activity in each network covaries with some linguistic features that, behaviorally, influence on-lin

117 in language as a result of randomness in how linguistic forms are copied between speakers.

118 However, the complex links between linguistics forms and their phonetic realizations defy s

119 n blindness, this region takes on high-level linguistic functions, becoming less selective for readin

120 us (STG) is implicated in complex social and linguistic functions.

121 Decades of linguistic, genetic, and archaeological research have pr

122 tence of discrete units at various levels of linguistic granularity that then must be operated upon b

123 nto haplotype sharing across different ethno-linguistic groups and the recent movement of alleles int

124 By applying different linguistic groups as well as the most likely ancestral N

125 thy groups, bands, cognitive groups, tribes, linguistic groups, and so on.

126 derstanding of the ancestry of several ethno-linguistic groups, including African Americans, Ethiopia

127 The data indicate that continents, ethno-linguistic groups, races, ethnicities, and individuals a

128 investigate different indicators such as the linguistic homogeneity of different countries, the touri

129 Implications of these findings for the linguistic hypothesis uniting Ket and Na-Dene languages

130 exity best capture the global progression of linguistic impairment through the successive clinical st

131 ive incompatibility in sexual eukaryotes and linguistic incompatibility among human cultures, the com

132 Here, we survey worldwide linguistic indicators and trends through the analysis of

133 link low-level acoustic representations with linguistic information about word identity and meaning.

134 network because reading involves extracting linguistic information from visual symbols.

135 l stream because reading involves extracting linguistic information from visual symbols.

136 sen & Chater (C&C)'s key premise is that "if linguistic information is not processed rapidly, that in

137 Moreover, these findings that specific linguistic information is represented in FSNs that have

138 ch/noise stimuli in reverse, indicating that linguistic information plays an important role for the o

139 ory function, track the amount of contextual linguistic information provided in sentences.

140 rosodic intonation conveys much more complex linguistic information than mere emotional expression.

141 low for ever greater interference from extra-linguistic information, and that it is nevertheless the

142 ven by previous experience with acoustic and linguistic information, and with a neurophysiological ef

143 ectories, lacking distinguishing features or linguistic information.

144 ment often attributed to visually reinforced linguistic information.

145 understand (1) the precise mappings between linguistic input and comprehenders' syntactic knowledge;

146 ttleneck, the brain must compress and recode linguistic input as rapidly as possible.

147 icitly, as evidence that both networks track linguistic input closely, and in a manner consistent acr

148 visual inputs from retinotopic cortices and linguistic input from the frontotemporal language networ

149 Perceiving linguistic input is vital for human functioning, but the

150 t is not clear how the human brain processes linguistic input within the rich contextual environments

151 g that this network has continuous access to linguistic input, and suggests a new typology of compreh

152 y, before extensive intergroup experience or linguistic input.

153 ge system must "eagerly" recode and compress linguistic input; (2) as the bottleneck recurs at each n

154 al successfully with the continual deluge of linguistic input?

155 ntextually most predictive list chunks while linguistic inputs are stored in the working memory.

156 Here, we argue that successfully gaining linguistic insights from structural priming requires us

157 similar brain activity patterns during human linguistic interaction is correlated with communicative

158 in a way to efficiently trigger language and linguistic interactions can render formation of certain

159 One of the oldest problems in linguistics is reconstructing the words that appeared in

160 e, poverty, unemployment, homeownership, and linguistic isolation.

161 d by neural models for short-term storage of linguistic items in an Item-Order-Rank working memory, w

162 In addition to linguistic knowledge and fluency, nursing requires consi

163 More generally, we ask whether linguistic knowledge is fully embodied or whether some l

164 ence for online interactions with high-order linguistic knowledge.

165 ve principles, constrains the acquisition of linguistic knowledge.

166 Independent of self-identified ethno-linguistic labels, the vast majority (97.3%) of individu

167 l has been based entirely on data from cross-linguistic language samples, our results suggest it may

168 Menzerath's law is a linguistic law that states that, the larger the construc

169 een to test whether patterns consistent with linguistic laws are found in nonhuman animals.

170 Linguistic laws constitute one of the quantitative corne

171 the value of exploring the applicability of linguistic laws in vocal systems outside the realm of la

172 sensorimotor processes and not more abstract linguistic levels (e.g., syntax, semantics, phonology).

173 predictions for upcoming input at different linguistic levels (sounds, words, sentences, discourse).

174 ry requires nested levels of processing, but linguistic levels do not fully nest; further, it would s

175 ns of other people's utterances at different linguistic levels.

176 occurring persistently across continents and linguistic lineages (linguistic families or isolates).

177 However, B&P overlook a vast (corpus-)linguistic literature that converges with - but extends

178 s regularly use intonational pitch to convey linguistic meaning, such as to emphasize a particular wo

179 ral events that underlie the construction of linguistic meaning.

180 gatively correlated with reading and related linguistic measures in phonology and vocabulary (such th

181 We develop computational linguistic methods that extract levels of respect automa

182 ples from Albanian- and Greek-speaking ethno-linguistic minorities of Southern Italy.

183 at is, the foundation of the co-evolution of linguistic motor skills with the auditory skills underly

184 determined cognitive substrate: For example, linguistic nativism proposes a domain-specific faculty o

185 ionary stance appears to provide support for linguistic nativism, because coordinated constraints on

186 Previous studies have shown that linguistic negation reduces the accessibility of the neg

187 several points of similarity with the adult linguistic network.

188 ntators suggested additional theoretical and linguistic nuances and extensions, links with prior work

189 or a merge operation that applies equally to linguistic objects of arbitrary complexity.

190 With a cultural and linguistic origin in Island Southeast Asia the Lapita ex

191 ions through a visual pathway than through a linguistic pathway.

192 The proposed approach utilizes simple linguistic patterns to select candidate noun phrases bas

193 Attempts to explain linguistic phenomena as consequences of memory constrain

194 However, the genes influencing this early linguistic phenotype are unknown.

195 s move from universal discrimination of most linguistic phonemic contrasts to phonemic expertise in t

196 Linguistic Platonism could offer a solution to this para

197 Referred to as "linguistic positivity bias" (LPB), this effect has been

198 thodologies showing cerebellar engagement in linguistic prediction and suggest that internal modeling

199 the degree to which they permitted specific linguistic predictions.

200 s preference across languages and behavioral linguistic preferences documented experimentally in adul

201 These results demonstrate that linguistic preferences doubly dissociate from sensorimot

202 s are in line with the possibility that some linguistic principles are abstract, and they apply broad

203 knowledge is fully embodied or whether some linguistic principles could potentially be abstract.

204 system develops at a different rate than the linguistic processing system in children.

205 processing in tasks such as spatial memory, linguistic processing, and decision making.

206 -relevant brain areas, which is required for linguistic processing, may depend on the contributions o

207 evidence linking the hippocampal complex to linguistic processing.

208 ucture that the brain must analyze to enable linguistic processing.

209 inferior frontal gyrus, commonly observed in linguistic processing.

210 ect finding routines and lower dependence on linguistic processing.

211 We find that the manual modality takes on linguistic properties, even in the hands of a child not

212 WRD, with TD showing greater connectivity to linguistic regions than WRD, and WRD showing greater con

213 owever, current approaches focus only on one linguistic relationship at a time, missing the complex m

214 that might be used to find evidence for deep linguistic relationships beyond that time barrier.

215 thesauri provide adequate coverage of these linguistic relationships.

216 ers a mechanistic linking hypothesis between linguistic representation and cortical computation.

217 neurobiological mechanism when hierarchical linguistic representation became an efficient solution t

218 ng as a useful tool for the investigation of linguistic representation but not the only tool.

219 Assuming that linguistic representation has been studied only by lingu

220 he strength of inductive inference regarding linguistic representation is rather limited.

221 for language can and should be equated with linguistic representation or with language processing.

222 upplant grammaticality judgments for testing linguistic representation.

223 tural priming is a valuable tool for probing linguistic representation.

224 to produce a cognitively plausible model of linguistic representation.

225 the language system must build a multilevel linguistic representation; and (3) the language system m

226 the use of syntactic priming to investigate linguistic representations and argue that it overcomes s

227 onstraints require detailed specification of linguistic representations and memory architectures alik

228 processed in the future, which suggests that linguistic representations are not static entities that

229 ires, emotions, motivations, intentions, and linguistic representations exert direct, top-down influe

230 ructural priming paradigm is a Royal Road to linguistic representations of any kind, unobstructed by

231 provides an implicit method of investigating linguistic representations that should end the current r

232 Understanding the nature of linguistic representations undoubtedly will benefit from

233 asic building blocks from which higher-level linguistic representations, such as words and sentences,

234 Once integrated into linguistic representations, this visuo-motor content can

235 lds only incomplete data about the nature of linguistic representations.

236 ween motor functions and their cognitive and linguistic representations.

237 ing levels, it cannot detect every aspect of linguistic representations.

238 e direct evidence about the nature of stored linguistic representations.

239 as the holy grail for testing the nature of linguistic representations.

240 l priming is a useful tool for investigating linguistics representations.

241 in continuous flowing speech, the cognitive/linguistic restorative processes observed after sentence

242 is the emerging evidence for a number of non-linguistic roles of FOXP2 and its orthologs.

243 owed by a combination of algorithms applying linguistic rules with groups of known terms to extract c

244 arn to categorize, or chunk, variable-length linguistic sequences, and choose the contextually most p

245 ing on crystallised intelligence (humanistic/linguistic) showed no correlation with chronotype.

246 ign language users, gesture - in contrast to linguistic sign - is iconic, highly variable, and simila

247 nally related computations, e.g., detect the linguistic signal and perform other cognitive functions,

248 To detect the linguistic signal, human brains must form hierarchical r

249 These results suggest that the cross-linguistic similarity in color-naming efficiency reflect

250 ve unexplained problems acquiring proficient linguistic skills despite adequate intelligence and oppo

251 Although AF anatomy has been related to linguistic skills, an explanation of how this fiber bund

252 enabled our lineage to successfully acquire linguistic skills.

253 and communication that spans from basic pre-linguistic social abilities shared with non-human primat

254 This question engages fields as diverse as linguistics, sociology, and cognitive science.

255 We propose that the focus on linguistic status is problematic, and a shift to focus o

256 shape the representation of words and other linguistic stimuli - for example, incorporating in it th

257 Using non-linguistic stimuli devoid of meaning we assessed three k

258 d suggest that cerebellar internal models of linguistic stimuli support semantic prediction.SIGNIFICA

259 xists in primary progressive aphasia for non-linguistic stimuli.

260 Two basic principles of linguistic structure are relevant for building text mini

261 Many aspects of linguistic structure can be accounted for by appealing t

262 e extent to which typological differences in linguistic structure can be traced to processing differe

263 als: to investigate the neural processing of linguistic structure in American Sign Language (using ve

264 ch focused on automating the analysis of the linguistic structure of language and developing basic te

265 kinship channels can change the genetic and linguistic structure of populations.

266 uages, as these codified systems display the linguistic structure that homesign has the potential to

267 -based internal construction of hierarchical linguistic structure.

268 is not causally linked to the computation of linguistic structure.

269 y investigating the mental representation of linguistic structure.

270 than a system of pictorial gestures without linguistic structure.

271 urrently tracked the time course of abstract linguistic structures at different hierarchical levels,

272 In speech, hierarchical linguistic structures do not have boundaries that are cl

273 Notably, the neural tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures was dissociated from the encoding

274 t from spoken language, with all of the same linguistic structures.

275 racted predictive features measuring affect, linguistic style, and context from participant tweets (N

276 used magnetoencephalographic imaging during linguistic tests (verb generation, picture naming) to te

277 participants completed a detailed battery of linguistic tests evaluating auditory input processing, r

278 nfold sequentially, one word at a time, most linguistic theories propose that their underlying syntac

279 ful technique for testing the predictions of linguistic theories, but one cannot conclude anything de

280 tural priming is a powerful method to inform linguistic theories.

281 ng the syntactic structures of sentences and linguistics theories.

282 t relationship between psycholinguistics and linguistic theory.

283 o extend the methods of computational corpus linguistics to the analysis of organic molecules.

284 We outline a method that leverages linguistic tools to connect insights across fields that

285 merican presidents: KODAMA reveals an abrupt linguistic transition sharply separating all post-Reagan

286 along genetic, geographic, or cognate-based linguistic trees predicts similar ancestral phoneme stat

287 Usage-based cognitive linguistic (UBCL) theories offer a unifying interpretati

288 g loss to explore the possibility that a non-linguistic unaided spectrotemporal modulation (STM) dete

289 es challenge this view, maintaining that all linguistic units exhibit gradience.

290 mmatical system, resulting in a hierarchy of linguistic units, such as words, phrases and sentences.

291 Christiansen & Chater (C&C) ignore the many linguistic universals that cannot be reduced to processi

292 eaker meaning) from the coded meaning of the linguistic utterance.

293 aimed that many striking universals of cross-linguistic variation follow from a hypothetical principl

294 human languages and support explanations of linguistic variation in terms of general properties of h

295 To examine cotransmission of genetic and linguistic variation within populations, we collected ge

296 s a relationship between human dispersal and linguistic variation.

297 ectories, with cotransmission of genetic and linguistic variation.

298 ants whose attention was occupied with a non-linguistic visual feature-detection task.

299 Rhythmically entrained and articulated pre-linguistic vocal activity in early hominins might have s

300 ive acts in both systems combine categorical linguistic (words or signs) with imagistic (gestures) co